Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.


Author Topic: What's wrong with seeing (with protection) a girl who does bareback?  (Read 4278 times)

Offline willmo1

Slightly off topic but Ive been using condoms for so long now its become the norm. Once you get the macho bareback thing out of your head and realise that the ultra thin skins around these days are so close to the real thing that its not worth fretting about. Most of being inside a girl is in your head anyway and risking your health for the sake of a bit of slime on your cock is plain stupid. Enjoy it for what it is and forget about past civvie sex because its another world.
Banning reason: Leaver

Offline Roth

Slightly off topic but Ive been using condoms for so long now its become the norm. Once you get the macho bareback thing out of your head and realise that the ultra thin skins around these days are so close to the real thing that its not worth fretting about. Most of being inside a girl is in your head anyway and risking your health for the sake of a bit of slime on your cock is plain stupid. Enjoy it for what it is and forget about past civvie sex because its another world.

Fucking well said.  :thumbsup: :thumbsup:

Slightly off topic but Ive been using condoms for so long now its become the norm. Once you get the macho bareback thing out of your head and realise that the ultra thin skins around these days are so close to the real thing that its not worth fretting about. Most of being inside a girl is in your head anyway and risking your health for the sake of a bit of slime on your cock is plain stupid. Enjoy it for what it is and forget about past civvie sex because its another world.

Well, i work with very young English girls and sometimes we talk about nights out. Some of these girls do not care about safe sex. One of them is pregnant now after having unprotected sex with a stranger in da club. And the biggest problem for her now is the fact she doesn't know a father of her child. So i said what about HIV? She didn't give a fuck about it...  :bomb: :bomb: :bomb:

Offline Roth

Well, i work with very young English girls and sometimes we talk about nights out. Some of these girls do not care about safe sex. One of them is pregnant now after having unprotected sex with a stranger in da club. And the biggest problem for her now is the fact she doesn't know a father of her child. So i said what about HIV? She didn't give a fuck about it...  :bomb: :bomb: :bomb:

Just goes to show that civvie birds can be fucking dangerous.  :scare: :bomb:

Just goes to show that civvie birds can be fucking dangerous.  :scare: :bomb:

Fucking dangerous and fucking stupid because these girls i work with are nurses so they have proper medical education  :bomb:

Online Trenlover

I guess if your extremely risk averse then it will be an issue.

The biggest worry for me is herpes HSV2 which you can catch even with a condom and I suppose barebackers are at significantly higher risk.

I was going to keep off this thread but decided to come in.

There is much strange reasoning going on here. There must be loads of gents do bareback as there are loads of ladies who do advertise it in the categories - bareback or oral without or unprotected sex - and these ladies survive and have clients. So maybe there are gents on here who keep quiet or do not tell the truth - to transfer the epithet, they do not feel safe to 'come out'.

Given that we believe that most ladies do bareback whether with clients or other partners and do not advertise it, what about the risk? I try and make careful choices. It is fortunate that I am happy with older, larger, provincial or suburban ladies - mainly but not exclusively British and often with a dusty phone (and biy are they randy!). . I do not usually punt in cosmopolitan central urban areas - not only becuase I rarely go to them anyway. I often go for new ladies who might have had less exposure. So they are less busy and take the time to be tested - not foolproof but another factor.

When I do use an umbrella it interferes with my orgasm, so at age 74 and with a good medical education, I am prepared to take the risks which I have weighed up. So far I have remained safe. I do get tested from time to time and for those who are close enough I like Doctor Today.

https://www.doctortoday.co.uk
« Last Edit: February 13, 2016, 05:12:46 PM by Horizontal pleasures »

Offline willmo1

Well, i work with very young English girls and sometimes we talk about nights out. Some of these girls do not care about safe sex. One of them is pregnant now after having unprotected sex with a stranger in da club. And the biggest problem for her now is the fact she doesn't know a father of her child. So i said what about HIV? She didn't give a fuck about it...  :bomb: :bomb: :bomb:

I mean the norm for me Type O and agree that youngsters still dont understand whats involved with unsafe sex. I was a holiday rep years ago and shagged dozens of civvies bareback and picked up one pox after another, but nothing off a wg using condoms. Owo likewise all clear.
Banning reason: Leaver

Offline Olivia

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 66
Fuck me, I can't believe some of shite some people write on here. I've been punting 30 yrs , fucked most of Sheffields finest, spent thousands as others will have. I'M CONVINCED ALL THE GIRLS Will offer BB after you become a regular, we all know it so the risk is always there. Like it's been said you've to decide on risk. Point is Don't be fooled there all at it, even in the best parlours.

You're attempting to assert, as fact, what is merely your opinion.  To suggest those in disagreement with you are in any way foolish or naive is an insult to your fellow punters intelligence, never mind those of us prostitutes who never have, nor ever will, engage in the provision of bareback services.  Your accusations are unsubstantiated inaccuracies, clearly uncorroborated by the vast majority of your contemporaries.

