Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.


Author Topic: Rise of bareback  (Read 56699 times)

Offline billyjo

Sorry I should of been more clear, I like receiving owo but don't give oral myself, there was one time I gave owo when she smelt so good I couldn't resist, I couldn't fight it, head turned into a pussy magnet, but this particular working girl didn't do bb or anal so I felt a bit safer.

So what I wanted to ask is just having a bb blowjob very low risk?  I've never had any sexual diseases to date and would prefer to keep things that way.

Offline smiths

Personally I try to avoid girls that offer bb, I went to a punt last year and when I arrived the girl told me she had no condoms left and I could do the business bb, luckily I always carry condoms with me, no way in hell would I have bb sex with a working girl, my limit with wg's is owo, is owo generally safe?

Whereas i would of and have walked in that scenario. The fact a WG is prepared to offer BB because she has run out of condoms tells me all i need to know about her.

OWO is clearly a lesser risk than BB penetration, only you can decide if the reward is worth the risk. I get no sexual thrill from OW, a wank is more fun so for me OWO is worth the risk and i have not yet ever caught anything.

Offline codebreaker

Thats the risk with punting, you're doing it with a prossie that may have seen a dozen guys before you that same day. You can get some STIs from kissing. OWO is so common these days, most guys want it and most prossies give it. I know I would never waste my money seeing a girl that didn't kiss properly or do OWO. I might as well stay home, save money and have a wank if she didn't offer that. Thats why we punt its risk vs reward.

Thats why we punt its risk vs reward.

In all future posts it might be an idea for you to change 'we' to 'I'.

Offline codebreaker

Hey all punters are taking some risk, whether its BB, OWO, STIs, getting found out, bait and switch, getting robbed, wasting money!

But back to the point, if one had the time, "hypothetically" speaking, it wouldn't take much to set-up a fake profile of a girl offering bareback on AW. Then crossing referencing all the emails from guys trying to book "her" with the prossies these guys have left feedback for.

"Hypothetically" could be quite revealing  :diablo:

Offline maloney

Being back in London after a good few months away, my observations are not only the rise in offer of BB but increase in number of girls quite clearly stating on their profiles ' ... i do not offer bb ...' which to me indicates BB is not only becoming more prevalent but in danger of becoming the norm...??
just my opinion ...

Hey all punters are taking some risk, whether its BB, OWO, STIs, getting found out, bait and switch, getting robbed, wasting money!

But back to the point, if one had the time, "hypothetically" speaking, it wouldn't take much to set-up a fake profile of a girl offering bareback on AW. Then crossing referencing all the emails from guys trying to book "her" with the prossies these guys have left feedback for.

"Hypothetically" could be quite revealing  :diablo:


True and if we ddnt have an ethical nature we too could fund UKP with fake PGs! I think AW should donate to UKP for the service we provide! ;)

Has anyone picked up a  new trend of WG's offering bareback but not to completion, but asking clients to pull out and cum on body...

https://www.adultwork.com/1877576 or https://www.adultwork.com/x+LUCIA+x

https://www.adultwork.com/1804826  or https://www.adultwork.com/Sweet+Jasmine+20+xxx



9 review(s) found for the service provider linked to in above post (5 positive, 2 neutral, 2 negative)

Offline James999

Has anyone picked up a  new trend of WG's offering bareback but not to completion, but asking clients to pull out and cum on body...

Probably so they don't have spunk dripping out of them when their next client arrives, they can just wipe the spunk off their tits / arse with a wet wipe before the next client arrives  :drinks:

Probably so they don't have spunk dripping out of them when their next client arrives, they can just wipe the spunk off their tits / arse with a wet wipe before the next client arrives  :drinks:

Spot on James!
« Last Edit: February 01, 2013, 10:29:38 AM by manchester_gent »

Offline yumyum3

Quote
Probably so they don't have spunk dripping out of them when their next client arrives, they can just wipe the spunk off their tits / arse with a wet wipe before the next client arrives 
:lol:

Offline Joe Blob

Probably so they don't have spunk dripping out of them when their next client arrives, they can just wipe the spunk off their tits / arse with a wet wipe before the next client arrives  :drinks:

They're probably missing a trick. There are punters who'd pay to see spunk dripping out. :coolgirl:

Offline CoolTiger

Or worse still.... they think that if punter cums outside, they won't get catch any STI's.

Or worse still.... they think that if punter cums outside, they won't get catch any STI's.

That should be their line of thinking behind offering it that way...

Offline Ali Katt

That should be their line of thinking behind offering it that way...
I would have thought it's to avoid getting pregnant, of course any sensible person knows it offers no guarantees. Maybe she save full bareback for her hubby?

Offline Cactus

https://www.adultwork.com/1892564 or https://www.adultwork.com/TattooedLESBIAN

Spotted this one tonight when looking on AW to see if anyone new has turned up locally.  Anyway, in the gold package she says:

Quote
this package does include unprotected sex *

Notice the asterisk, further down the page it says:

Quote
*unprotected sex: due to the nature of this activity, can I kindly ask you to include into your email enquiry your age. Thank you.

