Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.


Author Topic: Successful UK Punting - 100 completed  (Read 25163 times)

Offline Lamorak

I’m not on here to troll or wind anyone up and this thread certainly was not intended in any way to do this. The discussion got heated, incorrect information regarding the date of my first auto-censored FR was taken as fact and eventually insults get thrown back and forth.

Too get back on track.

These are my punts so far for 2012, all range from good to excellent:

1. Millie – 90 minutes. Sunday 8 January 2012 MKEscorts
2. Valentina – 90 minutes. Monday 16 January 2012 MKEscorts. PN FR107442
3. Pixie – 90 minutes. Friday 20 Janurary 2012 Annabellas
4. Sara – 90 minutes. Friday 3 February 2012 MKEscorts PN FR107640
5. Karolina – 2 hours. Monday 13 February 2012 ThePumpClub. PN FR107805
6. Laura – 90 minutes Friday 24 February 2012 Annabellas. PN FR107974
7. Sara - 90 minutes. Friday 2 March 2012 MKEscorts
8. Laura – 90 minutes. Friday 9 March 2012 Annabellas
9. Jasmine – 2 hours. Friday 30 March 2012 Annabellas. PN FR108432
10. Karolina – 90 minutes. Monday 2 April 2012 Annabellas
11. Sara - 90 minutes. Tuesday 10 April 2012 MKEscorts
12. Emma - 90 minutes. Monday 16 April 2012 Annabellas
13. Tilly - 90 minutes. Monday 23 April 2012 Annabellas. PN FR108733
14. Sara - 90 minutes. Wednesday 2 May  2012 MKEscorts
15. Sara - 90 minutes. Monday 21 May  2012 MKEscorts
16. Jade - 90 minutes. Friday 25 May  2012 MKEscorts
17. Lucy - 90 minutes. Wednesday 30 May 2012 Annabellas. PN FR109270
18. Sara - 90 minutes. Wednesday 6 June  2012 MKEscorts
19. Vanessa – 2 hours. Wednesday 13 June 2012 MKEscorts. PN FR109523
20. Vanessa – 2 hours. Saturday 16 June 2012 MKEscorts

Now there must be someone on here that has been to MK, HoD SW7 or else where and has seen a girl off this list, or has looked at their profile pages on the relevant web sites.

If you have lets hear how you got on with them and how your punt went.

I’m just trying to prove the point that I’ve been making i.e good research and carefull selection can lead to a good and ongoing punting hobby. Thats all.

Offline Matium

Which girls on your list would you recommend for a duo?

Offline Lamorak

Which girls on your list would you recommend for a duo?

The only due i've had was 90 minutes with Karolina and Jasmine.

I was seeing both regularly at the time, they are also friends. These two plus a bottle of wine and K and J being very interactive with each other - yes  a good time was had by all, especially me when K straddled my face and came in mouth the same time that Jasmine sucked me off into hers. Snowballing followed.

Pixie and Karolina would be a good due.

I'm hoping to get a long interactive session with Emma and Amy dressed as schoolgirls complete with red suspender belts and black stockings arranged soon.

Offline andrei


Regarding not doing FR's for the two not good punts, the reason is I'd already submitted 3 for the establishments and I couldn't submit anymore

ok, lets assume you have mitigating circumstances re your first negative experience

by the time your second negative had come around you had written more than 3 reports so that rule was clearly changed by then - why didnt you write a negative on punt 28?
Banning reason: Multiple accounts (andrei, london_lad_2)

Offline Lamorak

ok, lets assume you have mitigating circumstances re your first negative experience

by the time your second negative had come around you had written more than 3 reports so that rule was clearly changed by then - why didnt you write a negative on punt 28?

I raised the issue at the time with the then manager and a satisfactory conclusion was reached. Happy now?

The pedantic way some of you guys go on, you would make someone a very annoying wife!  :rolleyes:

Offline outofthegame

I raised the issue at the time with the then manager and a satisfactory conclusion was reached. Happy now?

