Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.


Author Topic: Rise of bareback  (Read 56650 times)

Offline maloney

Agreed with HP - I am sure he is not the only one who goes 'au natural' ....

Yes it is obviously on the rise - if i was a doubter (+ a reverse pyschologist) it would be quite obvious from the girls who clearly state " no bb ...etc. - dont even ask etc etc.  ...""

Its happening - girls offering, punters partaking - their choice, your choice - but lets not be judgemental ...


Offline ambroz

Has anyone picked up a  new trend of WG's offering bareback but not to completion, but asking clients to pull out and cum on body...

https://www.adultwork.com/1877576 or https://www.adultwork.com/x+LUCIA+x

https://www.adultwork.com/1804826  or https://www.adultwork.com/Sweet+Jasmine+20+xxx

Jasmine skills must be insane, oral  without giving blowjob is a  first class service.
« Last Edit: February 20, 2013, 01:12:14 AM by ambroz »


9 review(s) found for the service provider linked to in above post (5 positive, 2 neutral, 2 negative)

Offline antrim

Some people who say "I never do bareback, except with my partner or a non WG!" are hypocrites.

If a WG does bareback with her partner, she never truly knows what he gets up to when she isn't there.  He could be having bareback anal with gay guys or other women, you just wouldn't know!

If a punter does bareback with a tart down the club, the chances are she is a much greater risk than a WG.  How many civvies get tested on a regular basis?

I don't think bareback with a carefully chosen female partner civvy or WG is a great risk, especially if both parties get tested beforehand.  I haven't done bareback for over 4 years.  All my tests are negative.  I would do bareback again, but not with just anybody, we would also both have to be tested first.

Offline skittish



I don't think bareback with a carefully chosen female partner civvy or WG is a great risk, especially if both parties get tested beforehand.  I haven't done bareback for over 4 years.  All my tests are negative.  I would do bareback again, but not with just anybody, we would also both have to be tested first.

I can't believe people are still this ignorant in this day and age.

I can't believe people are still this ignorant in this day and age.

Ignorant of what ?  :)

Offline skittish

Ignorant of what ?  :)

That thinking being tested offers some kind of extra protection.

I'll definitely draw the line with girls offering bareback. The risks are too great for the sake of a 1 hour tumble. I don't like the idea of having to step into a clinic and answering awkward questions either.

That thinking being tested offers some kind of extra protection.

Reducing the odds by being tested, surely counts for some kind of extra protection

Offline skittish

Reducing the odds by being tested, surely counts for some kind of extra protection


Does it? Knowing an escort was clean at her last test just proves she has been lucky, doesn't mean she's disease free by the time the punter get to her days or weeks later after she's been shagged silly by others.

Offline maloney

Girls/Boys - as above ... its happening and lets not be too judgemental .


I've only done it once; several years ago as a "farewell present" [ :scare: !] from a "regular" who was retiring.

You can guess which clinic I contacted the following morning!!

Offline mh

I've only done it once; several years ago as a "farewell present" [ :scare: !] from a "regular" who was retiring.

You can guess which clinic I contacted the following morning!!

I think I'd have said "thanks but I don't need a farewell gift that keeps on giving" and kept the condom on except to come over her pussy instead of tits or arse.

Offline AnthG

I found this girl via searching for something else for another topic. But this girl is nasty! :vomit:

https://www.adultwork.com/823141 or https://www.adultwork.com/abby%2Dgateshead

£70 per hour, aged 21, has a review score of 93 and 10 FR's.

If anyone wants to find a nasty one in the north east. Here is your one it seems.  :vomit:

I mean come on, what is wrong with her. If you are going to do something like BB which the sicko's crave for, why charge £70 per hour. She could probably charge £200 per hour and get as many bookings as its a sought after niche as no sane girl offers it. (and yes for things like BB, I am going to be talking up prices, be ashamed if you are wanting to do it)

Offline Joe Blob

I found this girl via searching for something else for another topic. But this girl is nasty! :vomit:

https://www.adultwork.com/823141 or https://www.adultwork.com/abby%2Dgateshead

£70 per hour, aged 21, has a review score of 93 and 10 FR's.

