Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.


Author Topic: face pics  (Read 6138 times)


Offline mh

I have never jeopardized my anonymity just to get more dick through the door and never will.

So do you offer some kind of modern Glory Hole service?  :D

There seems to be a lot of sudden WG input on UKP. Has AnthG been recruiting during his break?

be fair mh, there has been an increase in input.
We will never be 100% certain regarding the gender of our new recruits.
I could'nt give a shite tbh.  If people wanna fool others then that's there hangup, not mine.

The key positive for me is that people are interested in UKP and the forum continues to snowball.
Thing is, we seem to be losing our forum police at a fast rate of knots.
Softy will have to choke the crow an hour earlier to sort out the wheat from the chaff  :D

Morning Softy.

Offline kizzie

  • Banned
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 45
I am with kizzie, i would never send a face pic. It would just be another thing to worry about as the photos could end up everywhere. The same way punters don't trust us we have zero reason to trust you to be discrete and care about keeping our identity a secret. I have a question, when you ask for a face pic would you ever send one of yourself in return??
hi amelia, an ally! Lovely. But i actually WILL send a fully clothed pic if im satisfied genuine enquiry. I have never shown my face in any pics that could even vaguely be construed as adult, And its done me no harm. I go to some trouble to ensure my face isn't out there. I.e. reputable photographer who signs over copyright. take own pics, chop head if possible or ensure couple distortions I don't cam, etc. and i have 120 feedback. Do you not  think someone would have mentioned if i was actually 50?!! I never forget one guy saying to me 'you are.actually a size ten, you say 12 (do this cos i fluctuate) i was expecting 14 at least! Funny but sad too.

The reason I don't show my face in adult pictures is more about discretion though safety does come into it.

If a punter turned up wearing a balaclava or mask and his reasoning was personal discretion, would you still see him?

Offline squelching-companion

If a punter turned up wearing a balaclava or mask and his reasoning was personal discretion, would you still see him?

lol good point here.

Online Jimmyredcab

be fair mh, there has been an increase in input.
We will never be 100% certain regarding the gender of our new recruits.
I could'nt give a shite tbh. 

Well I do give a shit.
If prostitutes come on here posing as punters they will be banned.   :diablo:

Offline Suroya

Hi my first post on here, though I have lurked for a while.

My take on the face pic is that advances in technology will make keeping working life seperate from private life harder in the future unless some form of face "distortion" is used.

We all use things like Google reverse imaging, and this technology will improve, probably to the point it will give results based on single facial features. Then anyone could use a private Facebook pic to link to the working world.

Personally I do not use a pro photographer, and my pics are not photoshopped. The level of blurring is fairl minimal, and if a punter is determined to see my face first, I will send a face pic

Offline Daffodil

So do you offer some kind of modern Glory Hole service?  :D

There seems to be a lot of sudden WG input on UKP. Has AnthG been recruiting during his break?

Maybe it's because matty is no longer here...

Offline kizzie

  • Banned
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 45
If a punter turned up wearing a balaclava or mask and his reasoning was personal discretion, would you still see him?
it's not the same at all! Nor a good point! At the point the punter is at the door (i don't open it in mask/blackjack either) there is a mutual discretion agreed upon (hopefully). I am not putting l face on the internet associated with escorting for anyone with access to the internet to see .  It's a rubbish point! You are not comparing like for like!

Offline kizzie

  • Banned
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 45
Maybe it's because matty is no longer here...
  i didn't mind his posts actually. Even if (imo) he was talking utter bollox,    there at least seemed ability to think and not just follow down a narrow minded route, just because! Also he didn't seem to fall into the 'pack mentality' some on here do!
So there you go, bet you never thought to see thee day! A prossie with a good word to say for him. Lol (& no never met him etc)

Offline Sienna

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 18
For me......I do offer a face picture in my private gallery - my reasoning being that a punter is going to see my face anyway when he visits....... so what difference does it make?

Of course each girl has there own reasons for how they work. Whether they do or don't offer a face picture is really of no interest to me.

It just makes me wonder - if you wish to be so anonymous it isn't really the job for you. Punters usually need the same level of discretion as we do.......So with that in mind I just have to try and trust that it's all carried out in a professional manner. I wouldn't expect a punter to send a picture - but he  is paying for a service we as wg's offer . That generally includes someone he finds attractive - so I can understand the want and need of seeing a face picture......


Offline AnthG

But i will send a face pic on request, if i  feel serious enquiry! i.e.  19 yr old with 1 feedback for cammimg dream on!

There was one thing I wanted to add to this topic which I am surprised nobody challenged Kizzie on beforehand as it seems to be a serious issue with her decision making on this.

And that is it is fairly common that those punters who have done more bookings than most other punters combined do not bother at all with the AW booking system at all. So those punters will have very limited, or even no feedback via AW but have a load of actual bookings. And yet it seems from what you've said you would auto treat them as a non serious enquiry?

Another thing to add. How do you know the age of the person emailing you? Are you suggesting people are emailing you telling you that they are 19 yrs. Or does the AW system allow escorts to see the age of the punter emailing you like we can see yours? Or reading that line you said further from a different angle are you suggesting other escorts email you asking for your face pic?

