Why do some SPs think a punter will automatically take their word for things?
I posted on a thread on auto-censored about a punter who says he got a STI off of a WG who he punted with through Agency Barracuda (i have no idea if he did or not and whether what he has posted is true or not) and the Agency Midland Maidens has posted if an Agency is any good they would keep the punter informed regarding whether the results of GUM testing come back positive or negative.
Would they? IMO it could well be seen as bad for business to admit the WG did have a STI so not telling the punter the truth could be what they do. Obviously they might tell him the truth but my point was unless the punter goes with the WG to the GUM and stays with her 24/7 until she gets the results which in reality isnt going to happen its not provable.
If something isnt provable to me beyond all doubt which on punting forums is likely to not be that often then i dont just take a stranger or virtual strangers word for things anymore than i do with any stranger or virtual stranger to me outside punting, i listen to or read what they say and make a judgement what i think which in reality might be right or wrong but bearing in mind its not provable.