You're attempting to assert, as fact, what is merely your opinion.  To suggest those in disagreement with you are in any way foolish or naive is an insult to your fellow punters intelligence, never mind those of us prostitutes who never have, nor ever will, engage in the provision of bareback services.  Your accusations are unsubstantiated inaccuracies, clearly uncorroborated by the vast majority of your contemporaries.
Hi, I'm only going off 30 yrs experience, I don't do BB but the times it's been offered is unbelivable.

You're attempting to assert, as fact, what is merely your opinion.  To suggest those in disagreement with you are in any way foolish or naive is an insult to your fellow punters intelligence, never mind those of us prostitutes who never have, nor ever will, engage in the provision of bareback services.  Your accusations are unsubstantiated inaccuracies, clearly uncorroborated by the vast majority of your contemporaries.
Although fairly new on this site, I too am a seasoned campaigner, having punted regularly for about 25 years. My experience is that, whilst the majority of prostitutes will never go bareback even with a regular client, there is a sizeable minority who will do, particularly when given the prospect of an overnight or weekend booking with a well-known regular.
 
So to return to the topic, if a punter uses protection, is he any safer if he limits his punts to those prostitutes who refuse to go bareback in any circumstances?
Not really, because many WGs have relationships outside of work, and since they are more than likely to be on the pill or have a coil fitted, they won't be using condoms with their boyfriend/partner/pimp. The type of bloke who is happy for his girlfriend to make her living as a prostitute is hardly likely to be clean as the driven snow in the genital area himself, is he?
So it can be argued that WGs who DO offer bareback are no more risky than those who don't!
Bottom line is, ALWAYS use a condom, and furthermore, always carry your own with you.


However in my experience of bb discussions in the past people rarely, and understandably, give links to practitioners apart from ones who openly advertise it. When you think about it unless a prossy advertises it giving a link would be pretty pointless as she would merely deny it, and it would again develop into a slanging match.

I did check on those names today as I said I would (WGs who say they don't go bareback but sometimes will). I have only identified two, however the WG I spoke to, who has no reason to lie about it, said she had been in 3somes with several more who went bareback, but she did not know their AW names.

AS NIK advises, it would be pointless giving a link, but I am happy to pass the two names I know on to anyone who is interested and who sends me a PM

I did check on those names today as I said I would (WGs who say they don't go bareback but sometimes will). I have only identified two, however the WG I spoke to, who has no reason to lie about it, said she had been in 3somes with several more who went bareback, but she did not know their AW names.

AS NIK advises, it would be pointless giving a link, but I am happy to pass the two names I know on to anyone who is interested and who sends me a PM

So the lapdogs owner doesn't know the names but you are happy to pass on, feel this is an exercise to get some PM friends !   :sarcastic:


I did check on those names today as I said I would (WGs who say they don't go bareback but sometimes will). I have only identified two, however the WG I spoke to, who has no reason to lie about it, said she had been in 3somes with several more who went bareback, but she did not know their AW names.

AS NIK advises, it would be pointless giving a link, but I am happy to pass the two names I know on to anyone who is interested and who sends me a PM
Thanks but I tried and I may not send you a PM for some reason. Maybe you can try sending one to me, thanks, HP

So the lapdogs owner doesn't know the names but you are happy to pass on, feel this is an exercise to get some PM friends !   :sarcastic:
Your post makes no sense.

I said I would check that the one or two names I had been told were correct. I have now done this, and if you PM me I shall happily give them to you.

 

I said I would check that the one or two names I had been told were correct. I have now done this, and if you PM me I shall happily give them to you.
 

"User 'Randolph69' can not receive personal messages"

Offline Nagilum

Your post makes no sense.

I said I would check that the one or two names I had been told were correct. I have now done this, and if you PM me I shall happily give them to you.

 

Why not tell all reading this thread in the future?

"User 'Randolph69' can not receive personal messages"
I have been puzzling over this HP. It appears that as I am still classified as a new member, Admin has not yet enabled this facility for me.


Why not tell all reading this thread in the future?
See NIK's message #70 on Page 3

**With** protection, I mean, of course.  Without - yeah it's obvious.
Not that I would, or have done, or intend to or anything.  I'm just wondering why we often see "Bareback/UPS -  :vomit:" as an almost automatic post on some reviews/questions.

Here's my thinking.  All WG visits are not without risk, so by definition if you keep punting then sooner or later you will visit one who has something, but you're protected so you go away none the wiser.  With a barebacker, the risk of her having something is greater of course, but you're still protected, so again you go away none the wiser.  So what's the issue?  Is it just that the risk is higher for no really good reason, or do barebackers tend in general to give worse service, or is there more to it than that?

What sort of stupid question is this? Smart WGs do not offer bareback for their own safety. A smart punter should also stay away from a barebacker.

Offline PickleTwiddler

What sort of stupid question is this?

There should be no such thing as a stupid question.  Stupid *actions* are another story, but by asking questions and learning from the answers we can avoid stupid actions.
Banning reason: Shitty childish entitled attitude after given perfectly reasonable PM reply by Admin

Offline Roth

There should be no such thing as a stupid question.  Stupid *actions* are another story, but by asking questions and learning from the answers we can avoid stupid actions.

Fair point but if you see too many barebackers your little Twiddler might well and truly turn into a Pickle:lol:


Latest videos on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

Latest images on UKEscorting.com (free site!)