Does fluffy cheerleading put you off a wg?

[Cuntminion]

I joined in may there was a couple things I have realised are correct that I ignored from the start but agree now

Don't be afraid to travel and vary it up but a new one hit me recently

Forget about the backlash of a neg or neutral review against a popular girl but is fanclub fawning and cheerleading enough to put you off a booking ?


I've always thought some of the high level slueths are more damaging to a girls reputation purely because they are so blinkered they make it worse when critiscm comes forth

Now I am at a point where I simply wouldn't consider booking a fluffy favourite irregardless

[vw]

Yes very much so, there are plenty with great reviews but some with cheerleaders that seem inappropriately familiar with that I tend to avoid, this implied closeness by a cheerleader is possibly in their head but certainty would not cross swords with some people even if it is all in their head.

[Cuntminion]

Theres no damage limitation either its the equivalent of going to court on a terror charge and having sharia4islam represent you
It's a very small vocal minority but the head is so far up the wg arse I'm surprised they are not being charged £20 extra

[vw]

Theres no damage limitation either its the equivalent of going to court on a terror charge and having sharia4islam represent you
It's a very small vocal minority but the head is so far up the wg arse I'm surprised they are not being charged £20 extra

No different than life in any circumstance, you should see the fan boys of the arse hole bleacher from my local pub (Bloke).

[AnthG]

The thing is, all of the really good girls, no matter the region, will have their band of followers. It seems its kind of part and parcel of this industry. The really good girls, all have their cheerleaders and followers.

What I do not like is when people lose touch on reality just to support this person. I have had the misfortune of leaving a negative towards someone with a bunch of cheerleeders and as a result she had lied to them about me to justify getting the negative. And non stop afterwards its a pain in the backside as they believe her completely and think this means they need to say anything to let the girl know they have

[WelshClipper]

To be fair, I can see how it happens, you want a punt that is going to go well, Mr Plod doesn't really care about reviews, feedbacks, field reports, Mr Plod just gets turned on by a piece of ass that he likes the look/sound of.

Of course all punts must measure up to the UKP screening test, but as long as it's not one of the common traps like B&S or not fulfilling the likes list or not a psycho in disguise, if Mr Plod fancies it I wouldn't write off a fluff.

IMHO 

[Cuntminion]

To be fair, I can see how it happens, you want a punt that is going to go well, Mr Plod doesn't really care about reviews, feedbacks, field reports, Mr Plod just gets turned on by a piece of ass that he likes the look/sound of.

Of course all punts must measure up to the UKP screening test, but as long as it's not one of the common traps like B&S or not fulfilling the likes list or not a psycho in disguise, if Mr Plod fancies it I wouldn't write off a fluff.

IMHO 

From what I've seen though and I can count em one hand so its not a punter generalisation

The uber fluffy has mcfly traits in their descriptive manner, fawning, trying to self represent as nice and refined the moment shit hits the fan is when they get put out by a favourite then it goes loco

[Mansell]

Good question, over time you tend to get to know the guys on here and their preferences / review style. So I am far more likely to take account of that than I am people being fluffy or otherwise to a girl. I also like to see if the punter is always giving positive or negative reviews, so overall, read all that you can and then make your own mind up. That's why I have mainly got positive reviews, info off here has meant I have been able to pick the good ones  thanks everyone.

[WelshClipper]

From what I've seen though and I can count em one hand so its not a punter generalisation

The uber fluffy has mcfly traits in their descriptive manner, fawning, trying to self represent as nice and refined the moment shit hits the fan is when they get put out by a favourite then it goes loco

Agreed but surely if there are several from dare I say it, normal members, then there is some hope the punt will work out ??

[vw]

From what I've seen though and I can count em one hand so its not a punter generalisation

The uber fluffy has mcfly traits in their descriptive manner, fawning, trying to self represent as nice and refined the moment shit hits the fan is when they get put out by a favourite then it goes loco

Easy to avoid anyway, your punt and we all have our own algorithms, possibly 40-60 factors spread between 2 brains.  Your algorithm obvious gives a low score for this part of the equation and other punters will allocate this as a massive positive.

You should always go with what makes you comfortable and horny.  These cheerleaders cannot possibly cheer all girls, that would cause resentment between the two prizes so always greatness to book somewhere !

