punters who say they have seen someone and dont do a review

[bronson24]

ive noticed there seems to be quite a few posts on the NE section recently and before aswell when members have asked for any info about certain girls and there are quite a few who have responded and say yea ive seen her or whatever else but no actual reviews have been written

now without me sounding like a moaning dick and im sure many will agree with what i have put
 

But we are all mean to be helping each other out on here so none of us get stung with bad punts

Now fair enough i understand people are busy in there day to day lifes and don't always have time to write full on reviews, but surely even just a quick review with the essential facts shouldn't take to long to do

[vw]

Most importantly the bad ones, nothing worse than some guy coming on to your review saying yes she was crap when I saw her 2 months ago.

[bronson24]

Most importantly the bad ones, nothing worse than some guy coming on to your review saying yes she was crap when I saw her 2 months ago.

yea exactly, ive seen that happen quite a few times on here

[PlasticGeordie]

I think sometimes people think the girl they have reviewed has so much good feedback that a review may not get much response. I.E the one of Jessamy yesterday that got none (I just did a belated one ! ) One of the reasons I have recently tacked on a review to an existing one on a number of occasions.

I agree the more reviews the better but lets try and respond to the ones we get to encourage more of them.

[Marmalade]

It's also a common prossie technique to sign up as a 'punter' and ask, "has anyone seen..." Adding a link yo their ownnprofile.

[Third Man]

i think if we are honest we have all had punts and not reviewed. Its been said on the main board that sometimes guys keep some to themselves. I think my reviews have little to add at times as im not  a stallion type guy and iv kind of decided that unless there is something bad like really bad attitude or bait and switch ill prob not review but will still respond to questions asked if i have seen a girl. That said im planning a 'left field' punt this week which i will review if it comes off! 

[Reeson69]

i think if we are honest we have all had punts and not reviewed. Its been said on the main board that sometimes guys keep some to themselves. I think my reviews have little to add at times as im not  a stallion type guy and iv kind of decided that unless there is something bad like really bad attitude or bait and switch ill prob not review but will still respond to questions asked if i have seen a girl. That said im planning a 'left field' punt this week which i will review if it comes off!

I'd add that for the likes of myself, who often prefers alternative types of services, I feel uncomfortable in giving a review that's a bit more unconventional than the usual.
I've no hesitation in reporting a terrible punt though or forewarning someone of a dodgy WG.

[Marmalade]

The way I look at it is like this. You get something out of the forum, you put something in. If that's not enough, think of the hard work and unbelievable hassle the founders of this website went through. I think it must have had about four incarnations as Nik battled on to keep it afloat, before handing it over to the present Admin whose technical expertise and dedication has enabled it to grow to Britain's premiere source of reliable punting information. It's still a not-for-profit exercise, so isn't it only decent to chip in?  ...not with cash (which has been offered and refused before) but with something of value that contributes to its mission and ethos, something that helps other punters (fluffies note: bragging about your cock giving some larger-than-life 'wonder-woman', a slag, a 'good seeing to' is no fucking help to punters really, but live-n-learn...). There's no duty to write reviews, but ffs throw a few in occasionally. It's a joint effort, and UKP is what the combined effort of everyone makes it, so you're a bit of a sad bastard if you can't be man enough to step up to the plate occasionally.

[Reeson69]

The way I look at it is like this. You get something out of the forum, you put something in. If that's not enough, think of the hard work and unbelievable hassle the founders of this website went through. I think it must have had about four incarnations as Nik battled on to keep it afloat, before handing it over to the present Admin whose technical expertise and dedication has enabled it to grow to Britain's premiere source of reliable punting information. It's still a not-for-profit exercise, so isn't it only decent to chip in?  ...not with cash (which has been offered and refused before) but with something of value that contributes to its mission and ethos, something that helps other punters (fluffies note: bragging about your cock giving some larger-than-life 'wonder-woman', a slag, a 'good seeing to' is no fucking help to punters really, but live-n-learn...). There's no duty to write reviews, but ffs throw a few in occasionally. It's a joint effort, and UKP is what the combined effort of everyone makes it, so you're a bit of a sad bastard if you can't be man enough to step up to the plate occasionally.

I've got at least two punts lined up over the holidays and will review the conventional one.
The forum's a great pool of knowledge/experience and I wish I was starting out on my punting career again as it would help me avoid all the mistakes of the past when all I had to go on was a telephone number in a newspaper or contact mag.
These young punters have it easy nowadays.  

[vw]

These young punters have it easy nowadays.

They missed an interesting era, wouldn't change it for anything.

[AgedCases]

They missed an interesting era, wouldn't change it for anything.

I'm in my mid-40s and glad that I've resorted to punting at this time. I did try the newspaper ads and contact mags years ago but only ever ran into con artists, none of whom got my money, mind. Never did get an actual shag out of it.

I was planning a punt in the New Year but seems MM2 has put a dampener on it. 

[Bengeo13]

I think Mr Bronson makes a valid point, and I for one have been guilty of not submitting reviews, but mainly I've thought I have nothing to add to previous comments.

Note to self - make more effort!

[bronson24]

I think Mr Bronson makes a valid point, and I for one have been guilty of not submitting reviews, but mainly I've thought I have nothing to add to previous comments.

Note to self - make more effort!

hi bengeo. I dont think theres nothing wrong at all with adding comments to girls who have been reviewed as that's still helpful too for us all, even if they still keep it a short review and say what services the girl offered and didn't as things may change since the original poster last saw her. As it still helps us all out on here

[Marmalade]

hi bengeo. I dont think theres nothing wrong at all with adding comments to girls who have been reviewed as that's still helpful too for us all, even if they still keep it a short review and say what services the girl offered and didn't as things may change since the original poster last saw her. As it still helps us all out on here

+1 If there is a large number of reviews covering both positive and negatives, maybe; but personally I try to write any review before reading everybody else's. Bear in ind that some people (myself included) will discount fluffie reviews even if there are several all saying the same thing. There is usually something new to add, if you think about the punt in the cold light of day, and apply some perspective rather than just getting carried away with how nice it was to empty your sac (and how that made her seem 'wonderful' overall).

There's nothing wrong with enjoying a reasonable punt to the max(!), even if it is wasn't Scarlett Johansson who happened to open the door, immediately feeling such a spark for your ugly beer belly and crooked teeth that she falls in love with you and rushes to give you the blow job that would Emmanuelle blush  ) ... BUT...
afterwards, when getting it in perspective, separate objective facts first and then add a personal vfm -yes/no opinion.

A comparison might be the new Star Wars movie that your kids will doubtless drag you along to:
You get into the spirit of it, feel at least a bit thrilled (if only vicariously), but you don't then insist to the local film buffs that it is the most amazing film ever, definitely "Oscar material!'

One other suggestion/request: please don't base reviews on the vomit-inducing Adultwork format or rating system (it sucks). The three initial categories I want to read about personally are looks, service and venue. Objectively.
This is a punters forum, so we don't write reviews to be "fair" to the prostitute: we rate her factually. If she was just about ok but you weren't thrilled personally and wouldn't go back, (and at that price!) I'd say that is a neutral or a negative, wouldn't you? not a positive (...because "someone else might enjoy her" or "she seemed a nice person and tried hard"). (Who gives a fuck?)

It is your review, your experience, so if she "scraped her teeth on your cock" that is more factually useful than "she is probably a nice girl." If you like fat women, don't use euphemisms like "nicely rounded the way I like it", just say she's be honest and say a bit fat / skinny / very fat. These are factual things, not opinions.

They're only punter reviews, and a review is not a judgement, and is not addressed to her so there is no question of whether it is "polite" to her (save that bit for the punt). Neither is it the Independent on Sunday and none of us write perfect reviews. No-one is held to some fantastical high writing standard, just sincerity and objectivity. I hope I'm not harping on... it probably sounds like it, but I'm just to point out some common problems and I hope it maybe helps. The only type of review that tends to get it in the neck is the fluffie rose-tinted crap. Stop thinking about what she will think and focus on what the next guy will think of your review if you said she was perfect and he thinks she's shit. We're here to help each other, not cosset prossies. Praise the good ones (within reason) and expose the bad ones, bearing in mind that, being prostitutes, most will be somewhere in the middle.

[Sar-Major]

I'm in my mid-40s and glad that I've resorted to punting at this time. I did try the newspaper ads and contact mags years ago but only ever ran into con artists, none of whom got my money, mind. Never did get an actual shag out of it.

I was planning a punt in the New Year but seems MM2 has put a dampener on it. 

Hey A-C,    Why let MM2 put a dampener on your punt, I'm not defending him, BUT who knows how many of his reviews on here were "Right or Wrong"  Go for it, you never know the girlie you want to see may
"Bang like a Belt fed Bazooka" 

He's reviewed many a girlie I want to see, and I'm "FEKIN NOT" letting him spoil my fun. I shall, probably like a lot of others on here see those girlie's, but be extra careful.

