Vicky diamonds,/previously of allure

[Bobroy]

Hi, 1st review in here so go easy? Been a member for a while, been on my mind to write this for a while as just so let down by the punt.
Driving home a few weeks ago gets the horn , so thinks fuck it il see what's on offer, diamonds website Vicky was on, rang up and to my surprise had loads of Availability, which I thought was strange as she has been well reviewed on here but now know why she was free.
Gets to the room met by a really really attractive young girl with cracking figure , lush eyes and a sexy southern accent , not to mention great body, that's where it stopped.
Ask you like kissing? Oh yea! 1peck on lips then on to bed for vigorous owo, some banter in between then on with the Mack, doggy styles with her head buried in the pillow making ridiculous fake screams, how where they fake I here u ask ? Cos I was so dissapointed by the punt the little fella was not what he should of been, not to mention the screams from the punt going on in next room, all in all she couldn't wait for it to be over and neither could I, totally rushed shite 30mins.

[happy-jack]

had same experience with her in Washington about a month ago also states shes 23 I could be wrong but closer to 30 id say

[Looking4fun]

2 first time posters having a bad punt with a girl that has had great reviews,I haven't seen her but a punting buddy of mine strongly recommend her( it wasn't Anthg before we go down that path)

[Rod trotter]

Sounds like shes going through the motions

One to aboid for me......sounds good looking but not a great perfomer where it counts like so many

[westbay_abaco]

Helpful if original poster put up a link External Link/Members Only  Despite AnthG's fluffiness (on Diamonds website) I think I'd rather rely on him than on two Sergeis who probably joined simply to post this negative review

[Rod trotter]

OP joined in aug so i fail to see why its bullshit.

I take it on face value, simple as that, one mans experience can be different to anothers thats why we ask for reviews

[MDB72]

I agree - people are entitled to write reviews and it's for others to consider them before they make a booking

[vw]

I agree - people are entitled to write reviews and it's for others to consider them before they make a booking

The more opinions the better, one mans pleasure is another's poison.  Key to reading reviews is find a reviewer who is like you.

[happy-jack]

not a first time punter though just poster. had plenty great punts in my 2 year (so far) spell including keeva tori bbb sarah jane jade heart lady Victoria bubble butt martina etc Vicky was the poorest agency punt ive had of course ive had a few worse with indies but the going through the motions comment is bang on imo

[Mansell]

Really surprised to hear of your experiences, but as has been said, sometimes happens.

Reminds me I should have done a review of her, seen her a couple of times and both we really good 10 out of 10 punts with none of the problems mentioned. Must be my Adonis like figure and manly charm  only kidding, I'm like Rod's Avatar

[Looking4fun]

not a first time punter though just poster. had plenty great punts in my 2 year (so far) spell including keeva tori bbb sarah jane jade heart lady Victoria bubble butt martina etc Vicky was the poorest agency punt ive had of course ive had a few worse with indies but the going through the motions comment is bang on imo

You should share your experiences in a review then we can get a better idea of what to expect, that's what the forums all about mate

[Bobroy]

Hi all, apologies if post seemed shite, am literally technology inadequate, have been a long time lurker of ukp, I fact use if at as a must when reasearching punts, was a little hesitant at posting a review full stop, but gave it a go, apologies if not detailed.
If some 1 can tell me how to post links much appreciated. As for my previous punts, keeva x3 = all amazing, Morgan of diamond (3 years ago like) = awesome, Nicole none down in Stockton x2 1 X ashington= class, the list goes on , first pint ever, Nottingham 15 yrs ago, = shocking

[Looking4fun]

The problem with being a long term lurker is when your first post is a negative review The sceptical amongst us think that it could be a rival agency or rival girl as this has happened on numerous occasions over the past couple of months, don't be offended just participate more then we all can share our experiences

[Mansell]

As looking4fun has said, it's best to post on the site for a while before doing a review, then at least we know you from Adam.

We have had a lot of problems hence some scepticism. Not saying your not genuine and what you said didn't happen, just explaining situation.

To post link use the "globe" icon and copy and paste a link into it.

[happy-jack]

You should share your experiences in a review then we can get a better idea of what to expect, that's what the forums all about mate

I'll try to be more active in future.
One of the reasons I don't review is most of the girls I've seen are heavily reviewed on here already and I've nothing of note to add.

[Mansell]

I'll try to be more active in future.
One of the reasons I don't review is most of the girls I've seen are heavily reviewed on here already and I've nothing of note to add.