WTF does age have to do with offering unprotected sex?  Are younger or older guys cleaner?  I dispair  :dash:

Offline Miss A Squires

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 296
https://www.adultwork.com/1892564 or https://www.adultwork.com/TattooedLESBIAN

Spotted this one tonight when looking on AW to see if anyone new has turned up locally.  Anyway, in the gold package she says:

Notice the asterisk, further down the page it says:

WTF does age have to do with offering unprotected sex?  Are younger or older guys cleaner?  I dispair  :dash:

When I go to the GUM clinic, they heavily advertise that older people are more at risk of being carriers of diseases like AIDs as they've never been checked out. Whereas young people are sleeping with each other willy nilly and i know when I was at uni, condoms were used sporadically.

Crazy lady, but then her mind is already addled if she's offering bareback.

Offline CurvyKinkyVixen

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 297
Or worse still.... they think that if punter cums outside, they won't get catch any STI's.


Ignorant skanks , its quite depressing the amount of money spent on sexually educating the masses , and STILL people think their "safe" if the guy "pulls out" .

Same as the ones who say "no bb in pussy but you can bb my arse" - Bareback anal is THE highest risk thing going ,.

Offline CurvyKinkyVixen

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 297


There is a reason why condoms were invented. There is a reason why the Gum Clinic says any sex worker cannot undertake the express checkup service that everyone else can do and neither are for things like pregnancy.

And just to show this is the case

thats strange as the GUM i use encourages WGs to use express check up , they also give you kits to take home that check for the 2 most common STIs - Chlamidia n gonnoreah ( yes i know ive spelt them wrong ) .... It must be up to the individual clinics "discretion" whether to exclude sex workers or not.

Offline CurvyKinkyVixen

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 297
When I go to the GUM clinic, they heavily advertise that older people are more at risk of being carriers of diseases like AIDs as they've never been checked out. W

Yes , correct ... a lot of  new STI cases are in the over 50s group simply because a lot of these people have been in LTRs for a long time and when they come out of it and get back in the sex/dating game they think that STIs are a "young" persons problem.

A  non - prossie mate whos in her 50s recentley came out in herpes . She is living with a new partner and has only ever had sex with 2 men before that ( husband no 1 n 2 ) ...... I went to the GUM with her and she felt embarrassed and dirty. You dont need to be sleeping aorund or seeing prostitutes to be at risk

BB is madness .

The one good thing about BB skanks advertising there services openly , is that the rest of us know who to avoid ( including the punters who've been there ) .

Offline CurvyKinkyVixen

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 297
I am with Sarah on this one 100%.

Can I ask as a few times its been mentioned that AW have a forum for the escorts to post. Do the AW admins read that forum as it would be a good place to start a poll to show them how unwanted it is having profiles that allow this to be advertised.

if it was banned then it would go "underground"  and neither sensible punter nor prossie would know who to avoid  like the plauge ..............  Better  it out in the open
« Last Edit: February 02, 2013, 09:23:17 AM by CurvyKinkyVixen »

Offline Whore Of Babylon

if it was banned then it would go "underground"  and neither sensible punter nor prossie would know who to avoid  like the plauge ..............  Better  it out in the open
+1
Personally I think girls who offer BB are nuts but as long as they're informed of the risks, I feel strongly that they should do what they like. And be able to advertise.
BB being offered as an "underground" kind of service will breed confusion and not really help the industry in any real way.
Out in the open is always a good idea.

Even though I don't have bb ticked on my profile, I still get emails asking for it. And guys will turn up and in a round about way try and find out if it's on the cards.
Reckon I'm going to have to boringly place a 'no unprotected sex' line in my frequently asked questions section like everyone else. Yawn.

« Last Edit: February 02, 2013, 11:30:11 AM by Whore Of Babylon »

Offline mon8y_man2012

I would NEVER see anyone who offered 'bb'.  To much of a risk for me and i am sure its the same for everyone else.   :dash:

Offline Panda989

I can't imagine having a punt with a bb WG. I have punted on 4 continents and every and I mean every provider used protection without even asking. Just in case I have brought one with me as I never wanted to be in a position where I was without especially in brazil. Birth control and the church and all.  :diablo:

Have I had the odd owo sure but only after both parties were showered and scrubbed clean, but reality is I prefer the safety of my personal life for bb.

I'm not stupid enough to think "I'm the only one she does this with" as I'm sure some delude themselves into thinking that's the case. Any punt involves a countless number of previous encounters brought into the bed with you and I would never want to face the hordes of men that punted before I without my side arm called Trojan.

The fact is that a bloke will get his business done with protection on. I don't give a shit what they say. It's possible, and anyone who thinks that it's impossible should be beaten senseless.

At the end of the day the cost could be your life and the lives of others.

Offline MissCaraMay

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 23
I think the majority of the time bareback is ticked in the AW likes is because they are scammers after more private gallery sales..... Or some girls (usually foreign or new to escorting) that really don't understand the risks involved with this service and the diseases that could be contracted.

If a punter or a WG I would seriously take caution if contemplating enjoying/offering this service.
Better to be safe than sorry :)

Cara x


Latest videos on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

Latest images on UKEscorting.com (free site!)