 

[smiths]

I think sometimes people think the girl they have reviewed has so much good feedback that a review may not get much response. I.E the one of Jessamy yesterday that got none (I just did a belated one ! ) One of the reasons I have recently tacked on a review to an existing one on a number of occasions.

I agree the more reviews the better but lets try and respond to the ones we get to encourage more of them.

Depends how you measure getting much of a response, if its just by others posting on the thread that's one thing, but the views a review gets is another of course and some or many who have viewed it but not posted might of found it useful. One thing is certain, if a review isn't done its of no use to those reading the forum.

As to just adding to another punters existing review admin requested punters do their own reviews not just add to others. The most often reason I have read for a punter not doing a positive review on here is the WG already had loads, the point for me is yes that's true BUT a review by another punters is his unique experience of the WG and as such is useful in my opinion.

Unless a punter has been stupid and told the WG his real details I see no other reason not to do a negative review on here, the times I have read a negative review and then another punter posts on it saying he experienced the same recently, yet he didn't bother reviewing her, too late for the reviewer.

[smiths]

Hey A-C,    Why let MM2 put a dampener on your punt, I'm not defending him, BUT who knows how many of his reviews on here were "Right or Wrong"  Go for it, you never know the girlie you want to see may
"Bang like a Belt fed Bazooka" 

He's reviewed many a girlie I want to see, and I'm "FEKIN NOT" letting him spoil my fun. I shall, probably like a lot of others on here see those girlie's, but be extra careful.

 

Well admin has been clear, treat all his posts with suspicion and banning reasons, undesirable and untrustworthy. I agree about not letting him put a dampener on though.

[The_Don]

ive noticed there seems to be quite a few posts on the NE section recently and before aswell when members have asked for any info about certain girls and there are quite a few who have responded and say yea ive seen her or whatever else but no actual reviews have been written

now without me sounding like a moaning dick and im sure many will agree with what i have put
 

But we are all mean to be helping each other out on here so none of us get stung with bad punts

Now fair enough i understand people are busy in there day to day lifes and don't always have time to write full on reviews, but surely even just a quick review with the essential facts shouldn't take to long to do

Its up to the punters if they wish to share.

But If all members chose not to share on UKP. It would make a bigger minefield the sites (or places), when trying to punt.

Reviews are a very useful part of UKP and if a W/G has lots. It can only help, paint a picture of what her consistency is like over time.

The more info shared about W/G and locations etc, the better IMO.

[Kev3773]

Its up to the punters if they wish to share.

But If all members chose not to share on UKP. It would make a bigger minefield the sites (or places), when trying to punt.

Reviews are a very useful part of UKP and if a W/G has lots. It can only help, paint a picture of what her consistency is like over time.

The more info shared about W/G and locations etc, the better IMO.

  + 1 

[greychap]

Hey A-C,    Why let MM2 put a dampener on your punt, I'm not defending him, BUT who knows how many of his reviews on here were "Right or Wrong"  Go for it, you never know the girlie you want to see may
"Bang like a Belt fed Bazooka" 

He's reviewed many a girlie I want to see, and I'm "FEKIN NOT" letting him spoil my fun. I shall, probably like a lot of others on here see those girlie's, but be extra careful.

 

He only reviewed a small amount of girls he actually used to see there were loads more he had not reviewed and he saw on a regular basis, I mean he never did any recent reviews for example for Franchesca at Amour but I suppose not much point as he said not all his meets with her were paid she used to some bookings for free and meet up for car meets and there were other girls he had freebies with too so a lot of it did not get reviwed on the forum. He liked to review brand new girls mainly.

[flash1965]

He only reviewed a small amount of girls he actually used to see there were loads more he had not reviewed and he saw on a regular basis, I mean he never did any recent reviews for example for Franchesca at Amour but I suppose not much point as he said not all his meets with her were paid she used to some bookings for free and meet up for car meets and there were other girls he had freebies with too so a lot of it did not get reviwed on the forum. He liked to review brand new girls mainly.

What a surprise you only naming an Amour girl, it like you have grudge against them. If you and him were so close how come you never said anything earlier?

[greychap]

What a surprise you only naming an Amour girl, it like you have grudge against them. If you and him were so close how come you never said anything earlier?

