Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.


Author Topic: Message For White Knight Fluffies.  (Read 4282 times)

Offline tonysoprano

I always knew that Unclesweetoldfart was a a fucking wrong'un.

There has definitely been a mini cartel of fluffy fuckwits on here who have attempted to use certain girls to further their own agendas. The sooner every single one of these sad cunts is outed and banned the better.
Banning reason: Troll

Offline smiths

Was checking if that 'Atticus Finch' created a new account after his recent banning, but unusually seems to be using unclesweetheart's account, now banned:


Well I knew unclesnide was WELL dodgy but thanks for checking and discovering this. IMO a big part of the cancer that was trying to destroy UKP is now gone with the banning of these pricks. Merry Christmas. :drinks:


Online Flunt

I wonder how WKs feel when they realise that they have been lied to, manipulated and shown to look complete mugs?

Offline tonysoprano

I wonder how WKs feel when they realise that they have been lied to, manipulated and shown to look complete mugs?

If you mean WG's then in certain cases, i'm pretty sure they are aware of what's going on... :thumbsdown:
Banning reason: Troll

Well I knew unclesnide was WELL dodgy but thanks for checking and discovering this. IMO a big part of the cancer that was trying to destroy UKP is now gone with the banning of these pricks. Merry Christmas. :drinks:

Kudos to you buddy for your tenacity in exposing this "Sweet Heart" every time he posted.

He had form if I'm not mistaken for undermining anyone who challenged the forum darlings
BEFORE the LK love sonnets (thinking of much earlier in the year with that Kavita Lipstick
business and him white knighting her).

I originally thought that Atticus was Uncle's Nephew, as whenever Uncle posted, then shortly
afterwards Atticus would post with his sycophantic ramblings etc. But after what Admin has
exposed think it could be a case of multiple personality disorder syndrome / extreme schizophrenia.


Offline shagbambi

A nice Christmas surprise!

Have felt Sylvester was Atticus Finch for some time.  I have disliked his AF  persona from the start and first thought it may have been our friend Marty but settled on Sylvester.  Thought he was just undercover due to Marty issues.

As for USH, the most loathsome fluffy cunt, good riddance.  Can almost hear him slithering to his punts, leaving a slime trail like some hideous slug.

But all three one and the same now that's a major surprise.

Offline smiths

A nice Christmas surprise!

Have felt Sylvester was Atticus Finch for some time.  I have disliked his AF  persona from the start and first thought it may have been our friend Marty but settled on Sylvester.  Thought he was just undercover due to Marty issues.

As for USH, the most loathsome fluffy cunt, good riddance.  Can almost hear him slithering to his punts, leaving a slime trail like some hideous slug.

But all three one and the same now that's a major surprise.

I don't think snide is the same person as Finch and Sylvester who definitely are, they know each other and I assume snide let finch use his log-in for dodgy reasons. Also IF Lindsay is to be trusted she said they were 2 different punters as she had punted with both. What is the case in my view is they have conspired together to undermine UKP, and probably with others who we will hopefully find out about in the future.
« Last Edit: December 25, 2015, 12:57:56 PM by smiths »

Online Rose_128

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 52
I can also testify they are not the same one person but two individual punters Ush and Sylvester now revealed as Atticus.

As Lindsey stated before, they probably must have shared an account log since Sylvester/Atticus got banned a few days ago.

I can also testify they are not the same one person but two individual punters Ush and Sylvester now revealed as Atticus.

As Lindsey stated before, they probably must have shared an account log since Sylvester/Atticus got banned a few days ago.
Yes very underhand devious individuals, 2 of them to watch not just one !

Offline smiths

Kudos to you buddy for your tenacity in exposing this "Sweet Heart" every time he posted.

He had form if I'm not mistaken for undermining anyone who challenged the forum darlings
BEFORE the LK love sonnets (thinking of much earlier in the year with that Kavita Lipstick
business and him white knighting her).

I originally thought that Atticus was Uncle's Nephew, as whenever Uncle posted, then shortly
afterwards Atticus would post with his sycophantic ramblings etc. But after what Admin has
exposed think it could be a case of multiple personality disorder syndrome / extreme schizophrenia.

Thanks mate. :thumbsup: As I posted above Atticus and Sylvester ARE definitely one and the same, snideheart is linked to them and been caught out by admin. :thumbsup:

Online Rose_128

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 52
I think Admin stopped lurkers for a bit so unless you have an account you cannot see what is going on on the board, at least not for the moment so this might explain the act of sharing but I agree with Lindsey, Ush and Sylvester/ Atticus are two punters, so not one or three.
« Last Edit: December 25, 2015, 01:09:01 PM by Rose_128 »

Thanks mate. :thumbsup: As I posted above Atticus and Sylvester ARE definitely one and the same, snideheart is linked to them and been caught out by admin. :thumbsup:
Hopefully he will borrow a few of the other forum disrupters accounts and we can have a good clean up maybe that beano, quasi or any of the other excessive back slapping brigade !

Offline Lindsey_xxx

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 17
I don't think snide is the same person as Finch and Sylvester who definitely are, they know each other and I assume snide let finch use his log-in for dodgy reasons. Also IF Lindsay is to be trusted she said they were 2 different punters as she had punted with both. What is the case in my view is they have conspired together to undermine UKP, and probably with others who we will hopefully find out about in the future.

I agree that it is difficult to trust anyone and people's words should certainly be taken with caution.
I do not accept bookings from either of these two punters anymore, so I would have no reason to defend them.

This is Admins site, you break his rules, you get banned  :unknown:

Online Rose_128

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 52
It is difficult, booking is a booking and you don't want to get sucked into all this as a WG. You want to remain impartial. What is between punters on here should stay there and girls should not be blamed for getting reviews from even the bad apples because at the end it is business for them, albeit you get to the point of not being able to see someone any longer,as Lindsey says, and I have made my decisions too.

