Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: Little Katie – Unreliable, Disorganised & Comtemptible Comms  (Read 26679 times)


29 review(s) for x Little Katie x (27 positive, 0 neutral, 2 negative) [Indexed by ]
30 review(s) for Katie Skye 94 (28 positive, 0 neutral, 2 negative) [Indexed by ]


Offline pumps

Well Mr B basically called her a liar re the tweet; but this has been resolved...

I fully acknowledge that I've probably just made it worse however it just seemed unfair so I got involved...

Of course Katie can stick up for herself; she's an adult but she's not really in a great place at the moment so I stuck my oar in...

 :unknown:


Prossies don't need anyone to stick up for them, they're still making plenty of money what ever gets said on ukp, and they certainly won't lose any sleep over this, and most importantly your still getting your bits wet regularly.

The only person who eventually gets the brunt of the bad review is the person seen to be the white-knight.

Salt

  • Guest

Prossies don't need anyone to stick up for them, they're still making plenty of money what ever gets said on ukp, and they certainly won't lose any sleep over this, and most importantly your still getting your bits wet regularly.

The only person who eventually gets the brunt of the bad review is the person seen to be the white-knight.

+1

I will refrain from any further comments

 :hi:

Offline claretandblue


Prossies don't need anyone to stick up for them, they're still making plenty of money what ever gets said on ukp, and they certainly won't lose any sleep over this, and most importantly your still getting your bits wet regularly.

The only person who eventually gets the brunt of the bad review is the person seen to be the white-knight.
+1 ,also if she really is in such a bad place she shouldn't have took the booking in the first place, also sharing that on here and telling her regulars who then run on here and repeat it just makes things worse,punting is supposed to be fun and a release from everyday stresses, this girl just sounds like way too much aggravation all round

Offline LoneWolf2020

read the review once, cant be arsed to check my facts before posting but looks to me like the worst thing was not the cancellations or the bollox that was being posted on twatbook but the fact that the punter would have set out (and possibly completed) on a 3 hour wasted journey if it was left to the prostitute. Regardless of the family tragedy thats inexcusable and tells you all you need to know, she doesnt give a flying.
« Last Edit: November 02, 2015, 06:50:09 pm by LoneWolf2020 »

bristolqwerty

  • Guest
Quote
As has been suggested, it's worth remembering that this is purely a financial arrangement for WGs and they wouldn't touch us with a barge pole if we weren't paying them, so we shouldn't kid ourselves into thinking it's anything more than that./quote]

That's why its advisable not to become fixated, it is what it is, enjoyable but just a paid service like a car wash, if ones shut go to the next one.
« Last Edit: November 02, 2015, 07:23:58 pm by bristolqwerty »

Offline Mr Br1ghts1de

Just logged in and caught up.

Firstly, having checked some dates of dm's on twitter it does appear my twitter account may have been set to -7 hours. In no way was I intending to mislead.

Did that that make a blind jot of difference in me posting a negative review ? NO. I asked for a response ASAP having been royally fucked about twice and she chose to publically promote herself instead before getting back to me. That is unforgiveable in my book.

As much as I expected some of Katie's client's to support her here by offering some mitigating comments perhaps, I really didn't expect the unswerving blind support some of them have shown here, including some I previously had respect for. As others have said, they actually embarrass Katie.

Maybe they can ask themselves - Was Katie right to post a promotional update of herself on Twitter visible to all before getting back to a pissed off customer ?

Even Katie in her own defence has not defended this. Would she do it again in hindsight ? Would she do it again ?



   

theGOAT

  • Guest
Just logged in and caught up.

Firstly, having checked some dates of dm's on twitter it does appear my twitter account may have been set to -7 hours. In no way was I intending to mislead.

Did that that make a blind jot of difference in me posting a negative review ? NO. I asked for a response ASAP having been royally fucked about twice and she chose to publically promote herself instead before getting back to me. That is unforgiveable in my book.