I knew he had seen girls not just Amour girls for free but I had no idea about any barebacking going on and he also mentioned Francesca on his post seeing her for free and car meets he probably mentioned her because she commented on the exposure of him with Dee over on UKE so he probably thought fuck it people should also know I was seeing her sometimes for free he thought she was obviously being 2 faced.

And your right it was not only Amour girls he had seen for free other agency girls plus independents so thanks for letting me point that out.

[flash1965]

 

[johnny34]

He only reviewed a small amount of girls he actually used to see there were loads more he had not reviewed and he saw on a regular basis, I mean he never did any recent reviews for example for Franchesca at Amour but I suppose not much point as he said not all his meets with her were paid she used to some bookings for free and meet up for car meets and there were other girls he had freebies with too so a lot of it did not get reviwed on the forum. He liked to review brand new girls mainly.

He said a lot of things about a lot of things, however his banning reason was 'Undesirable and untrustworthy. Treat all posts by this member with suspicion'. Think it's time to forget about him and move on.

[vw]

What a surprise you only naming an Amour girl, it like you have grudge against them. If you and him were so close how come you never said anything earlier?

What a surprise the pimps pets is defending master, with the grudge line.

[greychap]

And what is it that you wanted me to say earlier regarding him?

Because it seems there was some that already knew about what he was getting up to but said nout, I think it was Flying Blue that decided that admin should know about what he was getting up to so good on FB for blowing the whistle

[flash1965]

What a surprise the pimps pets is defending master, with the grudge line.

Nope, just curious if he was so close with MM2 he never said anything earlier

[smiths]

He said a lot of things about a lot of things, however his banning reason was 'Undesirable and untrustworthy. Treat all posts by this member with suspicion'. Think it's time to forget about him and move on.

Indeed, that kind of banning reason makes the poster a low life in my book so I disregard what they have posted as possibly bollocks, I certainly don't simply believe what they posted is true.

[greychap]

Nope, just curious if he was so close with MM2 he never said anything earlier

No your not curious at all be honest with why you are saying this?

whenever I have said anything negative about Amour/Stacey and being the truth you have trolled and got on my posts before have you not? so this is to do with not liking anything I say and you have taken an instant dislike to me because I exposed something that happened to me via an agency. You are there cheerleader like some others and that is embarrassing going against punters.

[flash1965]

 truth you have trolled and got on my posts before have you not?

No I haven't, I try not to get involved in squabbles

[johnny34]

Indeed, that kind of banning reason makes the poster a low life in my book so I disregard what they have posted as possibly bollocks, I certainly don't simply believe what they posted is true.

+1 Exactly

[vw]

No your not curious at all be honest with why you are saying this?

whenever I have said anything negative about Amour/Stacey and being the truth you have troleed got on my posts before have you not? so this is to do with not liking anything I say and you have taken an instant dislike to me because I exposed something that happened to me.

The guys a pimp pet, probably gets discount or maybe just a suck up with no reward and a natural bum kisser.

the irrational pimp white knighting is ridiculous its not pimp cheerleading camp.

[greychap]

Nope, just curious if he was so close with MM2 he never said anything earlier

And who said I was so close to him, I was grateful when he gave me some support over threats I had over mentioning something negative about the agency.

Obviously I was not that close to him as he was sharing pms with other members who was swapping pms about bare backing WG's and there is no way he would have done that with me as he knew how I felt about that....so maybe take it up with these other members that he was closer with

[greychap]

The guys a pimp pet, probably gets discount or maybe just a suck up with no reward and a natural bum kisser.

the irrational pimp white knighting is ridiculous its not pimp cheerleading camp.

Its very very bad on the north east region, you cant say anything without them getting you, it don't matter if you have had trouble all that matters is there doing there job in defending....but I don't care anymore one time it might have bothered me but not anymore as I have become thick skinned to it and expect it in the NORTH EAST more then anywhere!

[Colston36]

I'd add that for the likes of myself, who often prefers alternative types of services, I feel uncomfortable in giving a review that's a bit more unconventional than the usual.
I've no hesitation in reporting a terrible punt though or forewarning someone of a dodgy WG.

Me too. I find this forum really helpful, but it's a bit intimidating in two ways. First to read about these majestic sexual feats - maybe because I'm bloody old. And second because one or two of the things I like have either been dismissed as disgusting or might be seen as pathetically unadventurous.

[greychap]

The guys a pimp pet, probably gets discount or maybe just a suck up with no reward and a natural bum kisser.

the irrational pimp white knighting is ridiculous its not pimp cheerleading camp.

