Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.




Author Topic: Vanesa - Edinburgh  (Read 1839 times)

This review has not been indexed yet.

Offline Soidog

https://www.escort-scotland.com/escorts/vanesa34-russian-female-escort.html

Called her and it was quite easy to arrange a meeting. The place is easy to find and very safe, in a populated area. Arrived, called, she let me in and went upstairs. She opened the door wearing a red silk robe, it was to the knees if I can remember correctly. She insisted I take a shower to which I tried to explain I just came from my hotel freshly showered but like a strong stubborn Russian woman she insisted, I got the impression if I didn't I won't get 100%, so I thought why not, if it makes her happy I'm sure I will be too. She provides clean towels. Did the paperwork and took a quick shower. Upon returning to the room, she was standing there waiting with her robe open, wearing sexy red lingerie. She is hot, her pictures are accurate, maybe a little photoshopped (which majority are anyway) but she is hot, I think a perfect way to describe the hotness would be a very hot mid 30s MILF or porn star. Tall, tanned, blond hair with make up, beautiful boobs, and pretty fit for her age. She told me that she's a couple of years older than what it states. She doesn't do FK, OWO, just soft kissing and all that, but to be honest that didn't matter much because she was really into it and she knows what she is doing. We slowly made it to the bed and she gave me a good BJ, body to body and we got down and dirty. The sex was great, no weird moments, and she was totally into it. We started off slow and ended up fucking really hard and before I knew it, I blew it! The experience was like visiting a hot and experienced Russian WG (they mean business), or for those of you that have not spent some time with good Russian ladies, it was sort of like visiting a hot mistress. After the fun, she said I can shower again, I wanted to use the towel I used when I got there but she insisted I use a new one, I argued that we can save the earth by me reusing my old towel, but once again due to her Russian traits I lost that battle and she made me shower with a fresh towel, it was like, you paid for this service, this is how I do things and you have no choice, which is excellent. We said our goodbyes and she slammed the door behind me, I don't know if it was by mistake or she was just upset that I was leaving, because everything went well and she said she hopes to see me again. Very satisfied, would definately see again and again.    :thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup:

Offline JazzMan

I've seen these photos loads of times.
It looks like a bait and switch.
That doesn't mean it's not a bad punt of course.

« Last Edit: January 09, 2016, 05:06:19 AM by JazzMan »
Banning reason: Slagging off membership

Offline Santiago

Thanks for the review..

What are the prices as nothing listed.. :hi:

Offline Soidog

JazzMan, you posted the same exact rubbish you posted on my other review about a different girl. Once again, if you have not seen a WG or went through with a booking, your comments are nothing but a load of useless information, they do nothing for your credibility, and they don't do nothing to me. I doubt very much from seeing all the horse poo you post anyone on here takes into consideration what you have to say. Read my post / reply on my other review, read it carefully and try to comprehend at least, and read the rules of this site too. It seems to me you are just someone who sits behind your screen and keyboard with too much time on your hands. Don't post useless information, this is not what this site is for.

Santiago, she tip for half an hour was 70. When we originally spoke on the phone it was breaking up and I vaguely heard her hourly and 45 minute tip, it was something like 120 or 130 for full hour and 100 or 110 for 45 minutes. Nice lady.  :hi:

Offline JazzMan

The Vanesa and Camilla photo have been used in many profiles.
Well known bait & switch profiles.
Avoid escort-scotland stick with AW.
Banning reason: Slagging off membership

