Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: Little Katie - Going for chaos  (Read 4097 times)

unclesweetheart

  • Guest
In the light of Mr B’s recent unfortunate experience I must confess that part of my being a fluffy cunt is that I fully expect girls to be crap at comms. Maybe it makes the experience more like real life. Or maybe it’s because, in my two years’ punting, I’m inured to playing the waiting game. It may well be that I have self-esteem issues. Or maybe I just mistrust efficient people. Earlier this year I got so pissed off with a UKP star that, like Mr Brightside, I wrote her a Dear John email saying that despite her blandishments re: me being special etc etc  there was so wide a gap between word and deed that it was surely best for us to go our separate ways. This provoked an interesting twitter exchange and my wounded pride was duly salved. But, you know, having a little spat with a WG only makes the gfe illusion all the more lifelike.

It was a bit hard for me, like Mr. B, to see Katie posting gorgeous pix of herself when she hadn’t replied to my “thank you for an amazing time” text.  But then she did, so all was ok. More than. But I understand and respect Mr B’s frustration. After you’ve had an amazing time with a girl, she’s cum several times, so have you, it’s been fucking great…how can you not want some kind of confirmation that this was more than a normal fuck n chuck? And for this confirmation to take the form of reliable comms?  It’s (I assume) a problem for the best girls: they’re present with you. In Katie’s case (as her post in Mr B’s thread makes clear) she’s a natural submissive, and so is wired to give pleasure. But this is also a job, and how do you balance your own sexuality with the demands of offering a service and those of the Real World? I think doing that would be a huge challenge, and so, like I say, I’m prepared to cut WGs a huge amount of slack. No doubt this is because I’m hugely disorganised myself and therefore deeply mistrust people who are too well-organised. I’m with Bob (Dylan) on this: “I accept chaos – I’m not sure if it accepts me.”

Having said all this, Katie’s comms with me were great. I was on the train to Bristol when I saw on twitter that she’d cancelled her week’s bookings due to family circumstances. So I texted her to check that all was ok, and received an enthusiastic “looking forward to it” text. But that felt formulaic to me so I texted again to ask if she was really sure. She answered to say that she really wasn’t sure: why didn’t we meet up, drink and chat and see what happened? If nothing did it’d be a social evening, no charge. I was fine with that. Last thing I wanted to have was sex with someone who wasn’t really up for it, and I’d met Katie before and we’d had a great time – not just sexually. A free night with a beautiful young woman, setting the world to rights and getting pleasantly pissed – that’d be great. Also, as we were starting an hour late, owing to the family circumstances – if anything did happen, it’d cost £200 less than the agreed overnight price. Fine.

So I’m sitting in the bar, eeking out the beer. Accepting chaos, maybe. Then get the call to go up.

I’d asked Katie to wear schoolgirl gear but, given that the intercourse we were going to have may well have been only conversational, she’s dressed only in a gold top and leather trousers. Tight leather trousers, mind. She’s exceptionally  lovely.

We talk, sitting cross-legged on her sofa. We don’t know if we’re actually going to fuck or not, and, as I say, that’s about as close to gfe as it’s possible to get. First date! I have my baggage, she hers. We tip it out, chew it over.

There’s some friendly touching. Her breasts seem welcomingly touchable. And so therefore touched. But, you know, we’re talking. I play her some deeply unerotic Unthanks. She likes, but.

I’m hovering between sensitivity and something else. Skimming through my ipod. Then find this, and the guitar kicks in, we both know this isn’t going to be a free session:

External Link/Members Only

Then it’s clear we’re going for chaos.


[Review proper starts here]

Problem is, you can’t really do justice to Little Katie without mentioning stuff that makes you sound like a fluffiest bag of pillowstuff in the Land of Eiderdown. Because the salient points are:

1.    When she stands at her wall-size window (Californianesque) in the early morning sunlight, naked, about to draw the blinds so you can both get back to sleep, having only had 3 hours of the stuff, looking out over just-woken Bristol, you are both hard and soft. You don’t know whether to ask her to sit on your face so you can breakfast on her perfect bottom or write a sonnet-sequence about a gorgeous, naked girl looking out over the city. I opted for the first option in this universe, but in another one I’m still knocking out the fourteen-liners.
2.   I love making Katie squirt, not just because making a girl squirt is great, but because Katie squirting feels so right. Givers have to give as takers take and Katie is a giver. Somehow, I can do this to her, over and over. I don’t give up on getting her to release and the thing is, I don’t know what my technique is, beyond sortve knowing that if I finger her hard and deep enough it may well happen. But the key thing is not my fingering, but her wanting. A girl has to want to squirt, to squirt. And there’s something about forcing a girl to lie back on the ridge of her sofa while you frig her cunt as hard as you can until she unloads everyfuckingwhere that turns a client into a regular.
3.   Great escorts are born, not made. Like great porn stars or great … bakers. You have to want to do it, and you have to love the process, the means by which. You have, therefore, to have a genuine interest in if not passion for:
-   Men and
-   Their dicks
-   What those dicks do and produce
-   People being together
-   Breaking taboos
-   Pleasure and all its knotty issues like
-   The relationship of identity to the body
-   And so on

Because Katie is exceptional it’s worth thinking about why. In back-to-basics terms she offered the following “services” in our overnight: DFK, CIM, rimming, RO, Deep throat, gagging, cowgirl and reverse cowgirl. Also, for fans of degradation like me, she likes being slapped and spat on. Choked. Anal play is very much going to happen. Two fingers? That’ll do nicely. Lick the two fingers that have been up there? Why I’d be delighted. Spanking? Well it’d be silly not to. Pussy slapping? Oh go on then.

There is also the thrill of doing all of this with a beautiful girl. The sleepy-but-alert girl at the window. So part of the key is the paradox: she’s beautiful, and drooling plentifully over your cock. When she spins a filthy tale about what we’re going to get up to at a sex club, maybe, with another girl, them both licking each others’ arses, mouths wide open for any cock that wants to fill them,  with “slut” lipsticked across her forehead, on a leash that I’m holding, she’s smiling at the thought of it, in the sure knowledge that her telling you about it is going to unload your (banana-flavoured, apparently) spunk in her mouth. As of course it does.

I love this, what we’re doing, this now. I love these nows. Whether it’s smoking, or fucking, or me slapping her tits, or sucking them gently, or listening to Richard Hawley or knowing that she’s about to let go, or her smiling, or us talking or her standing naked at the window. What Katie is the best at is being present. You’re in the room with her and it’s the two of you.The two of you being together is a project. The project is not just desire and excitement and pleasure: the project is intensifying the present.

We both need to know what is/was this like? What’s it about? What’s going on? This stuff needs knowing about.

I’m apprehensive because BDSM is, perhaps, about the rage that accompanies desire. What is slapping, I say to myself, if not the desire to inflict pain, and what else could provoke that desire except rage? When we – ok then, when I – slap Katie what, exactly, am I expressing? It’s about power too, of course. I want to have power over her. I want to make her cum. I want to have an effect on her. I want her to know I’m here. I want her to know that I want something. I want her to know that I want.

But what, very exactly, do I want?

Sometimes I feel like Jekyll and Hyde: I read my own reports of sessions I’ve had with Lindsey and other submissive girls, and the previous one with Katie, and I think: who is that guy?  But when Richard Hawley  starts, and we start to go down in it, I know more and more that I want, and what I want. I want to lick that arsehole. I just want my face in it. So I bend her over to do so. I want to feel her tits. I want that cunt. In my face. Now. I want to smear her cuntjuice over her face. Her squirt’s got to go there too.

So the now is about answering the key question: what do you really, really, really want? Tippy-Toe across the ice, then letting the ice break. Katie’s exceptional because she’s there with you all the way.

I just know she’s an excellent dance teacher. And not just because I’ve seen her with a hula hoop. She proffered it to me, just before I left but I declined. Of course. Too shy. But maybe – maybe – with her help, I’ll get the knack of it. Ish.

We might be in for a long haul, though.

So, in summary: a glorious gfe turning into a pse and a huge amount of drunken kissing, music-listening, chat, hanging loose. I can't think of any significant negative. I even managed to make Katie into a convert to Lucinda Williams. I can't wait to see her again though I know that her family situation is such that that may take a long time. And fluffy as it may sound I believe Katie when she says she needs to be totally present in the room with the guys she sees - she certainly has been with me on both occasions I've seen her - and so I'm more than happy to wait.