As much as I expected some of Katie's client's to support her here by offering some mitigating comments perhaps, I really didn't expect the unswerving blind support some of them have shown here, including some I previously had respect for. As others have said, they actually embarrass Katie.

Maybe they can ask themselves - Was Katie right to post a promotional update of herself on Twitter visible to all before getting back to a pissed off customer ?

Even Katie in her own defence has not defended this. Would she do it again in hindsight ? Would she do it again ?

Hi Mr B.  I would like to thank you for sharing this awful experience.  You are brave as you knew both Katie and her fanboys would likely attack you, and all her other reviews are glowing.  This forum will be better for knowing this other side of her and she may learn something too hopefully.

I can say that from my own experience with Katie (seen her seven times over a 12 mth period) that I am not at all surprised and totally sympathise with you.  She messed me around so many times, cancelled me, re-scheduled me, failed to reply to comms, made so many excuses. She upset me like she has upset you because I really enjoyed my first meetings with her, and thought she was a genuinely nice person.

BUT she is unprofessional in her comms.  She claims to be "caring", but I found her to be uncaring and selfish. She is good in the bedroom, but its just not worth the hassle to get there.

The last time I saw her in May she was 1 hour late starting.  She didn't bother to tell me till I was halfway there (1 hour drive), so I had to wait over an hour after I arrived. Then she said she didn't have any condoms! (luckily I did).

I decided to give up on her in July after she tried to re-schedule our next date.  I'm soooo glad to be rid of her.  Best punting decision I've ever made.

Cheers!  :drinks: :drinks: :drinks:
« Last Edit: November 02, 2015, 09:18:05 pm by theGOAT »

bristolqwerty

  • Guest
Well said, VW.   :thumbsup: You took the words right out of my mouth.  :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

 :yahoo: Viva Plymouth  :scare: :scare: top of the league for both escorts and footy. This thread is a bit sickening in parts, shoot me if I ever get this sycophantic about an escort.  :vomit:


Offline dubs

I think it is a risk you have to accept when booking a popular girl - if you have to book weeks in advance then unforeseen things can happen, periods, illness, family problems etc.

Its just a risk/reward thing.  You want the reward of seeing a great girl, you have to take the risk of cancellation. (in my experience)


vw

  • Guest
I think it is a risk you have to accept when booking a popular girl - if you have to book weeks in advance then unforeseen things can happen, periods, illness, family problems etc.

Its just a risk/reward thing.  You want the reward of seeing a great girl, you have to take the risk of cancellation. (in my experience)
That's the same with any prossie they all have unforeseen things happen, periods, illness, family problems etc.

Offline dubs

That's the same with any prossie they all have unforeseen things happen, periods, illness, family problems etc.

Not really, it doesn't apply to the ones that just put on their Available Today text when they are not on period, and are fit an healthy on the day.

vw

  • Guest
Not really, it doesn't apply to the ones that just put on their Available Today text when they are not on period, and are fit an healthy on the day.
Well most don't use the little green light and are still available and still turn up or let down !

Offline Mr Br1ghts1de

Hi Mr B.  I would like to thank you for sharing this awful experience.  You are brave as you knew both Katie and her fanboys would likely attack you, and all her other reviews are glowing.  This forum will be better for knowing this other side of her and she may learn something too hopefully.

I can say that from my own experience with Katie (seen her seven times over a 12 mth period) that I am not at all surprised and totally sympathise with you.  She messed me around so many times, cancelled me, re-scheduled me, failed to reply to comms, made so many excuses. She upset me like she has upset you because I really enjoyed my first meetings with her, and thought she was a genuinely nice person.

BUT she is unprofessional in her comms.  She claims to be "caring", but I found her to be uncaring and selfish. She is good in the bedroom, but its just not worth the hassle to get there.

The last time I saw her in May she was 1 hour late starting.  She didn't bother to tell me till I was halfway there (1 hour drive), so I had to wait over an hour after I arrived. Then she said she didn't have any condoms! (luckily I did).

