Little Katie 2016

[stevedave]

A newly registered martymcfly. Possibly an imposter?

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=profile;u=65428

Jesus.

Imposter, or someone that just thinks that martymcfly is a cool name (which is would be 99% of the time  )

Who wants to tell him he has picked probably the worst nickname in punting - bagsy not me...

[vw]

Done 

Lies then you were last active after this.

[PLeisure]

A newly registered martymcfly. Possibly an imposter?

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=profile;u=65428

I'll get the popcorn on...... 

[ATMIV]

Lies then you were last active after this.

Yep, found out someone had been banned - wanted to see why

You're not stalking me VW,  are you ? - you're obviously checking my activities 

Anyway found what I was looking for - cheerio

[vw]

Yep, found out someone had been banned - wanted to see why

You're not stalking me VW,  are you ? - you're obviously checking my activities 

Anyway found what I was looking for - cheerio

Not interested either way most people that say that don't mean it.   

Sure I have said so in the past to !   

[GBush]

Errrr guys and girls, Mr President here.

I'm just a punter that likes to pay good looking young women to suck my cock and fuck my brains out. I'm in Bristol 3 or 4 times a month and have punted with some of the locals. Love the accent BTW.

Says in this thread that this LK bird is ugly. Now the president tries to avoid paying to fuck ugly birds so any help would be appreciated.

[yorkshire123]

Errrr guys and girls, Mr President here.

I'm just a punter that likes to pay good looking young women to suck my cock and fuck my brains out. I'm in Bristol 3 or 4 times a month and have punted with some of the locals. Love the accent BTW.

Says in this thread that this LK bird is ugly. Now the president tries to avoid paying to fuck ugly birds so any help would be appreciated.

I'm not going through every post to spot the one you mention nor have I seen her in the flesh but I always thought that Katie's cuteness was never in doubt?

[cueball]

I'm not going through every post to spot the one you mention nor have I seen her in the flesh but I always thought that Katie's cuteness was never in doubt?

I'm with y123 here president, I don't think her looks have ever been in doubt

[vw]

I'm with y123 here president, I don't think her looks have ever been in doubt

The President could ask the vice president to click the link in the original review for him then seek advice from the presidential advisdors as to whether the photos get the presidential seal of approval.

Maybe get the NSA to keep tabs on KT to ensure that these horrible threats stay just that !

[SamLP]

Who did i accuse atticus of being on his first day ?  So similar !  No wonder I was concerned but ip's didnt match.

Similar in regarding their self importance but they are two different people. One was a psycho, the other a sly cat.

[GBush]

The President could ask the vice president to click the link in the original review for him then seek advice from the presidential advisdors as to whether the photos get the presidential seal of approval.

Maybe get the NSA to keep tabs on KT to ensure that these horrible threats stay just that !

I'll put some of the smart  guys at the CIA on it. Seems to be a lot of fuss about one little girlie. 

But heck, what's the "special relationship" worth if we can't help our friends across the ocean.

Thanks for all your help in Iraq guys.

Problem with the French is the just don't have a word for entrepreneur.

Have a nice day now y'all

[cueball]

You've got to hand it to Katie

She makes a cracking comedy thread

 

[stevedave]

You've got to hand it to Katie

She makes a cracking comedy thread

 

Well, her loyal subjects do, at least 

[cueball]

Well, her loyal subjects do, at least 

All hail queen katie and the sun beams that exude from her rusty sheriffs badge

One day, when all the stars align, I too shall bathe in that royal sunshine

Review to follow

C'mon uhu, giddy up 

[PeachyAssFan]

Every time LK is mentioned on UKP it generates a lot of "debate". I am quite intrigued about why she generates such strong emotions and am thinking of trying to see her sometime in 2016. I'm a vanilla sort of guy and when I saw SexyAngelina a few years ago it was very full on and I was very unprepared for what happened. It was enjoyable though (she was known as xxSexyAgelinaxx in those days and before I discovered UKP). I've not seen SA since (I think I ought to given my asian punts over the past year have become 'groundhog day' ). My questions are 'Is  she wasted on someone like me' and 'Would she actually be interested in seeing a vanilla guy"'I would be going into the LK thing with feet firmly on the ground. And they would remain so

[vw]

Every time LK is mentioned on UKP it generates a lot of "debate". I am quite intrigued about why she generates such strong emotions and am thinking of trying to see her sometime in 2016. I'm a vanilla sort of guy and when I saw SexyAngelina a few years ago it was very full on and I was very unprepared for what happened. It was enjoyable though (she was known as xxSexyAgelinaxx in those days and before I discovered UKP). I've not seen SA since (I think I ought to given my asian punts over the past year have become 'groundhog day' ). My questions are 'Is  she wasted on someone like me' and 'Would she actually be interested in seeing a vanilla guy"'I would be going into the LK thing with feet firmly on the ground. And they would remain so

Ask her she is banned here though , and most of her spokes people are banned so you may need to ask her through different channels, if you were that bothered you would notice some vanilla reviews in her list or the same question asked in this review and answered.

[unclesweetheart]

Every time LK is mentioned on UKP it generates a lot of "debate". I am quite intrigued about why she generates such strong emotions and am thinking of trying to see her sometime in 2016. I'm a vanilla sort of guy and when I saw SexyAngelina a few years ago it was very full on and I was very unprepared for what happened. It was enjoyable though (she was known as xxSexyAgelinaxx in those days and before I discovered UKP). I've not seen SA since (I think I ought to given my asian punts over the past year have become 'groundhog day' ). My questions are 'Is  she wasted on someone like me' and 'Would she actually be interested in seeing a vanilla guy"'I would be going into the LK thing with feet firmly on the ground. And they would remain so

Not all of LK's reviews are PSE or BDSMish. And my sessions have been as much GFE as either of those. I believe she's very happy to do either and says so on her website. In my experience she's amazingly good at providing exactly what you want.

[theGOAT]

Thanks for the great review Cape. 

I remember you PM'd me just after her infamous Neg review which I supported. I said "go for it" and I'm glad you did and you had a great time.

Katie is a truly fabulous girl in the bedroom.  Its just getting there that is painful.

Cheers! 

[fitasfuck]

One of the great attributes of an excellent WG (all 'top' escorts, including LK) is giving her best what she can depending on that particular punter's needs & requests. So communication is the key!

LK is so versatile she performs both GFE & hardcore BDSM with equal ease. I have experienced both & each experience was enjoyable. That is why every punter feels special with her. Strictly speaking, 'made to feel very special' by her and she is so natural at it & genuinely enjoys it herself!

[claretandblue]

One of the great attributes of an excellent WG (all 'top' escorts, including LK) is giving her best what she can depending on that particular punter's needs & requests. So communication is the key!

LK is so versatile she performs both GFE & hardcore BDSM with equal ease. I have experienced both & each experience was enjoyable. That is why every punter feels special with her. Strictly speaking, 'made to feel very special' by her and she is so natural at it & genuinely enjoys it herself!

"Every punter"? I have never seen her and have no intention to,but are you including those that she has messed about in your analysis?

[Mr Br1ghts1de]

Glad the OP had a good time.

As separately reviewed here, I had the best and worst times with LK in 2015. For anyone that actually gets to see her, I don't doubt they will have an excellent time.

It's just getting to see her that is the problem. One for the endlessly patient only perhaps.   

What truly disappointed me about her though was the way she turned after my negative on her. Not content with writing pm's to long established members on here trying  to undermine me (which got her banned), she also completely twisted the facts with her subsequent tweets and web postings which were complete fabricated bollocks.

I would never have imagined this of her after my first meeting with her. I hope others do not experience what I did, but she's sadly a nasty piece of work if you have the nerve to Neg her.       

[fitasfuck]

"Every punter"? I have never seen her and have no intention to,but are you including those that she has messed about in your analysis?

Certainly not. I am nobody's advocate, I call it as I see it I am also not denying that some punters may indeed have been messed about and we know that has happened from a review recent history. However it appears a fact that even the messed about punters don't deny in their reviews that they had an excellent time when they did see her! 

Mine was simply a generic point made that very good escorts, including LK 'adjust' to their type of clients ie punters to give them the experience they desire, whether an excellent GFE or BDSM. It certainly helps if 'versatility' is present in the WG's enjoys' arsenal & able to deliver it consistently to a high standard, which LK certainly does. This was the context of the discussion - whether LK who is an excellent sub with punters' hardcore reviews is also good at GFE & hence my response, having experienced both 'flavours' during different punts. That she is extremely difficult to pin down (not literally but metaphorically, lol ) is another matter altogether & not the context of the question.

[The Beano]

Come on Mr B. You and I have a similar taste in girls, and I agree that LK offers our preferred type of experience. I can understand your frustration re booking but she was going through a genuine bad time which may have clouded her judgement. I kept out of the debate at the time because the emotions were raw, but let's not make Katie an object of distain, especially when there are far worse SPs our there.
TB

[fitasfuck]

Come on Mr B. You and I have a similar taste in girls, and I agree that LK offers our preferred type of experience. I can understand your frustration re booking but she was going through a genuine bad time which may have clouded her judgement. I kept out of the debate at the time because the emotions were raw, but let's not make Katie an object of distain, especially when there are far worse SPs our there.
TB

+1

I see your post echoes the point I made in mine. We seem to have posted almost at the same time.

[unclesweetheart]

We've been here, at length, before. No-one is going to change their minds. Everyone's had their say. I don't see any point in going over old ground or bringing old issues up. Smiths probably won't be able to resist giving me another kicking but once that's done can all we move on?

[fitasfuck]

We've been here, at length, before. No-one is going to change their minds. Everyone's had their say. I don't see any point in going over old ground or bringing old issues up. Smiths probably won't be able to resist giving me another kicking but once that's done can all we move on?

I agree. I also think it is disrespectful & unprofessional to the OP's current review thread to reopen old wounds.

[Mr Br1ghts1de]

Come on Mr B. You and I have a similar taste in girls, and I agree that LK offers our preferred type of experience. I can understand your frustration re booking but she was going through a genuine bad time which may have clouded her judgement. I kept out of the debate at the time because the emotions were raw, but let's not make Katie an object of distain, especially when there are far worse SPs our there.
TB

I have no wish to make LK an object of distain but as someone that has experienced the best and worst of LK, I believe I can offer a more objective view on her than most.

I really have no wish whatsoever to re-open my issues with her, but I feel it only right that I point out her negatives as well as her positives to would be punters. 

[smiths]

We've been here, at length, before. No-one is going to change their minds. Everyone's had their say. I don't see any point in going over old ground or bringing old issues up. Smiths probably won't be able to resist giving me another kicking but once that's done can all we move on?

No there wont be any moving on where your concerned you snide. You fluffies trying to close debate down to try to protect your fave WGs WONT prevail on here. Posters are free to post as they wish unless admin says they cant.

[unclesweetheart]

I agree. I also think it is disrespectful & unprofessional to the OP's current review thread to reopen old wounds.

+ 1. Enough already.

[smiths]

I have no wish to make LK an object of distain but as someone that has experienced the best and worst of LK, I believe I can offer a more objective view on her than most.

I really have no wish whatsoever to re-open my issues with her, but I feel it only right that I point out her negatives as well as her positives to would be punters.

You can of course post as you wish, she fucked you about and you posted about it on here, that's what UKP is here for, the fact the fluffies don't like to see any criticism of their fave WGs is tough fucking shit, and will try to close discussion down. It wont work, amazing they still haven't twigged after those two and especially that Finch prick got banned.

I also see an excuse made above as to why she may have fucked you about,  she shouldn't of been working IF she couldn't offer ALL a good service, she didn't so the consequence was your negative review as she deserved which then led to snides dig at you and love letter he called a review, admin didn't and her banning. YOU were just being honest and I for one thank you for that.

[Salt]

You can of course post as you wish, she fucked you about and you posted about it on here, that's what UKP is here for, the fact the fluffies don't like to see any criticism of their fave WGs is tough fucking shit, and will try to close discussion down. It wont work, amazing they still haven't twigged after those two and especially that Finch prick got banned.

I also see an excuse made above as to why she may have fucked you about, as I said above she shouldn't of been working IF she couldn't offer ALL a good service, she didn't so the consequence was your negative review as she deserved which then led to snides dig at you and love letter he called a review, admin didn't and her banning. YOU were just being honest and I for one thank you for that.

Exactly... she did legitimately cancel...

Which led to mr b's negative review..

Then when people tried to point out her positives as well as negatives to would be punters that wasn't allowed

Is no one allowed to praise LK for a good booking?

I wonder if other punters are put off writing her a positive review because they will be labeled "fluffy"

Surely that can't be right.... 

[OldAdmin]

I wonder if other punters are put off writing her a positive review because they will be labeled "fluffy"

Not as bad as punters getting bad service and afraid to write a negative because of her fanclub.

[OldAdmin]

I wonder if other punters are put off writing her a positive review because they will be labeled "fluffy"

Just checked your account, seems you've not posted on anything recently except about her since your unbanning.

You're now in indefinite pre-mod, until you start posting about other matters, no more posts about her allowed from you.

EDIT: Actually had to go back to June to see a post from you that's not about her.

EDIT 2: I doubt you'll have anything to contribute to this site, so no point keeping your account. You'll do the same for another prossie in the future when you move on to your next obsession.

[smiths]

Exactly... she did legitimately cancel...

Which led to mr b's negative review..

Then when people tried to point out her positives as well as negatives to would be punters that wasn't allowed

Is no one allowed to praise LK for a good booking?

I wonder if other punters are put off writing her a positive review because they will be labeled "fluffy"

Surely that can't be right....

She fucked him about as he reported in his review, that's why it was a negative. Punters are free to post whatever review they like as long as its genuine, anyway I see admin has sussed you out.

[vw]

I agree. I also think it is disrespectful & unprofessional to the OP's current review thread to reopen old wounds.

No difference to opening old praise really, history defines people.

If you quote and judge from the nice history its only fair to use the bad parts to learn from to.

In the words of the philosopher Edmund Burke “Those who don't know history are doomed to repeat it.”

[vw]

Yep, found out someone had been banned - wanted to see why

You're not stalking me VW,  are you ? - you're obviously checking my activities 

Anyway found what I was looking for - cheerio

Well fuck you ATMIV , delighted to see you were banned on Christmas day so you have no choice on coming back.  What a great gift to wake up to uncle and you and sylvester all gone.   

[smiths]

Well fuck you ATMIV , delighted to see you were banned on Christmas day so you have no choice on coming back.  What a great gift to wake up to uncle and you and sylvester all gone.   

See reply 122 by The Beano, an attempt to try to give an excuse why LK fucked Mr Brightside about, that "punter" is also a disgrace in my view. And I laid into snide for posting a love letter as a review for LK, The Beano posted a thread on the London regional board as a love letter for Lindsay sometime ago when she was abroad and not even working as a WG which got locked in the end.

[theGOAT]

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Communication - There is no doubt that Katie is hard to book!  Trust me, it took 8 months to get this far!  All sorts of things happened to thwart me, LK's AW profile being taken down, lost emails, lost phone numbers, mother nature, you name it.  But Katie did always get back to me and assure me we would get together.  Even on the day, Katie had problems with her phone but we kept in touch via email and she didn't let me down.  It was a long, long wait and at times I felt like giving up but I am so glad I didn't.

The OP enjoyed his meet but also confirmed she is still hard to book.

[vw]

The OP enjoyed his meet but also confirmed she is still hard to book.

So and your point is ?

[OldAdmin]

So and your point is ?

He's just reminding us of his unhealthy obsession with her.

[Belisknor]

After everything I have read on this lady both good and bad I still really want to meet her and have arranged a booking with her for later this month, her communication has been excellent so far and am looking forward to meeting her    Will let you all know how it goes. On the safe side I have a plan B just in case it falls through.

[pking_paul]

You must have been quick off the mark as I tried on 28th and she was fully booked - looking forward to hearing more, especially if she doesn't push you to a plan B of course 

[Natwest]

I managed to get a booking and can vouch all January was booked up in 30 minutes after she put the dates up at 8pm on the day.

[Roth]

I managed to get a booking and can vouch all January was booked up in 30 minutes after she put the dates up at 8pm on the day.

That'll be the fan club slots then. 

[Natwest]

That'll be the fan club slots then. 

I sent her an email a few days before and that was the first communication. She told me the dates were going up and she wasn't going to allocate in advance but all very friendly. I took a chance and emailed when they showed on her page just after 8pm. Gave a couple of alternatives for days and got one of them. So that was it.

[bfl]

I sent her an email a few days before and that was the first communication. She told me the dates were going up and she wasn't going to allocate in advance but all very friendly. I took a chance and emailed when they showed on her page just after 8pm. Gave a couple of alternatives for days and got one of them. So that was it.

I text her literally 8pm on the dot so managed to get a date. 

[Roth]

I text her literally 8pm on the dot so managed to get a date. 

Date or booking?

[bfl]

Date or booking?

Date, but without dinner or a drink. Just skip to the good stuff 

[vw]

Date, but without dinner or a drink. Just skip to the good stuff 

Hope you will be reviewing  !  I do love a good drama  and a cull of white knights ! 

[smiths]

Date, but without dinner or a drink. Just skip to the good stuff 

So you went on a date with Little Katie and by good stuff I assume you mean you shagged her and all this was off her WG clock as according to you it was a date. So it wasn't a punt, it was a date, is that right?