Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.




Author Topic: Mandy  (Read 3204 times)


77 review(s) for MandyFoxxx (71 positive, 5 neutral, 1 negative) [Indexed by Admin]


Online mrfishyfoo

Some members used to bet the position of timmy2's posts on mandy reviews.  Often 1st comment much to Ladbrookes disappointment.

She's a good podge no doubts about it IMHO.

FFS though WG's have their moments. Anyone who thinks otherwise is deluded.

She's a good podge no doubts about it IMHO.

FFS though WG's have their moments. Anyone who thinks otherwise is deluded.

I think there is some doubt as 10% of her reviews are NOT positive, mine included.

tcm

Online mrfishyfoo

I think there is some doubt as 10% of her reviews are NOT positive, mine included.

tcm

I think you miss where I am coming from. It took a revisit for me to form my opinion as the Mandy I met the second time was far superior to when I first podged her.

As with all WG's YMMY. This is why I like to get to a lass as first punter of the day....once they are shagged out after a hard day in the office  :lol: :lol: they are never IMHO at their best. :dash: :dash:

I know there are many who say it really shouldn't matter when during the day a punter sees a WG but that is the reality of it IMHO.
« Last Edit: October 19, 2016, 07:57:01 AM by mrfishyfoo »

I think there is some doubt as 10% of her reviews are NOT positive, mine included.

tcm
Especially with the rumours of reductions for reviews  and sone won't go near girls that use things like poppers as noted on poppergate.

Offline RedKettle

I think there is some doubt as 10% of her reviews are NOT positive, mine included.

tcm

8.69%  :hi:

That is just me being annoying, not WKing  :D :D

8.69%  :hi:

That is just me being annoying, not WKing  :D :D
Would be telling kf someone could be bothered with a percentage of punters rather than reviews  would get closer to 25%

Think you are in the .minority with a single review
« Last Edit: October 19, 2016, 10:58:49 AM by virtualwaster »

Would be telling kf someone could be bothered with a percentage of punters rather than reviews  would get closer to 25%

Think you are in the .minority with a single review

Interesting stat......

tcm

Offline cueball

Especially with the rumours of reductions for reviews

Yes, I've read this a few times.

Makes me wonder about the back story of a punter reviewing her multiple times.

Food for thought there, food for thought.

Interesting stat......

tcm

Hope it was more interesting than that stato bollix about mutony . 

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=115193.0

Anyway who is top of the mandy review league ?  May Analize it later. :D
« Last Edit: October 19, 2016, 05:47:42 PM by virtualwaster »

Offline cueball

Anyway who is top of the mandy review league ?  May Analize it later. :D

Yes, do the numbers, matey's thrive on stats on the forest trails.

Hope it was more interesting than that stato bollix about mutony . 

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=115193.0

Anyway who is top of the mandy review league ?  May Analize it later. :D

It would be interesting to know how many different guys have reviewed as opposed to how many reviews she has.

tcm

Offline GolfNut

It would be interesting to know how many different guys have reviewed as opposed to how many reviews she has.

tcm

Funny you should ask that tcm. Had a bit of time on my hands and was curious meself as always the banter was heading in a particular direction and rather than take vw's gut instinct which happens to be a mile off I checked for myself. Yes I'm a dullard also.

So the numbers are as follows:

69 reviews came from 46 reviewer, of whom 5 scored neutral, 1 scored negative and 40 scored positive. The average % by reviewer therefore is 87% positive, 11% neutral and 2% negative.

I think pretty good stats for any SP. It would be a first class degree if it was exam results.

So not as bad as the three musketeers all seemed to think  :sarcastic:

Think we should therefore put this one to bed and get back to having a life  :D
Banning reason: Undesirable

It would be interesting to know how many different guys have reviewed as opposed to how many reviews she has.

tcm

Well all in excel now

46 reviewers total

6 not completely satisfied  which is 12% of reviewers

6 reviews by redt4
4 by timmy2's
3 golfnut - what wI'll emily say ?
3 chezzie john
« Last Edit: October 19, 2016, 07:07:40 PM by virtualwaster »

Offline GolfNut

Well all in excel now

46 reviewers total

6 not completely satisfied  which is 12% of reviewers

6 reviews by redt4
4 by timmy2's
3 golfnut


You omitted the 3 by Chezzie John and Wasox, or are you just counting solo meets? If so the numbers are very similar:

39 reviewers, 34 positive, 4 neutral, 1 negative, so 87% positive, 10% Neutral and 2% negative
Banning reason: Undesirable

Offline GolfNut


3 golfnut - what wI'll emily say ?


I hope she's jealous.  :D

If you care to have a look my reviews are all different scenario's and services  :hi:
Banning reason: Undesirable


You omitted the 3 by Chezzie John and Wasox, or are you just counting solo meets? If so the numbers are very similar:

39 reviewers, 34 positive, 4 neutral, 1 negative, so 87% positive, 10% Neutral and 2% negative

No just wanted to mention your name for a giggle.

Did she meet flunt though that is the question

Offline cueball

So not as bad as the three musketeers all seemed to think

All for one and one for all  :D

I hope she's jealous.  :D

If you care to have a look my reviews are all different scenario's and services  :hi:

This is not a golfie witch Hunt stop making it about you.  Such an attention hugger  :lol: :lol: :lol:

Offline cueball

Yes, don't get your knickers in a twist agent, we're all matey's here...... aren't we?

Offline GolfNut

Yes, don't get your knickers in a twist agent, we're all matey's here...... aren't we?

 :drinks: I'd like to think so CB but sometimes I do wonder  :unknown:
Banning reason: Undesirable

Offline cueball

:drinks: I'd like to think so CB but sometimes I do wonder  :unknown:

Fear not oh shiny great golfing matey, in your case it's all leg pulling  :D

I think pretty good stats for any SP. It would be a first class degree if it was exam results.

Love the exam results analogy, which punting certainly is not.

As for the stats, I'd reckon they're not so good amongst SP's with 50+ reviews. Nothing to back that up, just a hunch.

tcm

Offline GolfNut

Love the exam results analogy, which punting certainly is not.

As for the stats, I'd reckon they're not so good amongst SP's with 50+ reviews. Nothing to back that up, just a hunch.

tcm

You know I'm no fanboy tcm but looking at her numbers in any number of ways, I struggle to see anything other than a pretty good service provider. Clearly you disagree driven by your personal experience. Although yours was only a grey not red  :unknown:, so I don't get why you feel the need to continue highlight how bad you think she is. I'm puzzled by your apparent vitriol.

So far on this thread hunches have proven to be far from accurate or factual, so maybe go and get some facts before making sweeping statements.

In 2016 she's had 33 positives and 1 neutral, or 97% to 3%. Dunno about exam grades but that is a very good performance whatever you are comparing it to. Yes there will be 100% girls out there and I've met a few as you have too, but no one has said she's perfect as I'm sure Mandy wouldn't either claim to be.
Banning reason: Undesirable

I'm puzzled by your apparent vitriol.

Is vitriol one of her new beauty products in her aw shop?   

Did TCM out you off your putting?   Maybe cueball can help you pot the brown  :D

Online mrfishyfoo

.......Maybe cueball can help you pot the brown  :D

Gangbang ??? Count me in.  :yahoo: :yahoo:




Latest media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)