You're attempting to assert, as fact, what is merely your opinion. To suggest those in disagreement with you are in any way foolish or naive is an insult to your fellow punters intelligence, never mind those of us prostitutes who never have, nor ever will, engage in the provision of bareback services. Your accusations are unsubstantiated inaccuracies, clearly uncorroborated by the vast majority of your contemporaries.
Although fairly new on this site, I too am a seasoned campaigner, having punted regularly for about 25 years. My experience is that, whilst the majority of prostitutes will never go bareback even with a regular client, there is a sizeable minority who will do, particularly when given the prospect of an overnight or weekend booking with a well-known regular.
So to return to the topic, if a punter uses protection, is he any safer if he limits his punts to those prostitutes who refuse to go bareback in any circumstances?
Not really, because many WGs have relationships outside of work, and since they are more than likely to be on the pill or have a coil fitted, they won't be using condoms with their boyfriend/partner/pimp. The type of bloke who is happy for his girlfriend to make her living as a prostitute is hardly likely to be clean as the driven snow in the genital area himself, is he?
So it can be argued that WGs who DO offer bareback are no more risky than those who don't!
Bottom line is, ALWAYS use a condom, and furthermore, always carry your own with you.