Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.




Author Topic: Vicky diamonds,/previously of allure  (Read 1619 times)

This review has not been indexed yet.

Offline happy-jack

The point was, if someone has never had a negative punt, this suggests they are too easy to please.

Everyone sooner or later will have a negative punt. And doing research will not stop it given the amount of factors that can give a negative punt.

Two of my worst punts were with girls everyone else raves about and said they were two of the best in Newcastle. Another of my worst punts was with a girl who I myself raved about for two punts and thought she was the bees knees and then the third punt was dreadful. There is no way I could have prevented having those poor punts from happening in advance and preparation and research wouldn't have made a difference.

exactly anth each to their own. I'm not making any sort of attack at Vicky I'm sure other guys have had a great time with her hence other posters leaping to her defence. But I don't think its good or encouraging to new posters to be accused of this that and the other for sharing a different view. I understand coming straight in with a negative is suspect but in my defence it is the first time I've felt I had something to add to a topic instead of just being a reader.

as for a similar writing style to the op, that really made me chuckle I guess some people see what they want. I suppose we are both typing in English so there's one similarity.  :lol:
Banning reason: Posing as woman and signing up to UKSW

Offline greychap

Its very difficult for every girl to be everybody's cup of tea even though Vicky is popular with some.

A negative don't alway's bother me if the girl has been nice and pleased others. I bet even the few very popular girls like Tori, Keeva and Brooke Knights have had the odd punter here and there where it was not what they expected or did not enjoy it as much, its just not everybody that punts is a member on here so you don't alway's get to find out, plus some WG's might not perform as well because the punter is not nice with them or might smell etc and some girls wont go out of there way with those types as they wont want them back.

Anyway, better luck next time OP and hope it works out better for you.
Banning reason: North East shit stirrer who contributes nothing

Online Mansell

Greychap, whilst what you say is true. Did you miss that in this particular case the original reviewer Bobroy was posting things that were proven not true ? as I commented and was confirmed by Anth she was not working for Diamonds when said, it's therefore a very suspect review.

happy-jack appears more genuine, but as you well know we have had a spat of first time posters putting a negative review up that has been very suspicious to say the least.

I would have no issue with a well known person on here posting a negative review, but as per Admin's post in the main NE section, there are people out there trying to abuse the review process in the NE at the moment.

Offline AnthG

Did you miss that in this particular case the original reviewer Bobroy was posting things that were proven not true ? as I commented and was confirmed by Anth she was not working for Diamonds when said, it's therefore a very suspect review.

She has been working for Diamonds for only two weeks. And her first week (two weeks ago) she was down as Outcall only on the Diamonds site too.

This was why I politely asked this above to the original poster as it was strange him saying he seen her for an incall three weeks ago in his review incase there was something I had missed.

Can I please ask out of curiousity which Diamonds flat did Bobroy see her in for his punt?

The thing is for some reason this girl has been having some serious issues - some git has got her AW profile taken down yet again. Which is something like the seventh or eighth time in the 5 months she has been back working someone has reported and had her profile taken down.

https://www.adultwork.com/3160229

So its just a case of when things seem a bit odd it just seems wrong to not ask more questions to clarify from the poster of the review.
« Last Edit: December 06, 2015, 11:06:59 PM by AnthG »


2 review(s) found for Diamond Vicky linked to in above post (2 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative)

Offline greychap

Greychap, whilst what you say is true. Did you miss that in this particular case the original reviewer Bobroy was posting things that were proven not true ? as I commented and was confirmed by Anth she was not working for Diamonds when said, it's therefore a very suspect review.

happy-jack appears more genuine, but as you well know we have had a spat of first time posters putting a negative review up that has been very suspicious to say the least.

I would have no issue with a well known person on here posting a negative review, but as per Admin's post in the main NE section, there are people out there trying to abuse the review process in the NE at the moment.

Yes think I missed that bit but must say the negative review never bothered me anyway and im just sick of all the bullshit and lies that go on and motives....some people are not right in the head. :crazy:
Banning reason: North East shit stirrer who contributes nothing

Offline greychap

She has been working for Diamonds for only two weeks. And her first week (two weeks ago) she was down as Outcall only on the Diamonds site too.

This was why I politely asked this above to the original poster as it was strange him saying he seen her for an incall three weeks ago in his review incase there was something I had missed.

The thing is for some reason this girl has been having some serious issues - some git has got her AW profile taken down yet again. Which is something like the seventh or eighth time in the 5 months she has been back working someone has reported and had her profile taken down.

https://www.adultwork.com/3160229

So its just a case of when things seem a bit odd it just seems wrong to not ask more questions to clarify from the poster of the review.