Offline Soidog

JazzMan, being the experienced punter that you are, I don't think I can say much which will stop you from writing your professional knowledge on here. Once again, you are writing things you do not know, why don't you get up from that seat behind your screen and keyboard and wipe the poo off your hands and fingers. The pictures are real and accurate, on both Camilla's and Vanesa's profiles. Don't comment if you have not seen them in person and went through with a date. You are assuming things that you have created in your head, your statements are not based on experience. Comment on the WGs you've seen, not the ones you fantasise about. Another thing I would like to add is, if in Scotland, I'd rather use Escort Scotland and AW, ES has got more girls and more girls in Scotland advertise on ES than AW. AW is best for London and England where it's the total opposite of Scotland where the majority of fake, unverified profiles you would find on Escort England. Generally, my preference is AW, I agree, but not in Scotland, you have to use both, take a gamble, take one for the team if you choose, remember about the freedom of choice? And if you don't go through with a booking, don't assume and add your two cents based on speculations. If you say you have seen these pictures used on other profiles, then go ahead and expose these fakes as you claim they are without having met them and I have seen in the flesh. The profiles in question are accurate.
« Last Edit: January 09, 2016, 12:34:20 PM by Soidog »

Offline JazzMan

Banning reason: Slagging off membership

Offline Soidog

Has it not crossed your mind that the profile you have posted is using the pictures from the lady I posted about here? Congratulations JazzMan, you have done something right, you have exposed a fake profile of somebody using the Russian ladies pictures that I have posted about. Now, don't automatically assume these are 'fake Vanessa pictures' as you said, because you still have not seen her did you? What you have done is exposed a fake profile of someone else who is using Vanesa's pictures. I've seen the lady I have posted about, pictures are definately hers, and I highly recommend.

Offline RandyF

Has it not crossed your mind that the profile you have posted is using the pictures from the lady I posted about here? Congratulations JazzMan, you have done something right, you have exposed a fake profile of somebody using the Russian ladies pictures that I have posted about. Now, don't automatically assume these are 'fake Vanessa pictures' as you said, because you still have not seen her did you? What you have done is exposed a fake profile of someone else who is using Vanesa's pictures. I've seen the lady I have posted about, pictures are definately hers, and I highly recommend.

Jizzman is correct here Soidog.

You met someone that resembled the fake stolen pics.  FFS.  Not smart to get all high and mighty when your perception skills are apparently non existent.

Your just misleading punters....and by Christ, many of them don't need much misleading  :lol:
Banning reason: Troll

Online Marmalade

If anyone posts a review that is high on adjectives and low on material facts, it's not unreasonable IMO for people to seek conformation. What I got from reading the review was no FK, no OWO blonde, quite old, and a lot of stuff about fluffy towels.

Offline Soidog

RandyF nobody is getting 'high and mighty'. I posted a review based on MY experience, and I have no complaints. I was satisfied with the service I got. JazzMan, or JizzMan as you said keeps on posting things based upon his assumptions, not experience.

Marmalade, you sound like an expert. What you have stated is exactly what I have written but used your imagination to twist it a little. Yes, I said no FK, and OWO, which I said I did not expect, and I don't think she offers so I went in NOT expecting FK and OWO. And yes, she is older, early to mid 30s which I stated as well. Your expert advice based upon 'adjectives and material' is just the way YOU read between the lines.

I said this before and I'll say it again, if you have not seen a WG in person or went through with a booking, why post things you do not know? As JazzMan always seems to do. If you did see a WG and had a bad experience, write your own review and explain why.

One more thing I'd like to mention which I forgot earlier which I find strange and since we are reading between the lines, using our imaginations and assuming, I would like to ask why are most of JazzMan's punts in Edinburgh and Glasgow, but he is looking at escorts in Birmingham and he found this profile 'by mistake'?  :lol: :lol: :lol:

I hope you people have a nice day and wish you all the best at getting some better experiences in the future.  :cool:


Offline seeker

Soidog says he has met Camilla and the pictures are her
I've met Camilla years ago and the pictures are definitely her ....
Also a fantastic wee ride  :cool:
But I've not met Vanessa so will NOT speculate . :hi:

