2hr+ Meets

[Sonny Crockett]

In my punting life I have only done 2 hour meets with one lady. The reason behind it being that I had 2 very good meets with her previously, and that she was reasonably priced. As I wanted another session of pleasure with double the time, I had the intention of having sex with her throughout the whole two hours with her, so good was the fucking I had in the previous meets. However as much as I wanted to continue to the end, and I had the energy to do so, I was not able to as the lady wanted me to cum at about 1hr and 15mins into the meet. The rest of the meet was made up by a massage, and then a shared shower. I am actually unable to cum multiple times during a meet.

In hindsight, I now believe that in order to have sex throughout a 2hr+ meet, I would have to cum multiple times (probably 3 or 4 pops), and have brief breaks. Also I now think that after a long while the sex can start to get repetitive.

With that experience, I started to think what other things I could do in a 2hr+ meet if I decided to embark on one. From that I felt that having a longer meet with a WG you've seen before is a good opportunity to try new things. In my case those new things would be services like roleplay, strap-on, BDSM, tie & tease, toy show, etc and specific sessions for 30mins like face fucking and ass worship. As there is more time and you've seen the lady before, there is a feeling of comfort when embarking on those services.

For me the main downside to doing 2hr+ meets is that they are more expensive. However from thinking about this further, they present an opportunity to try new things that you'd probably are unlikely to in a 1hr meet.

[Midlane]

2 hour outcalls for a long time, until I gained more confidence and realised a lot of the time was wasted.

Overnights too, but now I don't like sharing my bed when I want to sleep.

[vw]

Yes your right it gets boring doing the same shit all the time, I always mix mine up for variety.   Imagine those with limited likes or no imagination longer sessions would be a waste.

[azrael]

I've only ever had two punts that where two hrs or more, the first one was with hayley xx from down south (portsmouth/southampton) spoke to a few people who recomended her so decided on a 3 hr session as anything else would not have been worth the trip down to see her, totally excellent meet.
The second time was a 2 hr meet with an old regular that meeting didn't go as planned she thought i was gonna sit around for an hour after my first pop.
Personally i think the session depends on the girl, if your a one pop guy then it isnt worth booking anything longer than the hour imho 

[Nagilum]

Correct that why I have started looking at BDSM and to be the Dom, I think it will be interesting.  I don't plan to go ultra sadist, but I like the tease and light spanking as punishment idea, anything like leather gear would just be amusing to me.  Naturally it has to be pleasurable for both parties to enjoy it fully and both need to engage.

With 2 hour punts - I don't know, I sometimes overrun on my punts by 15 mins to 30 minutes (with the best girls), but in fairness if I like the WG and click with her conversationally, then I could see myself stretching to two hours with mixture of sexual activities. 

You need to be armed with some viagra to recover for 3 - 4 pops! I certainly would be as I'm no longer in my 20's where I could perform such heroics.

[Jimmyredcab]

I can only dream of multiple pops ---- and I doubt that I am alone. 

[Midlane]

I can only dream of multiple pops ---- and I doubt that I am alone. 

You're not. In an hour alone with Woodman's website and a LOT of effort, maybe. In real life it's just the one. I accept that.

[The_Don]

I've done a few 2 hour + punts. For a number of reasons

1) I looked at hourly rates that I've paid (ie £120-£150+, for other W/G) and if the 2 hour rate for a different W/G. That I had punted as positive @ before was around the same. I some times booked her, for 2 hours.

2) If I had a good punt, and wanted to carry on, so I booked the next hour, if she was up for it. Or booked another day 2+ hours.

But in most cases now (IMO) 2 hours is a waste of time and effort in one go. And I would prefer, a 1 hour punt. Followed by a break and then another 1 hour punt with a different W/G. Which is, what I do now, instead of 1, 2 hour punt!

[Nagilum]

I've done a few 2 hour + punts. For a number of reasons

1) I looked at hourly rates that I've paid (ie £120-£150+, for other W/G) and if the 2 hour rate for a different W/G. That I had punted as positive @ before was around the same. I some times booked her, for 2 hours.

2) If I had a good punt, and wanted to carry on, so I booked the next hour, if she was up for it. Or booked another day 2+ hours.

But in most cases now (IMO) 2 hours is a waste of time and effort in one go. And I would prefer, a 1 hour punt. Followed by a break and then another 1 hour punt with a different W/G. Which is, what I do now, instead of 1, 2 hour punt!

I like that, I shall try it.  The punting two different girls approach.

