Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: EnglishRebecca121 / poppy69 (Thread split)  (Read 3547 times)

Lz-129

  • Guest
Im actually shocked at lz! feel free to show twitter messages ive nothing to hide!
im saying no more on the matter some people just have it in for others

sorry benny for your review now being such a crap one

Can't see why your shocked! I've ticked you of numerous times when you brought up about me seeing Katie.
You went ahead and reported salt for lying but as you said similar to me what was I supposed to do, nothing? Are you going to report me for lying too?

Offline Roth

OK but what about the answer to my question? :unknown:  You have over 9500 posts but no reviews?   :unknown: Why's that? :unknown: :unknown:


And silence?  Wonder why?  :unknown:  Haven't got time to read the 9500 posts but has he ever punted can someone tell me please?  :unknown:  Just curious.  :hi:
« Last Edit: December 07, 2015, 11:36:12 pm by Roth »

unclesweetheart

  • Guest
Can't see why your shocked! I've ticked you of numerous times when you brought up about me seeing Katie.
You went ahead and reported salt for lying but as you said similar to me what was I supposed to do, nothing? Are you going to report me for lying too?

Any businesswoman will try to convince you that her services are superior to another's. It's a market and the girls are in competition for punters. In my experience the classier and more successful ones tend to do this by example:I don't have to tell you I'm better, because you can feel that I am. When the comparisons are made explicit and spoken about to the punter - it's less persuasive.

Offline Roth

Any businesswoman will try to convince you that her services are superior to another's. It's a market and the girls are in competition for punters. In my experience the classier and more successful ones tend to do this by example:I don't have to tell you I'm better, because you can feel that I am. When the comparisons are made explicit and spoken about to the punter - it's less persuasive.

So let the market forces run. :hi:

Offline EnglishRebecca121

  • Banned
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 3,924
  • Likes: 0
if im unclassy prehaps the lk followers may want to read her twitter , slagging me off on there so her fan boys can slag me off! i have suggested she unfollows me if she has an issue .
Banned reason: Ex sex worker with zero useful contribution to make
Banned by: Head1

Online RedKettle


And silence?  Wonder why?  :unknown:  Haven't got time to read the 9500 posts but has he ever punted can someone tell me please?  :unknown:  Just curious.  :hi:

admin did say once that james was a proven punter.  not sure why no reviews

Salt

  • Guest
if im unclassy prehaps the lk followers may want to read her twitter , slagging me off on there so her fan boys can slag me off! i have suggested she unfollows me if she has an issue .



Hidden Image/Members Only




Doesn't look like she's slagging you off at all...

You are twisting her words...




Offline Roth

Who gives a fuck which prossie bitches about which other prossies.   :angry: :angry:

You go to fuck em not treat em as friends. :dash: :dash:  I'm sure some cunt-struck punters pass on the bitchy comments in an attempt to get favours during their punt but there just making themselves as bitchy as the prossie what started it in the first place. :dash:

Seem to be into prossie-baiting now which detracts from the point of the review.  :dash: Presumably being done so as to get the prossie in question to say something stupid enough to get her banned.  :unknown: Bit like the LK posts recently. :unknown:

Time to break out a tinnie and get the popcorn ...... :lol: :lol:

« Last Edit: December 08, 2015, 02:57:43 am by Roth »

Offline Roth

admin did say once that james was a proven punter.  not sure why no reviews

Fair enough but wonder why so many posts and not even a single review? :unknown:

Lz-129

  • Guest
You go to fuck em not treat em as friends. :dash: :dash:  I'm sure some cunt-struck punters pass on the bitchy comments in an attempt to get favours during their punt but there just making themselves as bitchy as the prossie what started it in the first place. :dash:


I'll say this, Rebecca is a good punt, I've never denied that and I enjoyed my time with her. It was just the afters. It wasn't so much slagging anyone of but having a pop at me for having the audacity to see someone else that really pissed me off. I was kinda hoping my little rant on a review would of stopped it but no another dig turned up in my inbox around an hour after another review.
After a 3rd time I lost my rag with her and bit back.

vw

  • Guest
I should post a review more often, this is better than Hollyoaks!
Cheers for your review Benny, obviously better than hollyoaks  look at the cast. 