The pedantic way some of you guys go on, you would make someone a very annoying wife!  :rolleyes:
It is because your story, if one applies common wisdom, does appear suspect.  Couple that with your trolling statements aimed at one of the mods and your overall iffy responses then you should expect that people will challenge you. 98% hit record and no negative FRs usually equates to a devoted fluffy from auto-censored. If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it is probably a duck. You want some bread?

Offline andrei

I raised the issue at the time with the then manager and a satisfactory conclusion was reached. Happy now?

The pedantic way some of you guys go on, you would make someone a very annoying wife!  :rolleyes:

so basically in return for not writing a negative for your favourite establishment you were offered an inducement to your next appointment

you've dug a hole now

i really enjoy going to hod myself, but people like you do irreparable damage to them, you had bad times there but refused to write negatives for fear of sullying their rep - in actual fact you write a negative and if the girl is no good then hod to their credit would turf her which would further add o their already excellent rep

successful uk punting my backside, fluffsessful punting morelike
Banning reason: Multiple accounts (andrei, london_lad_2)

Offline iName

I've seen Jade at HOD South Kensington and she wasn't as great as all the reviews I've read. She was OK not the worst I've had.

But I know I'm the odd one out with her as every body else has had a great time with her. It's all about whether you click and we just didn't.

Offline AnthG

so basically in return for not writing a negative for your favourite establishment you were offered an inducement to your next appointment

you've dug a hole now

I know I may dig a hole for myself too. But I personally don't see anything wrong with this. I say this as when I punt with an agency, I feel I am putting my faith in that agency to provide me a good service. If its not satisfactory and I complain and they put it right. I would say that would mean you would be a bit off to then still negative review them.

It is the same if I buy a TV from Richer Sounds. And I do not like it. If they offer me a refund or swapped it for a different one. Then its not really worth a negative review of Richer Sounds.

The way the auto-censored reviews system works is you are negative reviewing the agency more so than the girl you see.

Offline Sailormack

I can't help thinking that lamorak is like a fish out of water on here.

A bit like him walking into a party wearing chinos and a t shirt when everyone else is wearing rubber gimp suits  :scare:

Offline Lamorak

I can't help thinking that lamorak is like a fish out of water on here.

A bit like him walking into a party wearing chinos and a t shirt when everyone else is wearing rubber gimp suits  :scare:

I'm starting to think you right.

I'm not a auto-censored Fluffy ,what ever that's supposed to be. (I'm certain some will tell me very quickly)

The problem i seem to have on here is i've have a good punting record, instead of not having a good punting record and moaning about my bad choice of girl and that it never seems to get any better.


Offline Lamorak

so basically in return for not writing a negative for your favourite establishment you were offered an inducement to your next appointment

you've dug a hole now

i really enjoy going to hod myself, but people like you do irreparable damage to them, you had bad times there but refused to write negatives for fear of sullying their rep - in actual fact you write a negative and if the girl is no good then hod to their credit would turf her which would further add o their already excellent rep

successful uk punting my backside, fluffsessful punting morelike

It was actually Madam Beckys Kittens just after HoD took them over. Michelle was a stand in for a non appearing Karolina and was recommended by the then manageress as providing the services I'm used to. However once in the room and underway there was no DFK or CIM, these were refused with the line "your not my boyfriend so I don't do those here" After talking to manageress about this I got £20 off my next punt and Michelle disappeard of the rota after a week or so. Hardly a bribe, given the amount I spend.

So know you've disected my punts, why don't you list yours on here and we can debate them.

Offline Lamorak

I've seen Jade at HOD South Kensington and she wasn't as great as all the reviews I've read. She was OK not the worst I've had.

But I know I'm the odd one out with her as every body else has had a great time with her. It's all about whether you click and we just didn't.

I've seen Jade twice and I had two good punts with her, but she is not the best i've punted with and neither were the "names" Tiff Kingston, Vienna Moore or Summer Raine, Summer was the best out of these three though.

Offline Lamorak

I know I may dig a hole for myself too. But I personally don't see anything wrong with this. I say this as when I punt with an agency, I feel I am putting my faith in that agency to provide me a good service. If its not satisfactory and I complain and they put it right. I would say that would mean you would be a bit off to then still negative review them.