Any review is always worth having even if it just confirms what we all know. Means the girl is still up to the usual standard. So crack on and join in.

[Mansell]

Driving home a few weeks ago gets the horn , so thinks fuck it il see what's on offer, diamonds website Vicky was on, rang up and to my surprise had loads of Availability,

Just been doing a bit of checking as something didn't ring true with this. A few weeks ago suggests 3 or so and she wasn't working for Diamonds then. So sounds like we have got another false reviewer on some sort of mission. Maybe another WG just having a go, seen it so many times this year 

[AnthG]

Just been doing a bit of checking as something didn't ring true with this. A few weeks ago suggests 3 or so and she wasn't working for Diamonds then. So sounds like we have got another false reviewer on some sort of mission. Maybe another WG just having a go, seen it so many times this year 

This is what I was thinking too. I just didn't want to be the first one to say this (for obvious reasons). Can I please ask out of curiousity which Diamonds flat did Bobroy see her in for his punt?

I'll try to be more active in future.
One of the reasons I don't review is most of the girls I've seen are heavily reviewed on here already and I've nothing of note to add

But the thing is about posting reviews is punters get to know from your reviews and the more you post, what type of girls you go for, or what type of things you want from a booking, or how easygoing you are or how strict you are on issuing positive or negatives.

For example if a guy posts 10 positives and not one negative, then people will take their reviews with a pinch of salt as they are easily pleased. Same goes if a guy posts 10 negatives and not one positive as the seem to be far too hard to please.

The posting of reviews are more so about allowing other punters to know about the punter posting them as much as the girl. Hence why its good to post a review after every punt, good or bad, and reglardless of how many times the girl has been reviewed.

[westbay_abaco]

Strange both boroboy and happy jack have been members for a while but never posted, both have been punting many of the most popular girls, both have similar writing styles ........

AnthG's post seems to be quite perceptive here.

I am  a new member so I'll leave it to more experienced and knowledgeable members to address - I just find it quite unusual.  Is it possible that sergei has several dormant accounts to get around suspicion resulting from someone who joined very recently?

[jack-chan]

We all have different tastes and different opinions. Had a similar experience recently with Vicky, IMHO "not as impressive as her reviews suggest", more so when you consider she charges above the normal Diamonds rate!

[Rod trotter]

I will take it as honest until proven

[Tiger63]

This is what I was thinking too. I just didn't want to be the first one to say this (for obvious reasons). Can I please ask out of curiousity which Diamonds flat did Bobroy see her in for his punt?

But the thing is about posting reviews is punters get to know from your reviews and the more you post, what type of girls you go for, or what type of things you want from a booking, or how easygoing you are or how strict you are on issuing positive or negatives.

For example if a guy posts 10 positives and not one negative, then people will take their reviews with a pinch of salt as they are easily pleased. Same goes if a guy posts 10 negatives and not one positive as the seem to be far too hard to please.

The posting of reviews are more so about allowing other punters to know about the punter posting them as much as the girl. Hence why its good to post a review after every punt, good or bad, and reglardless of how many times the girl has been reviewed.

Dont agree with that ....should we post a negative to keep people happy......dont think so.
It just proves that we are enjoying ourselves and not worrying what other people think

[Mansell]

Dont agree with that ....should we post a negative to keep people happy......dont think so.
It just proves that we are enjoying ourselves and not worrying what other people think

I agree Tiger, it also can show the benefit of UKP as by punting with girls who have a good review you can get a better success rate. That's what I have been doing, don't have the time or money to go after any unknowns. But I have noticed some guys like the unknown girls.

[AnthG]

Dont agree with that ....should we post a negative to keep people happy......dont think so.
It just proves that we are enjoying ourselves and not worrying what other people think

I agree Tiger, it also can show the benefit of UKP as by punting with girls who have a good review you can get a better success rate. That's what I have been doing, don't have the time or money to go after any unknowns. But I have noticed some guys like the unknown girls.

The point was, if someone has never had a negative punt, this suggests they are too easy to please.

Everyone sooner or later will have a negative punt. And doing research will not stop it given the amount of factors that can give a negative punt.

Two of my worst punts were with girls everyone else raves about and said they were two of the best in Newcastle. Another of my worst punts was with a girl who I myself raved about for two punts and thought she was the bees knees and then the third punt was dreadful. There is no way I could have prevented having those poor punts from happening in advance and preparation and research wouldn't have made a difference.