I decided to give up on her in July after she tried to re-schedule our next date.  I'm soooo glad to be rid of her.  Best punting decision I've ever made.

Cheers!  :drinks: :drinks: :drinks:

Thank you taleyho, that's really much appreciated. 

Very sorry to hear of your own frustrations in booking Katie too.

Prior to this I would not have dreamed of considering another girl in the SW. I now look forward to what the rest of the region can offer.  :)

 :drinks:

Offline Mr Br1ghts1de

You are brave as you knew both Katie and her fanboys would likely attack you, and all her other reviews are glowing.  This forum will be better for knowing this other side of her and she may learn something too hopefully.


Just had a look and that's not quite so.

In fact, I see I'm not the first reviewer here to previously laud her and then feel compelled to Neg her.

Offline Cuntminion

Mr B sorry to hear that you were cancelled twice...
However I was also cancelled this week because Katie has had a significant personal upheaval in her life... 
I know for a fact that Katie would never take someones money if she didn't think that she could give 100% to the booking so I would much rather she cancelled than was anything other than fully present...
would you rather have had handed over your money and had your booking when she was incapable of giving anything less than the service she is famous for?
I think that Katie should be applauded for putting the punter first...
Many other pro$$ie would have just taken the money because that is their only agenda...

Any complaints department ever must fucking love you

"Oh never mind talktalk it's only money come round kick the cat and fuck my wife for the inconvenience of having my cuatom"

Op you have been reasonable


Offline Roth


Then she said she didn't have any condoms! (luckily I did).


A prostitute without any condoms but takes a booking is FUCKING INEXCUSABLE.  :dash: :dash:

No way any fluffy white knight can come up with a good reason for that one.  :dash: :dash:
« Last Edit: November 02, 2015, 11:30:03 pm by Roth »

Offline smiths

A prostitute without any condoms but takes a booking is FUCKING INEXCUSABLE.  :dash: :dash:

No way any fluffy white knight can come up with a good reason for that one.  :dash: :dash:

Spot on, a WG with no condoms is the same as a plumber without the tools of his trade, fucking useless. Its the VERY basics for a WG to always ensure she has a sufficient stock.

TheCape

  • Guest
Gents

Just a simple question: is it possible to stick up for a girl on UKP without being labelled 'cunt struck/fluffy/white knight"? 

Honest question.

And no, I haven't met LK.

cockneybstrd

  • Guest
Gents

Just a simple question: is it possible to stick up for a girl on UKP without being labelled 'cunt struck/fluffy/white knight"? 

Honest question.

And no, I haven't met LK.

Yes of course it is...but dont expect not to be called out for it just because your fav gets a justifiable negative and you react like i ve come around your gaff and done hardsports with your mum (her receiving)

Little Katie

  • Guest
I do not have the time nor strength right now to defend myself against every nit-picking allegation and speculation in this thread considering my current circumstances.. However, I do feel the need to reply to this... I HAVE NEVER AND WOULD NEVER ENGAGE IN UNPROTECTED SEX WITH ANY CLIENT and find it absolutely disgusting that this has even been insinuated by Taleyho's utterly thoughtless comment!
I could not find my box of condoms in the run up to this meeting (Which I later discovered had slipped down the side of my bed) at which point I texted Taleyho to ask if he had any on him and suggested I would go to the shop to buy some if he hadn't.
This whole thread has turned into a bitter frenzied attack against me over what was no more than an innocent cancellation down to a serious legitimate personal reason.
I am utterly shocked at the level of ignorance displayed by the punters I have never even met and the 2 of you I have that are refusing to take responsibility for your own emotional involvement and are consequently seeking some form of vengeful closure in tearing me down.
Nobody is seemingly allowed to shed any light on my true nature or mention anything that vaguely implies or relates to any one of the hundreds of positive experiences they have shared with me out of fear of being labelled a "fluffy" "Fan Boy" or "White Knight" and therefore my character and services are not being fairly reflected in this absolute car crash of a review... Words fail me.

squeezebox

  • Guest

Whenever I read a positive or negative review, I always take a view from both sides. In this case, Mr B, who is well established and in my view a respected punter, felt the need to express his frustration on the lead up to the non-meeting. On the other hand, LK is also well established and a well liked WG who has provided excellent services and her reviews stand testimony to.