[Yeboahsleftfoot]

Multiple pops are a difficult one, I almost always see duos, normally 90 minutes, if the whole thing flows right and the girls are not big talkers but sexy and into it I can easily cum three times, however, if the room is too hot or I start overthinking I can't manage a second pop even with great girls. 2 hours seem like a loooong time for just sex, even after a period of abstinence.

[The_Don]

I like that, I shall try it.  The punting two different girls approach.

Some times do it with regs (punt - eat + travel + punt again)

But mostly, TOFTT (and of it goes south) followed up by a reg.

[Nagilum]

Multiple pops are a difficult one, I almost always see duos, normally 90 minutes, if the whole thing flows right and the girls are not big talkers but sexy and into it I can easily cum three times, however, if the room is too hot or I start overthinking I can't manage a second pop even with great girls. 2 hours seem like a loooong time for just sex, even after a period of abstinence.

Second pop with a new girl is no issue for me generally, but with regulars I struggle. Overthinking is definitely a factor and affects performance including getting a chubby going.

[Nagilum]

Some times do it with regs (punt - eat + travel + punt again)

But mostly, TOFTT (and of it goes south) followed up by a reg.

How long do you leave in between there?

2 - 3 hours?

[The_Don]

How long do you leave in between there?

2 - 3 hours?

I normally eat local to the first punt and then allow 2 + hours

[Nagilum]

I normally eat local to the first punt and then allow 2 + hours

Noted, I shall give this a go.  It can only go well or even better 

[smiths]

In my punting life I have only done 2 hour meets with one lady. The reason behind it being that I had 2 very good meets with her previously, and that she was reasonably priced. As I wanted another session of pleasure with double the time, I had the intention of having sex with her throughout the whole two hours with her, so good was the fucking I had in the previous meets. However as much as I wanted to continue to the end, and I had the energy to do so, I was not able to as the lady wanted me to cum at about 1hr and 15mins into the meet. The rest of the meet was made up by a massage, and then a shared shower. I am actually unable to cum multiple times during a meet.

In hindsight, I now believe that in order to have sex throughout a 2hr+ meet, I would have to cum multiple times (probably 3 or 4 pops), and have brief breaks. Also I now think that after a long while the sex can start to get repetitive.

With that experience, I started to think what other things I could do in a 2hr+ meet if I decided to embark on one. From that I felt that having a longer meet with a WG you've seen before is a good opportunity to try new things. In my case those new things would be services like roleplay, strap-on, BDSM, tie & tease, toy show, etc and specific sessions for 30mins like face fucking and ass worship. As there is more time and you've seen the lady before, there is a feeling of comfort when embarking on those services.

For me the main downside to doing 2hr+ meets is that they are more expensive. However from thinking about this further, they present an opportunity to try new things that you'd probably are unlikely to in a 1hr meet.

2 hour punts 121 with regulars only if I rate them enough, I always have a plan of what I want to do and aim to multi pop so its usually been VFM as I see it.

On occasion I have booked a newbie WG to me and found her so good that I have asked to extend to 2 hours or if she couldn't do that fit me in a couple of hours later for another hour.

[jcdmj12]

I prefer time to relax into the meet, extended foreplay etc so 2 hrs+ is ideal for me. Usually pop a couple of times in that space.   I only tend to see WGs who discount multiple hours though.

[willmo1]

Got to be good to keep me interested for that long. Not happened yet.

[Nagilum]

Got to be good to keep me interested for that long. Not happened yet.

Care to share some reviews?

[willmo1]

Care to share some reviews?

Put another record on for fucks sake.

[Nagilum]

Put another record on for fucks sake.

What is wrong with the request?

[dizietsmae]

What is wrong with the request?

Absolutely nothing, he is a knob I reckon.

[Sonny Crockett]

2 hour punts 121 with regulars only if I rate them enough, I always have a plan of what I want to do and aim to multi pop so its usually been VFM as I see it.

On occasion I have booked a newbie WG to me and found her so good that I have asked to extend to 2 hours or if she couldn't do that fit me in a couple of hours later for another hour.

+10000 to planning

Putting a lot of thought and planning what you are going to do is key in the chances of a successful, action-packed 2hr punt. Shame that the one I had organised never came to fruition.

[mattylondon]

Yes your right it gets boring doing the same shit all the time, I always mix mine up for variety.   Imagine those with limited likes or no imagination longer sessions would be a waste.

I can't see the logic of two hours personally, I'd rather punt one prossie for an hour in the evening, have my sleep and fuck another in an early morning meet. Two for the price of one.

[yorkshire123]

When I first started punting & was throwing money about like it was going out of fashion I would book 2 hour plus booking quite regularly.
I then came to realise that I was a one popper & once the plums were empty my interest in the punt evaporated quite quickly.