It is the same if I buy a TV from Richer Sounds. And I do not like it. If they offer me a refund or swapped it for a different one. Then its not really worth a negative review of Richer Sounds.

The way the auto-censored reviews system works is you are negative reviewing the agency more so than the girl you see.

Thanks for your response.

Common sense did prevail at the time and I was happy with the outcome

Offline Lamorak

Today I booked my next punt, for 2 hours, which will be my 100th in MK. It's the same girl I spent 4 Hours with last week:

Take a look, see what you think, she looks good in the picture and even better in the flesh and offers the services I enjoy:

http://www.miltonkeynesescorts.com/escort-girl.php?girlid=416

I'm sure you'll find fault somewhere!


Offline AnthG

I'm not a auto-censored Fluffy ,what ever that's supposed to be. (I'm certain some will tell me very quickly)
I don't think that is the right term for them.

auto-censored Acolyte is better IMHO. Fluffy suggests they are nice people. And yet from what I could see they are not. auto-censored Acolytes are people who act vile towards any punter who even remotely speaks out or differers in the view of the female posters on there.

They usually spout the words Twat or Troll in their responses to those posts.

You seem like a nice person so far from your posts. And therefore I would not in anyway class you as a auto-censored acolyte.

I have never saw a fluffy on auto-censored yet.

I can't help thinking that lamorak is like a fish out of water on here.

A bit like him walking into a party wearing chinos and a t shirt when everyone else is wearing rubber gimp suits  :scare:
I disagree with this, and strongly so. For one, if not here, where would be the right place for someone who has had so many what they would rate as good punts? It certainly would not be auto-censored. The people there are vile. And will simply put anyone off punting.

Plus if someone is genuinely enjoying himself with every punt they have. Nobody should try to make them see the errors in his ways so to speak. What would be the point or benefit in that?

I truly wish I could enjoy every punt. And I honestly thought I would. but unfortunately some girls see a sort touch and take liberties.

Offline cunnyhunt

I used to research and used HoD, but then I booked a "milf" who they advertised as 35, I thought she would be 40  but she was actually 53, the cunt who ran it never got back to me.

You have to admit that even though you research there is a lot of photoshopping on the MK sites now and the girls are not as portrayed. I only visit the UK now but tend to not go to MK.

Offline Lamorak

I used to research and used HoD, but then I booked a "milf" who they advertised as 35, I thought she would be 40  but she was actually 53, the cunt who ran it never got back to me.

You have to admit that even though you research there is a lot of photoshopping on the MK sites now and the girls are not as portrayed. I only visit the UK now but tend to not go to MK.

I think I know the milf you booked. Not my type!

Photoshopping is common place everywhere these days, as is being economic with their ages.

An advantage of having to drive to MK is that i'm usually in MK centre by 10.00 for my 11.00 booking is that I can park up within site prior to 10.30 and get to see the girls who are working that day as they arrive. It's helped me to decide making a future booking or not to make a future booking. Two girls I saw arrive that I later booked were Pixie and Millie. Some girls I've booked are one's I've seen in passing once inside, that is of course if they offer the services I look for. I don't just book a girl because she looks gorgeous.

Offline outofthegame

I'm starting to think you right.

I'm not a auto-censored Fluffy ,what ever that's supposed to be. (I'm certain some will tell me very quickly)

The problem i seem to have on here is i've have a good punting record, instead of not having a good punting record and moaning about my bad choice of girl and that it never seems to get any better.
The problem is that you have acted like an arse, stating on Twitter that you are winding a mid up here and then slagging off the way in which the board is run.  Something doesn't add up, the majority of genuine punters do not come here and troll or attack the board.

Offline Jerboa

Apparently she had slimmed down and improved by the time she was in MK, Jerboa rated her and i respect his opinions. ;)

Why thank you Mr Smiths, the cheque is in the post,  :P  Vanessa was curvy when I saw her in '09, I think I said buxom size 10, but never saw her at a party, so maybe It's not for her.
She has recently started working In Bedford at Intimate.