If anyone wants to find a nasty one in the north east. Here is your one it seems.  :vomit:

I mean come on, what is wrong with her. If you are going to do something like BB which the sicko's crave for, why charge £70 per hour. She could probably charge £200 per hour and get as many bookings as its a sought after niche as no sane girl offers it. (and yes for things like BB, I am going to be talking up prices, be ashamed if you are wanting to do it)

93Feedback, 10FRs and yet she hides the feedback

Offline foresight


If you are going to do something like BB which the sicko's crave for,

There is nothing intrinsically 'sick' about bareback. It is the natural way to have penetrative sex.  You wouldn't be here without bareback sex. It is a great deal more pleasurable than covered sex, even more so than OWO is more pleasurable than covered oral. 
Responsible punters choose to forego the pleasure and intimacy of bareback penetration for the sake of their own health and that of the wg and the wider community.  If it wasn't for the health risks, we would all be doing it - thanks to modern contraception.

There is nothing intrinsically 'sick' about bareback. It is the natural way to have penetrative sex.  You wouldn't be here without bareback sex. It is a great deal more pleasurable than covered sex, even more so than OWO is more pleasurable than covered oral. 
Responsible punters choose to forego the pleasure and intimacy of bareback penetration for the sake of their own health and that of the wg and the wider community.  If it wasn't for the health risks, we would all be doing it - thanks to modern contraception.
Very true, foresight; but doesn't it show what a big word "If" is?

Offline AnthG

If it wasn't for the health risks, we would all be doing it - thanks to modern contraception.

If it wasn't for the health risks I would walk across the road without looking both ways first...

Offline Daffodil

If it wasn't for the health risks I would walk across the road without looking both ways first...

Everything we do involves risk. Even crossing the road after looking both ways. I could stay at home all day in my nice, safe bed and then die from a DVT.

I don't bareback prossies, but I do rock climb. I don't know the definite risks, but I imagine the risk I take when climbing is similar to or greater than the risk of bareback. I do it though, in spite of the risk, because I enjoy it.

Unless people take every precaution to safeguard themselves against all risk then, I think, they are hypocritical to berate punters who partake in bareback. And, if you are such a person, you're not living a life I would like to lead.

Offline milo

I do rock climb. I don't know the definite risks

Sorry to take the thread off topic, but just for a bit of fun I have been searching the internet and found these two articles that include some tables of comparative risks of rock climbing with other activities.

In the UK there is one death per 320,000 rock climbs. (Source: http://www.medicine.ox.ac.uk/bandolier/booth/risk/sports.html)

or measured another way, 40,000 deaths per billion hours of the activity. (Source: http://www.nationalstemcentre.org.uk/dl/a90b51bd406c0ecde42bc92e5a0d141c44816031/1813-energy_risk.pdf)

Unfortunately, neither reference has a measure for bareback sex!


Offline AnthG

I don't bareback prossies, but I do rock climb. I don't know the definite risks, but I imagine the risk I take when climbing is similar to or greater than the risk of bareback. I do it though, in spite of the risk, because I enjoy it.
Then given that statement its worth asking, why don't you bareback prossies?

I can bet the reason you will come back with will either be that of an acceptance of the risk is too great. Or an attempt at a getout of along the lines of well I don't want my partner finding out or something.

The fact is deep down you know how dangerous, vile and nasty it is. Rock Climbing is not vile and nasty. So if you do happen to slip and break your leg or arm from those risks that you've ignored. You can say it with pride.

How did you do that
Ah I fell as the rope was not hooked on strong enough when doing rock climbing.

But if you slipped up from barebacking a prossie and got an STD you cannot boast similarly about that. You would be holding your head in shame and embarrassment. Therefore I class BB much more riskier than Rock Climbing.