You should pop by  more often !

GBush

  • Guest
Now there's me coming to Bristol this week and looking for a good old fashioned punt.


WTF

vw

  • Guest
Now there's me coming to Bristol this week and looking for a good old fashioned punt.


WTF
No such thing as an old fashioned punt, it is crowd punting where you get to know all the other ex partners first.

GBush

  • Guest

Cornish sub

  • Guest
Sorry to go off topic here (though it's about English Rebecca, so sort of on topic), but isn't it a UKP rule that escort members on here must use their working name as their user name? I'm referring to Rebecca using Boo Boo as her user name on here. Not having a go at her for it or anything, just curious.

vw

  • Guest
Sorry to go off topic here (though it's about English Rebecca, so sort of on topic), but isn't it a UKP rule that escort members on here must use their working name as their user name? I'm referring to Rebecca using Boo Boo as her user name on here. Not having a go at her for it or anything, just curious.
Yes but she was banned and allowed bask a boo boo bear, yogis sister.   :lol: :lol:

Blame McFly incident !   :scare: :scare: :scare: :scare:

Offline SmokeEater

Sorry to go off topic here (though it's about English Rebecca, so sort of on topic), but isn't it a UKP rule that escort members on here must use their working name as their user name? I'm referring to Rebecca using Boo Boo as her user name on here. Not having a go at her for it or anything, just curious.
No idea!!   But I quite like the idea of escorts on here ☺

vw

  • Guest
No idea!!   But I quite like the idea of escorts on here ☺
Why they have UKescorting now and anyone can join and like the idea.

I cringe when have been thanked on reviews before by WG's.

Offline poppy69

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 54
  • Likes: 0
Sorry to go off topic here (though it's about English Rebecca, so sort of on topic), but isn't it a UKP rule that escort members on here must use their working name as their user name? I'm referring to Rebecca using Boo Boo as her user name on here. Not having a go at her for it or anything, just curious.
iv never been told to use my aw name?

vw

  • Guest
iv never been told to use my aw name?
Hi poppy

The Site rules state you must reveal your working identity !

- Service Providers

This site allows service providers to be members, but there is zero tolerance for touting, flirting, attention-seeking and negative attitude towards punters. Service providers must respect the ethos of the site. This site is not a chat platform between clients and service providers, nor is it a support site for service providers. All service providers must reveal their working identities - no 'anonymous WGs'. Transsexual service providers may be members, but not male service providers.


https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=1.0

James999

  • Guest
iv never been told to use my aw name?

Perhaps you're boring and no ones noticed you  :unknown:

What's your AW name?
« Last Edit: December 08, 2015, 06:45:07 pm by James999 »

vw

  • Guest
Perhaps you're boring and no ones noticed you  :unknown:

What's your AW name?
Bit of digging she is poppy at central feet ????

External Link/Members Only

James999

  • Guest
Bit of digging she is poppy at central feet ????

External Link/Members Only

Pretty shit profile  :thumbsdown:

Stats imply she should be fit, so why not show it  :unknown:

Offline Sonny Crockett

Quote
- Service Providers
This site allows service providers to be members, but there is zero tolerance for touting, flirting, attention-seeking and negative attitude towards punters. Service providers must respect the ethos of the site. This site is not a chat platform between clients and service providers, nor is it a support site for service providers. All service providers must reveal their working identities - no 'anonymous WGs'. Transsexual service providers may be members, but not male service providers.

