Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.


Author Topic: Watford  (Read 4226 times)

Offline mh

Can I honestly say. No jokes or anything. If Dreamgirl is not TK. Then this now definitely someone else I would love to book with. :)

Are you anywhere near Newcastle?
You expect the mysterious dreamgirl to tell you? Then she'd have to kill you as this is top secret information

Offline mattylondon

You expect the mysterious dreamgirl to tell you? Then she'd have to kill you as this is top secret information
You mean she'd have to squash him?!  :crazy:

Anth is very much into the larger ladies, so no doubt would die a happy man, although I'm intrigued as to why he'd only punt her if she really wasn't TK? Sounds like there's been a parting of the ways! :D

Offline AnthG

I'm intrigued as to why he'd only punt her if she really wasn't TK? Sounds like there's been a parting of the ways! :D
Crossing of wires.

I meant if Dreamgirl isn't TK - in that people are suggesting it may be - then Dreamgirl is someone else to add to my list I would love to see alongside TK given that if its not TK. Then she also sounds fun.

Crossing of wires.

I meant if Dreamgirl isn't TK - in that people are suggesting it may be - then Dreamgirl is someone else to add to my list I would love to see alongside TK given that if its not TK. Then she also sounds fun.

well i would love you to experience the screwed up TK

Offline mattylondon

well i would love you to experience the screwed up TK
Interesting that he's blind to your punting view and you've met her? But then they say love is blind.  :dancegirl:

Offline AnthG

Interesting that he's blind to your punting view and you've met her? But then they say love is blind.  :dancegirl:
I am not blind to his punting view. One of the things I can remember TK was so upset about was the fact that initially he said the booking was ok. And I will say that again, ok. Not fantastic, but nowhere as bad as WaW suggests now.

Here was his description on auto-censored when someone asked how it was

Quote from: WaW's TK Review
Seen her she is young huge tits and about a size 16
good enough but i wont be returning
i think she needs to take stock of her life before she gets all bitter and twisted

So unless he saw her twice, which I don't believe he did, this was his opinion afterwards. It appears he changed this opinion somewhere down the line due to her posts on the forum itself. Which to be honest I think of some of the things TK was annoyed about. I agreed with her on this one. That's not strictly kosher to do.

Its a punting forum, and if she was ok on the actual punt this is what matters. Not if she annoyed you on the forum in posts afterwards.

Offline mattylondon

I am not blind to his punting view. One of the things I can remember TK was so upset about was the fact that initially he said the booking was ok. And I will say that again, ok. Not fantastic, but nowhere as bad as WaW suggests now.
Point taken on that. I'm inclined to agree you and you may have a point here. It I'm sure WAW could clear that up.

Offline ParisB

i think the jurys is key carded      the hilton isnt key carded  not sure if that makes a difference or not

The Hilton on A41 is friendly also Jurys Inn in Clarendon rd (restaurant OK but plenty of choice in the town, 2 mins walk away )

Kerry on AW is good  and English and a 5 min walk from Jurys Inn

https://www.adultwork.com/651835 or https://www.adultwork.com/+++KERRY++++++++++


7 review(s) found for    KERRY           linked to in above post (4 positive, 2 neutral, 1 negative)

Offline mh

Point taken on that. I'm inclined to agree you and you may have a point here. It I'm sure WAW could clear that up.

But it's a moot point anyway as dreamgirl has said she will never reveal her WG identity. So the most likely 3 options to my mind are:

a) it's TK (whatever dreamgirl's protestations) or another WG already posting on here under her "real" working name
b) it's a punter who has made a fake profile purporting to be a WG
c) it's a new WG who doesn't want any business from guys on here

I think c) is least likely and b) is looking more likely for my money. I suppose the admins can match IP addresses to another profile, though. So far they may only have tried to match against addresses used by TK.

There's one other quite likely option. d) a WG has registered a profile so she can say what she likes about punters on here without risking looking bad and therefore not affecting her business. If she really is a WG I don't think it's acceptable for her to be anonymous on a punting forum. As I said before, I know it's double standards as all us punters want our anonymity, but that's tough.