[Mansell]

The point was, if someone has never had a negative punt, this suggests they are too easy to please.

Everyone sooner or later will have a negative punt. And doing research will not stop it given the amount of factors that can give a negative punt.

Two of my worst punts were with girls everyone else raves about and said they were two of the best in Newcastle. Another of my worst punts was with a girl who I myself raved about for two punts and thought she was the bees knees and then the third punt was dreadful. There is no way I could have prevented having those poor punts from happening in advance and preparation and research wouldn't have made a difference.

OK, get that 

[happy-jack]

The point was, if someone has never had a negative punt, this suggests they are too easy to please.

Everyone sooner or later will have a negative punt. And doing research will not stop it given the amount of factors that can give a negative punt.

Two of my worst punts were with girls everyone else raves about and said they were two of the best in Newcastle. Another of my worst punts was with a girl who I myself raved about for two punts and thought she was the bees knees and then the third punt was dreadful. There is no way I could have prevented having those poor punts from happening in advance and preparation and research wouldn't have made a difference.

exactly anth each to their own. I'm not making any sort of attack at Vicky I'm sure other guys have had a great time with her hence other posters leaping to her defence. But I don't think its good or encouraging to new posters to be accused of this that and the other for sharing a different view. I understand coming straight in with a negative is suspect but in my defence it is the first time I've felt I had something to add to a topic instead of just being a reader.

as for a similar writing style to the op, that really made me chuckle I guess some people see what they want. I suppose we are both typing in English so there's one similarity. 

[greychap]

Its very difficult for every girl to be everybody's cup of tea even though Vicky is popular with some.

A negative don't alway's bother me if the girl has been nice and pleased others. I bet even the few very popular girls like Tori, Keeva and Brooke Knights have had the odd punter here and there where it was not what they expected or did not enjoy it as much, its just not everybody that punts is a member on here so you don't alway's get to find out, plus some WG's might not perform as well because the punter is not nice with them or might smell etc and some girls wont go out of there way with those types as they wont want them back.

Anyway, better luck next time OP and hope it works out better for you.

[Mansell]

Greychap, whilst what you say is true. Did you miss that in this particular case the original reviewer Bobroy was posting things that were proven not true ? as I commented and was confirmed by Anth she was not working for Diamonds when said, it's therefore a very suspect review.

happy-jack appears more genuine, but as you well know we have had a spat of first time posters putting a negative review up that has been very suspicious to say the least.

I would have no issue with a well known person on here posting a negative review, but as per Admin's post in the main NE section, there are people out there trying to abuse the review process in the NE at the moment.

[AnthG]

Did you miss that in this particular case the original reviewer Bobroy was posting things that were proven not true ? as I commented and was confirmed by Anth she was not working for Diamonds when said, it's therefore a very suspect review.

She has been working for Diamonds for only two weeks. And her first week (two weeks ago) she was down as Outcall only on the Diamonds site too.

This was why I politely asked this above to the original poster as it was strange him saying he seen her for an incall three weeks ago in his review incase there was something I had missed.

Can I please ask out of curiousity which Diamonds flat did Bobroy see her in for his punt?

The thing is for some reason this girl has been having some serious issues - some git has got her AW profile taken down yet again. Which is something like the seventh or eighth time in the 5 months she has been back working someone has reported and had her profile taken down.

External Link/Members Only

So its just a case of when things seem a bit odd it just seems wrong to not ask more questions to clarify from the poster of the review.

[greychap]

Greychap, whilst what you say is true. Did you miss that in this particular case the original reviewer Bobroy was posting things that were proven not true ? as I commented and was confirmed by Anth she was not working for Diamonds when said, it's therefore a very suspect review.

happy-jack appears more genuine, but as you well know we have had a spat of first time posters putting a negative review up that has been very suspicious to say the least.

I would have no issue with a well known person on here posting a negative review, but as per Admin's post in the main NE section, there are people out there trying to abuse the review process in the NE at the moment.

Yes think I missed that bit but must say the negative review never bothered me anyway and im just sick of all the bullshit and lies that go on and motives....some people are not right in the head.

[greychap]

She has been working for Diamonds for only two weeks. And her first week (two weeks ago) she was down as Outcall only on the Diamonds site too.

This was why I politely asked this above to the original poster as it was strange him saying he seen her for an incall three weeks ago in his review incase there was something I had missed.

