Karen Worcester

[londin]

External Link/Members Only

Reference: FBSM thread. Karen's massage is highly recommended. Also warned that communication is sometimes difficult.

Appointment: Tried to get an appointment through text messages. Was unsuccessful in the first few attempts. After around a month, got a response back from Karen. 1hr massage was booked. Clear address and direction received through text.

Parking: Free parking in front of the venue. Safe locality.

Day of massage: Reached in time. Pressed the bell, door opened by Karen. Very fit and athletic built, on the slimmer slide. Smiling face, elegantly dressed. Took me to the first floor room with a massage table. There were some questionnaire regarding medical history. Over in no time. Handed over £65. Asked to lie on the couch after getting into my birthday suit

Karen came to the room and started massage in her exquisite bra and panty. I asked whether it was okay to touch her, she said it was okay as long as it was gentle. Problem is, she is never within a very comfortable 'reach'!!

About the massage: Massage is professional and good. You will immediately realise she is good masseur. You are initially on your front, and she starts with your legs. Gradually she moves up to your neck and then she asks you to turn over. If you request her to get the bra and panty off, she will oblige, but only after you turn over and lie on your back.
The front massage is also good. You will enjoy the massage, I hope..I mean, I did. At the end of the massage, she will wank you off.

Looks: As I have already mentioned, she has a good face. Very slim built. Very nicely toned body. She has tattoos at the right places. Clean shaven. Very small boobs, but nice big nipples.

Positives: Very good massage, probably one of the best around. She will the chat exactly the way you want her to. What I mean by that is, she will respond if you start chatting, but she will not bother you if you love silence. Nice, warm behaviour. You are allowed to touch her whereever you want to as long as you are gentle.

Negative: If you are looking for a good Happy Ending, you might be disappointed. She will not touch your balls or your the liitle johny when you are face down. No 'cc swipe' or 'reach under'. And when you turn over and on your back, it is just ordinary wanking. Also, the boobs are almost non-existent, like an old man's chest! Remember, she is charging you £65, whereas, £60 can buy you a decent massage and fantastic HE..just think about someone like Suka.

Will I visit her again: If I am looking for a pure massage experience, yes. But, I usually look for a decent massage with good HE..which she does not provide. Also, the non existent boobs are a big negative for me.

[Magpie12345]

I've been seeing Karen for quite a while now and she certainly will reach under so not sure why she didn't during your session. The other thing I like about going to Karen is that she is happy to give a nice BJ and 69.  Always have a bloody good time and whilst it would be great if her tits were bigger it is not a massive issue for me. As many others have pointed out comms is a problem but I find it best to text in the evening or very early in the morning, you will get a reply eventually!

[bod666]

Bj and 69? You're a very lucky boy (if it's true). That's the first anyone has ever mentioned those kind of extras with Karen. 

[TomR]

The BJ and 69 has been implied before but no-one actually reported experiencing it.

I have seen Karen a few times and whilst the quality of HE improved there was never any
suggestion of anything else. Possible reasons for this have been discussed in a previous thread.

[londin]

Yes..I agree..this is the first time I am hearing someone getting BJ! I would say..I am a little surprised!

[beefton]

I've been seeing Karen for quite a while now and she certainly will reach under so not sure why she didn't during your session. The other thing I like about going to Karen is that she is happy to give a nice BJ and 69.  Always have a bloody good time and whilst it would be great if her tits were bigger it is not a massive issue for me. As many others have pointed out comms is a problem but I find it best to text in the evening or very early in the morning, you will get a reply eventually!

I've seen Karen many times. The massage is good with a hint of a sensual element and lovely HE to finish, but never had a reach under or received a happy ending like that!.
Just wondered does she charge extra, if you're lucky enough to get that type of service, or does it fall within the scope of her £65 special?

[bod666]

I think this is a prime example of don't always believe everything you read on these forums - particularly from posters with few posts to their name. It may be true but I'm taking this with a big pinch of salt.

[Dodo]

I think this is a prime example of don't always believe everything you read on these forums - particularly from posters with few posts to their name. It may be true but I'm taking this with a big pinch of salt.