With regard to Taleyho's post, he didn't infer bareback was offered or on offer, just that the condoms were forgotten. LK explained how this happened, so no big deal.

One suggestion for Little Katie is, don't post until things have been sorted at your end. Clearly reading your last post, there's a lot of emotion built up there.

cockneybstrd

  • Guest
I do not have the time nor strength right now to defend myself against every nit-picking allegation and speculation in this thread considering my current circumstances.. However, I do feel the need to reply to this... I HAVE NEVER AND WOULD NEVER ENGAGE IN UNPROTECTED SEX WITH ANY CLIENT and find it absolutely disgusting that this has even been insinuated by Taleyho's utterly thoughtless comment!
I could not find my box of condoms in the run up to this meeting (Which I later discovered had slipped down the side of my bed) at which point I texted Taleyho to ask if he had any on him and suggested I would go to the shop to buy some if he hadn't.
This whole thread has turned into a bitter frenzied attack against me over what was no more than an innocent cancellation down to a serious legitimate personal reason.
I am utterly shocked at the level of ignorance displayed by the punters I have never even met and the 2 of you I have that are refusing to take responsibility for your own emotional involvement and are consequently seeking some form of vengeful closure in tearing me down.
Nobody is seemingly allowed to shed any light on my true nature or mention anything that vaguely implies or relates to any one of the hundreds of positive experiences they have shared with me out of fear of being labelled a "fluffy" "Fan Boy" or "White Knight" and therefore my character and services are not being fairly reflected in this absolute car crash of a review... Words fail me.


No offence but its hardly been a bitter frenzied attack (the condom issue aside)

Every review is snapshot of a moment in time. Mr Brightside gave what was a fair representation in his eyes and you came on explained that you had a family emergency. Which is of course acceptable and reasonable as i stated earlier. The twitter issue from the OP review was solved.

What was not acceptable was that some posters were attacking the OP's right to leave a Negative Review.

If you look at the review..it was critical of the behaviour of some of your supporters who  seemed to get themselves in a froth because someone dared say something they didnt like about you. I get it if someone on here was cunting off Sir Trevor Brooking I would be rightly fucked off and would be cunting people off left right and centre

But to claim that people having a pop at you are obsessed with you (when its pretty obvious which posters are suffering from EAS) is a bit below the belt. When even your most ardent supporter admits he probably made it worse with the manner and the nature of his staunch defence of you

However your obviously going through an emotional time and I hope that you have support to deal with your major personal issues.

Offline fitasfuck

I do not have the time nor strength right now to defend myself against every nit-picking allegation and speculation in this thread considering my current circumstances.. However, I do feel the need to reply to this... I HAVE NEVER AND WOULD NEVER ENGAGE IN UNPROTECTED SEX WITH ANY CLIENT and find it absolutely disgusting that this has even been insinuated by Taleyho's utterly thoughtless comment!
I could not find my box of condoms in the run up to this meeting (Which I later discovered had slipped down the side of my bed) at which point I texted Taleyho to ask if he had any on him and suggested I would go to the shop to buy some if he hadn't.
This whole thread has turned into a bitter frenzied attack against me over what was no more than an innocent cancellation down to a serious legitimate personal reason.