The thing is for some reason this girl has been having some serious issues - some git has got her AW profile taken down yet again. Which is something like the seventh or eighth time in the 5 months she has been back working someone has reported and had her profile taken down.

External Link/Members Only

So its just a case of when things seem a bit odd it just seems wrong to not ask more questions to clarify from the poster of the review.

What I don't get is how can AW keep taking someones profile down constantly and it is happening all the time with lots of girls....People reporting a profile does not mean there telling the truth so why oh why does AW keep removing the profiles, did Vicky have to verify?

[AnthG]

did Vicky have to verify?

Someone complained. So she verified to get it put back up, someone reported it again after it was verified, they then took it down again. She appealed, got put back up, same person reported it again. They took it down again. She appealed again. They put it back up. Same person reported it again. They took it back down.

The thing is everytime its reported the girl loses AW credits from Private Gallery purchases. And when its put back up the credits don't get returned. So this is a nice earner for Adultwork and hence why they are not bothered.

The annoying thing is, there have been times in the past when there have been profiles that have been 100% definite private gallery scammers that I have reported and AW have just ignored me. And yet this girl they just keep taking the profile down for absolutely no reason whatseover.

There is absolutely nothing wrong with her profile to justify it being taken down if complained about.

Just shows what scum AW management are. And why UKescorting is a godsend to potentially advertise from.

[greychap]

I think something needs to be done with AW. There should be full evidence to take a profile down and they should know vindictive people do this all the time, they should be used to it.

There supposed to be just a directory so why do they act like pimps and why do they make girls verify with passport and pictures of them when it means fuck all and they can just take it down again.

Why does this just keep happening, does AW not have the history of the profile constantly beingtaken down to know its a trouble maker. They should remove the report button full stop.

[maxxblue]

I think something needs to be done with AW. There should be full evidence to take a profile down and they should know vindictive people do this all the time, they should be used to it.

There supposed to be just a directory so why do they act like pimps and why do they make girls verify with passport and pictures of them when it means fuck all and they can just take it down again.

Why does this just keep happening, does AW not have the history of the profile constantly beingtaken down to know its a trouble maker. They should remove the report button full stop.

Not sure I agree with you here, greychap. I have used the 'report button' when I've come across profiles that are clearly scams, and provided AW with evidence that the profile is not genuine (e.g. fake pictures), and have been happy that AW have responded quickly.

[greychap]

Not sure I agree with you here, greychap. I have used the 'report button' when I've come across profiles that are clearly scams, and provided AW with evidence that the profile is not genuine (e.g. fake pictures), and have been happy that AW have responded quickly.

Ok well not make it so easy for everybody reporting everything all the time when sometimes its just for vindictive reasons. I bet more people report now on revenge or getting rid of a rival then genuine reasons.

[billypunter]

I saw her in washington and had similar experience, maybe not quite as bad. she had taken over that flat from SJ and was supposed to be there long term so she said but suspect not popular and so now someone else has it. Far too business like for me.

[greychap]

I saw her in washington and had similar experience, maybe not quite as bad. she had taken over that flat from SJ and was supposed to be there long term so she said but suspect not popular and so now someone else has it. Far too business like for me.

Each to there own I suppose. It wont put off Anth though as he is crazy for her and best girl he ever seen.

[vw]

Each to there own I suppose. It wont put off Anth though as he is crazy for her and best girl he ever seen.

We all have a best punt, just depends who you are.   

[AnthG]

I saw her in washington and had similar experience, maybe not quite as bad. she had taken over that flat from SJ and was supposed to be there long term so she said but suspect not popular and so now someone else has it. Far too business like for me.

Each to there own I suppose. It wont put off Anth though as he is crazy for her and best girl he ever seen.

I am crazy about her, yes. If someone gave me a chance to punt with literally any girl I have met in my entire life. She would actually be in the top three contenders I would choose. So the fact that I am punting her is unreal for me. The flat is Allures, when she left them she had to leave it.

She is not business like. She is just quite shy. So I am suspecting people are going there expecting someone like Tori Taylor to open the door. When I say someone like Tori Taylor I mean by that TT is a massive extrovert and someone who excubes confidence.

VickyD on the otherhand is someone who is quite shy, introverted, but still goes all out to please. As a shy person myself I go for shy girls and find shy girls going all out a massive turn on.

I do not want to turn this negative into the white knight bragade so will bow out from this review now