Offline Dani

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 2,593
I dont think there is a rise in bareback at all.  I do think however it has come to out attention more due to the internet and sites like AW that allow it to be advertised.  It seems to be on the increase only because we see it on these sites whereas before it was not really advertised as newspapers never had in the their ads and phone box ads were too small to put services on. 

I get asked for it as often now as I did when I started this job (nearly all asking are from the local papers I advertise in). 

I think it is more prevalant in civvie life than in prossie life though as none of my civvie friends carry condoms when they go out on the pull and are quite happy to not have protected sex as they still have the attitude that it is unlikely they will catch anything

Offline Daffodil

Then given that statement its worth asking, why don't you bareback prossies?

I can bet the reason you will come back with will either be that of an acceptance of the risk is too great. Or an attempt at a getout of along the lines of well I don't want my partner finding out or something.

The fact is deep down you know how dangerous, vile and nasty it is. Rock Climbing is not vile and nasty. So if you do happen to slip and break your leg or arm from those risks that you've ignored. You can say it with pride.

How did you do that
Ah I fell as the rope was not hooked on strong enough when doing rock climbing.

But if you slipped up from barebacking a prossie and got an STD you cannot boast similarly about that. You would be holding your head in shame and embarrassment. Therefore I class BB much more riskier than Rock Climbing.

I think a lot of people (probably the majority) would consider punting to be 'vile and nasty'. That is only your personal opinion of bareback sex.

Barebacking itself is not 'vile and nasty'. As foresight says, it is very enjoyable and is the 'intended way' to have sex. I have bareback sex with my girlfriend every time.

Yes, society views an STD in a more negative light than a climbing injury, but, when you get down to the nitty gritty, there isn't a lot of difference. Both involve getting an injury from a 'risky' behaviour. For the most part STDs are either easily treatable and/or manageable for the longterm. HIV is no longer a death sentence. Try recovering from a broken back sustained whilst climbing however. And those who depend on you suffer, I could turn my girlfriend into a lifelong carer over the course of an afternoon climbing.

You're right (I think), the reason I don't bareback is because when I weighed up the benefits vs risks to me, personally, I decided not to. The increased pleasure of bareback does not justify the risks. To others it does.

As I say, if you are somebody who is totally risk averse and never takes a chance and castigates all others for taking unnecessary risks then fair enough, you can berate barebackers without being hypocritical. If not, then you can't.

Right I'm off to work, am a little late so will probably have to take a risk and speed....

Offline foresight

Then given that statement its worth asking, why don't you bareback prossies?

I can bet the reason you will come back with will either be that of an acceptance of the risk is too great. Or an attempt at a getout of along the lines of well I don't want my partner finding out or something.

The fact is deep down you know how dangerous, vile and nasty it is. Rock Climbing is not vile and nasty. So if you do happen to slip and break your leg or arm from those risks that you've ignored. You can say it with pride.

How did you do that
Ah I fell as the rope was not hooked on strong enough when doing rock climbing.

But if you slipped up from barebacking a prossie and got an STD you cannot boast similarly about that. You would be holding your head in shame and embarrassment. Therefore I class BB much more riskier than Rock Climbing.

You seem obsessed with the idea that bareback sex is vile and nasty.  It is not.  It is very pleasurable.  It is just that there is a time and place for it and for most of us that means not during punting or casual sex.

Offline AnthG

You seem obsessed with the idea that bareback sex is vile and nasty.  It is not.  It is very pleasurable.  It is just that there is a time and place for it and for most of us that means not during punting or casual sex.

We are on a punting forum. It stands to reason my comments would be in relation to the issue discussed. Barebacking prostitutes.

Offline foresight

We are on a punting forum. It stands to reason my comments would be in relation to the issue discussed. Barebacking prostitutes.

Dangerous?  A bit extreme in my view. Foolish, risky and irresponsible, yes.
Vile and nasty?  These words imply a revulsion at the act of unprotected, penetrative sex rather than an ethical concern. Either you have a problem or you should choose your words more carefully.


Latest videos on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

Latest images on UKEscorting.com (free site!)