I am utterly shocked at the level of ignorance displayed by the punters I have never even met and the 2 of you I have that are refusing to take responsibility for your own emotional involvement and are consequently seeking some form of vengeful closure in tearing me down.
Nobody is seemingly allowed to shed any light on my true nature or mention anything that vaguely implies or relates to any one of the hundreds of positive experiences they have shared with me out of fear of being labelled a "fluffy" "Fan Boy" or "White Knight" and therefore my character and services are not being fairly reflected in this absolute car crash of a review... Words fail me.

As you can see, I have already made my opinion known on this thread. I had a great meet with you last year which was your very first and then recently I have not had any problems with comms with you when I arranged another meeting. Yes you had to cancel it & I was disappointed (as I lost out on the non-refundable overnight hotel booking) but I found you very apologetic & courteous in your explanation to me for the cancellation.

This is just my positive experience & I wouldn't be able to comment on what others' experiences have been. I made my opinion not because I am a fluffy (far from that) but I wanted the discussion to be balanced and fair. I believe any member should feel free to make their honest comment or opinion on the forum, either positive or negative (hence OP is entitled to his opinion & review) but unfortunately sometimes the counter opinion gets shouted down or drowned in the din and several members may hesitate to give their opinion for fear of being labelled a fluffy or a white knight. It is easy to pick up a stone to throw or go with the flow but it does need guts & character to state one's opinion honestly without fear or favour.

Offline timstella

Gents

Just a simple question: is it possible to stick up for a girl on UKP without being labelled 'cunt struck/fluffy/white knight"? 

Honest question.

And no, I haven't met LK.

I intend to test this question. I am not a fluffy and in fact am a ukp member in good standing that has in the past been told by PM by several members that I am respected by them and that my reviews and posts have been helpful. Smiths may consider that I pollute the forum but I don't care.

I have refrained from posting much on this thread except to correct a matter of fact. I have no intention of undermining the OP in this post or any other. It is possible to stick up for Katie without undermining the OPs review, which describes his experience and can be used by others to decide whether they want to visit her or not.

I have seen Katie more than anyone, in fact if I hadn't been cancelled on Friday it would have been my 30th visit. I have had my share of cancellations. I see her often because she always gives me a fantastic time and I consider it money well spent. It is clear to me that Mr B also had a fantastic experience making him very keen to repeat it.

I also agree, and wish Katie could see this too, that this thread is not for the most part an attack on her. However . .

The condom story if it is taken as an indication of her uselessness is completely ludicrous. Her account of it rings completely true in my experience of her. She was then working in a small Gloucestershire village and could easily have popped to the shop. I have also received texts as I was on my way to ask if I would mind picking some small item up. She is obviously not useless or she would not be booked up for weeks ahead and have people clamouring for repeat bookings.

The idea that she would not lose sleep over this is also wrong. She is very embarrassed and affected by cancelling people and as others have said is always deeply apologetic. She is clearly very affected by this whole incident (far too much in my view). She has in the past few days suffered something that would throw anyone off balance and in fact it has devastated her. I am not afraid to say I think some of the posts on this thread are ignorant, judgemental and rude. That does not make me into an anti-punter, pro-prossie fluffy cunt. This forum is a fantastic achievement and resource, and I agree with its ethos, which I believe includes tolerance and good humour.

Yes she is disorganised, yes she can be scatty, yes booking her carries the risk of cancellation and disappointment, yes Mr B is entitled to review as he chooses. She is a young, part time escort who has always seemed to me to be honest and genuine. At least one punter posting here seems to me to be one of the fluffies who fell for her and has now turned, because she won't see him. I have not fallen for her, though I have to say I like her.

Cheers
Tim

Offline Bigus Dickus

I intend to test this question. I am not a fluffy and in fact am a ukp member in good standing that has in the past been told by PM by several members that I am respected by them and that my reviews and posts have been helpful. Smiths may consider that I pollute the forum but I don't care.

I have refrained from posting much on this thread except to correct a matter of fact. I have no intention of undermining the OP in this post or any other. It is possible to stick up for Katie without undermining the OPs review, which describes his experience and can be used by others to decide whether they want to visit her or not.