Offline Johny Stone

Pretty shit profile  :thumbsdown:

Stats imply she should be fit, so why not show it  :unknown:

Shit profile and thick  prossie  :D

Town:    Center
County:    Bristol
Region:    South West

I bet her phone is dusty  :lol:

James999

  • Guest

Offline mattylondon

Pretty shit profile  :thumbsdown:

Stats imply she should be fit, so why not show it  :unknown:
A pretty odd profile? Displays that she offers 'bareback', when in reality she doesn't, as she wears a female condom? Not really bareback then is it?!  :crazy:

I think you were correct the first time. She's just fucking boring and nobody cares what she calls herself!  :crazy:

A nice bit of sleuthing from virtualwaster though.  :hi:
« Last Edit: December 08, 2015, 09:32:29 pm by mattylondon »

guy_of_fifty

  • Guest
And a barebacker  :thumbsdown:

I see you're back James.

Care to answer Roth's question. Why no reviews???

vw

  • Guest
Always lovely to see you too, darling. Your witticisms would be even more cutting if you could get the spelling right, though. It's "absinthe". And there's no need for a capital letter. Otherwise: classy post.
You need more discretion when arranging good reviews mate, discounts ?  How many of your fairy tales went this way ? Why no negatives because you in effect are paid to review here by accepting radio silence or as you would call it being a character of superior etiquette.

External Link/Members Only

Offline mattylondon

You need more discretion when arranging good reviews mate, discounts ?  How many of your fairy tales went this way ? Why no negatives because you in effect are paid to review here by accepting radio silence or as you would call it being a character of superior etiquette.

External Link/Members Only
Ah yes. Fluffies are so sweet.  :D

And they also tend to be the biggest boundary pushers and nuisances to prossies, from what I've been told by several prossies on forums. Essentially tracking a prossies' movements concerning when she logs in and out of a website or a forum is definitely a bit creepy. What a sad life he must lead.

I'm sure that the prossies concerned are laughing through their teeth, whilst gladly taking all that cash! I wonder what sort of discounts a punter receives for writing such warm reviews?

I think most would treat any such reviews with caution.
« Last Edit: December 08, 2015, 09:46:20 pm by mattylondon »


Offline Roth

You need more discretion when arranging good reviews mate, discounts ?  How many of your fairy tales went this way ? Why no negatives because you in effect are paid to review here by accepting radio silence or as you would call it being a character of superior etiquette.

External Link/Members Only

Getting paid to review a prossie? If that's the case it makes a mockery of the independent UKP review system surely?  :unknown:

Offline mattylondon

Evidence?   :unknown:
Do you realise how many prossies will fuck without a rubber for a favoured punter or the right price? How would a punter know who a prossie fucks bareback in her private life and who those guys fuck?

What two consenting adults want to do is their business, surely? Not my bag but it's up to the individual.

However, this girl has published bareback on her Adultwork profile.

And then she qualified that by stating that she wears a 'female condom', which would suggest it's not on offer.

If I was to take an educated guess and it's purely gut instinct, looking at her rates and what she looks like, I'm certain that it's on offer for the 'right punter' or price. I cannot prove it, of course. It's just a gut feeling, which will obviously never be admitted by her on here.

Very good rates though and a half decent body on her, even if she's boring as fuck!
« Last Edit: December 08, 2015, 10:36:12 pm by mattylondon »

James999

  • Guest

Offline Roth

Do you realise how many prossies will fuck without a rubber for a favoured punter or the right price? How would a punter know who a prossie fucks bareback in her private life and who those guys fuck?

What two consenting adults want to do is their business, surely? Not my bag but it's up to the individual.

However, this girl has published bareback on her Adultwork profile, has she not?

And then she qualified that by stating that she wears a 'female condom'

If I was to take an educated guess and it's purely gut instinct, looking at her rates and what she looks like, I'm certain that it's on offer for the 'right punter' or price. I cannot prove it, of course. It's just a gut feeling, which will obviously never be admitted by her on here.