Hidden Image/Members Only

[Cuntminion]

 

[WelshClipper]

Safety in numbers me.

10am, available today, 12 to 14 choice cuts and away we go with UKP on the tablet and AW on the phone..

worked a treat last time and going forward.....

[Pumper]

Almost all AW feedback is bollocks. It's there to make the client feel like he's a sex God and for the girl to encourage a repeat booking. How any reasonable client can write "I love this girl" is simply beyond me. Which is why UKP punting is anyone's best first point of reference.

[DannyJames]

Yes very much so, there are plenty with great reviews but some with cheerleaders that seem inappropriately familiar with that I tend to avoid, this implied closeness by a cheerleader is possibly in their head but certainty would not cross swords with some people even if it is all in their head.

+1

Have removed one from my hotlist this week because of this issue.

[Cuntminion]

+1

Have removed one from my hotlist this week because of this issue.

Yep knocked two off the list here

[Ben4454]

I don't punt the forum darlings on ukp. Booking process is too lengthy and comms are terrible.

[threechilliman]

Wouldn't necessarily put me off but I would look for reviews from punters I trust and take review from fluffpots with a pinch of salt.

tcm

[Bangers and Gash]

I don't punt the forum darlings on ukp. Booking process is too lengthy and comms are terrible.

Yeah, I know the feeling on that score. Plus, if you end up giving the darling a negative review then all the white knights and wannabe prize fighters come crawling out the woodwork. 

[smiths]

I joined in may there was a couple things I have realised are correct that I ignored from the start but agree now

Don't be afraid to travel and vary it up but a new one hit me recently

Forget about the backlash of a neg or neutral review against a popular girl but is fanclub fawning and cheerleading enough to put you off a booking ?


I've always thought some of the high level slueths are more damaging to a girls reputation purely because they are so blinkered they make it worse when critiscm comes forth

Now I am at a point where I simply wouldn't consider booking a fluffy favourite irregardless

I will punt with any WG I fancy if she meets my criteria except any WGs I know post on here.

[greychap]

I joined in may there was a couple things I have realised are correct that I ignored from the start but agree now

Don't be afraid to travel and vary it up but a new one hit me recently

Forget about the backlash of a neg or neutral review against a popular girl but is fanclub fawning and cheerleading enough to put you off a booking ?


I've always thought some of the high level slueths are more damaging to a girls reputation purely because they are so blinkered they make it worse when critiscm comes forth

Now I am at a point where I simply wouldn't consider booking a fluffy favourite irregardless

Yes some times when a punter goes too far it can turn you off a bit and when a punter seen a girl a few times and suddenly knows her inside out, knows everything about her and knows how careful she is as a sex worker and knows she gets tested for STI's like all the time as she is so so careful

[greychap]

I will punt with any WG I fancy if she meets my criteria except any WGs I know post on here.

Usually the more reviews they have on here and the more punters that adore them on here the more likely they will and do get a big head, it goes to some of there heads if there popular on here!

[cueball]

I joined in may there was a couple things I have realised are correct that I ignored from the start but agree now

Don't be afraid to travel and vary it up but a new one hit me recently

Forget about the backlash of a neg or neutral review against a popular girl but is fanclub fawning and cheerleading enough to put you off a booking ?


I've always thought some of the high level slueths are more damaging to a girls reputation purely because they are so blinkered they make it worse when critiscm comes forth

Now I am at a point where I simply wouldn't consider booking a fluffy favourite irregardless

I get your op coma, I too find the white knights and fluffs annoying. It does push me away slightly. I am more than happy to see a well reviewed lass but see no point in fluffs attacking a negative review of their favourites, we all have different experiences and the reviews should be read and digested (as long as it's pukka from a trusted member), defending her does have the opposite effect of rectifying her tarnished reputation.

The silly bickering won't make me go and see her, I'll judge that for myself from the original review without the bollocks that follow it.