I have seen Katie more than anyone, in fact if I hadn't been cancelled on Friday it would have been my 30th visit. I have had my share of cancellations. I see her often because she always gives me a fantastic time and I consider it money well spent. It is clear to me that Mr B also had a fantastic experience making him very keen to repeat it.

I also agree, and wish Katie could see this too, that this thread is not for the most part an attack on her. However . .

The condom story if it is taken as an indication of her uselessness is completely ludicrous. Her account of it rings completely true in my experience of her. She was then working in a small Gloucestershire village and could easily have popped to the shop. I have also received texts as I was on my way to ask if I would mind picking some small item up. She is obviously not useless or she would not be booked up for weeks ahead and have people clamouring for repeat bookings.

The idea that she would not lose sleep over this is also wrong. She is very embarrassed and affected by cancelling people and as others have said is always deeply apologetic. She is clearly very affected by this whole incident (far too much in my view). She has in the past few days suffered something that would throw anyone off balance and in fact it has devastated her. I am not afraid to say I think some of the posts on this thread are ignorant, judgemental and rude. That does not make me into an anti-punter, pro-prossie fluffy cunt. This forum is a fantastic achievement and resource, and I agree with its ethos, which I believe includes tolerance and good humour.

Yes she is disorganised, yes she can be scatty, yes booking her carries the risk of cancellation and disappointment, yes Mr B is entitled to review as he chooses. She is a young, part time escort who has always seemed to me to be honest and genuine. At least one punter posting here seems to me to be one of the fluffies who fell for her and has now turned, because she won't see him. I have not fallen for her, though I have to say I like her.

Cheers
Tim

Very balanced post which covers a lot of valid points which I tend to agree with.

It's not good when you anticipate a meet and it gets cancelled. I know how disappointing that can be, especially when you wait so long for one. I follow LK on Twitter and understand that she's had a few recent issues (moving home etc) including the recent devastating one. I don't know any details, just what's on here. Sometimes life becomes chaotic in ways beyond your control. I think this is the case here rather than her deliberately or recklessly messing people around.

Offline akauya

Gents

Just a simple question: is it possible to stick up for a girl on UKP without being labelled 'cunt struck/fluffy/white knight"? 

Honest question.

And no, I haven't met LK.

In my opinion it's perfectly OK to disagree with a negative review and stick up for a prossie by stating your own experience of the prossie in question.

Something like... I'm sorry the OP had a bad experience yada yada, I must say my own experience is very different as I always had a good service from [insert prossie's name]. Add a few facts if necessary then post and then leave it at that.

What happened here is that those punters who came to LK's defence were so forceful in their approach that derailed what could have been a good thread for the OP and LK to sort out their version of events or whatever. LK comes across as a very intelligent and articulate young woman and is clearly able to stick up for herself, probably the last thing she needs is some punters getting all het up about a negative review.

The reason this thread has become a car crash is because of her fans not because of her.

Offline Mr Br1ghts1de

In my opinion it's perfectly OK to disagree with a negative review and stick up for a prossie by stating your own experience of the prossie in question.

Something like... I'm sorry the OP had a bad experience yada yada, I must say my own experience is very different as I always had a good service from [insert prossie's name]. Add a few facts if necessary then post and then leave it at that.

What happened here is that those punters who came to LK's defence were so forceful in their approach that derailed what could have been a good thread for the OP and LK to sort out their version of events or whatever. LK comes across as a very intelligent and articulate young woman and is clearly able to stick up for herself, probably the last thing she needs is some punters getting all het up about a negative review.

The reason this thread has become a car crash is because of her fans not because of her.

There's no doubt about the version of events as far as I'm concerned beyond 7 hours difference in a senseless promotional and disrespectful twitter update.

She was not getting a 4th chance after that with me.




Offline claretandblue

It gets better,she sometimes doesn't have any johnnies and asks punters to get them for her!

