Personally, I always read whatever anyone has to say in life and try and be as receptive as possible rather than as negative as can be. I genuinely believe my comments have been reasonable, I can't change the fact that all my experiences with Paris have been good in the past, as they have always been good. I acknowledged that she made a serious error, haven't we all sometimes. I doubt many of us can honestly say that we've never treated an escort with lack of respect either in communication or whilst seeing them. I'm a decent bloke but I've made plenty of errors of judgement myself.
I have actually spoken to Paris and I've sent a message to the bloke who rightly complained about her. He's yet to read the message. I hope he ends up contacting her. The 2 profiles that someone referred to in the thread are both not both hers. Her correct account in Miss Paris, she even explains that she had her profiled hacked which AW are addressing. That's why her current account is dated 1st December as she deleted the previous one when it was hacked. The hacked account is known as Prettykinky21 with allocation of Doncaster which has the same content but no photos but has all of Paris' own feedback.
I think you're missing the point of reviews here. One major point is we get to know timewasting, lying and cheating WG's and those that provide crap service. If service is shit, we need to say so, not just say positive things only.
So you have:
1.Made excuses for her "error".
2.Called this WG about the negative review.
3.Messaged the reviewer on behalf of the WG asking him to contact her.
4.Checked several times whether he has read your message.
5.Found out the issues regarding her AW accounts.
6.Found out what her hacked account was and what is on that account.
7.Made several posts regarding the all of the above issues and praising her to high heaven.
Bloody hell, just as well you're not defending her.
Tell me is she your missus or something?