Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.


Author Topic: PURPLE SITE (AdultWork) REVIEWS  (Read 1338 times)

Offline Kaluuu276

I am not clear about whether this site has genuine reviews?

I had my very first outcall from here and read several good feedbacks and reports.

However, the lady turned out to be a big disappointment on both looks, personality and services.

I see many punters write out full reports so surely not all of them are fake?

I now rely on this forum for future punts.

I am not clear about whether this site has genuine reviews?

I had my very first outcall from here and read several good feedbacks and reports.

However, the lady turned out to be a big disappointment on both looks, personality and services.

I see many punters write out full reports so surely not all of them are fake?

I now rely on this forum for future punts.

I think it's generally agreed on here that AW feedback is a crock of shit .

UKP reports can usually be trusted ,just remember that one punters diamond is another's lump of coal.


Bb

Offline Chuckman

I regard AW reviews as fluffiness central and only take notice when there's a dissenting voice amongst the choir. Stick to the reviews on here and you can't go far wrong.

Offline Jimmyredcab

ALL reviews from ALL sites should be treated with caution, some guys would fuck anything as long as the price was right. 

Offline potato

AW reviews will always be potentially flawed  because a punter leaving a bad review on there is likely to receive retaliatory feedback from the prossie with no right of reply from the punter.  For example the prossie could reply with "he tried to BB me" etc etc.,   For punters that use the AW booking system or those that do Reverse Bookings their feedback is important to them and they wouldn't want it tarnished.   It's totally wrong of  course but that's the way it is.   The chances are that a punter would not leave feedback at all if it he had a bad booking rather than risk retaliation..

UKP reviews don't suffer from that problem but all reviews are still subjective anyway.   No matter how professional the girl is, a punter that looks like Brad Pitt is likely to get a better time than someone that looks like Shrek, it's human nature..

Nawaab46 - welcome to the minefield that is AW. Proceed with caution.

 :hi:

tcm

Offline NelsonH

I joined on here mainly so that I could leave accurate feedback, which you just cannot do on AW.

Offline Sonny Crockett

Don't read purple site reviews.
Banning reason: Troll

Offline yumyum3

Quote
some guys would fuck anything as long as the price was right.
Even if the price isn't right, deluded men will pay extortionate rates with extras and then write a love letter to their courtesan as a review, with a little bit at the end that goes: "treat her well and with respect" etc  :vomit:

Who was the girl? Did she have any reviews on UKP?

Offline tonysoprano

Don't trust any of them. A lot of the profiles are built by pimps with multiple accounts and the feedback is pure bullshit.

You also get a lot of sad cunts trying to carry favour with WG's by posting what amounts to a fake love note to their pretend GF.
Banning reason: Troll

I see the OP title has been changed just for new members you dont have to call it the purple site on here. it fucking annoys the fuck out of me that people still do.

Offline Marmalade

UKP reviews don't suffer from that problem but all reviews are still subjective anyway.   No matter how professional the girl is, a punter that looks like Brad Pitt is likely to get a better time than someone that looks like Shrek, it's human nature..

Subjective yes in the sense that it is just one punter's experience and some punters will get better service (either loking like Brad Pitt or simply finding the prossie in a better mood).

Maybe there are some distinctions. 'Service' is clearly more subjective than 'dress size' and dress size is more of a guess than 'big tits.'

Offline Kaluuu276

AW reviews will always be potentially flawed  because a punter leaving a bad review on there is likely to receive retaliatory feedback from the prossie with no right of reply from the punter.  For example the prossie could reply with "he tried to BB me" etc etc.,   For punters that use the AW booking system or those that do Reverse Bookings their feedback is important to them and they wouldn't want it tarnished.   It's totally wrong of  course but that's the way it is.   The chances are that a punter would not leave feedback at all if it he had a bad booking rather than risk retaliation..

UKP reviews don't suffer from that problem but all reviews are still subjective anyway.   No matter how professional the girl is, a punter that looks like Brad Pitt is likely to get a better time than someone that looks like Shrek, it's human nature..

This makes a lot of sense especially when you need good feedback from the girls to help your own ratings.

I'm not going to name the girl who is no longer in London but she actually made a fake feedback on my time with her.

Will definitely stick with you guys on UKP.

Offline Marmalade

I think it was Jason that did a brilliant post quite a while ago, with a 'reference grid' of attractiveness of known celebs. If you have a scale of 1 to 10 with top film actresses for instance, it is not hard to say that for most people Scarlett Johansson and Jessica Alba would be in or nearer the "ten", than say Sharon Osbourne who would be somewhere lower on the scale, and Kathy Bates a lot lower on the physical attractiveness scale.

When a reviewer describes someone as "utterly beautiful" or "one of the most beautiful women he has ever seen", you have to ask, compared to what??

Sadly no-one took a lot of notice of Jason's guidance grid of beautifulness. Very attractive women, quite unfalrly perhaps, tend to get very well paid civvy jobs and/or rich husands. Most prossies are not in the top ten of physical attractiveness or anywhere near it, but some are at least as nice looking as a few you might shag in a pub given the chance.