Offline mattylondon

As I said before, I know it's double standards as all us punters want our anonymity, but that's tough.
Exactly. Tough shit, I'm afraid. That's just the way the cookie crumbles.    :cool:

The key difference is that punters aren't the providers of services, so have no need to advertise or be known publicly. It makes me laugh when I read prossies complaining about this on sites such as Saafe that it isn't fair? There seems to be this misconception that being a prostitute and a punter are tantamount to the same thing and there should be a need for 'balance'. It's my contention that they are certainly not the same thing.  :hi:
« Last Edit: July 06, 2012, 09:49:26 AM by mattylondon »

I am not blind to his punting view. One of the things I can remember TK was so upset about was the fact that initially he said the booking was ok. And I will say that again, ok. Not fantastic, but nowhere as bad as WaW suggests now.

Here was his description on auto-censored when someone asked how it was

So unless he saw her twice, which I don't believe he did, this was his opinion afterwards. It appears he changed this opinion somewhere down the line due to her posts on the forum itself. Which to be honest I think of some of the things TK was annoyed about. I agreed with her on this one. That's not strictly kosher to do.

Its a punting forum, and if she was ok on the actual punt this is what matters. Not if she annoyed you on the forum in posts afterwards.


read it again Ant
Seen her she is young huge tits and about a size 16
good enough but i wont be returning
i think she needs to take stock of her life before she gets all bitter and twisted

last line sums it up along with the pms e mails on AW and about 99 texts before i threw the sim card away
some people will be happy with the service she provides I was not ,it was a report which due to her inexperience and obvious attitude was meant to get the point across to the real punters without overly upsetting her, obviously it didnt work .

Whats your punting history now ANT

Offline mattylondon


last line sums it up along with the pms e mails on AW and about 99 texts before i threw the sim card away

And as somebody who thankfully decided not to punt her, due to her nasty little temper, as alluded to by another girl in that same thread, I can vouch for her habit of sending dozens of angry, ranting texts.

Offline AnthG

last line sums it up along with the pms e mails on AW and about 99 texts before i threw the sim card away
some people will be happy with the service she provides I was not ,it was a report which due to her inexperience and obvious attitude was meant to get the point across to the real punters without overly upsetting her, obviously it didnt work.
To be fair which by your description now it seems you understand this maybe now. That point you were making was not entirely clear by your review sum up.

I for one would love it if an escort stayed in contact to chat. I come to the forums kind of deep down hoping one of the escorts will do just that.

The only escorts I have chatted with close to like the above is BBWClaire, ShadyLady and TK. Hence why I have defended them as I appreciate this.


Whats your punting history now ANT
About 15-20 bookings now. But mostly grouped when I first started as I was like a kid in a sweet shop then.

Last one Wednesday with Courtney, before that March with IP, before that in January with Paige, before that Halloween with Paige again. so a booking every 3 months seems to be me now,

BBWClaire, ShadyLady and TK

oh well one day you will learn ......

Offline James999


But it's a moot point anyway as dreamgirl has said she will never reveal her WG identity. So the most likely 3 options to my mind are:

a) it's TK (whatever dreamgirl's protestations) or another WG already posting on here under her "real" working name
b) it's a punter who has made a fake profile purporting to be a WG
c) it's a new WG who doesn't want any business from guys on here

I think c) is least likely and b) is looking more likely for my money. I suppose the admins can match IP addresses to another profile, though. So far they may only have tried to match against addresses used by TK.

There's one other quite likely option. d) a WG has registered a profile so she can say what she likes about punters on here without risking looking bad and therefore not affecting her business. If she really is a WG I don't think it's acceptable for her to be anonymous on a punting forum. As I said before, I know it's double standards as all us punters want our anonymity, but that's tough.

Then as it's a board for punters she / or he has no valid input, it's either a Troll, Teen Kylie or a wind up, whichever it is what does it add to the forum? Nothing..... Adam stated it was TK and as such it's up to Dreamgirl to prove otherwise  :hi:

Remember the ethos USED to be putting the punter first  :hi:


Latest videos on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

Latest images on UKEscorting.com (free site!)