OldAdmin

  • Guest
The reason this "review" was posted is obviously to push down the negative she just got. You probably wouldn't have posted it otherwise.
There is also no reason to include all that bollocks at the top repeatedly mentioning Mr.Brightside. It's irrelevant to the new review.
For those reasons, does not qualify as review and moved here.

vw

  • Guest
The reason this "review" was posted is obviously to push down the negative she just got. You probably wouldn't have posted it otherwise.
There is also no reason to include all that bollocks at the top repeatedly mentioning Mr.Brightside. It's irrelevant to the new review.
For those reasons, does not qualify as review and moved here.
Sneaky behaviour IMHO.

Again another review by Uncle with no description, absolutely pointless like his latest review where it took to page 4 to figure the WG was an Indian.  Serves no new punters anything other than an ego rub.

Tip for uncle, there are new people here, not familiar with your reviews.

Imagine reading a review on a new stereo and all it went on about was the songs he had played.  Yes  not very useful

MrBridger

  • Guest
Fuck me, and I thought I was fluffy.

What complete and utter solipsistic bollocks.

Offline HawkG

To the o.p.: learn to edit, FFS

vw

  • Guest
In the light of Mr B’s recent unfortunate experience I must confess that part of my being a fluffy cunt is that I fully expect girls to be crap at comms. Maybe it makes the experience more like real life. Or maybe it’s because, in my two years’ punting, I’m inured to playing the waiting game. It may well be that I have self-esteem issues. Or maybe I just mistrust efficient people. Earlier this year I got so pissed off with a UKP star that, like Mr Brightside, I wrote her a Dear John email saying that despite her blandishments re: me being special etc etc  there was so wide a gap between word and deed that it was surely best for us to go our separate ways. This provoked an interesting twitter exchange and my wounded pride was duly salved. But, you know, having a little spat with a WG only makes the gfe illusion all the more lifelike.

It was a bit hard for me, like Mr. B, to see Katie posting gorgeous pix of herself when she hadn’t replied to my “thank you for an amazing time” text.  But then she did, so all was ok. More than. But I understand and respect Mr B’s frustration. After you’ve had an amazing time with a girl, she’s cum several times, so have you, it’s been fucking great…how can you not want some kind of confirmation that this was more than a normal fuck n chuck? And for this confirmation to take the form of reliable comms?  It’s (I assume) a problem for the best girls: they’re present with you. In Katie’s case (as her post in Mr B’s thread makes clear) she’s a natural submissive, and so is wired to give pleasure. But this is also a job, and how do you balance your own sexuality with the demands of offering a service and those of the Real World? I think doing that would be a huge challenge, and so, like I say, I’m prepared to cut WGs a huge amount of slack. No doubt this is because I’m hugely disorganised myself and therefore deeply mistrust people who are too well-organised. I’m with Bob (Dylan) on this: “I accept chaos – I’m not sure if it accepts me.”

Having said all this, Katie’s comms with me were great. I was on the train to Bristol when I saw on twitter that she’d cancelled her week’s bookings due to family circumstances. So I texted her to check that all was ok, and received an enthusiastic “looking forward to it” text. But that felt formulaic to me so I texted again to ask if she was really sure. She answered to say that she really wasn’t sure: why didn’t we meet up, drink and chat and see what happened? If nothing did it’d be a social evening, no charge. I was fine with that. Last thing I wanted to have was sex with someone who wasn’t really up for it, and I’d met Katie before and we’d had a great time – not just sexually. A free night with a beautiful young woman, setting the world to rights and getting pleasantly pissed – that’d be great. Also, as we were starting an hour late, owing to the family circumstances – if anything did happen, it’d cost £200 less than the agreed overnight price. Fine.

So I’m sitting in the bar, eeking out the beer. Accepting chaos, maybe. Then get the call to go up.

I’d asked Katie to wear schoolgirl gear but, given that the intercourse we were going to have may well have been only conversational, she’s dressed only in a gold top and leather trousers. Tight leather trousers, mind. She’s exceptionally  lovely.

We talk, sitting cross-legged on her sofa. We don’t know if we’re actually going to fuck or not, and, as I say, that’s about as close to gfe as it’s possible to get. First date! I have my baggage, she hers. We tip it out, chew it over.

There’s some friendly touching. Her breasts seem welcomingly touchable. And so therefore touched. But, you know, we’re talking. I play her some deeply unerotic Unthanks. She likes, but.

