xxSexyKat25xx External Link/Members Only or
External Link/Members OnlyIntroductionKat who has recently changed her Adultwork nickname from EnglishGirl1990 into xxSexyKat25xx is a well-known girl touring across the East Anglia region (Cambridge, Ipswich, Norwich, Colhester, Brentwood, Stowmarket) plus Gatwick. These are 7 locations toured throughout a week, one every day. Anyway my booking with Kat was a duo together with her blonde girlfriend who doesn't have a profile and hasn't even been given a name. For the purposes of this review I will refer to her as Kit so that together with Kat they make a Kit Kat. A quite appropriate name for their duo as like the commercial of the Kit Kat chocolate they both like taking a break while they were supposed to be working. A quite looong break actually.
LocationI might elaborate on it in separate post but for this review (which is long enough with the other material) I will just say it was an incall in a serviced apartment.
Comms ---
5/10 ≡ Communication was by text only (her method of choice, fairly prompt by the way) up until I arrived outside the building. Then the flat number was given through a phone call.
x The booking started with 15 minutes delay. She even switched her phone off during that 15 minute waiting and I started thinking she would turn out to be a total timewaster (in hindsight that would actually be the best scenario as I would have not wasted my money on this punt).
Side note --- Originally I had no intention to book for a duo. However, Kat insisted due to her booking a one-bedroom apartment and preferring to do duos with her friend. The quoted duo price was £200 for 1 hour, £300 for 1.5 hour and £400 for 2 hours. This means that the duo hourly rate is
IN THEORY better on average than the cost for Kat for the first hour (£120 for the first hour). It should be mentioned here that there is another review on UKP about Kat's duo with another girl called Vicky which only cost £180 for one hour so the rate for Kat and her new friend was
not by any means a special offer. If anything there was a price rise. And while we are at it, the other UKP review about Kat's duo was very promising about her performance, plus the AW feedback was great and when I met the girls it turned out that her friend Kit was more attractive than Kat. So I thought 'what could possibly go wrong with the Kit Kat duo?' Fairly 'safe' and good choice right? WRONG!
Physical Kat --- Looks: 8.0/10, Body: 8.0/10 + Age 25 years old seems legit. Certainly not older than 30.
+ Pics are shit and pointless but are indeed hers. She has a quite fit body. Petite frame, a rather skinny dress size 6-8, 5 feet 3 inches tall, small pert 32B boobs.
+ Facially she is pretty enough but not beautiful or stunning as other feedback suggests. She does have nice features like nice blue eyes but her face shape is a bit too oblong (like that of Sarah Jessica Parker) and some of her other features like her nose are bit streamlined/narrow. Anyway she is pretty enough and there are actually models who do look like her, though that’s because they look good under some angles like 'en face'. In real life they are nothing special though.
+ I can’t recall her having any tattoo which is a good thing.
≡ Her hair colour is a bit weird. It’s dark brown but she has grey (artificial) extensions. Her hair without the extensions is armpit length and with the extensions it’s bra-strap length.
Kit --- Looks: 8.0/10, Body: 8.5/10 + Probably younger than Kat. Perhaps 23-24.
+ Facially pretty. I would say she is ‘technically’ as pretty as Kat but I fancied Kit more than Kat. Of course that is subjective to my personal taste and I can understand if someone prefers Kat over Kit. Anyway, again not a stunner, but instead a girl next door. A
pretty girl next door.
+ Slim body as you can also see from the shit pictures on Kat’s Adultwork profile. Size 6, height around 5 feet 5 inches. Breast 32C, probably even 32D. Definitely larger cup than Kat’s though same underband (32, not 34). Boobs are slightly saggy/deflated but quite good regardless.
≡ Has one small tattoo on the dorsal area of her left hand. She also has a piercing on her navel.
Experience ---
5/10Events' time placement --- This booking started at (say) 5pm. After the intro and the paperwork I took a shower (shower #1) and sexual action started at 5:07pm. I was proposed to have a massage but I declined. Of course Kat suggested it hoping I would accept and waste time. Anyway we proceeded to sexual action and I popped at around 5:30pm on Kit's face. Then Kit went to the bathroom leaving me thinking she went just to clean her face. Instead she had a shower (shower #2). Meanwhile Kat proposed a massage which this time I accepted thinking it would be good for recovery for round 2. Oh yeah, how fool was I to expect a second round! Kit finished her shower but never returned to the bedroom and went to dress up in the living room. Then at about 5:35pm Kat went to the bathroom to have a shower herself (shower #3) and when she finished she told me it was my turn to have a shower (shower#4). When I finished I found both of them in the living room, dressing up (full clothes), having a chat about personal matters while Kat was also texting and later talking on her phone. The punter, the bystander! At least I managed to get a further 2-3 minutes French kissing from Kit while sitting on the sofa. I dressed up and ultimately the girls ushered me to the door at 5:54pm.
Points + They were polite and pleasant.
+ They were clean.
+ OWO was quite good from both and the dual blowjob was great. They licked the balls too.
+ Good handjob from both.
