Marmalade, you sound like an expert. What you have stated is exactly what I have written but used your imagination to twist it a little. Yes, I said no FK, and OWO, which I said I did not expect, and I don't think she offers so I went in NOT expecting FK and OWO. And yes, she is older, early to mid 30s which I stated as well. Your expert advice based upon 'adjectives and material' is just the way YOU read between the lines.
Siodog, I commented simply to clarify the roots of a common argument. The difference between adjectives and objective is a technical one, not a reading between the lines. I give you credit for reporting your experience; the next thing I do is say how could this report help me?
People vary enormously in what they think is a good punt. But there are some things that are not reliant on opinion and independently useful and these are very valuable, in addition to whether you personally enjoyed the punt
. These are things like the link (which you gave), the price (which you didn't but is easy to look up), the area she lives in, services offered and services rendered, body shape/size. These are things that a court room if you like would accept as facts. That you think a woman is 'hot' is a subjective opinion, and valuable in its own right, but is a fact about your opinion, not a clear fact about the prossie (for instance is she was a size 16).
So I didn't add imagination or opinion, I subtracted it. What I was left with is, she's older than I would go for, she doesn't do certain services (a negative but not a dealbreaker). All the stuff about towels just means I have to wade through quite a bit to find the factually critical info.
Ultimately punters are not that interested in whether you had a great time or whether you think a girl is hot, THEY ARE INTERESTED IN WHETHER THEY
WOULD HAVE A GOOD TIME AND WHETHER THEY
WOULD THINK SHE IS HOT. So that's the point of, are you just sharing your feelings or are you sharing information to help punters.
I'm not having a go at you, just trying to clarify things for everyone's benefit.
I said this before and I'll say it again, if you have not seen a WG in person or went through with a booking, why post things you do not know?
I think Jazzman was saying he doesn't know that much from your review, which would b a reasonable comment. Evidence of pictures being used under several different names maybe doesn't prove anything but it is interesting (to me at least: if they were hers originally, she has no control over them so I don't know whether they are or not, so I balance that against your belief that they are genuinely originally hers.)
One more thing I'd like to mention which I forgot earlier which I find strange and since we are reading between the lines, using our imaginations and assuming, I would like to ask why are most of JazzMan's punts in Edinburgh and Glasgow, but he is looking at escorts in Birmingham and he found this profile 'by mistake'?
I think that's incorrect. You add a lot of inbetween the lines stuff. That's your choice, but I don't think other punters are out of order for saying wtf, just tell us some facts, preferably that you've critically examined. I only noticed the review because it's posted in the Scotland section (would have helped if you'd followed the guidelines in red that say please say where she's from in the header).
This is UKP. Getting a bit of stick is normal. Trying to help discriminating punters, who are largely a self-sufficient opinionated lot, is a lot harder than helping indiscriminate fluffies: but that is what we are here for. Not the chat. But to help each other get value for money punts. I know it's a bugger. We all piss each other off at times. But it is more productive overall than wallowing in a cloud of fluffyfluff and other people's orgasms. I'll post a couple of reviews over the next few days and you can take thoughtful pot shots at mine if you like. (people usually do)