Bareback = skin to skin with no protection

Female condom = protection

Misuse of the word Bareback.  She in fact says she will protect herself.  :thumbsup:

You have a theory she offers true bareback based on her prices but no proof? Make it up why don't you?   Sounds like bollocks to me. :dash:

Oh and I've never seen her either.  :hi:

Offline Roth

It clearly states bareback on her profile  :dash:

See me previous post.  :dash: Btw why no reviews ever?  :unknown:

Offline mattylondon

Bareback = skin to skin with no protection

Female condom = protection

Misuse of the word Bareback.  She in fact says she will protect herself.  :thumbsup:

You have a theory she offers true bareback based on her prices but no proof? Make it up why don't you?   Sounds like bollocks to me. :dash:

Oh and I've never seen her either.  :hi:
Well, you're entitled to your own opinion, even though she's actually ticked the bareback box!   :rolleyes:

Let's put it this way and I'll explain things very slowly for you... if a woman wants to wear a female condom, all she would need to do is state that in her profile blurb. And I have seen some who did just that. What they've never done, in my experience in using Adultwork for years, is tick the bareback or unprotected sex box.

And yes, I'm basing it on her rates and my opinion that whilst slim, she looks a little skanky to me. I wouldn't be surprised if she was an ex street prossie and Bristol is full of them. I have no evidence, of course. It's simply an opinion.  :hi:
« Last Edit: December 08, 2015, 10:44:44 pm by mattylondon »

Offline Roth

Well, you're entitled to your own opinion, even though she's actually ticked the bareback box!   :rolleyes:

Let's put it this way and I'll explain things very slowly for you... if a woman wants to wear a female condom, all she would need to do is state that in her profile blurb. And I have seen some who did just that. What they've never done, in my experience in using Adultwork for years, is tick the bareback or unprotected sex box.

And yes, I'm basing it on her rates and my opinion that whilst slim, she looks a little skanky to me. I wouldn't be surprised if she was an ex street prossie and Bristol is full of them. I have no evidence, of course. It's simply an opinion.  :hi:

Cheers for that.  :hi:

unclesweetheart

  • Guest
You need more discretion when arranging good reviews mate, discounts ?  How many of your fairy tales went this way ? Why no negatives because you in effect are paid to review here by accepting radio silence or as you would call it being a character of superior etiquette.

External Link/Members Only

I have nbo idea what this means.

GBush

  • Guest
Ok, so I've just come back to this thread and Bare Backer has been mentioned.

Who is the bare backer?

Offline EnglishRebecca121

  • Banned
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 3,924
  • Likes: 0
Banned reason: Ex sex worker with zero useful contribution to make
Banned by: Head1

tonibell99

  • Guest
Ok, so I've just come back to this thread and Bare Backer has been mentioned.

Who is the bare backer?

Thread has moved on to some girl called Poppy  :unknown:

GBush

  • Guest
Ok. I was concerned. Especially with the drama in the North East.

ATMIV

  • Guest
Confused.com

Can someone enlighten me please.

Why do we have a thread talking about 2 different and unrelated escorts?

Have I missed summat?

vw

  • Guest
Confused.com

Can someone enlighten me please.

Why do we have a thread talking about 2 different and unrelated escorts?

Have I missed summat?
Yes was part of a review that went off topic when poppy joined and james found out she has bareback on her profile and review comments went that way.  Not the sort of stuff for a review about someone else really so admin spit this from the rest off the review.

Hope that makes a bit of sense.

ATMIV

  • Guest
Yes thanks :hi:

Seen many threads go way off topic but I think this is the first time I've seen a split topic

vw

  • Guest
Yes thanks :hi:

Seen many threads go way off topic but I think this is the first time I've seen a split topic
Its like blackjack at the casino, sometimes a good move.

Offline Roth

Yes thanks :hi:

Seen many threads go way off topic but I think this is the first time I've seen a split topic

Its like blackjack at the casino, sometimes a good move.

Maybe James can introduce another prossie and we can have a prossie three-sum split?  :wacko: :crazy:

tonibell99

  • Guest

Offline Blue Suede Goo

Poppy has a face pic on her AW profile now.
She should definitely put more photos up.

She wasn't a skank when I saw her by the way. That was about three years ago though.
 :unknown:


External Link/Members Only