Author Topic: Successful UK Punting - 100 completed  (Read 29129 times)

outofthegame

  • Guest
To highlight that the agency rumped you for 20 quid.

PNE.Punter

  • Guest

The girl actually quit, never to be seen agai. What was the point of doing an FR to inform punters not to book a girl who has quit.

In case she showed up elsewhere could be one reason but to say that a regular of any decent place wouldn't take the offer of compensation like Lamorak did is wrong it happens fairly often.

Lamorak

  • Guest
To highlight that the agency rumped you for 20 quid.

Apart from me, it was only the manageress that new about the 20 pounds, there was no point, ffs sometimes you just have to move on!

Which is what im going to do.

outofthegame

  • Guest
In case she showed up elsewhere could be one reason but to say that a regular of any decent place wouldn't take the offer of compensation like Lamorak did is wrong it happens fairly often.
But he never got the cash so both the girl and the parlor should have been flagged in a negative FR.

Offline NIK

Lamorak asked for his account to be deleted. As, unless there are exceptional circumnstances, we don't delete accounts, he has been banned.

andrei

  • Guest
looooooooooooool looks like his marketing for his fave place faled miserably

sorry if it looked like i hounded him, i genuinely wanted to know why he didnt feel the need to write negs but loved to crow about the positives

i enjoy hod and will continue, but not at the request of some plum like him, i'll enjoy it because in the vast majority of cases theyre the best parlour around

Offline Sailormack

looooooooooooool looks like his marketing for his fave place faled miserably

sorry if it looked like i hounded him, i genuinely wanted to know why he didnt feel the need to write negs but loved to crow about the positives

i enjoy hod and will continue, but not at the request of some plum like him, i'll enjoy it because in the vast majority of cases theyre the best parlour around

Maybe he was on some sort of HOD affiliate marketing scheme  :sarcastic:

Lurtz

  • Guest
Lamorak asked for his account to be deleted. As, unless there are exceptional circumnstances, we don't delete accounts, he has been banned.

What a shame. He could have been an active UKP member with plenty to contribute - The MK Guru, if you will. Unfortunately he came here with preconceived ideas about what we were like, had an agenda to wind up Jimmy, and when the heat got turned up to gas mark 9, he bailed. TBH I reckon he'll be more at home on PN with the fluffy brigade. They'll pat him on the back so hard he'll have to see a chiropractor.

Offline Sailormack

I'll miss Anorak.

Only because I'm not aiming at him   :sarcastic:

Offline AnthG

TBH I reckon he'll be more at home on PN with the fluffy brigade. They'll pat him on the back so hard he'll have to see a chiropractor.
You are obviously aware of a different @@@ to what I am. The people on there are vile. And unpleasant and would not pat anyone on the back. Especially not a fellow punter.

With regards to Lamorak. I don't know why on earth he asked ton be banned for. This topic was interesting to read. Yes he clearly likes the MK escorts. But I don't think it means he is a marketer. People will say good things about places they enjoy.

He made a daft twitter post about JRC. But that wasn't beyond repair. He should have stayed and just weathered things out.

If he posted in other topics people would have forgot about this one soon enough. I have made a lot of daft posts. And I made more of them when I just joined. I was accused a couple of times of being an escort in disguise but weathered it out and am very pleased I did.

I also tried to weather it out at that pat on the back place. But they just made up reasons to get rid of me. (I will keep moaning about that one).

Lurtz

  • Guest
You are obviously aware of a different @@@ to what I am.

I was referring to the blokes; you are referring to the wimmin.

Offline AnthG

I was referring to the blokes; you are referring to the wimmin.
The blokes on there are worse than the women. They have this chivalry thing going and thus anyone who disagrees, or even just potentially disagrees with the women. They come along and act abusive and shit stirring to those fellow punters.

There are fluffys who are just nice people. And there are acolyte fluffys who act vile to all other punters to try and be their "special one".  @@@ is largely filled with the latter.

Lurtz

  • Guest

With regards to Lamorak. I don't know why on earth he asked ton be banned for.


Maybe he's a bit of a newbie on forums and the full glare of the UKP inquisition caused him to feel anxious and lose sleep. The subsequent tiredness may have resulted in a lack of focus and concentration at work, or perhaps he began to grind his teeth and bite his nails; maybe he experienced sudden onset diarrhoea during an important meeting? Who knows.

Offline smiths

You are obviously aware of a different @@@ to what I am. The people on there are vile. And unpleasant and would not pat anyone on the back. Especially not a fellow punter.

