Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.


Author Topic: Genuine review integrity  (Read 873 times)

Offline comaminion

Not looking for bitching, genuine question

After the fiasco of agency freebies, discounts

How credible does an individual's reviews become? I'm noticed a new trend on agency websites where website feedback on a girl included a link to their ukp reviews on at least two members (one now banned) using their own ukp name

Now why would they do that, unless trying to play both sides and sweeten their own pot?
Banning reason: White-knighting

Offline Admin

  • Site Owner
Agencies adding links on girl's pages to review sites is not uncommon. It's been done for years.
But most don't link to UKP because they prefer other review sites whos owners pander to agency owners, e.g. removing negative reviews on request as they advertise on his site.
Given UKP's popularity and trust among punters, some agencies may now believe it's beneficial for them to link to positive reviews on UKP.

Offline cueball

If the reviews were nicked off here without the op's permission then I'd still trust his reviews, if he's used his review to curry some kind of favour then he'd lose credibility with me.

Having said that, we've all got our trusted reviewers and others we read, take on board but use with caution.

Not looking for bitching, genuine question

After the fiasco of agency freebies, discounts

How credible does an individual's reviews become? I'm noticed a new trend on agency websites where website feedback on a girl included a link to their ukp reviews on at least two members (one now banned) using their own ukp name

Now why would they do that, unless trying to play both sides and sweeten their own pot?

Why are you bothered Coma.

You never leave the boundaries of Colindale and only see Khloe.

God help if she was to move out of area. Would you move too?

HD  :lol:

Up to me to decide who is credible in life do this with reviews there are reviewers I trust and ones I don't.

Pollution of reviews is bad whether from drinking to much turps and peecicles or money off vouchers from pimps.

Offline yorkshire123

UKP reviews are (were) only one part of my punting due diligence. And depending on who had written them changes the weighting behind them.

I really like the way TCM has total transparency on where he made contact & whether the girl knew beforehand who he is on here, I wish more would do it as for me that then lets me guess whether she has upped her game because of it.

That said even if a percentage were a little iffy they are still better that the tripe I have read on other forums.

As far as I'm concerned I'm the only one who decides who, where & when I punt & if I decide to take a chance on a girl based on a review from an unknown then that's my risk to take with nobody to blame but me if it goes tits up.

 
Banning reason: Making false malicious allegations against admin

Offline Nagilum

That's why its important you take a cross section of the reviews and judge yourself.  If the girl has a single review then I would take the punters word for it, depending on who it is and still go check out the girl.  If its a newbie with he single review then you have room for scepticism and knowledge that you may have to walk upon the visit.

Offline smiths

Not looking for bitching, genuine question

After the fiasco of agency freebies, discounts

How credible does an individual's reviews become? I'm noticed a new trend on agency websites where website feedback on a girl included a link to their ukp reviews on at least two members (one now banned) using their own ukp name

Now why would they do that, unless trying to play both sides and sweeten their own pot?

As admin said its not at all uncommon for some Agencies to link positive reviews off punting sites the pimp thinks will help him or her get more business. Not many link negative reviews though.

As to credibility, in MY eyes credibility has to be earned which takes time and crucially posting about various subjects NOT just being a one trick pony. That's not to say EVERY one trick pony poster is definitely dodgy but it is something that makes me suspicious.

Pimps bribing punters is nothing new sadly, it happened for years on another site I was a member of and any poster including me who dared post anything negative or even questioning about the pimp and/or his WGs got attacked by these "punters". I know from personally speaking to a couple of punters, one 6upxxx is long banned off here but he told me he got a discount off the pimp Divine years ago who ran HOD in London and various brothels in MK including MKE in exchange for positive reviews and defending the pimp on the forum. There is a punter on here who admitted to getting a £10 secret discount off Chloe when she managed MKE owned by Divine, he said he didn't do anything in exchange for this discount. These punters have sold their souls to the pimp as I see it, and nothing they post I just blindly believe. I view it as VERY seriously attempting to undermine the site, on here Divine has been long banned fortunately and unlike that site where the owner was making a packet off Divine out of advertising admin on here doesn't operate like that so has no vested interest.