This is indefensible for a wg

James999

  • Guest
It gets better,she sometimes doesn't have any johnnies

A pro$$ie without condoms can be code for "bareback available" and of course when it's mentioned the price goes up, just for the "special client" that is and provided they don't tell anyone else  :thumbsdown:

Offline claretandblue

A pro$$ie without condoms can be code for "bareback available" and of course when it's mentioned the price goes up, just for the "special client" that is and provided they don't tell anyone else  :thumbsdown:
Careful that's a rather large hornets nest you are stirring there!  :hi:

theGOAT

  • Guest
... I HAVE NEVER AND WOULD NEVER ENGAGE IN UNPROTECTED SEX WITH ANY CLIENT and find it absolutely disgusting that this has even been insinuated by Taleyho's utterly thoughtless comment!
I could not find my box of condoms in the run up to this meeting (Which I later discovered had slipped down the side of my bed) at which point I texted Taleyho to ask if he had any on him and suggested I would go to the shop to buy some if he hadn't.
I didn't insinuate that you would "engage in unprotected sex" you silly girl.  I was just supporting the OP's opinion that you are unreliable and disorganised.  Yes you offered to go to the shop and get some but as you were already running one hour late I offered to use mine.  :dash: :dash:

James999

  • Guest
I do not have the time nor strength right now

Then why keep coming on here and writing long drawn out posts  :unknown:

Offline hooper567

A pro$$ie without condoms can be code for "bareback available" and of course when it's mentioned the price goes up, just for the "special client" that is and provided they don't tell anyone else  :thumbsdown:

Not Katie regardless of how disorganised she maybe!

James999

  • Guest
Not Katie regardless of how disorganised she maybe!

I've never met her, so I can't say, but then nor can you, just because a pro$$ie doesn't offer bareback to one punter it doesn't mean she doesn't offer it to others, and the "no condoms" is a line that pro$$ies can use to test the water with punters re bareback  :hi:

Offline smiths

I've never met her, so I can't say, but then nor can you, just because a pro$$ie doesn't offer bareback to one punter it doesn't mean she doesn't offer it to others, and the "no condoms" is a line that pro$$ies can use to test the water with punters re bareback  :hi:

This is of course factually correct, no punter can possibly know what any WG COULD be doing and with whom unless they are with them 24/7/ Whether this WG does offer any punter BB I have absolutely no idea.

Atticus Finch

  • Guest
A pro$$ie without condoms can be code for "bareback available" and of course when it's mentioned the price goes up, just for the "special client" that is and provided they don't tell anyone else  :thumbsdown:

This is pretty feeble.  This is now just trolling Katie for sport, and has absolutely nothing to do with the grievances raised by the OP in his negative review.

I think that bringing up the 'issue' of bareback on a thread for any girl has the potential to be toxic for the girl in question, and in my view it's unfair to make the sort of comments made above on the basis of zero information, or even any accusation that it has ever been an issue.

As I said, it seems to me that this is just trolling for sport.  And it detracts from the content of the OPs original review by introducing superfluous 'and another thing...' Style comments.

Whatever Katie's shortcomings, and I'm sure she has them, as do we all, this is unfair and spiteful.

Offline timstella

This is pretty feeble.  This is now just trolling Katie for sport, and has absolutely nothing to do with the grievances raised by the OP in his negative review.

I think that bringing up the 'issue' of bareback on a thread for any girl has the potential to be toxic for the girl in question, and in my view it's unfair to make the sort of comments made above on the basis of zero information, or even any accusation that it has ever been an issue.

As I said, it seems to me that this is just trolling for sport.  And it detracts from the content of the OPs original review by introducing superfluous 'and another thing...' Style comments.

Whatever Katie's shortcomings, and I'm sure she has them, as do we all, this is unfair and spiteful.

Good post. I completely agree.

Offline Natwest

I've never met her, so I can't say,

I think he meant "never met a prossie, so I can't say".