It is very simple. You have mainly stuck with the same Establishments in MK where you know good WGs are often working and other punters who are respected post about their experiences by FRs and by forum posts about the same WGs. Its not rocket science. Sometimes its a case of not clicking with WGs though however good they are rated by others in my experiences.

I have no doubt you have punted as your list says, you  keep detailed records which you have posted before as i know from reading them.

Lamoraks good punts do sound to good to be true, I'm guessing there are some that were great some good some okayish, some that were poor but they scratched an Itch, but In his defence he has done the right thing In using PN and other punting boards to research his future punts, many of mine have been spur of the moments, or totally blind walk in's, but sometimes doing all the research In the world wont guarentee a great punt, some girls I've seen that have had great feedback I thought were average.

Offline andrei

It was actually Madam Beckys Kittens just after HoD took them over. Michelle was a stand in for a non appearing Karolina and was recommended by the then manageress as providing the services I'm used to. However once in the room and underway there was no DFK or CIM, these were refused with the line "your not my boyfriend so I don't do those here" After talking to manageress about this I got £20 off my next punt and Michelle disappeard of the rota after a week or so. Hardly a bribe, given the amount I spend.

So know you've disected my punts, why don't you list yours on here and we can debate them.

a bribes a bribe mate - you accepted a bribe in return for not writing a negative fr, no two ways about it

as for listing my punts on here, why, do i look like the kind of idiot who would start a thread saying "ooooh look at all the punts i've done, i must be some sort of superhero"

its childish, sort of like the kid who likes to tell everyone at school how many new toys he is getting for xmas, not my style at all amigo
Banning reason: Multiple accounts (andrei, london_lad_2)

Offline Jimmyredcab

a bribes a bribe mate - you accepted a bribe in return for not writing a negative fr, no two ways about it

as for listing my punts on here, why, do i look like the kind of idiot who would start a thread saying "ooooh look at all the punts i've done, i must be some sort of superhero"

its childish, sort of like the kid who likes to tell everyone at school how many new toys he is getting for xmas, not my style at all amigo

Brilliant post.   ;) ;)

Offline Lamorak

a bribes a bribe mate - you accepted a bribe in return for not writing a negative fr, no two ways about it

I think you’ll find it’s called compensation for lack of services advertised. In fact the manageress left shortly afterwards and I didn’t get the £20 anyway. I didn’t really care as £20 is peanuts to me.

After you feeble attempt to discredit me with the incorrect auto-censored FR information you posted why should I take any notice of anything you say?

At least you made JRC happy. Forum moderator??

With 98 successful punts out of 100 under my belt and my 99th booked for next week, I hope you all continue in your search to find punting happiness

Offline outofthegame

I think you’ll find it’s called compensation for lack of services advertised. In fact the manageress left shortly afterwards and I didn’t get the £20 anyway. I didn’t really care as £20 is peanuts to me.

So you were had over and you still did not submit a negative FR. Am glad you are do affluent as to be able to write off both the 20 quid and to some extent the whole cost. Most punters are not in the same situation and rely on sites like this one and auto-censored to provide some info on prossies, good and bad to prevent a waste of time and funds.

By not providing a negative report, you have let fellow punters down. Fair enough and you probably don't care, but to join a community and post up about how you have benefited from the wisdom and folly of others (careful research) to ensure you have had a good run, whilst avoiding reporting the bad times means that you are, IMHO, a bit of a wanker at best and at worst a troll who thinks they are clever.

Offline Lamorak

So you were had over and you still did not submit a negative FR. Am glad you are do affluent as to be able to write off both the 20 quid and to some extent the whole cost. Most punters are not in the same situation and rely on sites like this one and auto-censored to provide some info on prossies, good and bad to prevent a waste of time and funds.

By not providing a negative report, you have let fellow punters down. Fair enough and you probably don't care, but to join a community and post up about how you have benefited from the wisdom and folly of others (careful research) to ensure you have had a good run, whilst avoiding reporting the bad times means that you are, IMHO, a bit of a wanker at best and at worst a troll who thinks they are clever.


The girl actually quit, never to be seen agai. What was the point of doing an FR to inform punters not to book a girl who has quit.


Latest videos on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

Latest images on UKEscorting.com (free site!)