+ Nice French kissing. Especially Kit is a very good, sensual kisser. Kat’s FK on the other hand was mostly a mechanical whirling motion. Still it was open-mouth and fairly enjoyable when the whirling gradually soften a bit over time.
+ Kit took a nice facial.
x Kit refused to have penetrative sex or receive oral. She had supposedly acquired a cut in her pubic region during shaving. For that reason she also stayed clothed wearing her panties the entire time. Ok fair enough but my big problem with all this is their money grabbing dishonesty. I was not told about this issue before I paid. Wouldn't this bit of crucial information affect my decision about paying £200 for the duo? It's like getting promised a two finger Kit Kat only to find out that half of the one bar was missing after opening the seal.
x Just to elaborate on their dishonesty on the issue described above. It only became apparent that Kit could not receive oral or have penetrative sex when we were about in the 15th minute in the booking and I started asking for it. After some excuses that ‘she was still feeling shy’, Kat finally revealed that Kit could not remove her panties because she cut herself while shaving her pubic area. Look, I am not saying that it was not right to refuse having sex or reverse oral if she was cut. It was right. But I should have been told about it from the beginning before payment was made. Or at least being offered some discount/compensation for not getting full service from one of the girls. Instead they got the £200 and conned me on my face. Also I need to mention that it is not verified by me that Kit’s excuse was actually legit. She refused removing her panties to show me the cut. So it could well be a lie and the whole thing be an even bigger con than I thought. My gut instinct tells me that the excuse was a lie but not far from the truth however. I believe that Kit was on her menstruation/period so there was still a legit reason preventing penetration and reverse oral. But this of course changes absolutely nothing.
x Major timewasting tactics. I paid for 1 hour but I only got 25-30 minutes of sexual action (sex/oral/foreplay). The other 25-30 minutes were expertly wasted. Also the time was ultimately up 6 minutes from time. So to recap. In and out in 54 minutes and from them only 25-30 minutes were sexual.
x Only one pop in a 1 hour booking. Once I popped, Kit went to have a shower. Kat proposed a massage for 5 minutes and once Kit finished her shower Kat went to have a shower immediately afterwards signifying the ultimate end of play time with 25 minutes to spare.
x Also let me elaborate a bit on the scammy timewasting showers. First you will be told to have shower (it is mandatory regardless of whether you had a shower right before the booking). Ok fine. As a matter of fact I never refuse the offer of a shower in order to not give prossies any excuse about hygiene. In fact I often ask (an unnecessary) shower myself just to put the girl at ease. So I don't care at all about my own shower at the start, though I can guarantee you that the reason these two girls hand you over a towel as soon as you pay them is to knock off a few mins. Anyway what
did bother me was
their showers at the end of the encounter and the whole scammy practice of the shower being used to subtly indicate the end the sexual action. A premature end coming 25 minutes from the actual end of the booking which by the way starts at the instant you step into the flat.
x From the active time (which in case you missed it was only 40-50% of the booking length) only a very small portion was penetrative sex. The girls are actively suggesting oral sex and kissing rather than penetrative sex. All in all from the one hour booking I only shagged Kat for about 6-7 minutes at most. That’s it. That was all the sex I got from
two girls.
Final Words When I left from this punt I had very mixed feelings. Overall it was not a horrible avoid-at-all-costs experience. The girls certainly do have their merits. But unfortunately as much as I would love to see the glass half-full rather than half-empty, the glass that I was served was almost empty. I can’t help but feel scammed about how little I got. Only getting 25 minutes of action in a one hour booking, only having sex with the one of the two girls in what was supposedly a duo (and that without being told about the restriction before handing over the money but instead in the middle of the punt) and not even getting to see the one girl fully naked are difficult things to digest.
What makes me cast a wry smile when thinking about this punt was that I was complemented by both girls about how 'nice guy I am' as opposed to 'other punters who frighten them' (their words). That quite frankly felt like being thanked by a thief for being a nice victim while robbing my house or stealing my wallet. Still I even initially considered giving a rather very generous neutral rating due to the upcoming Christmas or even not review these girls at all. I am pretty sure that quite a few punters (especially those who mainly lurk) would have probably chosen to do the latter. However this is
exactly the reason I decided to post this review and highlight the negatives. I am sure that this con has been going on for quite a while now and just all those punters who previously suffered the same chose to remain silent, probably because of all the other good feedback. A feedback, however, some of which might not be representative at all due to it be given by fluffy punters. Well, anyway, it was time for someone to break the mould.
Now if you are still willing to give these girls a go, then by all means go. Be aware though that
you will be paying £200 for only HALF hour (not one hour) and that there is a great chance to not have penetrative sex or RO with Kit. Perhaps if they were more physically attractive and their sex skills better, then probably such a rather premium rate could be justified. Ultimately based on my experience I consider their duo package overpriced and I cannot recommend them. And I cannot recommend Kat alone for a solo booking either.
Hidden Image/Members Only
Topic: xxSexyKat25xx AdultWork. English DUO. Tour Cambridge, Colhester and elsewhere (Read 2088 times)
