Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.




Author Topic: Adele4U Keeps on getting better  (Read 5776 times)


104 review(s) for Adele4u (101 positive, 1 neutral, 2 negative) [Indexed by Admin]


Offline wayneking

Quote from: Atticus Finch link=topic=76961.msg9637Totally21#msg963721 date=1448892738
Another utterly irrelevant comment, and yes I do have something to say, particularly when I see that someone is needlessly digging another member out.

Which is all you were doing, just digging him out. 

Again - weak.

Totally agree with you AF - weak!
Banning reason: Previously banned troll (tom watton)

Offline Atticus Finch

Look - I have no particular interest in getting into an argument here.

It just seems to me that there has been A LOT of sniping and chipping away at punters on here, for no particularly good reason other than trying to make some dull, meaningless point.

There is nothing in the rules to say I can't call it out when I see it, any more or less than anyone else can.  I think it can be spiteful, hectoring, and in the worst cases open bullying.  I am not ashamed of picking people up on it.

I also think that if you are one of the people who feel they have a right to express their opinion by trying to undermine or belittle others, don't be surprised or angry when you get called out.  And certainly don't hide behind admin or complain that I shouldn't comment just because you've been here longer than me.

If you have a sound, legitimate basis for your comment, then you should be able to state it and it should stand up to scrutiny.
Banning reason: Fluffy twat

Totally agree with you AF - weak!
Finch can look after himself without trolls coming along and stealing his thunder.

Online Jimmyredcab

Another utterly irrelevant comment, and yes I do have something to say, particularly when I see that someone is needlessly digging another member out.

Which is all you were doing, just digging him out. 

Again - weak.

So you are offended on behalf of someone else, I get it now.    :hi:

How about you let unclesweetheart defend himself, if he wants to that is.  :rolleyes:

Offline Atticus Finch

So you are offended on behalf of someone else, I get it now.    :hi:

How about you let unclesweetheart defend himself, if he wants to that is.  :rolleyes:

Your 3 defences so far have been (in order):

1. Hide behind admin
2. You've been here longer than me
3. It's ok because you are having a pop at someone other than me so I shouldn't get involved

Do you really not see how feeble that is?  Really?  Honestly?

Look - I'll give you a hand.  If you think your original comments are fair comment, then stand by them and justify them.  Don't keep trying to deflect because it makes it look as though you don't have an argument, and you know it...
Banning reason: Fluffy twat

Offline unclesweetheart

So you are offended on behalf of someone else, I get it now.    :hi:

How about you let unclesweetheart defend himself, if he wants to that is.  :rolleyes:

I've only scanned the thread but the issue seems to be that, as a left-leaning sponger, I only see well-reviewed girls and take no risks. Some truth in that, in the sense that I scan the reviews of any purchase more expensive than a Solero these days before parting with my hard-earned. However I've also seen Bree (only reviewed on AW but not at all reviewed on here), contributed an early review of cherrytheescort - I think the first on here - and was the first guy to review Kavita Lipstick and Indigo Rose. Also did one on a girl in the South East who no-one else reviewed & whose name I can't remember. So there's not a great deal to support the idea that I just follow lemming-like in the wake of more Genuine Punters.

As far as only leaving positive reviews. Not sure how to defend myself against this charge, except to say that all the above-mentioned punts were more than highly satisfactory so it would have been wrong to leave anything other than a positive for them. And since - largely thanks to this site - I've had the pleasure of the paid company of Lindsey, Little Katie, Lily Hart, Ellie Rose and Adele, it's equally no surprise that the list keeps on growing.

I'm seeing two new girls in the next fortnight. Part of me hopes that at least one of them is shit, so I can receive the longed-for accolade of Genuine Punter. That part is about 1% of my brain. The other 99% hopes, given that I've done my research etc, that I'll have a great time. And if I do, I will have no qualms reporting on them.
Banning reason: Prossie fanboy + Sharing account with banned member (Atticus Finch aka Sylvester)

Online Jimmyredcab

Look - I have no particular interest in getting into an argument here.


Really ?
You could have fooled me.    :rolleyes:

Offline Atticus Finch

Really ?
You could have fooled me.    :rolleyes:

Still deflecting I see.

Be a man Jimbo - stand up for yourself.  You must have said what you did for a reason.
Banning reason: Fluffy twat

Online Jimmyredcab

Still deflecting I see.

Be a man Jimbo - stand up for yourself.  You must have said what you did for a reason.

It looks to me like you are trying to put yourself on the map, you have a long way to go.  :rolleyes:

Offline smiths

Wasn't he the one who did an utter rubbish review of Little Katie to defend her negative review?

 :rolleyes:

No he posted a love letter to Little Katie which was removed from a review to the regional board if I recall correctly after Mr Brightsides negative review BUT made snide digs to Mr B which was well out of order in my view. :thumbsdown:


Offline Atticus Finch

It looks to me like you are trying to put yourself on the map, you have a long way to go.  :rolleyes:
Ha!  Seriously? You think that much of yourself?
 
You think that me teasing you about your inability to justify your original nonsense comment will 'put me on the map'? 

This really isn't an argument.  I'm just trying to get you to understand (and I'll admit it's pretty fucking slow going) that if you post character assassinating nonsense, irrespective of your post count, you should expect to get called on it.

That's all.  What is keeping this gong however, is your seemingly limitless ability to try and deflect away from the fact that you can't actually justify what you said.  I'm genuinely curious to see what you say next.  Why don't you try pointing and saying 'look over there', that's a good one... :D
Banning reason: Fluffy twat

Online Jimmyredcab

Ha!  Seriously? You think that much of yourself?
 


Indeed I do.