I’m hovering between sensitivity and something else. Skimming through my ipod. Then find this, and the guitar kicks in, we both know this isn’t going to be a free session:

External Link/Members Only

Then it’s clear we’re going for chaos.


[Review proper starts here]

Problem is, you can’t really do justice to Little Katie without mentioning stuff that makes you sound like a fluffiest bag of pillowstuff in the Land of Eiderdown. Because the salient points are:

1.    When she stands at her wall-size window (Californianesque) in the early morning sunlight, naked, about to draw the blinds so you can both get back to sleep, having only had 3 hours of the stuff, looking out over just-woken Bristol, you are both hard and soft. You don’t know whether to ask her to sit on your face so you can breakfast on her perfect bottom or write a sonnet-sequence about a gorgeous, naked girl looking out over the city. I opted for the first option in this universe, but in another one I’m still knocking out the fourteen-liners.
2.   I love making Katie squirt, not just because making a girl squirt is great, but because Katie squirting feels so right. Givers have to give as takers take and Katie is a giver. Somehow, I can do this to her, over and over. I don’t give up on getting her to release and the thing is, I don’t know what my technique is, beyond sortve knowing that if I finger her hard and deep enough it may well happen. But the key thing is not my fingering, but her wanting. A girl has to want to squirt, to squirt. And there’s something about forcing a girl to lie back on the ridge of her sofa while you frig her cunt as hard as you can until she unloads everyfuckingwhere that turns a client into a regular.
3.   Great escorts are born, not made. Like great porn stars or great … bakers. You have to want to do it, and you have to love the process, the means by which. You have, therefore, to have a genuine interest in if not passion for:
-   Men and
-   Their dicks
-   What those dicks do and produce
-   People being together
-   Breaking taboos
-   Pleasure and all its knotty issues like
-   The relationship of identity to the body
-   And so on

Because Katie is exceptional it’s worth thinking about why. In back-to-basics terms she offered the following “services” in our overnight: DFK, CIM, rimming, RO, Deep throat, gagging, cowgirl and reverse cowgirl. Also, for fans of degradation like me, she likes being slapped and spat on. Choked. Anal play is very much going to happen. Two fingers? That’ll do nicely. Lick the two fingers that have been up there? Why I’d be delighted. Spanking? Well it’d be silly not to. Pussy slapping? Oh go on then.

There is also the thrill of doing all of this with a beautiful girl. The sleepy-but-alert girl at the window. So part of the key is the paradox: she’s beautiful, and drooling plentifully over your cock. When she spins a filthy tale about what we’re going to get up to at a sex club, maybe, with another girl, them both licking each others’ arses, mouths wide open for any cock that wants to fill them,  with “slut” lipsticked across her forehead, on a leash that I’m holding, she’s smiling at the thought of it, in the sure knowledge that her telling you about it is going to unload your (banana-flavoured, apparently) spunk in her mouth. As of course it does.

I love this, what we’re doing, this now. I love these nows. Whether it’s smoking, or fucking, or me slapping her tits, or sucking them gently, or listening to Richard Hawley or knowing that she’s about to let go, or her smiling, or us talking or her standing naked at the window. What Katie is the best at is being present. You’re in the room with her and it’s the two of you.The two of you being together is a project. The project is not just desire and excitement and pleasure: the project is intensifying the present.

We both need to know what is/was this like? What’s it about? What’s going on? This stuff needs knowing about.

I’m apprehensive because BDSM is, perhaps, about the rage that accompanies desire. What is slapping, I say to myself, if not the desire to inflict pain, and what else could provoke that desire except rage? When we – ok then, when I – slap Katie what, exactly, am I expressing? It’s about power too, of course. I want to have power over her. I want to make her cum. I want to have an effect on her. I want her to know I’m here. I want her to know that I want something. I want her to know that I want.

But what, very exactly, do I want?

Sometimes I feel like Jekyll and Hyde: I read my own reports of sessions I’ve had with Lindsey and other submissive girls, and the previous one with Katie, and I think: who is that guy?  But when Richard Hawley  starts, and we start to go down in it, I know more and more that I want, and what I want. I want to lick that arsehole. I just want my face in it. So I bend her over to do so. I want to feel her tits. I want that cunt. In my face. Now. I want to smear her cuntjuice over her face. Her squirt’s got to go there too.

So the now is about answering the key question: what do you really, really, really want? Tippy-Toe across the ice, then letting the ice break. Katie’s exceptional because she’s there with you all the way.