As I see it white knights who not only blindly defend their fave WG or WGs BUT attack any punter daring to post anything negative about them and these bribed punters are a problem on here but I have confidence admin will deal with them, them being secret might take time to come out of course. The thing to remember in my opinion is these pimps offer a discount or whatever because they want to further their agenda of getting more punters AND doing their best to ensure nothing negative gets posted about them on here. I just hope honest genuine punters tell them to fuck off as I did when GP Parties tried to bribe me on here some years ago. I cant be bought, I hope many on here cant either.

Offline yorkshire123

smiths, if there was a like button I would certainly be pressing it for your post.

This is UKP so a  :thumbsup: will have to do, great post.
Banning reason: Making false malicious allegations against admin

Why are you bothered Coma.
Maybe he cares for his fellow punters unlike the people who worry about bad hookers and pimps feelings.  :hi:

Offline Nagilum

As I see it white knights who not only blindly defend their fave WG or WGs BUT attack any punter daring to post anything negative about them and these bribed punters are a problem on here but I have confidence admin will deal with them, them being secret might take time to come out of course. The thing to remember in my opinion is these pimps offer a discount or whatever because they want to further their agenda of getting more punters AND doing their best to ensure nothing negative gets posted about them on here. I just hope honest genuine punters tell them to fuck off as I did when GP Parties tried to bribe me on here some years ago. I cant be bought, I hope many on here cant either.

+1
Well put

There is another angle to this also.  By succumbing to the bride you are robbing the genuine girls who provide a great service and feeding the rest of us to the vultures.  It's simply selfish.

I think we should all just trust adult work reviews and let that be an end to it. No? Anybody?  :crazy:

Offline comaminion

Why are you bothered Coma.

You never leave the boundaries of Colindale and only see Khloe.

God help if she was to move out of area. Would you move too?

HD  :lol:

 :D

Have a day off I have seen her twice in two months now and if at all again it won't be well into next year

My projected punting radius has grown massively


And if she moved I would move on and maybe even before that

Now back on topic thanks for other replies whether contrasting to the my opinion or not helps build a rounded picture  :thumbsup:

Regular does not = long term nothing its business that's it

I'm not the type to wait for something to no longer be available , when I've had enough that's it
Banning reason: White-knighting

:D

Have a day off I have seen her twice in two months now and if at all again it won't be well into next year

My projected punting radius has grown massively


And if she moved I would move on and maybe even before that

Now back on topic thanks for other replies whether contrasting to the my opinion or not helps build a rounded picture  :thumbsup:

Regular does not = long term nothing its business that's it

I'm not the type to wait for something to no longer be available , when I've had enough that's it
You upset his GF that's why he's on to you !  :rose:

Watch out or the pack leader finch will be sent to get you !    :scare:

Offline comaminion

You upset his GF that's why he's on to you !  :rose:

Watch out or the pack leader finch will be sent to get you !    :scare:

It's okay I'm going to create all them to their avatar or how I would imagine them to be (easier with the sp) in wwe on Xbox

Fluffy battle royal for a booking in the bank with their muumuu gollum
Banning reason: White-knighting

Offline Marmalade

As I see it white knights who not only blindly defend their fave WG or WGs BUT attack any punter daring to post anything negative about them and these bribed punters are a problem on here but I have confidence admin will deal with them, them being secret might take time to come out of course. The thing to remember in my opinion is these pimps offer a discount or whatever because they want to further their agenda of getting more punters AND doing their best to ensure nothing negative gets posted about them on here. I just hope honest genuine punters tell them to fuck off as I did when GP Parties tried to bribe me on here some years ago. I cant be bought, I hope many on here cant either.

To be honest, it really does quite often put me off writing reviews. It's just the time and stupid hassle of answering them. Especially when it gets to multiple threads.

eg
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=79162.0
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=79333.0

Offline Marmalade

This is from UKP wiki:



at https://www.puntingwiki.com/wiki/A_picture-calibrated_scale_of_female_face_beauty_(and_overall_attractiveness)

There's a lot of stuff that comes into review writing and again UKPunting Wiki has some I think useful stuff.
https://www.puntingwiki.com/wiki/Guide_to_UKP_review_writing

I'm not suggesting that everyone gets all mathematical about calculating whether a WG gets a positive neutral or negative, but thought it was posting as a sort of 'reality check'...