I pointed out earlier that you have been here for 8 weeks ------- I should have said 8 weeks under your latest name.    :bomb:

Offline Atticus Finch

Indeed I do.

I pointed out earlier that you have been here for 8 weeks ------- I should have said 8 weeks under your latest name.    :bomb:
Still deflecting?
Banning reason: Fluffy twat

Offline smiths

I've only scanned the thread but the issue seems to be that, as a left-leaning sponger, I only see well-reviewed girls and take no risks. Some truth in that, in the sense that I scan the reviews of any purchase more expensive than a Solero these days before parting with my hard-earned. However I've also seen Bree (only reviewed on AW but not at all reviewed on here), contributed an early review of cherrytheescort - I think the first on here - and was the first guy to review Kavita Lipstick and Indigo Rose. Also did one on a girl in the South East who no-one else reviewed & whose name I can't remember. So there's not a great deal to support the idea that I just follow lemming-like in the wake of more Genuine Punters.

As far as only leaving positive reviews. Not sure how to defend myself against this charge, except to say that all the above-mentioned punts were more than highly satisfactory so it would have been wrong to leave anything other than a positive for them. And since - largely thanks to this site - I've had the pleasure of the paid company of Lindsey, Little Katie, Lily Hart, Ellie Rose and Adele, it's equally no surprise that the list keeps on growing.

I'm seeing two new girls in the next fortnight. Part of me hopes that at least one of them is shit, so I can receive the longed-for accolade of Genuine Punter. That part is about 1% of my brain. The other 99% hopes, given that I've done my research etc, that I'll have a great time. And if I do, I will have no qualms reporting on them.

Genuine punter as opposed to a WGs arselicker who is prepared to dig other punters for daring to do a negative review on a WG you love, you sure are one piece of work, and no thats NOT a compliment, you snide. :thumbsdown:
« Last Edit: November 30, 2015, 09:05:31 PM by smiths »

Offline unclesweetheart

I think Atticus is saying that you chose a really bad example of a positive review to have a go at me with, since NO-ONE HAS EVER POSTED A NEGATIVE ABOUT ADELE. You should have waited to have a go at me, but you couldn't wait.

Another way of looking at my review is to say it provides even more evidence of consistently excellent service.

I note that just as you haven't replied to Atticus' point, neither have you to mine.

Thanks for calling me uncle sweetheart btw, though. Smiths should be along shortly to put you right about that.
Banning reason: Prossie fanboy + Sharing account with banned member (Atticus Finch aka Sylvester)

Offline unclesweetheart

Banning reason: Prossie fanboy + Sharing account with banned member (Atticus Finch aka Sylvester)

Indeed I do.

I pointed out earlier that you have been here for 8 weeks ------- I should have said 8 weeks under your latest name.    :bomb:

I'm starting to get the impression who he might be but I do wonder what happened to his previous nick?

 :sarcastic:

Offline The Beano

What's with all the infighting guys? USH comes on with a perfectly acceptable review (albeit in his inimitable flowery style) of a girl of unquestionable quality, who I can vouch for, and gets slated. Then there's people like Quesadilla who gets banned from here, openly brags (on uke) about getting banned deliberately, then is welcomed back with open arms after he falls for the banter and flirting of a girl who hasn't got the best of feedback on here. I just can't work it out.
TB

Offline PLeisure

Two review threads locked, will this be the third  :unknown:

As The Beano says, leave the in-fighting for another discussion elsewhere, please. It's just polluting the atmosphere. Thankees  :hi:

Offline dubs

Two review threads locked, will this be the third  :unknown:

As The Beano says, leave the in-fighting for another discussion elsewhere, please. It's just polluting the atmosphere. Thankees  :hi:

+1

Getting threads locked through petty bickering just pisses off posters who want to add something constructive to the conversation.

Offline SamLP

Two review threads locked, will this be the third  :unknown:

It hasn't reached the customary 10 pages yet  :D


Offline unclesweetheart

What's with all the infighting guys? USH comes on with a perfectly acceptable review (albeit in his inimitable flowery style) of a girl of unquestionable quality, who I can vouch for, and gets slated. ... I just can't work it out.
TB

Have to say that I really pruned the flowers on this one, but thanks very much TB. The chatter doesn't really matter. This site exists to tell guys where to find great girls. Adele continues to be great, and nothing anyone has said in the various spats following my review detracts from that one (extraordinarily) non-negotiable fact.   
Banning reason: Prossie fanboy + Sharing account with banned member (Atticus Finch aka Sylvester)

Offline Nagilum

Ok so let's come back on topic.

I will be seeing Adele soon, judging by her reviews I am expecting her to be great. Spoke to her via email so far and she seems great.

USH - can you tell me what she enjoys in particular?

Offline unclesweetheart

Ok so let's come back on topic.

I will be seeing Adele soon, judging by her reviews I am expecting her to be great. Spoke to her via email so far and she seems great.

USH - can you tell me what she enjoys in particular?

Unless I am totally deceived, I think she very much enjoys you going down on her. But that could be just where she and I have ended up. She is a very affectionate and deep and erotic kisser. To be honest, I think the reason why she is pre-eminent is that she, grounded in herself, really enjoys finding out where you are sexually and going with that. With me, she likes me licking her to the point of orgasm then moving to fucking. In straightforward missionary, last time. I'm not sure I really hit her sweet spot, but I think I was in the zone. She loves guys and loves sex: she'll enjoy working with your stuff, I'm sure.

She does like prosecco. You'll drink more of it if you're like me, but do take a bottle.
Banning reason: Prossie fanboy + Sharing account with banned member (Atticus Finch aka Sylvester)




Latest media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)