I just know she’s an excellent dance teacher. And not just because I’ve seen her with a hula hoop. She proffered it to me, just before I left but I declined. Of course. Too shy. But maybe – maybe – with her help, I’ll get the knack of it. Ish.

We might be in for a long haul, though.

So, in summary: a glorious gfe turning into a pse and a huge amount of drunken kissing, music-listening, chat, hanging loose. I can't think of any significant negative. I even managed to make Katie into a convert to Lucinda Williams. I can't wait to see her again though I know that her family situation is such that that may take a long time. And fluffy as it may sound I believe Katie when she says she needs to be totally present in the room with the guys she sees - she certainly has been with me on both occasions I've seen her - and so I'm more than happy to wait.
Sorry to be a cunt but its all about I

Offline knightofthegarter

It was a bit hard for me, like Mr. B, to see Katie posting gorgeous pix of herself when she hadn’t replied to my “thank you for an amazing time” text.

I'm not weighing into the whole debate about Little Katie's comms, that has already been discussed at length elsewhere. However Unclesweetheart get some perspective. I thought I was fluffy till I read this. I have never, ever sent a wg a "thank you for an amazing time text". Just because she gives the gfe doesn't mean she actually is your girlfriend. If this is the way you behave you are going to end up making a favourite wg uncomfortable at some point in your punting career and spoil a good thing. Thank her while you're there by all means but romantic texting is embarrassing.

I don't doubt that Little Katie is very good at what she does but your review was so Mills and Boon :rose: :dancegirl: that I had abandoned it long before any x rated stuff.

Offline Roth

FFS.   :scare: :scare: :dash: :dash: Gave up after the first sentence.  :dash: :dash: :dash:

whoflungdung

  • Guest
I truly hope i never get hung up on any wg like this it must be hard for the chap  :bomb:


Offline Cuntminion

I'm also starting to realize that although not as spiteful others have the Marty gene of romanticism near postal bollocks

Offline Bangers and Gash

The reason this "review" was posted is obviously to push down the negative she just got. You probably wouldn't have posted it otherwise.
There is also no reason to include all that bollocks at the top repeatedly mentioning Mr.Brightside. It's irrelevant to the new review.
For those reasons, does not qualify as review and moved here.

Thanks for that, Admin.  :thumbsup: I was just reading reams and reams of crap about complete delusional nonsense.

I lost interest at the 2nd paragraph.... did the OP actually end up paying money to fuck the pro$$ie or was it just a creepy love letter to someone he wished he was married to?  :vomit:

These soppy cunts need to get a fucking grip.  :bomb:

Speedy

  • Guest
Why did you waste your time writing all that bollocks that nobody is going to read.


James999

  • Guest
Why did you waste your time writing all that bollocks that nobody is going to read.

Perhaps little katie told him to do it  :unknown:

yumyum3

  • Guest
Quote
Thanks for that, Admin.  :thumbsup: I was just reading reams and reams of crap about complete delusional nonsense.

I lost interest at the 2nd paragraph.... did the OP actually end up paying money to fuck the pro$$ie or was it just a creepy love letter to someone he wished he was married to?  :vomit:

These soppy cunts need to get a fucking grip.  :bomb:
Snap. I see the twat's been nominated for wanker of the week

yorkshire123

  • Guest
This kind of retaliation review ( :sarcastic:) happens every now & again, personally I think its quite sad  :(

Disclaimer - Not that I've read it all but enough to get the general smell of heavy horse shit.

Hidden Image/Members Only

Offline PLeisure

Why did you waste your time writing all that bollocks that nobody is going to read.
Well, there's several ways to wank yourself  :sarcastic:

This is not a review - Admin was right in removing it from the SW board. It's a blatant, "Look at me! I got an overnighter when others got cancelled"

Disappointing  :thumbsdown:

Offline KidCandyShop

He stopped the night, you read that far. :crazy:

cockneybstrd

  • Guest
I am a bit concerned after reading six paragraphs of the OP's press release on Little Katie that I might catch something from it

Offline dboy74


Offline stevedave

What has been read cannot be unread.

Thankfully, I gave up reading this quite soon, as I get the jist. You quite like LK, don't you OP? Not quite sure how I worked that out, just a wild stab in the dark.