It is for some, don't forget VW all these agencies/girls know most of the blokes nicknames on here and they get brownie points to dig out any punter that says anything they don't like and will defend there honour.

[vw]

Me too. I find this forum really helpful, but it's a bit intimidating in two ways. First to read about these majestic sexual feats - maybe because I'm bloody old. And second because one or two of the things I like have either been dismissed as disgusting or might be seen as pathetically unadventurous.

Paying for sex is adventurous in the eyes of 99% of the population, your already in the more adventurous class in the real world.

[greychap]

truth you have trolled and got on my posts before have you not?

No I haven't, I try not to get involved in squabbles

Try a bit harder then not to look like you are taking sides with agencies over punters and any girls that are giving him freebies wether from Amour/Allure/Diamonds/Independents then if there was no blackmail involved and just giving him freebies for the sake of it then they are stupid idiots to be giving him free sex and desperate at that!

[smiths]

Its very very bad on the north east region, you cant say anything without them getting you, it don't matter if you have had trouble all that matters is there doing there job in defending....but I don't care anymore one time it might have bothered me but not anymore as I have become thick skinned to it and expect it in the NORTH EAST more then anywhere!

Admin has posted he gets more problems from the North East region than anywhere else on UKP. That's because of how many pimps there are running Agencies and who themselves or using arselickers post on here.

This is the SAME as what used to happen on another punting forum but in that case it was a brothel owner Divine with brothels in London and MK who had the arselickers defending him and attacking any punter who dared post anything negative about one of his WGs. He once posted he lied about his WGs ages and sizes, I replied I don't agree with that and he said he would be honest from that point onwards, he wasn't as I caught him out lying just a while later. Point is I had one of his arselickers who received a secret discount lay into me for posting I didn't agree with him lying about his WGs ages and sizes, then followed a couple more, all on the take, so this shit has happened before sadly, and its VERY unhealthy and bad for honest punters to have it on UKP.

[vw]

This is the SAME as what used to happen on another punting forum but in that case it was a brothel owner Divine with brothels in London and MK who had the arselickers defending him and attacking any punter who dared post anything negative about one of his WGs. He once posted he lied about his WGs ages and sizes, I replied I don't agree with that and he said he would be honest from that point onwards, he wasn't as I caught him out lying just a while later. Point is I had one of his arselickers who received a secret discount lay into me for posting I didn't agree with him lying about his WGs ages and sizes, then followed a couple more, all on the take, so this shit has happened before sadly, and its VERY unhealthy and bad for honest punters to have it on UKP.

The arse liking is phenomenal in the NE, psychologically EAS can be explained but PAS Pimp Attachment Syndrome is beyond the pale, stinks like FIFA.

[smiths]

The arse liking is phenomenal in the NE, psychologically EAS can be explained but PAS Pimp Attachment Syndrome is beyond the pale, stinks like FIFA.

Indeed, I wonder how many are also getting secret discounts for positive reviews and/or positive posts and defending the pimp/s on here. These "punters" have made a choice to cosy up to the pimp and don't hive a shit about genuine punters.

[greychap]

Admin has posted he gets more problems from the North East region than anywhere else on UKP. That's because of how many pimps there are running Agencies and who themselves or using arselickers post on here.

This is the SAME as what used to happen on another punting forum but in that case it was a brothel owner Divine with brothels in London and MK who had the arselickers defending him and attacking any punter who dared post anything negative about one of his WGs. He once posted he lied about his WGs ages and sizes, I replied I don't agree with that and he said he would be honest from that point onwards, he wasn't as I caught him out lying just a while later. Point is I had one of his arselickers who received a secret discount lay into me for posting I didn't agree with him lying about his WGs ages and sizes, then followed a couple more, all on the take, so this shit has happened before sadly, and its VERY unhealthy and bad for honest punters to have it on UKP.

This is true Smiths I have never known anything like it don't see why they need to go after punters that have been wronged why not say nothing....Another punter said he had threats also but wont bring it on the forum because he knows he will get attacked by the fans too and would rather not bother with it all.


Some are just so blinded and brain washed its just so embarrassing

[greychap]

Indeed, I wonder how many are also getting secret discounts for positive reviews and/or positive posts and defending the pimp/s on here. These "punters" have made a choice to cosy up to the pimp and don't hive a shit about genuine punters.

There is many that do get discounts and freebies and also some can get discounts to not use a rival agency and just stay with them too.