Online Marmalade

Marmalade, you sound like an expert. What you have stated is exactly what I have written but used your imagination to twist it a little. Yes, I said no FK, and OWO, which I said I did not expect, and I don't think she offers so I went in NOT expecting FK and OWO. And yes, she is older, early to mid 30s which I stated as well. Your expert advice based upon 'adjectives and material' is just the way YOU read between the lines.
Siodog, I commented simply to clarify the roots of a common argument. The difference between adjectives and objective is a technical one, not a reading between the lines. I give you credit for reporting your experience; the next thing I do is say how could this report help me? People vary enormously in what they think is a good punt. But there are some things that are not reliant on opinion and independently useful and these are very valuable, in addition to whether you personally enjoyed the punt. These are things like the link (which you gave), the price (which you didn't but is easy to look up), the area she lives in, services offered and services rendered, body shape/size. These are things that a court room if you like would accept as facts. That you think a woman is 'hot' is a subjective opinion, and valuable in its own right, but is a fact about your opinion, not a clear fact about the prossie (for instance is she was a size 16).

So I didn't add imagination or opinion, I subtracted it. What I was left with is, she's older than I would go for, she doesn't do certain services (a negative but not a dealbreaker). All the stuff about towels just means I have to wade through quite a bit to find the factually critical info.

Ultimately punters are not that interested in whether you had a great time or whether you think a girl is hot, THEY ARE INTERESTED IN WHETHER THEY WOULD HAVE A GOOD TIME AND WHETHER THEY WOULD THINK SHE IS HOT. So that's the point of, are you just sharing your feelings or are you sharing information to help punters.

I'm not having a go at you, just trying to clarify things for everyone's benefit.

Quote
I said this before and I'll say it again, if you have not seen a WG in person or went through with a booking, why post things you do not know?
I think Jazzman was saying he doesn't know that much from your review, which would b a reasonable comment. Evidence of pictures being used under several different names maybe doesn't prove anything but it is interesting (to me at least: if they were hers originally, she has no control over them so I don't know whether they are or not, so I balance that against your belief that they are genuinely originally hers.)

Quote
One more thing I'd like to mention which I forgot earlier which I find strange and since we are reading between the lines, using our imaginations and assuming, I would like to ask why are most of JazzMan's punts in Edinburgh and Glasgow, but he is looking at escorts in Birmingham and he found this profile 'by mistake'? 
I think that's incorrect. You add a lot of inbetween the lines stuff. That's your choice, but I don't think other punters are out of order for saying wtf, just tell us some facts, preferably that you've critically examined. I only noticed the review because it's posted in the Scotland section (would have helped if you'd followed the guidelines in red that say please say where she's from in the header).

This is UKP. Getting a bit of stick is normal. Trying to help discriminating punters, who are largely a self-sufficient opinionated lot, is a lot harder than helping indiscriminate fluffies: but that is what we are here for. Not the chat. But to help each other get value for money punts. I know it's a bugger. We all piss each other off at times. But it is more productive overall than wallowing in a cloud of fluffyfluff and other people's orgasms. I'll post a couple of reviews over the next few days and you can take thoughtful pot shots at mine if you like. (people usually do)
 :hi:
« Last Edit: January 11, 2016, 01:55:09 PM by Marmalade »

Offline Soidog

It's posted under Scotland because that's where I met her, in Edinburgh, Scotland. I post information to help punters, not feelings. I post only about WGs I've seen in person, and I don't speculate about ones I haven't. I posts my reviews with a link, I don't like to go into the details of what one can see on the profile. If it was good, I'll post a good positive review, if it wasn't, I will post a negative one, or neutral. I get around, see a lot of WGs all over, I don't need detailed explanations of how and what and where, but do appreciate your effort and thanks for the info. I post my reviews the way I post them, and you post yours the way you want. I also think people have missed the whole underlying issue here, JazzMan keeps posting nonsense over and over. Instead of going out to have some fun, he looks at pictures, assumes they're fake, and comments on WGs he has not seen as if he has. Anyway, I'm in London, I have a fun day planned tomorrow or later I should say with my two favourite ladies, I hope you people have a fun day too.  :P

Let it go, Soidog.

Everyone chooses for themselves what is useful and what is not on UKP.  No need for a defence and prosecution case, buddy.

Offline Soidog

Exactly, everyone chooses what is useful and what is not and no need to post opinions and speculate on WGs one has not met either. No defense and prosecution!?  :mad:




Latest media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)