This is from UKP wiki:



at https://www.puntingwiki.com/wiki/A_picture-calibrated_scale_of_female_face_beauty_(and_overall_attractiveness)

There's a lot of stuff that comes into review writing and again UKPunting Wiki has some I think useful stuff.
https://www.puntingwiki.com/wiki/Guide_to_UKP_review_writing

I'm not suggesting that everyone gets all mathematical about calculating whether a WG gets a positive neutral or negative, but thought it was posting as a sort of 'reality check'...
All perception really, who made up this bullshit ?

Its calibrated to one persons taste who ever that is or a random shuffle !

Offline Marmalade

I believe it was Jason but I think the idea is worth something if not the selection.

Let's take Charlize Theron, Sharon Osborne, Kathy Bates.

Which would you give positive neutral negative to on looks? I thought so. So would I.  :hi:

I believe it was Jason but I think the idea is worth something if not the selection.

Let's take Charlize Theron, Sharon Osborne, Kathy Bates.

Which would you give positive neutral negative to on looks? I thought so. So would I.  :hi:
Who are they ?  Bloody forcing me to use Google  :rolleyes:  Loaded question really

Yes each punter would need their own chart so people can seen their tastes, if you can be bothered. 

I have 1 rule yes no will never use number scales on such things just not my thing, if anyone wants to see their face never been a problem getting photos for me.

Some people have the need for top trumps reviews, mine are about the service that's what's important to me other retards want measurements for tongue penetration depth during DFK.   Poor little obsessives if they really  want to know send me a tongue penetration measurer.

I for one won't be making my own or using anyone else's scale of perception.  Each to their own, good click bait though for social media.

TCM has total transparency on where he made contact & whether the girl knew beforehand who he is on here

That's why I do it - so punters can make a subjective judgement on it. I'm not afraid to leave less than positive reviews either as happened recently to a girl I contacted via UKE - a forum favourite in the East Mids. The UKE link made me think long and hard because of potential reprisals, but glad that I did so now.

I do wonder whether girls will use UKE as a protection from neg's because punters won't fancy leaving one for exactly the reason above. I, for one, will use the site with care. The impression I get is that most punters seem to think all the girls on there will be brilliant. Not so is what I've learnt in the last week or so. Use it, but don't believe everything that's said. Trust me on that.....

tcm



What does UKE mean? UKE is short for www.UKEscorting.com

Offline comaminion

This is from UKP wiki:



at https://www.puntingwiki.com/wiki/A_picture-calibrated_scale_of_female_face_beauty_(and_overall_attractiveness)

There's a lot of stuff that comes into review writing and again UKPunting Wiki has some I think useful stuff.
https://www.puntingwiki.com/wiki/Guide_to_UKP_review_writing

I'm not suggesting that everyone gets all mathematical about calculating whether a WG gets a positive neutral or negative, but thought it was posting as a sort of 'reality check'...

Wtf is this?


There's at least 8 in the lowest three tiers I would and wouldn't kick any of em out of bed
Banning reason: White-knighting

Offline Marmalade

Wtf is this?


There's at least 8 in the lowest three tiers I would and wouldn't kick any of em out of bed

But do you, or do you not, see the difference between those and 8 in the top three tiers?

I don't agree with all his 'ratings' either but at least he has some.

That is why I always look to see if a punter has a spread of positives and negatives, and if all his women were 'wonderful looking' then I ignore his reviews. They don't have to match my criteria, just indicate that he differentiates. The same could be said for service but is harder to nail down. But many punters get thorough fucked off making a trip to see some 'gorgeous beautiful' prossie only to find she's a bit of a munter!!

But do you, or do you not, see the difference between those and 8 in the top three tiers?

I don't agree with all his 'ratings' either but at least he has some.
Its completely random of course you will agree with some !

Offline Marmalade

Its completely random of course you will agree with some !

Really? I accept that's you're opinion if you think so. Personally I would say that the top tier are better looking than ones in the bottom tier. If I post (what I judge to be reasonably accurate) pictures of prossies I've punted with, and we laid odds I think there would be lots of wildcards but still some would get higher 'marks' for looks than others.

Subjectivity is subjectivity: but to take a more extreme case, catwalk models are selected on a number of criteria, which include certain physical proportions of face and body and lack of unattractive features like warts on their nose. Night shift checkout assistants in Asdas could almost have been selected in the opposite manner.  :D

Are you really trying to tell me VW that all girls are equally attractive??? I don't mean that there won't be someone who will find even a fat old minger attractive: I mean some would not make Page 3.


Latest videos on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

Latest images on UKEscorting.com (free site!)