And I'm taking it with a packet of Saxo

[RedditchJay]

I have seen Karen a few times, amazing massage and booked again in a couple of weeks, never had any touching or HE.... to be honest with this one the massage is so good thats what I go for.

[Oooops]

I've been seeing Karen for quite a while now and she certainly will reach under so not sure why she didn't during your session. The other thing I like about going to Karen is that she is happy to give a nice BJ and 69.  Always have a bloody good time and whilst it would be great if her tits were bigger it is not a massive issue for me. As many others have pointed out comms is a problem but I find it best to text in the evening or very early in the morning, you will get a reply eventually!

I stopped having wet dreams some 40yrs ago 

[John313]

I have seen the lovely Karen a lot now over the past year and I can honestly say I have given her pussy a good licking out but never had a bj managed to cum over her pert little tits a few times hoping for more soon

[bod666]

It's half term this week isn't it? 

[Fishface]

I have seen the lovely Karen a lot now over the past year and I can honestly say I have given her pussy a good licking out but never had a bj managed to cum over her pert little tits a few times hoping for more soon

Well I'm sure the best way to ensure you don't get more soon is to make posts like this!?

Although I doubt the credibility only a fool would post info like this so I think it is a lie.

P.S. look at John313 other two posts especially one about Natalie of Cheltenham having a bloke in women's undies nosh you off for free during one of her sessions.

[londin]

I stopped having wet dreams some 40yrs ago 

+1 

[westmidskev]

+2

[Magpie12345]

I think this is a prime example of don't always believe everything you read on these forums - particularly from posters with few posts to their name. It may be true but I'm taking this with a big pinch of salt.

It's true my friend. Each time I go

[Turtle Z]

I have seen the lovely Karen a lot now over the past year and I can honestly say I have given her pussy a good licking out but never had a bj managed to cum over her pert little tits a few times hoping for more soon

When will punters learn not to post stupid comments like this? It's fairly obvious that this woman is trying to run a legitimate service, at least to the outside world. Do you not understand discretion or have any degree of common sense or are you still a teenager and simply had to brag that you've actually licked a pussy? Even if true, which I doubt, then I hope Karen puts two and two together and refuses your next booking. If she stops offering services then we'll have thoughtless idiots like you to thank.

[Fishface]

Well said Turtle Z.

If, and its a big if, the alleged pussylickers did get that why would they post about it when the most she offers is a massage with HE as in that's what she OFFERS.

More likely those disaffected punters who pushed her beyond her limit and perhaps got banned then set a trap by encouraging other wankers to try it on with her after making unsubstantiated claims on here.

Result one very unhappy provider and lots of angry clients who don't get what they read about.

Sad really how some people are so stupid and fuck things up for a very nice woman and potential good customers.

This is a provider with a public profile that needs to be treated with kid gloves/discretion not some creepy nihilistic misogyny.

[Dellboy]

When will punters learn not to post stupid comments like this? It's fairly obvious that this woman is trying to run a legitimate service, at least to the outside world. Do you not understand discretion or have any degree of common sense or are you still a teenager and simply had to brag that you've actually licked a pussy? Even if true, which I doubt, then I hope Karen puts two and two together and refuses your next booking. If she stops offering services then we'll have thoughtless idiots like you to thank.

+1

[Turtle Z]

Isn't it strange that the two punters claiming to have a 'special' relationship with Karen have contributed fuck all to this site. Both Magpie and John313 have 11 posts between them and zero reviews. John had a post deleted because to be frank it was just fucking creepy, making an unnecessary reference to Karens daughter. They both sound like a couple of fantasist stalkers to me.

[Magpie12345]

I find two things odd - firstly that your views are only valid if you have contributed lots of posts. Since I have been an observer of the forum for quite some time but only started to post very recently that is not surprising is it.

Secondly, I thought the purpose of the forum was share information so I posted what was happening to me. But apprently according to some you shouldn't do that, saying that Karen is running a legit business so don't post honest reviews. Makes reviewing a bit pointless really doesn't it. As to being a fantacist - believe whatever you like.

