Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.


Author Topic: Are face pics essential on a profile?  (Read 2083 times)

Offline henderson

Hi, I am fairly young and new here and I have punted about 5 times so far. Theres this prossie that has a stunning body (shes new on adultwork). She has a couple of fantastic reviews but she doesnt display face pictures and doesnt have a pg. Last time I went to see a wg that had no face pics, a nice body and a few positive reviews she looked 45 and not 25 as was stated on her profile. How do you guys approach prossies with no face pics available? Do you just turn back around if shes very ugly or really old?

Offline James999

Some insist on face pics, but body is more important to me.

Post her link so we know who you are talking about, some of us may have seen her  :hi:

Oh and when using the term Pro$$ie the SS are replaced with $$  :sarcastic:

Offline henderson

https://www.adultwork.com/dlgViewImage.asp?Image=http://84.244.135.41/f/1410810%5F2%2Ejpg&Description=me+2
This is her picture, obviously the body is amazing but honestly i dont care what her face looks like as long as shes not like 40+ or anything like that.



Offline James999

Considering her reasonable price (£60 half hour) and the fact she looks fit I am surprised the feedback is so low.

Perhaps it's time you popped along with three crisp twenty's and then reported back  :hi:


Online Jimmyredcab

Welcome to the forum, you must have been a lurker to know the correct term for WG's is pro$$ie.   ;)

If I have a short list of girls on Adultwork I will always go for the girl who shows a face pic but sometimes I will make an exception if lots of other boxes are ticked, such as location, feedback and price.

If when I arrive it is obvious that the girl has lied about her age by many years then I would not hesitate to walk away and I would tell her why. 

I fully understand why some girls refuse to show face pics however that is their problem, not mine.  ;)

Online Steve2

It's Kelly Kisses:

https://www.adultwork.com/1410810  or https://www.adultwork.com/Kelly%2Ex%2Ekisses

The profile has been on AW for 10 months and only 9000 hits so where has she been hiding? Certainly not in Birmingham

It's a NO from me

Some insist on face pics, but body is more important to me.

Post her link so we know who you are talking about, some of us may have seen her  :hi:

Oh and when using the term Pro$$ie the SS are replaced with $$  :sarcastic:

Hello Henderson: This is optional, I prefer to call them ladies and or ladies on the game. I see no reason to demean them or withdraw respect.

Welcome to the forum, you must have been a lurker to know the correct term for WG's is pro$$ie.   ;)

If I have a short list of girls on Adultwork I will always go for the girl who shows a face pic but sometimes I will make an exception if lots of other boxes are ticked, such as location, feedback and price.

If when I arrive it is obvious that the girl has lied about her age by many years then I would not hesitate to walk away and I would tell her why. 

I fully understand why some girls refuse to show face pics however that is their problem, not mine.  ;)

" the correct term for WG's is pro$$ie" This is not compulsory, use the word you prefer. I like lady.

" some girls refuse to show face " Would you show your face? A lady who hides her face may do so as she is shy of being recognised. Or she may do so because the photo is stolen. Good reasons or dishonest reasons. Despite the pessimists on here I suggest innocent until wrong.

As for no feedback, ladies who use phone numbers - and many punters here prefer to use phone numbers - often have less feedback as they do not use the booking system.

So follow your instinct and make a date, and follow your instinct and walk away - politely - before paying if you do not fancy her.

And who looks at the mantelpiece when stoking the fire?
Enjoy






Offline Melb

Quote
And who looks at the mantelpiece when stoking the fire?

I do.
A pretty face is very important to me. I like eye contact when she's sucking me and when I'm fucking her so an ugly mug would put me off.

Offline Wayang

At the risk of repetition I look at the following in order:

1.  Telephone number - if the WG is selling herself I am not going to f*ck around with AW or e-mails;
2.  Price - anything over £120/hour is out (I prefer 45 minutes at max £100);
3.  Physical description if given and photo - so often they do not correlate;
4.  Tits; I hate silicone.

Face photo is desirable but I am not looking at the mantlepiece when I am poking the fire

Offline Miss A Squires

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 296
I do.
A pretty face is very important to me. I like eye contact when she's sucking me and when I'm fucking her so an ugly mug would put me off.

Pop a mask of your favourite porn star on her!

Offline haystacks79

" the correct term for WG's is pro$$ie" This is not compulsory, use the word you prefer. I like lady.

And I tend to go for WG simply because it's easy to type, and is one of the terms those I've seen have used themselves. I've not (yet) had an experience that means I'm inclined to use another term.

As for the original question, for me, not a face pic isn't essential - yes there has to be some physical attraction there, but the character, personality and attitude are far more important, and it's those attributes that I'm looking for in the profile and reviews. It's worked out OK so far.


As for the original question, for me, not a face pic isn't essential - yes there has to be some physical attraction there, but the character, personality and attitude are far more important, and it's those attributes that I'm looking for in the profile and reviews. It's worked out OK so far.

+1

Offline brooksey

+1
+2 from me. I've often seen girls with "blurred" faces, as it were, and understand when they don't want to reveal themselves fully for fear of being recognised in civvy street.

It also adds a little frisson of anticipation to the first meeting if you're not sure exactly what they will look like.

Though hopefully the general shape and size of the body will not be such a surprise  :)

Offline oinki

To be honest, that blurring is not the worse encountered as you can slightly see through it on zoom on that other link provided. But I would second walk away if she is totally off those pictures and have a backup in mind.

I personally have outcalls to hotels so face pictures becomes a bit more important to me, but do agree that the pleasant surprise of someone with blurred face turning up to be of my fancy is a huge plus.

Online Jimmyredcab



Face photo is desirable but I am not looking at the mantlepiece when I am poking the fire

I strongly disagree, a pretty face is very important to me, I don't pay £120 an hour to shag mingers, why on earth would I do that. ??

Offline Wayang

I strongly disagree, a pretty face is very important to me, I don't pay £120 an hour to shag mingers, why on earth would I do that. ??

Trouble is JRC you see everything as either black or white.  No one would suggest f*ck*ng a butt ugly minger from choice and equally would love to shag a truly beautiful woman.  You may see the former when you try and punt but most unlikely you will come across the latter at less than £500/hour.

But there are degrees rather than absolutes and we each have our own cut off point.

But you can't fool me or anyone that you always fuck truly prtty women!

Offline Melb

Pop a mask of your favourite porn star on her!

My favourite porn star is Peter North - I don't see that working.

Online Jimmyredcab



But you can't fool me or anyone that you always fuck truly prtty women!

One thing I can guarantee, I have far better taste than you, I remember the lady from Gatwick who was truly awful.   :scare:

Offline NIK

Although a pretty face is the top priority for me, over the years I have seen far more girls without first seeing their faces and in the early days I would regularly book girls from agencies advertising in local papers without even seeing a pic.  :scare:

However I still book girls without clear facial pics. Two decent recent punts: Julia of Sheffield Babes and Crystal of GFE Sheffield both have faces covered, but both ladies were decent looking.

Normally if a girl has a good body but an unattractive face I don't want to know.
However those of you who have read my book will know there was one occasion when Sasha, a girl in a Sheffield parlour, had a pretty face but a really ugly scrawny body with droopy tits and stretched marked belly. Despite her pretty face this really put me off.
However usually in my vast experience pretty face = decent body. Ugly face = minger.  :cool:


Latest videos on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

Latest images on UKEscorting.com (free site!)