The "review" is a crock of shit, "not going into details" BUT at the same time covering all of the points she wants to get accross, from the accomodation to her relaxing people, and loads of other waffle, and of course not forgetting to mention her promotions and discount / loyalty card system, she must be fucking desperate if she has to give it away, what does she think she is, Fucking Tesco with her buy one get one free shit.
As for the fluffy white Knights, on another thread in the East Midlands even the pro$$ie they were "protecting" asked them to stop as she knew they were wrong 
James I'll address this to you but also include more generally others with a similar approach. I'll be explicit with you about my position then what you do with that information is up to you.
Firstly, simply calling people White Knights, fluffies, fan boys, or whatever in attempts to disparage or discredit those with views or experiences divergent from yours is lazy and ultimately nonsensical. Furthermore, simply stating your unsubstantiated beliefs does not constitute evidence and you shouldn't be surprised when people question or challenge you.
Secondly, I'll be explicit about my motivation. I've not met Pippa and she doesn't feature in my plans for the first half of 2016 (as far ahead as I plan). So I don't speak on her behalf. I contributed to this thread as, although I'm an experienced punter, I only recently registered on here and felt that the OPs were being maligned without any actual evidence of wrongdoing.
Thirdly, I'm not sure what service you actually believe it is that you're providing, or the reasons you believe that you have special insights, contributions, etc. I've explicitly stated my punting identity (The Celt on AW) and to that extent my punting history, reviews, feedback are openly accessible i.e. I'm open to a degree of scrutiny for anyone wishing to consider my opinions, etc. All of my AW punts (which also include the five I've reviewed on here to date) have been positive (from good to frankly fucking amazing). I've had those positive experiences as I do my research and then carefully consider all related information. I'm an intelligent, discerning, experienced man, and readily capable of independent thought and decision-making. The experiences I've had prove to me that my approach is very effective, and whilst I include others' reviews / feedback in my deliberation I don't need either assistance or intervention from you or anyone else. My open approach to linking my AW identity to UKP also means that others can view the information and opinions I provide and consider what value to place on these when informing their own perspectives and decision-making.
That brings me to fourthly, I've no idea who you are or why I should consider let alone believe the opinions (yes James opinions and not information or evidence) you express. In fact I don't even know whether or not you've ever actually had direct contact and experiences with escorts.
Please don't view this as a personal attack it isn't. However, please don't assume that you're automatically providing or contributing anything of genuine value on here, unless you're prepared to substantiate the "information" and / or present yourself as a credible source.
I'll also leave you to think about what's the worst that could be happening within this review. Even if it's false, is one review likely to influence a prospective punter's decision to see Pippa. I doubt it as there's a range of other information readily available on various sites to inform that decision (and no that's not why she's not on my first half of 2016 HL).
