punters who say they have seen someone and dont do a review

[Marmalade]

Sorry to hear you guys in the NE have been through such shit and hopefully it's been sorted out. Must say I've been completely ignorant of it as it's not my area. There was one arse-licker in Scotland for a while but nothing on the scale mentioned in these links.

They get exposed and dealt with eventually. Until then, each punter has to be aware enough to evaluate the worthiness of any particular reviewer I suppose. 

[sampat]

I have been using this site for about six months and found it very helpful. I have seen four wg,s, (each of them twice) three of whom have been reviewed on here to death, so never added anything as it would have been more of the same. The problem now is if i do a review on number 4 and it is good i will probably get slagged off as a newbie fluffy, and if it is bad as a competitor or worse. Suggestions?

[vw]

I have been using this site for about six months and found it very helpful. I have seen four wg,s, (each of them twice) three of whom have been reviewed on here to death, so never added anything as it would have been more of the same. The problem now is if i do a review on number 4 and it is good i will probably get slagged off as a newbie fluffy, and if it is bad as a competitor or worse. Suggestions?

Just review the good ones you have done really, might seem pointless but builds your credibility in case you have a bad one. 

If you are objective in reviews and honest then you want have a problem.

[The_Don]

I have been using this site for about six months and found it very helpful. I have seen four wg,s, (each of them twice) three of whom have been reviewed on here to death, so never added anything as it would have been more of the same. The problem now is if i do a review on number 4 and it is good i will probably get slagged off as a newbie fluffy, and if it is bad as a competitor or worse. Suggestions?

Every one started some where 

[bronson24]

I have been using this site for about six months and found it very helpful. I have seen four wg,s, (each of them twice) three of whom have been reviewed on here to death, so never added anything as it would have been more of the same. The problem now is if i do a review on number 4 and it is good i will probably get slagged off as a newbie fluffy, and if it is bad as a competitor or worse. Suggestions?

As far as im concerned every review done is a bonus. Even if the wg has been reviewed many times. As services and looks and other things can change over time so it helps everyone to know these things.
 And like virtualwaster just mentioned it will help build up your credibility on here too

[smiths]

I have been using this site for about six months and found it very helpful. I have seen four wg,s, (each of them twice) three of whom have been reviewed on here to death, so never added anything as it would have been more of the same. The problem now is if i do a review on number 4 and it is good i will probably get slagged off as a newbie fluffy, and if it is bad as a competitor or worse. Suggestions?

Sadly some other posters on here think the same. IMO ALL genuine reviews are worthwhile as they are the punters unique experience of the WG. I don't agree with the concept of reviewed to death.

[ollie52]

Just to bring things back to the original topic - In the past I posted lots of reviews under my first user name but then ran into an unexpected problem which caused me to be very careful about posting any reviews. I do however try to add my bit in comments on other reviews if I feel I can add anything of substance. I would also always post something if I had a bad punt as that is why I joined this forum in the first place. Lately it has become a site for punters to slag each other off and has become very boring.

I am a bit similar used to give quite detailed reviews about all my punts but earlier on this year I got recognised (my forum name on here) by an escort from a review I had done about her. This freaked me out a little since then I have scaled back my reviews and when I do write them trying to make sure nothing can identify me also why I will offer generic opinions on girls I have seen if someone asks though such as looks and services but not review her.

[Boob_lover98]

IMO it feels not far short of harassment into writing reviews.  I'll write one if I fucking feel like it and have time.  I've been grateful for others reviews and I've contributed my own but I've seen four girls this last week and I'll be fucked if I'm writing a review for each and every one.

It's not hard for agencies or girls to suss out who you are and for some guys that could cause stress, worry and even panic.

It's good to write reviews and contribute but it shouldn't be an obligation or condition of membership.

It'd just be too onerous to write up every punt and for me would spoil the session if I had the chore of a review every time.  Reviews are best saved for extreme positive of negative experiences IMO.

[Marmalade]

I have been using this site for about six months and found it very helpful. I have seen four wg,s, (each of them twice) three of whom have been reviewed on here to death, so never added anything as it would have been more of the same. The problem now is if i do a review on number 4 and it is good i will probably get slagged off as a newbie fluffy, and if it is bad as a competitor or worse. Suggestions?

Yes. As you've seen/see a large number, review several in a single post, just a paragraph on each, relevant info plus how they rate on your positive/neutral/negative scale. That should give a spread and show that you discriminate (if you do) plus indicate what in your experience are comparative worths of different punts.