Surely the OP knew he was going to be hung out to dry by writing that cringeworthy ode to Katie? Christ, I imagine the girl herself feels a bit queasy after reading that shite.

I have no cross to bare with Katie, I've not met her nor interacted with her in any way. She strikes me as someone who is very articulate, bright and good at what she does. If she cancelled on someone twice, I daresay she had her reasons...yep, it's not ideal for the punter, but just man up and deal with it - and exactly the same goes here for the OP...take your cunt struck head out of Katie's arse for a minute and GET A FUCKING GRIP.

You're a grown man paying a young woman for sex. End of chat.

Offline mh

I'd say moving this Sylvie Krin/Mills and Boon tale from the reviews section was very lenient. Could have been binned, could have been banned himself, could have got LK banned for his white knighting.
 :hi:

Offline smiths

The reason this "review" was posted is obviously to push down the negative she just got. You probably wouldn't have posted it otherwise.
There is also no reason to include all that bollocks at the top repeatedly mentioning Mr.Brightside. It's irrelevant to the new review.
For those reasons, does not qualify as review and moved here.

Absolutely, that doesn't work in the interests of UKP in my view, in my view that punter will find UKEscorting more too his taste, I assume its him on their with the same nick, up to him though of course.

Offline smiths

I'm also starting to realize that although not as spiteful others have the Marty gene of romanticism near postal bollocks

Its putting the WG first even when a credible punter like MrB posts a negative review, the OP feels the need to even the balance up. Disgraceful behaviour on UKP. :thumbsdown:

GBush

  • Guest
I'm new to membership but lurked for a couple of years. Haven't people been banned for less?

Offline Cuntminion

Its putting the WG first even when a credible punter like MrB posts a negative review, the OP feels the need to even the balance up. Disgraceful behaviour on UKP. :thumbsdown:

I'm not in the business of knighting as far as I am concerned people often are much better at speaking for themselves rather than have a blinkered wanker do it for them

But it's cases like this that are actually more damaging than a fair negative review

Fluffys actually on many occasions do more damage than good


Uncle if you ever agree with me please please don't be vocal about it your the support equivalent of a suicide bomber

GBush

  • Guest
I'm new to membership but lurked for a couple of years. Haven't people been banned for less?

On advice, I retract my remark. It's not up to me to draw attention to this. Admin team are fully qualified at making this decision.

Offline cueball

Uncle, you've been voted as wanker of the week.

After reading that load of sloppy shite you deserve the honour of wanker of the year.

Offline Cuntminion

On advice, I retract my remark. It's not up to me to draw attention to this. Admin team are fully qualified at making this decision.

Hidden Image/Members Only


Offline punk

In the light of Mr B’s recent unfortunate experience I must confess that part of my being a fluffy cunt is that I fully expect girls to be crap at comms. Maybe it makes the experience more like real life. Or maybe it’s because, in my two years’ punting, I’m inured to playing the waiting game. It may well be that I have self-esteem issues. Or maybe I just mistrust efficient people. Earlier this year I got so pissed off with a UKP star that, like Mr Brightside, I wrote her a Dear John email saying that despite her blandishments re: me being special etc etc  there was so wide a gap between word and deed that it was surely best for us to go our separate ways. This provoked an interesting twitter exchange and my wounded pride was duly salved. But, you know, having a little spat with a WG only makes the gfe illusion all the more lifelike.

It was a bit hard for me, like Mr. B, to see Katie posting gorgeous pix of herself when she hadn’t replied to my “thank you for an amazing time” text. 

You are one sad fucker.So does this review give you a discount on the next punt with her?

Pity ADMIN cant transfer your shit to UKESCORTING along with your nic,surely you dont belong on this site  :thumbsdown:
« Last Edit: November 03, 2015, 05:15:51 pm by punk »

Offline Cuntminion

You are one sad fucker.So does this review give you a discount on the next punt with her?

Pity ADMIN cant transfer your shit to UKESCORTING along with your nic,surely you dont belong on this site  :thumbsdown:


Don't even belong on uke , woman's own story of the week seems appropriate

Offline smiths

You are one sad fucker.So does this review give you a discount on the next punt with her?

Pity ADMIN cant transfer your shit to UKESCORTING along with your nic,surely you dont belong on this site  :thumbsdown:

There is a punter with his nick already on UKE I assume though don't know its the same person. Going on this total shit and many of his other posts its the ideal site for him, he can REALLY go to town with his fawning and arselicking on their.