[Cuntminion]

Yes some times when a punter goes too far it can turn you off a bit and when a punter seen a girl a few times and suddenly knows her inside out, knows everything about her and knows how careful she is as a sex worker and knows she gets tested for STI's like all the time as she is so so careful

This 

If have seen a girl and I have multiple times I don't wade in defending or speaking on her behalf

Not because I don't like confrontation because I love it but if I had any genuine respect which I would have to to keep seeing
I would know that the girl in question is confident and smart . Enough not to let it bother her

Two main types of fluffy

Think before they speak, knights of the garter who would tell you the sky is pink if it boosted their favourite

Also

Ping pong back and forth almost like they are writing in the hope of a cookie is the saddest type

Both would put me off seeing "their" wg


And a point that us extremely relevant I have yet to see any wg (not a dig I actually think it's wise) pipe up for their fluffy at any point , so that should knock something home but it don't

[tonysoprano]

It does make me less likely to book a girl if she's got spastics fawning over her like lovesick teenagers. There are a few very well reviewed girls on here I used to see before this forum discovered them and now I've just lost interest in seeing them again.

Prices go up as well the more the fluffy cunts pander to these girls as it makes them realise they can charge more and their fan club of window-lickers will continue to act as though they are doing us a favour by letting us see them.

[Marmalade]

To an extent yes. I naturally start looking for the shit the fluffhead has missed and assume the worst until someone else posts some balanced reviews. Also more likely to ignore her. Also more likely to think she's seen it and is putting her prices up 'accordingly'. Fluffy reviews stink all round.

[Cuntminion]

It does make me less likely to book a girl if she's got spastics fawning over her like lovesick teenagers. There are a few very well reviewed girls on here I used to see before this forum discovered them and now I've just lost interest in seeing them again.

Prices go up as well the more the fluffy cunts pander to these girls as it makes them realise they can charge more and their fan club of window-lickers will continue to act as though they are doing us a favour by letting us see them.

 

[vw]

Especially the punters that have to name drop and fawn at on their reviews of other WG's to send secret love notes and possibly a sorry I was unfaithful with an other girl but will give you a mention.

[anyfucker]

i will punt with any WG that takes my fancy regardless of whether she posts here/UKE or has a huge fluffy fan club or not.
I'm old enough to work things out for myself and can ignore anything too fluffy.
Have been accused myself of being close to a fluffy line on a comment i made but can't be arsed to remember it.

[Thepacifist]

I don't let the fluffies put me off the WG. It's not her fault imo if some white knight can't control himself. I tend to stay out of things, I've seen how these threads go. They don't need me or anyone else to defend them. I just sit back and enjoy.

[threechilliman]

Yeah, I know the feeling on that score. Plus, if you end up giving the darling a negative review then all the white knights and wannabe prize fighters come crawling out the woodwork. 

Ill leave a neg review irrespective if the girl let's me down. The results can be rather amusing. Some don their armour and saddle up, others go quiet.

tcm

[cueball]

Ill leave a neg review irrespective if the girl let's me down. The results can be rather amusing. Some don their armour and saddle up, others go quiet.

tcm

Ain't that the truth.

The decent lads on here sympathise though, even if they've seen her. It's punting and the classic ymmv.

Nothing makes a member look a bigger dickhead on here than white knighting a negative review.

(Well, when I think about that one, then there is quite a lot of things ha ha)

[vw]

Ain't that the truth.

The decent lads on here sympathise though, even if they've seen her. It's punting and the classic ymmv.

Nothing makes a member look a bigger dickhead on here than white knighting a negative review.

(Well, when I think about that one, then there is quite a lot of things ha ha)

No the sickening thing is them white knighting themselves on positive reviews highlighting their special relationship.

[dubs]

There's good reasons why some girls have the fluffy followers and its mainly because they give an exceptional service - so I would want to see them to experience it for myself.

You just have to expect a few weeks waiting time and poor comms.  If you expect it, its doesn't piss you off so much.

[cueball]

No the sickening thing is them white knighting themselves on positive reviews highlighting their special relationship.

Good point, like I said in the last line of my post, there's other stuff too that grinds my gears.

[vw]

Cueball

There are loads of things, thats just one that sprung to mind.

[cueball]

Cueball

There are loads of things, thats just one that sprung to mind.

Yep, I know 

Still hilarious on here though, even the fluff pots keep me entertained, it's great sport toying with em.

[Bangers and Gash]

A couple of years ago I was seriously in the mood to show Hot Ameera what she'd been missing, but it coincided with an avalanche of needy / braggish UKP followers doing novel length OTT reviews and going into microscopic detail of her (imaginary) love and special connection for them. Crossed off the list ASAP. Yuck! 

[Cuntminion]

There's good reasons why some girls have the fluffy followers and its mainly because they give an exceptional service - so I would want to see them to experience it for myself.