With regards to Lamorak. I don't know why on earth he asked ton be banned for. This topic was interesting to read. Yes he clearly likes the MK escorts. But I don't think it means he is a marketer. People will say good things about places they enjoy.

He made a daft twitter post about JRC. But that wasn't beyond repair. He should have stayed and just weathered things out.

If he posted in other topics people would have forgot about this one soon enough. I have made a lot of daft posts. And I made more of them when I just joined. I was accused a couple of times of being an escort in disguise but weathered it out and am very pleased I did.

I also tried to weather it out at that pat on the back place. But they just made up reasons to get rid of me. (I will keep moaning about that one).

Thats some of the people on there, once again posting in definitives tarring EVERYONE with the same brush, a very bad habit Anth in my view.

Lamorak is a  genuine punter, there is no doubt about that but as he posted he sticks virtually completely with the well known MK Parlours. Up to him that he didnt wish to post on here again.

Offline smiths

The blokes on there are worse than the women. They have this chivalry thing going and thus anyone who disagrees, or even just potentially disagrees with the women. They come along and act abusive and shit stirring to those fellow punters.

There are fluffys who are just nice people. And there are acolyte fluffys who act vile to all other punters to try and be their "special one".  @@@ is largely filled with the latter.

Once again its some of the blokes.

Lurtz

  • Guest
The blokes on there are worse than the women. They have this chivalry thing going and thus anyone who disagrees, or even just potentially disagrees with the women. They come along and act abusive and shit stirring to those fellow punters.

There are fluffys who are just nice people. And there are acolyte fluffys who act vile to all other punters to try and be their "special one".  @@@ is largely filled with the latter.

Yes, they are sycophantic.

Offline Jimmyredcab



He made a daft twitter post about JRC. But that wasn't beyond repair.

Yes it was.
It was the final nail in the coffin, most people on here had formed their own opinion on him, when you paint yourself into a corner the only option is to bail out.
He be will be far more at home on @@@, they will enjoy his stories of a 98% success rate.  :rolleyes:

Lurtz

  • Guest
Once again its some of the blokes.

I see they've started pruning your posts over there.

Offline smiths

I see they've started pruning your posts over there.

One post so far, i did call the SP who is a member on their as well as here a scumbag though so i assume thats why. He is one but i re-phrased it a bit still making the same point. ;)

Joe Blob

  • Guest

It was the final nail in the coffin, ...........when you paint yourself into a corner the only option is to bail out.
  :rolleyes:


And the prize for 'Mixed metaphor of the week' goes to..........  :drinks:

Lurtz

  • Guest
One post so far, i did call the SP who is a member on their as well as here a scumbag though so i assume thats why. He is one but i re-phrased it a bit still making the same point. ;)

Hmm. I wonder: if your handle was Mrs Smiths, would you have been given more leeway to use insults?  :rolleyes:

Offline smiths

Hmm. I wonder: if your handle was Mrs Smiths, would you have been given more leeway to use insults?  :rolleyes:

It wasnt just an insult, it was also a fact based on personal experiences of the pondlife the guy is. ;)

Offline Jimmyredcab

It wasnt just an insult, it was also a fact based on personal experiences of the pondlife the guy is. ;)

That is interesting, I got put on pre-mod for life for simply using the word pro$$ie.   :dash:

Lurtz

  • Guest
It wasnt just an insult, it was also a fact based on personal experiences of the pondlife the guy is. ;)

I'm a part-time medium. Hold on, I'm getting something coming through. I can see mist forming. They are two words appearing ... the first word begins with a 'G'.

Lurtz

  • Guest
That is interesting, I got put on pre-mod for life for simply using the word pro$$ie.   :dash:

Was it in the rules that the word 'Pro$$ie' was on @@@'s List of Banned Words??

Offline AnthG

I'm a part-time medium. Hold on, I'm getting something coming through. I can see mist forming. They are two words appearing ... the first word begins with a 'G'.
I thought that exact same person too. And P the second before anyone thinks I mean Galahad.

Was it in the rules that the word 'Pro$$ie' was on @@@'s List of Banned Words??
It is and its not.

Its not in that the mods have posted in threads countless times when I say I like to call them escorts, its just words call us whores and Pro$$ies we don't care.

