hi bengeo. I dont think theres nothing wrong at all with adding comments to girls who have been reviewed as that's still helpful too for us all, even if they still keep it a short review and say what services the girl offered and didn't as things may change since the original poster last saw her. As it still helps us all out on here
+1 If there is a large number of reviews covering both positive and negatives, maybe; but personally I try to write any review before reading everybody else's. Bear in ind that some people (myself included) will discount fluffie reviews even if there are several all saying the same thing. There is usually something
new to add, if you think about the punt in the cold light of day,
and apply some perspective rather than just getting carried away with how nice it was to empty your sac (and how that made her seem 'wonderful' overall).
There's nothing wrong with enjoying a reasonable punt to the max(!), even if it is wasn't Scarlett Johansson who happened to open the door,
immediately feeling such a spark for your ugly beer belly and crooked teeth that she falls in love with you and rushes to give you the blow job that would Emmanuelle blush
) ... BUT...
afterwards, when getting it in perspective, separate objective facts first and then add a personal vfm -yes/no opinion.
A comparison might be the new Star Wars movie that your kids will doubtless drag you along to:
You get into the spirit of it, feel at least a bit thrilled (if only vicariously), but you don't then insist to the local film buffs that it is the most amazing film ever, definitely "Oscar material!'
One other suggestion/request: please don't base reviews on the vomit-inducing Adultwork format or rating system (it sucks). The three initial categories I want to read about personally are looks, service
This is a punters forum, so we don't write reviews to be "fair" to the prostitute: we rate her factually. If she was just about ok but you weren't thrilled personally and wouldn't go back, (and at that price!) I'd say that is a neutral or a negative, wouldn't you? not a positive (...because "someone else might enjoy her" or "she seemed a nice person and tried hard").
(Who gives a fuck?)
It is your
review, your experience, so if she "scraped her teeth on your cock" that is more factually useful than "she is probably a nice girl." If you like fat women, don't use euphemisms like "nicely rounded the way I like it", just say she's be honest and say a bit fat / skinny / very fat. These are factual things, not opinions.
They're only punter reviews, and a review is not a judgement, and is not addressed to her so there is no question of whether it is "polite" to her
(save that bit for the punt). Neither is it the Independent on Sunday
and none of us write perfect reviews. No-one is held to some fantastical high writing standard, just sincerity and objectivity. I hope I'm not harping on... it probably sounds like it, but I'm just to point out some common problems and I hope it maybe helps. The only type of review that tends to get it in the neck is the fluffie rose-tinted crap. Stop thinking about what she will think and focus on what the next guy will think of your review if you said she was perfect and he thinks she's shit. We're here to help each other, not cosset prossies. Praise the good ones (within reason)
and expose the bad ones, bearing in mind that, being prostitutes, most will be somewhere in the middle.