ALL reviews from ALL sites should be treated with caution, some guys would fuck anything as long as the price was right.
Ah, you got me down to a T there !                      (or maybe not!)
 :hi: 

More seriously..... to reply to OP....  I have given feedback on AW  and make mine as accurate as i can - so wouldnt say its not worth considering reading feedback there- but treat all with caution - and more generally, as long as you are aware of  limitations /accuracy to feedback there, it can be a guide to the girl, but never take it on its own, try and see reviews on UKP too.....  If I had a shit punt though, i would probably just not give any feedback  on AW - and avoid the WG in future, like a lot of others i suspect.  (I know - that is part of the reason AW feedback is not to be trusted on its own!)
  :)
« Last Edit: December 20, 2015, 02:39:58 PM by hantshagger »

I've had dozens of punts through AW and have learnt over the years that the feedback is, by and large, bullshit.  There's one in particular, I've punted with her recently, she has 190+on AW, almost universal praise, yet it took me to find this site to get a nugget of truth on her.  I wasn't setting impossibly high standards, she was just a fucking shit prossie.

I don't know why guys leave positive feedback on AW for a crappy punt but I get why people are afraid to leave negative feedback, it's the worry of some tramp sullying your profile by making a claim of some sort against you; he tried to bareback me, stole my money, his cock stinks.  I'll hold my hands up and say I'm guilty of that too, I've been afraid to leave negative feedback on a crap punt, preferring to stick her in the shit-list and never visit again.  On here though, it's separate from AW and they have no way of destroying a punter's AW profile with nonsensical feedback.  I won't say I'm happy to bad-mouth a prossie, but I'm more comfortable with my anonymity here to tell the truth.

It's rare to see negative reviews on Adultwork. I've been thinking of seeing Shanice Richards. Her AW reviews all look great, but her reviews here are definitely more mixed.

As others have said, treat *all* reviews with a pinch of salt. As for Shanice, I may go ahead or I may not. But if I do, I'll be aware that it might not all be as rosy as AW implies.

Offline smiths

I am not clear about whether this site has genuine reviews?

I had my very first outcall from here and read several good feedbacks and reports.

However, the lady turned out to be a big disappointment on both looks, personality and services.

I see many punters write out full reports so surely not all of them are fake?

I now rely on this forum for future punts.

I trust NOTHING on A/W unless I know, trust and/or respect the punter. On here its just called A/W, no need to call it the purple site.

Offline Bluefin

So if a punter booked through AW, had a shit punt but didn't want to sabotage his own AW profile, what would be the best advice given that a lot of WGs read these reviews?

some guys would fuck anything as long as the price was right.
Some guys will shag nothing just so they can say the above !!   :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

Many times.   :wackogirl: :wackogirl:

So if a punter booked through AW, had a shit punt but didn't want to sabotage his own AW profile, what would be the best advice given that a lot of WGs read these reviews?

Review her here.  Presumably your AW and UKP usernames aren't the same?

Offline Bluefin

Review her here.  Presumably your AW and UKP usernames aren't the same?

No not the same, but then the review would need to be vague so that she couldnt retaliate on AW.

Offline Marmalade

So if a punter booked through AW, had a shit punt but didn't want to sabotage his own AW profile, what would be the best advice given that a lot of WGs read these reviews?

First off, thank you for your review of Amelia.  :hi: I revisited her profile (her blog certainly stands out).

AW feedback is a frequent concern and people give different answers. It can verge on martydom giving negative reviews/feedback on there. A bit like standing in a department store and loudly telling people at a checkout that the nicely packaged bath soap they're buying actually sucks.

UKP is the place to leave reviews for other punters. I used to think, but what about all the punters that only read AW feedbacks? I think you can't help all the people all the time. People reading UKP are at least making an effort to research, and you don't expose yourself to quite so much hassle generally on here as admin looks out for punters' interests whereas the AW business model is simply to take them into account but not prioritise them.

If I have a good punt I'll maybe leave a few words -- nothing too extravagant -- but a nice-to-be-nice and hope she does the same if I want my own feedback topped up. I think that's good business. If it's not a good punt I'll mostly save any criticisms for a review on UKP. There are punters who disagree, but it's hard enough at times dealing with fluffy whiteknights and trolls on here, without running the gauntlet of prossiedom and lack of punter protections on AW.

If you do leave negative feedback on AW, make sure your own profile there is pretty bulletproof, with great feedback from leading, well-respected current prossies. If some nutter blackballs you then they can make life difficult for you. Go back half a century, maybe picking up a SW down at the dockyard, would you voice your criticisms to her pimp in a dark alley on the way back home? AW isn't quite that bad, but some of the sisterhood that use it are. Your choice!

Offline Roth

some guys would fuck anything as long as the price was right.

I resemble that remark.  :lol: :wacko: :lol:

Some guys will shag nothing just so they can say the above !!   :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:


I could never not shag anything.  :lol: :wacko: :lol:


Latest media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)