[londin]

I find two things odd - firstly that your views are only valid if you have contributed lots of posts. Since I have been an observer of the forum for quite some time but only started to post very recently that is not surprising is it.

Secondly, I thought the purpose of the forum was share information so I posted what was happening to me. But apprently according to some you shouldn't do that, saying that Karen is running a legit business so don't post honest reviews. Makes reviewing a bit pointless really doesn't it. As to being a fantacist - believe whatever you like.

I think the point here is not about honest review...it is about the surprise that only one punter could elicit a different level of service...looks like "there was God...and then there were lesser mortals"!! It is simply 'disbelief' from all other punters who have frequented Karen.

[bbois77]

Isn't it strange that the two punters claiming to have a 'special' relationship with Karen have contributed fuck all to this site. Both Magpie and John313 have 11 posts between them and zero reviews. John had a post deleted because to be frank it was just fucking creepy, making an unnecessary reference to Karens daughter. They both sound like a couple of fantasist stalkers to me.

+!

[Turtle Z]

I find two things odd - firstly that your views are only valid if you have contributed lots of posts. Since I have been an observer of the forum for quite some time but only started to post very recently that is not surprising is it.

Secondly, I thought the purpose of the forum was share information so I posted what was happening to me. But apprently according to some you shouldn't do that, saying that Karen is running a legit business so don't post honest reviews. Makes reviewing a bit pointless really doesn't it. As to being a fantacist - believe whatever you like.

Your stupid posts are one of the reasons I started this thread.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=86986.msg1066026#msg1066026

No one is saying don't post honest reviews but if you're smart you can say enough without saying anything specific and also use the PM function. The issue here is that there are obviously some service providers who would not want details of 'extra' services published. Indiscretion or to be frank, outright boasting, does nobody any favours if the lady concerned then chooses to remove those alleged services.

[Dodo]

Your stupid posts are one of the reasons I started this thread.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=86986.msg1066026#msg1066026

No one is saying don't post honest reviews but if you're smart you can say enough without saying anything specific and also use the PM function. The issue here is that there are obviously some service providers who would not want details of 'extra' services published. Indiscretion or to be frank, outright boasting, does nobody any favours if the lady concerned then chooses to remove those alleged services.

Quite honestly I have seen nothing in Magpies posts that are anything other useful info.

I am with him on the disclosure of ones experience for the benefit of us all to whatever level the op chooses. Otherwise we are a step away from asking the WG to vet our intended review. KIV this is a PUNTERS forum. Additionally, if we witheld info from the open forum we would all be inundated with PM's asking for more detail......its happened before.

As far as what Karen does or does not allow, again, I am with Magpie. Of all the girls I see Karen is one who picks and choses what level of service she gives to which particular punter.....i have made comment in the past about what you shall receive may differ and I would not question M's report on what he indulged in.

[Magpie12345]

Your stupid posts are one of the reasons I started this thread.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=86986.msg1066026#msg1066026

No one is saying don't post honest reviews but if you're smart you can say enough without saying anything specific and also use the PM function. The issue here is that there are obviously some service providers who would not want details of 'extra' services published. Indiscretion or to be frank, outright boasting, does nobody any favours if the lady concerned then chooses to remove those alleged services.

So, another two things. 'Your stupid comments...................' Yet you immediately contradict yourself by saying ' no one is saying don't post honest reviews'. Make your mind up, is this an honest forum or not?

As to outright boasting, really? You seem to forget that a service was offered an I paid for it and posted about it. There is nothing grey here, if more than a straighforward massage is offered then others will want to know - the whole point of this forum. You seem to be saying that we shouldnt post about the extras that are sometimes received. That is simply daft. Get a grip on yourself.

[Turtle Z]

So, another two things. 'Your stupid comments...................' Yet you immediately contradict yourself by saying ' no one is saying don't post honest reviews'. Make your mind up, is this an honest forum or not?

As to outright boasting, really? You seem to forget that a service was offered an I paid for it and posted about it. There is nothing grey here, if more than a straighforward massage is offered then others will want to know - the whole point of this forum. You seem to be saying that we shouldnt post about the extras that are sometimes received. That is simply daft. Get a grip on yourself.