I've lost count of the amount of two hour bookings I paid for & found myself leaving after one.

[PLeisure]

Put another record on for fucks sake.

Why so defensive ? 

[Sonny Crockett]

When I first started punting & was throwing money about like it was going out of fashion I would book 2 hour plus booking quite regularly.
I then came to realise that I was a one popper & once the plums were empty my interest in the punt evaporated quite quickly.

I've lost count of the amount of two hour bookings I paid for & found myself leaving after one.

I know what you mean. I can relate to that!!

[vw]

I can't see the logic of two hours personally

There is logic, its what I want to do simple as !

[willmo1]

Why so defensive ? 

Because it gets boring. I punt my way, you punt yours and posting loads of reviews only shows youve spent lots of money and nout else. If thats how you play it fine but I'm just here for some banter with guys who think like me.

If you dont like me thats ok. Your choice.

[smiths]

Because it gets boring. I punt my way, you punt yours and posting loads of reviews only shows youve spent lots of money and nout else. If thats how you play it fine but I'm just here for some banter with guys who think like me.

If you dont like me thats ok. Your choice.

What, no doing reviews certainly doesn't ONLY show you have spent lots of money and nout else. It ALSO gives other punters information on good or bad WGs, its called info sharing and is one of the main reasons UKP is in existence.

Whether a punter does reviews or not is their business of course but to say there is nout other reason for doing a review is totally wrong.

[willmo1]

What, no doing reviews certainly doesn't ONLY show you have spent lots of money and nout else. It ALSO gives other punters information on good or bad WGs, its called info sharing and is one of the main reasons UKP is in existence.

Whether a punter does reviews or not is their business of course but to say there is nout other reason for doing a review is totally wrong.

Well thats how I see it and why others should be allowed to do things their own way without being pulled up every 5 minutes. In every hobby there are the hardcore guys who want to be 'out there' and others who want a low profile. For me its just a fun thing and I dont need any medals for what I do.

I dont criticise the guys who do reviews or want to poke my nose into how they do things. I just meet a girl, hand over my money and do the bizz. She might suit me and vice versa but might be crap with another punter. Reviews will only tell me she is active and I do the rest.

Dont want a fight here and Ill slide away quietly if you like. Punting is just part of my life not my reason for breathing.

[smiths]

Well thats how I see it and why others should be allowed to do things their own way without being pulled up every 5 minutes. In every hobby there are the hardcore guys who want to be 'out there' and others who want a low profile. For me its just a fun thing and I dont need any medals for what I do.

I dont criticise the guys who do reviews or want to poke my nose into how they do things. I just meet a girl, hand over my money and do the bizz. She might suit me and vice versa but might be crap with another punter. Reviews will only tell me she is active and I do the rest.

Dont want a fight here and Ill slide away quietly if you like. Punting is just part of my life not my reason for breathing.

What you do is up to you, though if you punt a bad WG I see no downside to doing a negative review to warn other punters but ultimately that's your business.

I was just pointing out what you posted wasn't the case, loads of punters wish to share info on WGs by way of review/s with other punters on here which is a big reason UKP is THE top punting forum in the UK.

[vw]

I was just pointing out what you posted wasn't the case, loads of punters wish to share info on WGs by way of review/s with other punters on here which is a big reason UKP is THE top punting forum in the UK.

Whether people choose to or not, all I require is honesty and no agenda in the review.

Have no problem with non reviewers, but have contempt for people with no reviews that comment on negatives and say she did that to me to.  Would have hoped for a negative or warning.  Maybe wilmo1 has not had a negative experience since joining and a bad one will be his first, in that case hope he doesn't need to.

[The_Don]

Because it gets boring. I punt my way, you punt yours and posting loads of reviews only shows youve spent lots of money and nout else. If thats how you play it fine but I'm just here for some banter with guys who think like me.

If you dont like me thats ok. Your choice.

Its about sharing info (which people can do in different ways, with in the set rules).

But, If punters didn't do reviews on UKP, this site wouldn't be what it is today.

As for spending, its up to the punter how much they wish to spend. The fact that they are willing to share, is a positive thing. Even if some punters don't read that review.

[willmo1]

Fair enough lads and I take your point. Sorry for being a bit jumpy but it seems sometimes guys assume that if you dont review you dont punt. I left a mild neg on AW a couple of years back before knowing these girls often work in groups and share passwords and it caused issues with others, and as I punt in a small area word travels fast. Not worth the aggro.