Offline kizzie

  • Banned
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 45
There was one thing I wanted to add to this topic which I am surprised nobody challenged Kizzie on beforehand as it seems to be a serious issue with her decision making on this.
 Hi Anth! xx

And that is it is fairly common that those punters who have done more bookings than most other punters combined do not bother at all with the AW booking system at all. So those punters will have very limited, or even no feedback via AW but have a load of actual bookings. And yet it seems from what you've said you would auto treat them as a non serious enquiry?

Another thing to add. How do you know the age of the person emailing you? Are you suggesting people are emailing you telling you that they are 19 yrs. Or does the AW system allow escorts to see the age of the punter emailing you like we can see yours? Or reading that line you said further from a different angle are you suggesting other escorts email you asking for your face pic?
All Valid points and I probably do lose business on occasion if I choose not send a face picture.  I can see on AW what the punter allows me to, I assume.  Sometimes there are details like age etc, sometimes not.  Sometimes I get an email direct to my email address and I judge from the tone, requests any info that I'm given, if I feel a serious enquiry.  I very much doubt I get it right all the time and I err on the side of caution.  As approx 70% of my work comes from regulars, it doesn't occur that often.   It really isn't genuine punters or even those who have not yet taken the plunge but are considering booking that I have a problem with having a face picture.  But I've had the dubious honour of being called a MILF by a 13 year old boy in a school.  As I said, I err on the side of caution.
 
And a quick side note - I could repeat almost word for word to you Anth what I said about Matty.  I may not agree with what you say, but I like the way you say what YOU think, not what the board wants to hear!  You're another poster that makes it interesting on here.  Mindless insults or comments disbelieving everything I say, based merely on the sheer narrow mindedness of the poster are just a yawn!  :thumbsdown:
 I don't mind a good forum disagreement, especially from people like yourself who do it with thought and their very own opinion!
Right that is the last I'll be complimenting anyone on here!  And yeah I know, you think I'm just drumming up biz - except I'm giving it all up to return to mundanity (is that a word?) soon

To be honest, I've had it with WG's that dont like to offer face pics.

First of all,and from my experience Ive had I can confidently say stay away from those that dont give them out. Obviously they have something to hide, and are not worthy of your time. SOme may delude themselves thinking their privacy is at stake. Pfff, give me a break, total crap. First of all there are millions of Adult Service providers across the globe, what makes them think they are special? Besides if their friends and family are lurking around escort websites then perhaps they should be mpore open about their day job!

I am fed up with women who do this, I ring up, ask for a face pic and am treated as if I am a time waster. Seriously? Despite I have only 3 feedbacks on AW (I hardly go throgh the booking procedure as I dont book ahead, more like within hour or two), the fact that I have been registered for so long should indicate I have some form of legitimacy.

Anyway, I do agree that if you are going to provide an intimate service, and then shy away from showing your face on the basis that its too intimate, then you are a hipocryte.

/rant off

Offline Ali Katt

I think charging for a face pic in a PG, is a prossie scam, it's a bit like charging for extras. Having said that if there are no face pics in a PG or normal gallery I rarely book.

I always reserve the right to walk, if the WG isn't what I expect or if she is butt ugly, but most of the time I have been pleasantly surprised.

The whole discretion thing is bollocks. It is more about keeping your private life private and keeping safe, regardless if you are male or female. It's the terminology I have an issue with, not the concept. There is nothing discrete about fucking multiple guys in a travelodge. At the end of the day if a prossie needs to airbrush her chav tatts or blur her face so her kids or hubby doesn't recognize her; maybe she should consider not fucking random guys for money and decide if her home life is more important. 

Offline k

I don't need to see face pics.  In fact there's often gold in them thar profiles that don't have any photos at all.  They are possibly more likely to be genuine.  Ok I have been a punter since the days when all there was was Soho walkups and the classified ad section in Where To Go magazine, so I am used to such anonymity, but a photo on a profile doesn't guarantee very much, if anything to my mind.

Earlier this year I contacted a woman who advertised on AW who had neither feedback nor face pic.  She was quite surprised when I agreed to meet her after a quick conversation on the phone (something she remarked upon when I arrived).  She turned out to be excellent in all possible respects and I have seen her a few times since then.  In the interim she put up fake photos on her profile and had it promptly removed by certain trigger-happy vigilantes - ok she shouldn't be posting fake photos, but not everyone's like me - willing to punt on the sound of someone's voice.  The dearth of response she received generally meant that she felt she had no option but to post photos that weren't hers (she has some distinctive tattoos on her body that prevented her from uploading genuine ones). 
« Last Edit: September 30, 2012, 12:05:07 PM by k »

Online Jimmyredcab

I think charging for a face pic in a PG, is a prossie scam, it's a bit like charging for extras.

Sorry, but I have to disagree.
A token payment of lets say £1 is very good value when you consider the overall cost of punting.
Some girls are nervous of being spotted on Adultwork by friends or family, that risk is greatly reduced if the photo is in a private gallery.

Online James999

More than once the odd £ spent on a private gallery has often saved me £100 on a punt  :hi:

More than once the odd £ spent on a private gallery has often saved me £100 on a punt  :hi:
+1
and also on the other hand sometimes confirmed that yes, this is going to be a good punt.

Online Jimmyredcab

More than once the odd £ spent on a private gallery has often saved me £100 on a punt  :hi:

Absolutely correct, it's not just the money, I may have travelled for 90 minutes to see a girl only to find she is an old munter, yes I can walk away but I have wasted 3 hours of my life.  :dash:


Latest media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)