What I don't get is how can AW keep taking someones profile down constantly and it is happening all the time with lots of girls....People reporting a profile does not mean there telling the truth so why oh why does AW keep removing the profiles, did Vicky have to verify?
Banning reason: North East shit stirrer who contributes nothing


2 review(s) found for Diamond Vicky linked to in above post (2 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative)

Offline AnthG

did Vicky have to verify?

Someone complained. So she verified to get it put back up, someone reported it again after it was verified, they then took it down again. She appealed, got put back up, same person reported it again. They took it down again. She appealed again. They put it back up. Same person reported it again. They took it back down.

The thing is everytime its reported the girl loses AW credits from Private Gallery purchases. And when its put back up the credits don't get returned. So this is a nice earner for Adultwork and hence why they are not bothered.

The annoying thing is, there have been times in the past when there have been profiles that have been 100% definite private gallery scammers that I have reported and AW have just ignored me. And yet this girl they just keep taking the profile down for absolutely no reason whatseover.

There is absolutely nothing wrong with her profile to justify it being taken down if complained about.

Just shows what scum AW management are. And why UKescorting is a godsend to potentially advertise from.

Offline greychap

I think something needs to be done with AW. There should be full evidence to take a profile down and they should know vindictive people do this all the time, they should be used to it.

There supposed to be just a directory so why do they act like pimps and why do they make girls verify with passport and pictures of them when it means fuck all and they can just take it down again.

Why does this just keep happening, does AW not have the history of the profile constantly beingtaken down to know its a trouble maker. They should remove the report button full stop.
Banning reason: North East shit stirrer who contributes nothing

Offline maxxblue

I think something needs to be done with AW. There should be full evidence to take a profile down and they should know vindictive people do this all the time, they should be used to it.

There supposed to be just a directory so why do they act like pimps and why do they make girls verify with passport and pictures of them when it means fuck all and they can just take it down again.

Why does this just keep happening, does AW not have the history of the profile constantly beingtaken down to know its a trouble maker. They should remove the report button full stop.

Not sure I agree with you here, greychap. I have used the 'report button' when I've come across profiles that are clearly scams, and provided AW with evidence that the profile is not genuine (e.g. fake pictures), and have been happy that AW have responded quickly.

Offline greychap

Not sure I agree with you here, greychap. I have used the 'report button' when I've come across profiles that are clearly scams, and provided AW with evidence that the profile is not genuine (e.g. fake pictures), and have been happy that AW have responded quickly.

Ok well not make it so easy for everybody reporting everything all the time when sometimes its just for vindictive reasons. I bet more people report now on revenge or getting rid of a rival then genuine reasons.
Banning reason: North East shit stirrer who contributes nothing

I saw her in washington and had similar experience, maybe not quite as bad. she had taken over that flat from SJ and was supposed to be there long term so she said but suspect not popular and so now someone else has it. Far too business like for me.

Offline greychap

I saw her in washington and had similar experience, maybe not quite as bad. she had taken over that flat from SJ and was supposed to be there long term so she said but suspect not popular and so now someone else has it. Far too business like for me.

Each to there own I suppose. It wont put off Anth though as he is crazy for her and best girl he ever seen.
Banning reason: North East shit stirrer who contributes nothing

Each to there own I suppose. It wont put off Anth though as he is crazy for her and best girl he ever seen.
We all have a best punt, just depends who you are.   :kissgirl:


Offline AnthG

I saw her in washington and had similar experience, maybe not quite as bad. she had taken over that flat from SJ and was supposed to be there long term so she said but suspect not popular and so now someone else has it. Far too business like for me.

Each to there own I suppose. It wont put off Anth though as he is crazy for her and best girl he ever seen.

I am crazy about her, yes. If someone gave me a chance to punt with literally any girl I have met in my entire life. She would actually be in the top three contenders I would choose. So the fact that I am punting her is unreal for me. The flat is Allures, when she left them she had to leave it.

She is not business like. She is just quite shy. So I am suspecting people are going there expecting someone like Tori Taylor to open the door. When I say someone like Tori Taylor I mean by that TT is a massive extrovert and someone who excubes confidence.

VickyD on the otherhand is someone who is quite shy, introverted, but still goes all out to please. As a shy person myself I go for shy girls and find shy girls going all out a massive turn on.

I do not want to turn this negative into the white knight bragade so will bow out from this review now :)
« Last Edit: December 07, 2015, 11:18:59 AM by AnthG »




Latest media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)