This poster is now beyond the pale in my view after this. :thumbsdown:

Online Sparta Prada

Do I detect that someone is ramming it down Mr Brightside's throat that his appointment got cancelled yet Uncle Sweetheart's was honoured? That is not very nice at all.

Offline Bangers and Gash

Do I detect that someone is ramming it down Mr Brightside's throat that his appointment got cancelled yet Uncle Sweetheart's was honoured?

Reading fannyfarts stalkerish tribute coupled with his deluded state of mind, are we even sure a booking took place?

Offline punk

Reading fannyfarts stalkerish tribute coupled with his deluded state of mind, are we even sure a booking took place?

Have to take his word for it  :unknown:

Offline knightofthegarter

Reading fannyfarts stalkerish tribute coupled with his deluded state of mind, are we even sure a booking took place?

I abandoned it at the part where he said he was thinking of writing a sonnet sequence for her. Maybe he just recited poetry to her all night  :unknown:

Atticus Finch

  • Guest
Uncle, you've been voted as wanker of the week.

After reading that load of sloppy shite you deserve the honour of wanker of the year.

Not particularly sticking up for USH here, but wanker of the year?  Seriously?  How quickly people forget..... :unknown:

Offline Cuntminion

I abandoned it at the part where he said he was thinking of writing a sonnet sequence for her. Maybe he just recited poetry to her all night  :unknown:

I don't know much poetry so recited lyrics to fresh prince of bel air to girl once

Didn't work

vw

  • Guest
Not particularly sticking up for USH here, but wanker of the year?  Seriously?  How quickly people forget..... :unknown:
your right there, maybe unbanned wanker of the year

Offline Bangers and Gash

Have to take his word for it  :unknown:

He's obviously not the full shilling and AFAIAA (despite spending plenty of time posting UKP) this Kate pro$$ie woman hasn't validated his ''review'', although maybe she's too mortified to pass comment. 

Atticus Finch

  • Guest
He's obviously not the full shilling and AFAIAA (despite spending plenty of time posting UKP) this Kate pro$$ie woman hasn't validated his ''review'', although maybe she's too mortified to pass comment.

How often are prossies obliged to 'validate' a review on here.

Nonsense comment.

Offline knightofthegarter

Perhaps USH has a point with the poetry. Perhaps we should all recite this poem on our next punts :

Roses are red, ready to be plucked  :rose:
as soon as you take off your knickers
you are ready to be fucked  :rose:


All the wgs will be so impressed and swoon for us. Then we can all fall in love and get married  :kissgirl:

Offline cueball

Not particularly sticking up for USH here, but wanker of the year?  Seriously?  How quickly people forget..... :unknown:

Good point, I forgot, there has been much much worse.

Wanker of the week will suffice

Offline Cuntminion

Not particularly sticking up for USH here, but wanker of the year?  Seriously?  How quickly people forget..... :unknown:

Vote stays

You don't have to be a mega cunt to win wotw just because mega cunts have won it

I started by saying I didn't dislike him but he was being a wanker, everyone has capacity to be a wanker so it's not exclusive just ush has gone the extra mile this week


The Extra effort should be rewarded

Offline stevedave

Good point, I forgot, there has been much much worse.

Wanker of the week will suffice

I'd be happy with wanker of the month, as a compromise. BUT, it is only the 3rd  :D

Atticus Finch

  • Guest
Vote stays

You don't have to be a mega cunt to win wotw just because mega cunts have won it

I started by saying I didn't dislike him but he was being a wanker, everyone has capacity to be a wanker so it's not exclusive just ush has gone the extra mile this week


The Extra effort should be rewarded

You're a groovy cat, but please pay attention to what I actually said....

Offline JEH7376

The reason this "review" was posted is obviously to push down the negative she just got. You probably wouldn't have posted it otherwise.
There is also no reason to include all that bollocks at the top repeatedly mentioning Mr.Brightside. It's irrelevant to the new review.
For those reasons, does not qualify as review and moved here.

That is excellent moderating, really, hats off.

Offline JEH7376

Sorry to be a cunt but its all about I

Oh, that's very nicely done vw, love it.  :thumbsup:

Offline Cuntminion

You're a groovy cat, but please pay attention to what I actually said....


Ahhh year


Apologies