Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: Which London based escorts have the most positive reviews in 2015?  (Read 1632 times)

Sir Lancealot

  • Guest
I was intrigued to know which London based girls had got the most positive UKP reviews in 2015. There may be others that I have missed (please add to the thread) but the top ones I came up with who had more than 25 positive reviews in the year were:

1. Miss KDD - 48
2. Ellie_12_Rose - 36
3. Adele4U - 35
4. Platinum Cindy - 26

Now is this a fair reflection of the best escorts that London has to offer or is it a case of flavour of the month / year, the girl having a well organised fan club or punters trying to win favour with certain girls?

Offline aprower994

I have seen Ellie Rose and can confirm she the best I've had along with Emma from Butterfly Touch.

tonysoprano

  • Guest
Quote
the girl having a well organised fan club or punters trying to win favour with certain girls

I think beyond doubt that's been the case...Shame because i don't doubt these girls are good providers.

Offline smiths

I was intrigued to know which London based girls had got the most positive UKP reviews in 2015. There may be others that I have missed (please add to the thread) but the top ones I came up with who had more than 25 positive reviews in the year were:

1. Miss KDD - 48
2. Ellie_12_Rose - 36
3. Adele4U - 35
4. Platinum Cindy - 26

Now is this a fair reflection of the best escorts that London has to offer or is it a case of flavour of the month / year, the girl having a well organised fan club or punters trying to win favour with certain girls?

Lindsay and Michelle Independent will have a lot of reviews on here as well. Having loads of reviews doesn't necessarily mean they are the best WGs in London, yes it can be flavour of the month and being a forum darling as all these WGs are, plus fluffies sometimes pile in to see the same WG one of their fluffy brethren have reviewed so those WGs get lots of reviews sometimes in a short period of time.

Personally I disregard the reviews of white knight fluffies or fanboys as opposed to just fluffies as those "punters" treat punting like dating which it isn't to those of us who punt in the real world, and I don't trust such "punters" anyway. Too many dodgy ones have now been banned for me to trust them now.

« Last Edit: December 31, 2015, 05:29:42 pm by smiths »

Offline laidbackasiandude

I've met both PC & Adele4U (just the one time for both) and all I can say that for me, sessions
were positive. However, there's no way that forum favourites (just like any WG) deliver 100%
service for ALL punters 100% of the time. It's just not feasible in reality.


Offline hendrix

I was intrigued to know which London based girls had got the most positive UKP reviews in 2015. There may be others that I have missed (please add to the thread) but the top ones I came up with who had more than 25 positive reviews in the year were:

1. Miss KDD - 48
2. Ellie_12_Rose - 36
3. Adele4U - 35
4. Platinum Cindy - 26

Now is this a fair reflection of the best escorts that London has to offer or is it a case of flavour of the month / year, the girl having a well organised fan club or punters trying to win favour with certain girls?

Probably a mix of all those things.

I don't need to say anything else about number 1 there :D

Offline Steely Dan

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only
Jennifer Pussy is more impressive with 6 Negatives in 2015 ... proving that we don't read or listen to advice!

Back on topic, these 4 (and add in MichelleI, HazelK, EmilyCB, Lindsay - are these all London too?) are strong candidates for equal best.  Smiths is right that there are other factors, and more reviews by fanboys do not mean better.  But still, these fanboys are us: there are clear trusted reviewers who have seen these 8 and they are well reviewed for a reason. Seeing these girls is much safer than TOFTT.

I believe there is another factor. Frequent punters (or frequent posters anyway) seem to like more services (says my non scientific reading of reviews).  So these girls with multiple positives tend to offer ALL the services that frequent punters like.  I bet that few, if any, of the 250+ reviews of these 8 in 2015 mention that they didn't want DFK, and that OW was fine,  'and after one pop we had a massage and a cuddle'.  Not likely!

Peterpack

  • Guest

vw

  • Guest
I think beyond doubt that's been the case...Shame because i don't doubt these girls are good providers.

Some girls seem to be proactive in getting feedback and very keen on it, ever Polish I book always wants a booking request for the feedback before hand so subliminally they are begging for a UKP review without saying.

Many of them do duos together so one meet can equal 2 or 3 reviews for this group distorting the figures, one thing for sure I will not be going anywhere near all of the above due to perceived friendships/closeness/whatever with cunts like Sylvester/atticus.

Sir Lancealot

  • Guest
External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only
Jennifer Pussy is more impressive with 6 Negatives in 2015 ... proving that we don't read or listen to advice!

Back on topic, these 4 (and add in MichelleI, HazelK, EmilyCB, Lindsay - are these all London too?) are strong candidates for equal best.  Smiths is right that there are other factors, and more reviews by fanboys do not mean better.  But still, these fanboys are us: there are clear trusted reviewers who have seen these 8 and they are well reviewed for a reason. Seeing these girls is much safer than TOFTT.



I was simply looking at number of positive UKP reviews in 2015 which is something tangible and wondering whether this was a fair reflection of what are considered the best London escorts, but as with all things it depends what you are after.

Emily CB has about 12 pos review but seems to have taken a break during the year.
 
Hazel Kitty - 14 pos reviews

Michelle I is primarily Birmingham based so I did not include although she does tour in London quite often.

Elle had about 25 but I think is retired so left off.

Horny Slutty Girl was prob the next highest with 22 pos reviews so clearly becoming a very popular girl and good vfm.

The problem with these well reviewed girls is that that they can get booked weeks in advance so you need to be a well organised punter which is not always possible, or perhaps be their 'regular'. I have tried a number of times to get a booking with Adele4u but never succeeded.

bokkaboy

  • Guest
The figures could also be distorted because of twats like Sylevester / Atticus who try to put people off seeing their favourite girls, because of their EAS and obsessions.

lcb

  • Guest
Is there a way to see the wgs reviews in a table for positive and negatives? Might be good to see who's consistently performing or not

« Last Edit: January 01, 2016, 02:13:48 pm by lcb »

Offline smiths


I was simply looking at number of positive UKP reviews in 2015 which is something tangible and wondering whether this was a fair reflection of what are considered the best London escorts, but as with all things it depends what you are after.

Emily CB has about 12 pos review but seems to have taken a break during the year.
 
Hazel Kitty - 14 pos reviews

Michelle I is primarily Birmingham based so I did not include although she does tour in London quite often.

Elle had about 25 but I think is retired so left off.

Horny Slutty Girl was prob the next highest with 22 pos reviews so clearly becoming a very popular girl and good vfm.

The problem with these well reviewed girls is that that they can get booked weeks in advance so you need to be a well organised punter which is not always possible, or perhaps be their 'regular'. I have tried a number of times to get a booking with Adele4u but never succeeded.

Not all punters including me wish to book a WG weeks in advance either, personally I wouldn't know if I would fancy a punt three weeks next Wednesday so these popular WGs being booked up is great for them but of no use to me.

tonysoprano

  • Guest
Not all punters including me wish to book a WG weeks in advance either, personally I wouldn't know if I would fancy a punt three weeks next Wednesday so these popular WGs being booked up is great for them but of no use to me.

+1

That's a major issue for me as well. I like to punt when I feel like it and not on some sort of schedule.

Offline The_Don


I was simply looking at number of positive UKP reviews in 2015 which is something tangible and wondering whether this was a fair reflection of what are considered the best London escorts, but as with all things it depends what you are after.

Emily CB has about 12 pos review but seems to have taken a break during the year.
 
Hazel Kitty - 14 pos reviews

Michelle I is primarily Birmingham based so I did not include although she does tour in London quite often.

Elle had about 25 but I think is retired so left off.

Horny Slutty Girl was prob the next highest with 22 pos reviews so clearly becoming a very popular girl and good vfm.

The problem with these well reviewed girls is that that they can get booked weeks in advance so you need to be a well organised punter which is not always possible, or perhaps be their 'regular'.


Having punted some of the W/G listed in this thread. Its really subjective, as punters YMMV with any 



But for me, I'm paying for a service. Thus I punt on my terms, that's how and when I like. If a W/G not offering that, I look else where because I'm not willing jump though hoops.




 I have tried a number of times to get a booking with Adele4u but never succeeded.

I've punted a lot Hungarian W/G but as for Adele4u: https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=53915.msg821288#msg821288
« Last Edit: January 01, 2016, 06:24:51 pm by The_Don »

Offline HighlyMotivated

Same - if I can't call a girl on the phone and book on the day then I'm not interested. I like my punting simple and  straight up

Shame because I like the look of Ellie rose. But, I don't want to sit  at work with a boner in my pants anticipating a meet 3 weeks away - I want it now!!!

Offline Silver Birch

I have tried a number of times to get a booking with Adele4u but never succeeded.

I had a few unsuccessful attempts but finally bit the bullet and planned 10 days in advance, making the booking easy to arrange. That timeframe will not suit a lot of guys, but in my opinion Adele4U was worth the wait and I will go through the whole process again in 2016.

Offline claretandblue

No great suprises, it's the eastern Europeans and to a lesser degree the top English girls cleaning up but I guess that's to be expected as they dominate the London area in terms of choice, certainly on awork

It's a pity there are not more decent Asian, Latin and black indies on awork to mix things up a bit

Online Silencio

It's a pity there are not more decent Asian, Latin and black indies on awork to mix things up a bit

I would certainly welcome more 'known to be good' latin WGs.