No, you are simply daft. There is no contradiction at all, I recently wrote a very honest massage review but did not outline all services because I know the lady concerned would not have wanted me to. Yet everything in my report was true. Why don't you ask Karen if she's happy about your comments and if she thinks they'll be good for business, or even if she'd like you to return based on those comments? You won't because you know the response you'll get and if she stops providing a service to regular happy punters due to indiscrete, unnecessary and probably untrue comments that you got to lick her pussy then we'll have you to thank won't we. If other services were on offer, I'd have simply said that other services were on offer and PM me for details but then I'm not immature enough to want to tell everyone that I got to lick a pussy just to make me feel superior to other punters on here. 

[Turtle Z]

I am with him on the disclosure of ones experience for the benefit of us all to whatever level the op chooses.

And is it for the benefit of us all if Karen chooses to withdraw those extra services?  In the context of what is being being delivered the graphic detail is unnecessary in my view. She delivers 'extra services at her own discretion' is all that is required and the individual can find out for himself without any unrealistic expectations. As I've said previously, Bridget in Wolverhampton was excellent and lots of graphic comments were being posted for the 'benefit of punters' and she retired shortly after due to those comments, which ultimately were to the detriment of the punter. She ran a legitimate shop front and asked a number of punters not to post graphic comments but ultimately its not something she could control.

[wally59]

Spoke to karen friday she is not happy about all the comments on here carry on posting bullshit and dont be suprised if she stops doing HE
and yes i will be seeing her tueday

[Turtle Z]

Spoke to karen friday she is not happy about all the comments on here carry on posting bullshit and dont be suprised if she stops doing HE
and yes i will be seeing her tueday

There you go, I rest my case! I've not even seen Karen yet and I wouldn't be surprised if I don't get the opportunity.

[Magpie12345]

No, you are simply daft. There is no contradiction at all, I recently wrote a very honest massage review but did not outline all services because I know the lady concerned would not have wanted me to. Yet everything in my report was true. Why don't you ask Karen if she's happy about your comments and if she thinks they'll be good for business, or even if she'd like you to return based on those comments? You won't because you know the response you'll get and if she stops providing a service to regular happy punters due to indiscrete, unnecessary and probably untrue comments that you got to lick her pussy then we'll have you to thank won't we. If other services were on offer, I'd have simply said that other services were on offer and PM me for details but then I'm not immature enough to want to tell everyone that I got to lick a pussy just to make me feel superior to other punters on here. 

Get your facts right smart arse John said about licking her pussy out not me.

However, you are barking up the wrong tree saying we should censure our posts. It seems your reviews are obviously not all that they appear.

[Turtle Z]

The other thing I like about going to Karen is that she is happy to give a nice BJ and 69. 

I think I did you idiot unless you don't know what a 69 is? You both actually claimed to have had the pleasure of RO through personally I think you're a couple of bullshitters or the same troll.

Oh, and when you've actually contributed anything but bullshit to this site then you might have the right to claim that genuine reviews are not all they appear to be.

[Magpie12345]

I think I did you idiot unless you don't know what a 69 is? You both actually claimed to have had the pleasure of RO through personally I think you're a couple of bullshitters or the same troll.

Oh, and when you've actually contributed anything but bullshit to this site then you might have the right to claim that genuine reviews are not all they appear to be.

Sorry but I've lost interest in your rantings and abuse.

[Turtle Z]

Sorry but I've lost interest in your rantings and abuse.

You obviously don't know what ranting or abuse is but I suggest placing a booking with Karen under the handle of Magpie12345 to find out. 

[Dodo]

No, you are simply daft. There is no contradiction at all, I recently wrote a very honest massage review but did not outline all services because I know the lady concerned would not have wanted me to. Yet everything in my report was true. Why don't you ask Karen if she's happy about your comments and if she thinks they'll be good for business, or even if she'd like you to return based on those comments? You won't because you know the response you'll get and if she stops providing a service to regular happy punters due to indiscrete, unnecessary and probably untrue comments that you got to lick her pussy then we'll have you to thank won't we. If other services were on offer, I'd have simply said that other services were on offer and PM me for details but then I'm not immature enough to want to tell everyone that I got to lick a pussy just to make me feel superior to other punters on here. 

Fuck me.....what a load of absolute bollocks. I notice you had a full shave from Helena recently.......I think it must have affected your brain.

Yea, lets see if admin will set up a conduit to have our posts vetted and authorised by the girls.

 

And how can you say 'probably untrue' unless you were lying under the massage table ??

And, have a read of your recent review on Patricia......do you think she would like some of your comments ?? Answer, no she wouldn't but that just tough shit because thats why our forum exists.

[Benson50]

For what it's worth, it seems to me that Turtle Z's comments on this thread make total sense.
Isn't there a difference between WGs advertising on AW and massage providers?
Massage providers tend to disclose their real names and locations.
I had thought that the review section was not meant for massage providers and that we were "bending" the site by starting the FBSM threads.

[beefton]

I personally have no problem with information being shared about extras received wether it be true or not, after all that's what this site is about.
My concern is the availability of this information to anyone.
You only have to google "Karen massage worcester" to see a link to view this thread, no username or password required.
Karen has a website and trades under her real name. My mrs knows i see Karen, for a legit massage obviously, god help me if she does a bit of detective work!!.
Im no IT bod but to protect providers and punters alike, is there any way of making this info only available to UKP members, and removing links to google etc??

[Benson50]

I personally have no problem with information being shared about extras received wether it be true or not, after all that's what this site is about.
My concern is the availability of this information to anyone.
You only have to google "Karen massage worcester" to see a link to view this thread, no username or password required.
Karen has a website and trades under her real name. My mrs knows i see Karen, for a legit massage obviously, god help me if she does a bit of detective work!!.
Im no IT bod but to protect providers and punters alike, is there any way of making this info only available to UKP members, and removing links to google etc??

That's a good point but I'm surprised, given that you obviously care so much about your own confidentiality, that you don't extend that concern to Karen who also has a family and a life outside of the massage services. Your position, which Dodo shares, seems to be that when a girl adds extra services to her massage she signs away all rights to confidentiality and a normal family life. This may be ok for girls from abroad who are here for a short while and who may have an assumed name, but it would soon drive everyone else away from FBSM, and we all lose out.

[Dodo]

Benson, it is a punters forum and the members on here should be sharing info related to there experiences.......if they do not wish to and just wish to extract information then that is up to them but for gawds sake lets get away from this over concern for the prossies feelings....have a look at prossienet, they certainly don't give much credit to the punter which is ok, after all its their forum.

Have a shufty at Mikexxlong's comment on the Loyalty thread......he is spot on.

And as for masseurs needing to be treated differently form fs girls.........I can't see much of a difference, they both extract  money from punters for sexual services.

[Benson50]

Dodo, I have enjoyed your posts over a long period and you're obviously an intelligent and decent person so I'm surprised at your being obtuse over this issue, I have outlined the difference between WGs and massage providers (and I'm talking about women like Karen who are running a legit business under their real name) and it is not a subtle difference.
As for the post you refer to - all that talk of snitches and slags undermines whatever point is being made.

[Dodo]

Dodo, I have enjoyed your posts over a long period and you're obviously an intelligent and decent person so I'm surprised at your being obtuse over this issue, I have outlined the difference between WGs and massage providers (and I'm talking about women like Karen who are running a legit business under their real name) and it is not a subtle difference.
As for the post you refer to - all that talk of snitches and slags undermines whatever point is being made.

I guess I felt Magpie was being unfairly critisised without any supporting evidence to contradict what he was saying.
The fact is though, she is not running a legit business for obvious reasons.....you get a whole lot more wonga for wankin a bloke of.
Anyway, lets just beg to differ on good terms .

[Benson50]

I guess I felt Magpie was being unfairly critisised without any supporting evidence to contradict what he was saying.
The fact is though, she is not running a legit business for obvious reasons.....you get a whole lot more wonga for wankin a bloke of.
Anyway, lets just beg to differ on good terms .

I agree.

I should have put "legit". My point is that her livelihood and reputation depend on her "legit" business being perceived as fully legit.

[Turtle Z]

Fuck me.....what a load of absolute bollocks. I notice you had a full shave from Helena recently.......I think it must have affected your brain.

Yea, lets see if admin will set up a conduit to have our posts vetted and authorised by the girls.

 

And how can you say 'probably untrue' unless you were lying under the massage table ??

And, have a read of your recent review on Patricia......do you think she would like some of your comments ?? Answer, no she wouldn't but that just tough shit because thats why our forum exists.

Because I believe very little info posted by new members and because the experience contradicted the vast majority of members who have seen Karen.  As it happens myself and Magpie have discussed the issue by PM and I'm now convinced he's been seeing Karen regularly but that doesn't change my opinion on the key point that you seem to be missing. Yes, this is a punters forum and therefore we hope that posts are in the best interests of punters. For the vast majority of girls openly advertising services then it makes sense to write detailed reviews because far from damaging their business, it will enhance their business. For girls who combine a few extras in with running a legit business then graphic detail on here will do nothing more than cause them to withdraw services or shut up shop, as it did for Bridget from Wolverhampton, but hey, tough shit because thats why out forum exists. How the fuck  does that benefit punters? As you said, we'll agree to differ and move on.

Incidentally, drawing a parallel between a negative review left for a WG with a fake name who is openly offering a full range of sexual services and a girl running a legitimate business under her own name is just fucking ridiculous.

[Dodo]

Turtle, she is not running just a legit business......she is also giving sexual services under the guise of running a legit business so she must accept the money and the risk that goes along with that.

And again, well done to Magpie who you reveal, via PM's with you, has got you believing what he said in his earlier post. And I/we are grateful to Magpie for sharing his experience on this forum.
Its a pity that his words were not taken at face value in the first palce.

[mikexxlong]

Dodo, I have enjoyed your posts over a long period and you're obviously an intelligent and decent person so I'm surprised at your being obtuse over this issue, I have outlined the difference between WGs and massage providers (and I'm talking about women like Karen who are running a legit business under their real name) and it is not a subtle difference.
As for the post you refer to - all that talk of snitches and slags undermines whatever point is being made.

How do those words undermine the points being made?

A turd by any other name would smell just as foul would it not 

Or do you think I should use politically correct, non-offensive words
As not to upset the fluffy cunts & the  pro$$i£’s  that give decent WG’s a bad name, who use this forum for their own agenda’s 

[londin]

All these noise created because of the very unclear and hazy ideas about the 'extras'...probably, consciously created by the service provider! Any publicity is good publicity!

[Benson50]

How do those words undermine the points being made?

A turd by any other name would smell just as foul would it not 

Or do you think I should use politically correct, non-offensive words
As not to upset the fluffy cunts & the  pro$$i£’s  that give decent WG’s a bad name, who use this forum for their own agenda’s 

I didn't pick out the offensive words, just the childish words - I don't think I've heard anyone being accused of snitching since I left school.

[Benson50]

All these noise created because of the very unclear and hazy ideas about the 'extras'...probably, consciously created by the service provider! Any publicity is good publicity!

So, bad publicity is good publicity?

In that case a negative review is as good as a positive review  (because it is publicity and therefore good publicity)

[mikexxlong]

I didn't pick out the offensive words, just the childish words - I don't think I've heard anyone being accused of snitching since I left school.

How about slag 

But regardless it’s hardly an intellectual discussion 

Obscene words used, be they supposedly childish or not; as they are
Descriptive For obscene actions by obscene persons

Besides all that who gives a fuck what words are used as long as it’s true & honest 

[Benson50]

How about slag 

But regardless it’s hardly an intellectual discussion 

Obscene words used, be they supposedly childish or not; as they are
Descriptive For obscene actions by obscene persons

Besides all that who gives a fuck what words are used as long as it’s true & honest 

Maybe you're right but I like to live and let live - there's room enough on this forum for the "fluffies" and the "toughies" as well as the vast majority in between.