More straw man BS. Again misunderstood, or playing silly on purpose.
Punters perceive the same services differently, hence therein it cannot be objective. This is evident in the many positive reviews where others comment things such as "strong positive and no OWO or DFK???" Your logic is assuming that every punter has an increasing rank of what's on offer (e.g. K up to DFK, OW up to OWO deepthroat). You simply cannot look at things like that, as desires vary. Moreover, when we are talking
luxury. Women do not buy Gucci bags and LV heels, because they are practical or durable.
Of course most prefer DFK to K, deeper the BJ the better...however, we also clearly have ugly people, attractive people, and everything in between. Somehow even the ugly ones have people attracted to them, hence looks become subjective through perceptions too. By your logic of "service itself in general is objective," one could well say that "looks itself in general is objective." There are many scientific studies on physical features that can reduce attractiveness down to mere numbers and symmetry, especially facially.
Yes I do have at least one review where I "explicitly stated to have paid 200 yourself," irrespective of my general reluctance to review British WGs as they seem to be the ones who make noise on this site and put two and two together figuring out who is who on UKP, effectively outing punters by default-- knowing their physical identity at least. I.e. I don't review the majority of my high end punts, although I do pay reference here and there (incumbent reviews on the WGs, etc).
As for you and your your 2,824 posts and 30 reviews, I assumed that you are the persistent reviewer type. Again, maybe I'm wrong. I'm not reluctant to admit where I could be wrong
lol. Says something about your other points which I refuse to accept.
Looking at your recent review that you use to rebut...I said I can't see that you dropped more than 120 on a single punt. Although her hour rate is £150 (so still not actually into high end territory, just approaching), you saw her for 30 mins...below that threshold. So alas, you just showed my comment to be correct (dropped more than 120 on a single punt..?).
Part of the higher end experience is moving away from pump and dump feeling. So even punting a WG with a higher hr rate, for 15 or 30 mins, isn't the full experience per se. Regardless, 150 is still a Tesco punt, if you like. But well done for graduating from Lidl.
Oh and btw, only fools correlate price and quality when it comes to prostitutes. 
Oh dear.
Agree to disagree. Derailing a good thread with your straw men.