[vw]

Indeed, I wonder how many are also getting secret discounts for positive reviews and/or positive posts and defending the pimp/s on here. These "punters" have made a choice to cosy up to the pimp and don't hive a shit about genuine punters.

Have heard lots of rumours and the pimp white knighting matches the rumours.

Some are more sly and try and close down threads on certain pimp empires rather than irrationally defend, you have been clocked PAS sufferers !

[smiths]

This is true Smiths I have never known anything like it don't see why they need to go after punters that have been wronged why not say nothing....Another punter said he had threats also but wont bring it on the forum because he knows he will get attacked by the fans too and would rather not bother with it all.


Some are just so blinded and brain washed its just so embarrassing

They go after them in the hope of stopping any more negative comments and when others see the attacks some get for posting negative comments they hope it will silence those others in the future. Its all planned by the pimp, bribing punters who will accept secret discounts is a good business move by them, really bad for UKP obviously. Divine got away with it for years, he reckoned he got a big percentage of his punters from that forum so offering bribes to a number clearly paid off. What became clear though on that forum was admin on their didn't care as Divine was one who spent a lot advertising on his site giving him a nice little earner. That doesn't happen on here of course so admin will deal with this pricks over time with genuine honest punters help.

[vw]

They go after them in the hope of stopping any more negative comments and when others see the attacks some get for posting negative comments they hope it will silence those others in the future. Its all planned by the pimp, bribing punters who will accept secret discounts is a good business move by them, really bad for UKP obviously. Divine got away with it for years, he reckoned he got a big percentage of his punters from that forum so offering bribes to a number clearly paid off. What became clear though on that forum was admin on their didn't care as Divine was one who spent a lot advertising on his site giving him a nice little earner. That doesn't happen on here of course so admin will deal with this pricks over time with genuine honest punters help.

The agencies would make Sepp Blatter  blush

[greychap]

They go after them in the hope of stopping any more negative comments and when others see the attacks some get for posting negative comments they hope it will silence those others in the future. Its all planned by the pimp, bribing punters who will accept secret discounts is a good business move by them, really bad for UKP obviously. Divine got away with it for years, he reckoned he got a big percentage of his punters from that forum so offering bribes to a number clearly paid off. What became clear though on that forum was admin on their didn't care as Divine was one who spent a lot advertising on his site giving him a nice little earner. That doesn't happen on here of course so admin will deal with this pricks over time with genuine honest punters help.

Yes it does stop some posting anything negative as they get worried with attacks, there is a lot of bribes that go on and I mean a lot and it does pay off for them to do this, but me I would rather have my pride then be manipulated in this way.

[GeordieBadass]

ive noticed there seems to be quite a few posts on the NE section recently and before aswell when members have asked for any info about certain girls and there are quite a few who have responded and say yea ive seen her or whatever else but no actual reviews have been written

now without me sounding like a moaning dick and im sure many will agree with what i have put
 

But we are all mean to be helping each other out on here so none of us get stung with bad punts

Now fair enough i understand people are busy in there day to day lifes and don't always have time to write full on reviews, but surely even just a quick review with the essential facts shouldn't take to long to do

Just to bring things back to the original topic - In the past I posted lots of reviews under my first user name but then ran into an unexpected problem which caused me to be very careful about posting any reviews. I do however try to add my bit in comments on other reviews if I feel I can add anything of substance. I would also always post something if I had a bad punt as that is why I joined this forum in the first place. Lately it has become a site for punters to slag each other off and has become very boring.

[greychap]

Just to bring things back to the original topic - In the past I posted lots of reviews under my first user name but then ran into an unexpected problem which caused me to be very careful about posting any reviews. I do however try to add my bit in comments on other reviews if I feel I can add anything of substance. I would also always post something if I had a bad punt as that is why I joined this forum in the first place. Lately it has become a site for punters to slag each other off and has become very boring.

It is boring your right there and it would not happen from my end if I did not get certain people having a dig at me first over something that happened to me that they feel I should never mention again or have a problem with....but that is just the way it is up the North East.

[vw]

Just to bring things back to the original topic - In the past I posted lots of reviews under my first user name but then ran into an unexpected problem which caused me to be very careful about posting any reviews. I do however try to add my bit in comments on other reviews if I feel I can add anything of substance. I would also always post something if I had a bad punt as that is why I joined this forum in the first place. Lately it has become a site for punters to slag each other off and has become very boring.

this is what seems to happen when you cross them

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=45445.msg602317#msg602317