Even IF you still decide to see them it does not mean you agree with their antics on here or approve of it in any way.
« Last Edit: December 25, 2015, 01:25:18 PM by Rose_128 »

It is difficult, booking is a booking and you don't want to get sucked into all this as a WG. You want to remain impartial. What is between punters on here should stay there and girls should not be blamed for getting reviews from even the bad apples because at the end it is business for them, albeit you get to the point of not being able to see someone any longer,as Lindsey says, and I have made my decisions too.

Even IF you still decide to see them it does not mean you agree with their antics on here or approve it in any way.
Money is money after all.

I have said in the past an unclesweetheart review is bad for any escort, orla being a prime example and his missing out the negatives to gain favour like the radio silence could have been mentioned.  Hopefully many ladies will not get caught in the crossfire of shots aimed at twats like that.

A nice Christmas surprise!

Have felt Sylvester was Atticus Finch for some time.  I have disliked his AF  persona from the start and first thought it may have been our friend Marty but settled on Sylvester.  Thought he was just undercover due to Marty issues.

As for USH, the most loathsome fluffy cunt, good riddance.  Can almost hear him slithering to his punts, leaving a slime trail like some hideous slug.

But all three one and the same now that's a major surprise.

Saddo internet trolls with no life sums them up. Doesn't surprise me one bit they do all this devious shit to troll this site.

Narcissistic, sociopathic, insecure, manipulative and anti social. Nothing else could explain their white knighting and fluffy cuntness.

Good riddance but there's still quite a few more of these wankers to clear out from UKP. They are a danger to prossies and a danger to UKP.

Offline tonysoprano

Quote
Even IF you still decide to see them it does not mean you agree with their antics on here or approve of it in any way.

Well as unclesweetoldfart was openly boasting of the punts he had lined up with you over Xmas, i'd sincerely hope you would have the sense to cancel.

If not, then i hope the money is worth compromising your safety and emotional health by dealing with with a devious, lying nut-job like him. Good luck.
Banning reason: Troll

Online Rose_128

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 52
There were no bookings with him since August. I am down with a cold right now anyway so even if anyone wanted to see me I can't work.

Offline smiths

It is difficult, booking is a booking and you don't want to get sucked into all this as a WG. You want to remain impartial. What is between punters on here should stay there and girls should not be blamed for getting reviews from even the bad apples because at the end it is business for them, albeit you get to the point of not being able to see someone any longer,as Lindsey says, and I have made my decisions too.

Even IF you still decide to see them it does not mean you agree with their antics on here or approve of it in any way.

Yes as long as that's ALL it is. Sadly I don't believe that's all it is though, I believe and no I cant prove it that some white knights have been conspiring with some WGs to agree reviews in the hope the WG/s will get more punters off the back of them, and the white knights have been offered something in exchange, free sex for example. My trust in WGs is at an all time low and particularly UKP forum WGs who have punted with these punters, i don't knowingly punt with any thankfully. Now that's not to say ALL these WGs are involved, the problem i have is i don't know who is and who isn't for sure so i have a big question mark over them ALL.

Now for ME as a consequence of that i will no longer be believing the reviews of a number of "punters" i see as linked or tainted by their links/support for those banned. At this point i wont name these punters except The Beano who i think is well dodgy.

Offline shagbambi

Can just see USH's Christmas punt with Rose.  Both on the couch following UKP...

Money is money after all.

I have said in the past an unclesweetheart review is bad for any escort, orla being a prime example and his missing out the negatives to gain favour like the radio silence could have been mentioned.  Hopefully many ladies will not get caught in the crossfire of shots aimed at twats like that.

Possibly true, but also inclined to think of this famous phrase,

"There's no such thing as bad publicity"

"Sweet Heart" has issues along with any of his alter-egos/identities, but believe he was incentivised in writing
up his Mills and Boon style reviews in exchange for significant discounts etc for repeat business.
« Last Edit: December 25, 2015, 01:57:02 PM by laidbackasiandude »

Online Rose_128

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 52
Can just see USH's Christmas punt with Rose.  Both on the couch following UKP...

Not really, Shagbambi, I would prefer to stay away from it but wanted to agree with Lindsey on here to clarify that they are two guys and not one or multiple personalities.


Offline smiths

Possibly true, but also inclined to think of this famous phrase,

"There's no such thing as bad publicity"

"Sweet Heart" has issues along with any of his alter-egos/identities, but believe he was incentivised in writing
up his Mills and Boon style reviews in exchange for significant discounts etc for repeat business.

Totally agree he was incentivised, good word that in some way, i suggested free sex above but it could be something else of course. And how many others have been or are being incentivised i wonder.

Online Rose_128

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 52
Totally agree he was incentivised, good word that in some way, i suggested free sex above but it could be something else of course. And how many others have been or are being incentivised i wonder.

I totally understand, Smiths. I am not defending him but to me specifically, he never asked for any discounts, relationship etc. I have no idea what went on between him and others but from the three bookings in summer we had I never received any requests for discounts, free sex etc. I do offer discounts for repeat bookings to everyone as a little thank you but had anyone pushed for a discount for writing reviews etc.or wanted more I would have shown them the door. Again, I am only speaking for myself.

Offline Lz-129

Tbh, I am fucked if I know what's going on anymore. I just want to fuck the best girls and by and large that's what I've done and I'll hopefully continue to do so.
I've had a great 2015 but it's not been without hiccups on the way (Marty being the worse)
This bitter in fighting hurts everyone but hopefully we can all pull through and get back to what ukp does best
Merry Xmas all. Hope it's a good one


Latest videos on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

Latest images on UKEscorting.com (free site!)