Ive also made a couple of comments in threads where someone was blatantly lying early on and then got white knighted soon after so I keep quiet now. Fair to say Ive not been properly scammed or ripped off yet but if it ever happened Id let you now. Thats a promise.

[Sonny Crockett]

Fair enough lads and I take your point. Sorry for being a bit jumpy but it seems sometimes guys assume that if you dont review you dont punt. I left a mild neg on AW a couple of years back before knowing these girls often work in groups and share passwords and it caused issues with others, and as I punt in a small area word travels fast. Not worth the aggro.

Ive also made a couple of comments in threads where someone was blatantly lying early on and then got white knighted soon after so I keep quiet now. Fair to say Ive not been properly scammed or ripped off yet but if it ever happened Id let you now. Thats a promise.

That's Ok. If you want to review or not, that is your choice. Also I'm sorry that you were the victim of white knight cunts that bashed down on your comments. These are the type of people that think it is acceptable for prossies to fuck about with punters, give bad service and give punters abuse whenever they get a negative review

[willmo1]

That's Ok. If you want to review or not, that is your choice. Also I'm sorry that you were the victim of white knight cunts that bashed down on your comments. These are the type of people that think it is acceptable for prossies to fuck about with punters, give bad service and give punters abuse whenever they get a negative review

Thanks Sonny. 

I appreciate the understanding.

[Nagilum]

Fair enough lads and I take your point. Sorry for being a bit jumpy but it seems sometimes guys assume that if you dont review you dont punt. I left a mild neg on AW a couple of years back before knowing these girls often work in groups and share passwords and it caused issues with others, and as I punt in a small area word travels fast. Not worth the aggro.

Ive also made a couple of comments in threads where someone was blatantly lying early on and then got white knighted soon after so I keep quiet now. Fair to say Ive not been properly scammed or ripped off yet but if it ever happened Id let you now. Thats a promise.

That's the danger with any comment you make about a girls somebody

Its down to you to review, which has been said.  Personally I would like to know if you have a bad experience to dodge that girls entirely.  Glad you have not been ripped off or scammed, that is a good thing and shows the site works. 

Don't let a few white knights deter you, your opinion is valid.

 

[Marmalade]

In hindsight, I now believe that in order to have sex throughout a 2hr+ meet, I would have to cum multiple times (probably 3 or 4 pops), and have brief breaks. Also I now think that after a long while the sex can start to get repetitive.

For me the main downside to doing 2hr+ meets is that they are more expensive. However from thinking about this further, they present an opportunity to try new things that you'd probably are unlikely to in a 1hr meet.

I don't think I'd ever consider a 2hr indie meet at UK rates.

LMP parties have been a good way to spend 2hrs of predominantly shagging with short breaks in between. Having several different women to fuck stops the interest flagging. Probably the best and longest just sex meet I've had was abroad. Prossie tentatively offered me a snort of coke which I accepted (I knew her reasonably well enough to take her back to my prossie-proof apartment and trust her drug-buying sense). I think we started about 2pm and by 6pm we looked at the time and felt well and truly fucking pleased with ourselves.

[Marmalade]

Just for safety's sake it should perhaps be mentioned that your body needs at least one deflation every few hours just in case anyone gets to viagra-happy. If you can't come for any reason, try having a pee or pour cold water on it. I think I popped once during the four hours, had maybe a five minute break then kept going till 6pm. Your cock can get seriously damaged if it's erect for more than four hours.

[shagbambi]

I prefer 2 hour meets  as it suits my needs (loads of foreplay and multi pop ).  Because of this I often punt less as it is more expensive.

[PLeisure]

Because it gets boring. I punt my way, you punt yours and posting loads of reviews only shows youve spent lots of money and nout else. If thats how you play it fine but I'm just here for some banter with guys who think like me.

If you dont like me thats ok. Your choice.

It's nothing to do with "liking you"... wtf 
What's boring, as you put it, is your passive aggressive sarcasm.
Chill.
And maybe keep in mind that UKP is primarily an information resource. The banter is fun, nobody will deny that - but it's secondary. This site is essentially about sharing intel

[pking_paul]

I prefer a little lead up to the fun and as I'm a very visual person I enjoy a good striptease and suchlike to get me going. If I strike lucky I get to take photos too, so can enjoy the punt over again 

I've discovered an hour and half is just about right, though have done a few two hour sessions too.

As for reviews, I have found myself waiting for a bad one to write about for some reason so found the discussion here interesting. I guess because my tastes don't always match others on here (Vanilla / GFE) it feels pretty pointless to write more positive reviews somehow. Something for me to think about, glad it has been raised here by others