But it is in that when someone does call them Pro$$ies they lose their frikkin minds and Premod them. I say they. But I mean "she"

The best thread ever to show the crazyness that is Pnet was this one

http://www.@@@.com/forum/index.php/topic/22634-proie/

Gemma Harris starts it to say she likes the word. A few of the ladies agreed with her. The mod of the red death (I.e The Vincent Price movie villain for those curious who I meant by that) came along and said "Well said Gemma. I have said for years, you can call me hooker, whore, prossie, whatever you choose. I know what I am, and I AM NOT ASHAMED.".

Chloe MKEscorts then said she doesn't mind it either; and if she says it, then its ok given she picks fights with everyone for no reason.

ShadyLady as Ilovekitties says; Nobody is tarring anyone. We can clearly see the difference. It's not a gender differentation, it's one of attitude, behaviour and belief. :)

So if the resident psycho and escorts hitwoman says it, its really ok.

Then a punter in Finn555 says "I use Pro$$ie but not in a derogatory way or with any intention to offend. If the sensitive souls take exception to it then so be it ;) ".

And the shit hits the fan from all directions and he is called all sorts from twat to twatter and is premodded and told to fuck off from the forum by the mods in Jkay, Claire and Genghis.  :lol:

Lurtz

  • Guest

And the shit hits the fan from all directions and he is called all sorts from twat to twatter and is premodded and told to fuck off from the forum by the mods in Jkay, Claire and Genghis.  :lol:

In your opinion, what's worse: 'Pro$$ie' or 'twat' ?

Offline softlad

In your opinion, what's worse: 'Pro$$ie' or 'twat' ?

Pro$$ie is far worse....
A twat has a use !  :dance:

Offline AnthG

In your opinion, what's worse: 'Pro$$ie' or 'twat' ?
I would say a Twat is way worse as its meant universally as an extreme insult.

You should watch the Cinema Snobs review of Cannibal Ferox where he makes a joke about one of the characters calling all the women in the film twats and whores and he thus tries it on his girlfriend. (9mins 55 seconds in for the start of the joke). (Its a strong horror film for those easily offended, but its a PGish rated review of it, its done for jokes of the movie).

http://thatguywiththeglasses.com/videolinks/bj/tcs/33849-cannibal-ferox

With regards to that, personally I would classify Whore as much worse than pro$$ie, or Prossy. A whore is a derogative name for a lady, and quite an offensive one. A Prossy/Pro$$ie is just a playful abbreviation.

If you walked up to a lady in the street and called a whore and then another a prossie. You stand a much better chance of getting slapped by the one you called whore. I honestly feel that way too. I would not use any personally. But I feel whore is way worse. And Twat even worse than that.

Lurtz

  • Guest
Pro$$ie is far worse....
A twat has a use !  :dance:

He He He  :D Hold on a moment [scratches head] .. don't pro$$ies have twats?

Lurtz

  • Guest
I would say a Twat is way worse as its meant universally as an extreme insult.


Assuming both terms were used pejoratively rather than playfully,  'twat' is a direct, personal insult aimed at an individual target with the intention of upsetting them. 'Pro$$ie' just refers to a non-specific group. At worse, it shows a lack of respect, irrespective of whether or not they deserve respect.

After some brief deliberation, I'd say 'twat' is worse. Curiously, females are allowed to use this highly offensive term against good, honest punters on some forums. Indeed, the mods use it  :scare:. It fills my heart with deoxygenated blood.  :(  Females in positions of power - whether they like it or not - have a duty of care towards their parishioners, but some act like weeds that choke the life out of the pretty little flowers. I guess it's the rule of the jungle; the law of the meadows; it's Natures way.  :(

Offline Jimmyredcab



With regards to that, personally I would classify Whore as much worse than pro$$ie, or Prossy. A whore is a derogative name for a lady, and quite an offensive one. A Prossy/Pro$$ie is just a playful abbreviation.

Can I make it clear that I did not call anyone a "pro$$ie" ------------ I simply used the word in a post.

The prostitute moderators bullied Galahad into putting me on pre-mod, not for a few days but for life.   :thumbsdown:


good lad
You are a relatively new member so welcome. You replied to a thread that has been dead for nearly 4 years. Always good to check on the posting date.  :hi:

cougar_hunter

  • Guest
How did you find Justine? There seems to be no reviews for her considering pretty much every other girl on HOD has. Is she really Brazilian or Romanian on cover?

Many thanks

How did you find Justine? There seems to be no reviews for her considering pretty much every other girl on HOD has. Is she really Brazilian or Romanian on cover?

Many thanks
Perhaps read my reply above yours and welcome  :drinks: