This may not be in context and I am sorry.
General rule for the forums anywhere is simple. "forum darlings, studs" stay away or avoid or simply dont cross them. As if you disagree with them or even tickle them the wrong way then people who can ban, like mods and other people will get rid of you. So best to stay way.
Also i feel on this forum few head strong, bosses do exisit but they keep things in context so therefore maybe on this forum is not an issue however elsewere you diagree with someone popular like smiths and you are gone. permernatly gone. i found out the hard way on few gaming and other forums.
if we all keep things in context and dont over sell or over hype one experience V really putting down a working girl beacse of a bad expereince. We must keep the context.
overall i will give this forum 99%. it is very good for eveyone including working girls to SEE why girls get postive reviews to improve there own game.
I'm not sure that positive reviews help prossies improve their game, although they do help them to increase their prices. It is often hard for newbies used to the mentality of AW and prossie-run forums. But UKP's not really a chat club. Newbies can browse and learn and find the best choices. After a few hard knocks they'll be better prepared to write reviews
for punters rather than prossies. If you read the reviews of longer-standing members (who are often critical) you will hopefully find that they express
facts in their reviews: things that can be objectively assessed.
Opinions are best tacked on at the end.
Whereas fluffies write almost 100% opinions, mostly a lot of adjectives and very few facts. Some people are easily satisfied and frankly don't need UKP. It can also take a bit of time to learn to view prossies objectively instead of just feeling wonderful that you've got your end away.
As for disagreeing, while anyone can and should feel free to disagree on politics and all the other rubbish, when it comes to reviews of prossies the forum guidlines are pretty clear and that is, don't post just to undermine another person's reviews. That goes for anyone. But the moderation is very light. If you write a
factual review, with
good and bad points about your experience (less strings of adjectives the better usually!) very few will challenge you. They might write a different review if they've seen her, or question some of the points, but it gioes both ways. Most of the complaints I've seen have involved fluffies expressing vitriol towards a negative review. I expect a rough ride every time I write a negative review, often fluffies popping up out of nowhere, not to write an alternative review, but to defend the prossie in question and get angry with me for saying anything. I also risk being blackballed by prossies over a negative review. Most of those 'punters' are prossies in disguise, or their faithful servants. So the only reason to do it is to warn other punters of what may be (at least in my experience) bad service providers and compliment good service providers. If you feel UKP has helped or benefitted you at all, that is the way I think you can give something back.