You just have to expect a few weeks waiting time and poor comms.  If you expect it, its doesn't piss you off so much.

Not really there's a big difference between many positive reviews and fluffy fanclub reviews, I often get the sense the uber fluffs are trying to maintain a "connection" in there mind when they are not punting their fave

As bangers said I actually find it off putting and it does have a factor in my choices now

[lostandfound]

I won't make a special effort to see a forum darling, as I don't regard any individual provider as a special snowflake, just as I don't expect any provider to see me in that light.

If I want a punt and they're available, and it's convenient for me to see them (for example no special hoops to jump through) then I would be no less likely to book them than another provider.

[claretandblue]

Fluffy reviews in particular and reviews in general seem on the decline, certainly in London

Go back six months and you couldn't  move for reviews of lydnsey, Cindy, misskdd etc etc

Maybe they have all fucked off to ukescorting or perhaps a few fluffies retired at the same time?

[Mr Br1ghts1de]

I have always reviewed on here as I have found and experienced.

I can understand that some on here would view some of my reviews as fluffy; I would just prefer to view them as exceptional experiences that were hopefully worth sharing, if not to all tastes.What I try not to do is cheerlead any girls and I will certainly not white knight any girl should they get a Negative. As long as the review is honest and posted in good faith, then every reviewer is entitled to their opinion and how they choose to review.

Fluffy cheerleading would not put me off a girl, but it doesn't necessarily mean I want to see them either. I tend to base my decisions on who I may punt with on a number
of different factors with looks, price and services all ranking higher for me than fluffy reviews.

 

[vw]

Just discovered the White Knights even have their own toilet chess piece.

Hidden Image/Members Only

External Link/Members Only

[Lz-129]

I guess most of you probably think iam either a cunt, white knight or at best fluffy after my spat the other day but all I want is honest reviews, not reviews influenced by others! No one can trust AW reviews so for me the ukp vital and I base my punting on what I read here 1st regardless of who posts it, if any girl gets a good review I want to see her, it's a simple as that in my view. I've tried to be very true with my reviews and hopefully some find them helpful and of use but I realise all to well you can't please everybody

[Eiltedongster]

Also it must be said that excessive fawning over any one WG inevitably inflates her head and then service goes down and prices go up.

A lot of guys are suckers and can't resist not only verbally grovelling over their favourites but spending a small fortune on them, net result is that in the long run said WG is hyped way beyond her true value as the above happens.

[cueball]

I guess most of you probably think iam either a cunt, white knight or at best fluffy

Ha ha, don't be too hard on yourself, you're not as bigger cunt as some I've seen on here 

[willmo1]

It takes all sorts and a review only tells me the girl really exists. Up to me then to find out what she does with me because they do different stuff for different punters if they click or not.

[yumyum3]

Good thread, C. 
It can put me off but it really depends on who the member is. I've been on here a few years now and trust and enjoy some members reviews and will use my gut instinct on whether to punt or not. One thing I have noticed on UKP over the years is that the forum always has one or two "flash-in-the-pan" members who post and review prolifically in a short period of time and then are banned or disappear and are heard of no more: I have a real distrust of this type. They are often people previously banned or touts/pimps. There's one or two on here at the moment who get on my fucking nerves and splatter the forum with reviews. I do not trust these reviewers one bit. They come across to me as stupid and addicted young men with more money than sense and no self-control.
However, I really agree with Tony Soprano as the real effect these soppy cunts have on the rest of us is this:

Prices go up as well the more the fluffy cunts pander to these girls as it makes them realise they can charge more and their fan club of window-lickers will continue to act as though they are doing us a favour by letting us see them.

[hendrix]

Good thread. I don't think it ever put me off as I was never quite sure what was fluffy and what wasn't. A number of "anti fluffs" write the fluffiest shit themselves, so that was confusing. It's like it's not "fluffy" if a vocal anti fluff writes it 

[yumyum3]

stupid and addicted young men with more money than sense and no self-control.

Apologies to the fine upstanding younger members on the forum. My comment should have read: " ... stupid and addicted men ... " 

[Eiltedongster]

The fluffy ones have also created a new problem, at least for me anyway. If I genuinely have a good experience, then I am now hesitant to put in a report of equal standing for fear of unintentional fluffing.