James999

  • Guest
This is pretty feeble.  This is now just trolling Katie for sport, and has absolutely nothing to do with the grievances raised by the OP in his negative review.

So because you fancy the girl we must pretend that the "no condoms" / bareback link couldn't possibly apply to her and if she says "no condoms" no one must mention the fact that for many pro$$ies this can be an opener to bareback negotiations?

If you have a problem with the discussion and would rather surpress it then report the posts to Admin  :hi:

Atticus Finch

  • Guest
So because you fancy the girl we must pretend that the "no condoms" / bareback link couldn't possibly apply to her and if she says "no condoms" no one must mention the fact that for many pro$$ies this can be an opener to bareback negotiations?

If you have a problem with the discussion and would rather surpress it then report the posts to Admin  :hi:

Nothing to do with me fancying the girl in question.  I've never seen her, and doubt I ever will.  I am however a believer in fair play, which I do not think is being observed here.

No need for me to take it up with admin, I'm quite happy to call you out directly on this matter, because I am sure you know exactly what you are doing.  Which is spiteful, baseless trolling.

I'm sorry you feel the need to hide behind admin, but I'm not surprised.  As I said, feeble.
« Last Edit: November 03, 2015, 09:46:01 am by Atticus Finch »

Offline lostandfound

Not having condoms available is desperately unprofessional and smacks of last minute haphazard preparation, which may lead to cutting corners.

LK's followers say they know her and she would never go bareback during a punt, and not having double checked she has condoms available \ discovering just before a punt she cannot find them is just LK being LK. IMO this is tantamount to saying the normal rules of punting do not apply because in their view LK is special and above all that - which has been a constant theme of their contributions to this thread.

As has been pointed out there is no way a punter can know whether or not a WG does BB with other people. Always knowing where her condoms are is a basic rule for any WG. Neglecting that casts her in a bad light IMO no matter how much special pleading is made on her behalf.
« Last Edit: November 03, 2015, 09:46:50 am by lostandfound »

James999

  • Guest
No need for me to take it up with admin, I'm quite happy to call you out directly on this matter,

Report to admin is the process if there are issues ( you're usually pretty quick with the use of the report button) , but if you'd rather play the super hero and discuss it further on this thread that's fine with me....

Lets take the discussion....... when a pro$$ie says "I don't have any condoms" I say that can be an "invite" to open the bareback negotiations............

Are you saying that's wrong? 
« Last Edit: November 03, 2015, 09:49:55 am by James999 »

James999

  • Guest
Nothing to do with me fancying the girl in question. 

Why don't you fancy her? She looks cute  :unknown:

Atticus Finch

  • Guest
Not getting drawn into a pointless and derailing debate.

I've made my opinions clear.  Feel free to ignore if you don't like it.  :thumbsup:

James999

  • Guest
Not getting drawn into a pointless and derailing debate.

I've made my opinions clear.  Feel free to ignore if you don't like it.

Make your mind up, you want to "call me out" on the forum and now you don't want to discuss it  :sarcastic:

Perhaps you should follow your own advice "Feel free to ignore if you don't like it"


Chunky Munky

  • Guest
We asked a handpicked audience what they thought about this thread and our survey said...

External Link/Members Only

Offline hooper567

I've never met her, so I can't say, but then nor can you, just because a pro$$ie doesn't offer bareback to one punter it doesn't mean she doesn't offer it to others, and the "no condoms" is a line that pro$$ies can use to test the water with punters re bareback  :hi:

Yes you have never met Katie I have and I know Katie values her health as well as others.This is based on my time and experiences I have had with her.

James999

  • Guest
The barebackers say they value their health as well, the fact that I haven't met Katie and you have simply confirms my view is impartial and your view is biased  :hi:

whoflungdung

  • Guest
Cmon guys remember why we're all here, nobody wins in any argument here, there is no pecking order we are all equal just agree to disagree or something so we can all move forward and enjoy what we're here for  :scare: