Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.




Author Topic: Little Katie – Unreliable, Disorganised & Comtemptible Comms  (Read 12593 times)


34 review(s) for x Little Katie x (31 positive, 0 neutral, 3 negative) [Indexed by Admin]


Offline cueball

This is still running, great stuff, I had a real giggle last night.

I've seen enough white knights on these two threads to start another crusade to the holy land.

More comedy gold

?
What do you mean ???

Your feeble excuse for that last piece of litter you dropped as a review

Blame the demon drink, cop out !

Offline Little Katie

  • Banned
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 74
Uncle Sweetheart is correct. Read and educate yourself about BDSM before you make presumptions about submissives. Everything I do in my bookings is safe, sane and consensual. Who are you to dictate what I should and shouldn't get turned on by? (Rhetorical question of course)  :thumbsdown:
« Last Edit: November 04, 2015, 07:41:09 PM by Little Katie »
Banning reason: Misuse of pm facility

Offline unclesweetheart

What do you mean ???

Your feeble excuse for that last piece of litter you dropped as a review

Blame the demon drink, cop out !

I meant, you admirable teetotaller (presumeably), that your ad hominem comment about my drinking had fuck all to do with the argument. As neither, incidentally, did this, your last post. You post a very great deal. Social life a bit lacklustre?
Banning reason: Prossie fanboy + Sharing account with banned member (Atticus Finch aka Sylvester)

A good Dom accepts full responsibility of his sub. Someone who not only dominates his sub, but at the same time nurtures, cares for and protects the selfless trust his sub reposes in him. Great feeling when you know you are responsible for not only your own enjoyment but equally responsible for the pleasure of your sub which she seems to derive in her total submission. The sceptics will never understand!

Offline stevedave

I would never see a girl who offered BB, like any other sane punter.  Your clear implication that LK - or any girl into BDSM - "would allow bb for a few more notes" is not only lamentably ignorant but a wholly false slur.

FWIW that's the first thing you've written in the last 48 hours I can actually agree with.

As for the choking, spitting etc stuff...nah, not for me. A bit of tie and tease is enough for me. Just call me vanilla, with a bit of chocolate sauce added in perhaps. Each to their own though. I don't think extreme services lead on to bareback - plenty of Romanians (other nationalities are available) will fuck you bare I imagine, but if you raised your hand to them then Sergei and the rest of his gang would be through the door in seconds.

Offline greychap

Of course you're entitled to your view. But then any girl who offers BDSM/ submission on her likes list would for you be opening herself up to the liklihood of actual abuse. I think you'd find the opposite: that the girls that do so are very aware, vet their clients carefully, and are - have to be - very scrupluous about what they will/ will not do and who they will/ won't do it with.

I said before I don't have a problem with some light role play, but choking, smacking and spitting is not just mild fantasy. And if she does incalls how does she vet her clients, takes a mobile number and name of the punter visiting her is that vetting a client that and shows the punter wont take the role play too far????
Banning reason: North East shit stirrer who contributes nothing

Offline unclesweetheart

I said before I don't have a problem with some light role play, but choking, smacking and spitting is not just mild fantasy. And if she does incalls how does she vet her clients, takes a mobile number and name of the punter visiting her is that vetting a client that and shows the punter wont take the role play too far????

See Katie's post.
Banning reason: Prossie fanboy + Sharing account with banned member (Atticus Finch aka Sylvester)

Offline Andyply

This is still running, great stuff, I had a real giggle last night.

I've seen enough white knights on these two threads to start another crusade to the holy land.

More comedy gold

+1. Yep it's still going....  :D
« Last Edit: November 04, 2015, 08:04:55 PM by Andyply »

Online smiths

I'm to say for one. Choking and spitting (both ways, if you're interested) are a fairly routine part of consensual BDSM play. Like it or not, they are. BB is a wholly different category because it carries serious risks of illness, unlike the other two activities, and responsible sps - of which LK is an exemplar - would never offer it. I would never see a girl who offered BB, like any other sane punter.  Your clear implication that LK - or any girl into BDSM - "would allow bb for a few more notes" is not only lamentably ignorant but a wholly false slur.

You sickening snide. :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

Offline greychap

Uncle Sweetheart is correct. Read and educate yourself about BDSM before you make presumptions about submissives. Everything I do in my bookings is safe, sane and consensual. Who are you to dictate what I should and shouldn't get turned on by? (Rhetorical question of course)  :thumbsdown:

You can do what ever you like little Katie and play out whatever fantasies that make you the money but my point is what he said in the so called review about choking you, slapping you and spitting in your face or whatever it is, most wg's I doubt would enjoy being chocked and slapped about most avoid that kind of thing.

But that is up to you what you offer but if a punter took it a bit far and you got injured I doubt you would get much sympathy reporting it to the police or reporting it on SAFFE because uncle sweet hearts review reads your up for that.

But of course up to you if you like being perceived like that and up to you if you do get someone that takes it too far. :wacko:
Banning reason: North East shit stirrer who contributes nothing

Online smiths

I meant, you admirable teetotaller (presumeably), that your ad hominem comment about my drinking had fuck all to do with the argument. As neither, incidentally, did this, your last post. You post a very great deal. Social life a bit lacklustre?

More snide. :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

Offline unclesweetheart

You sickening snide. :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

Why not engage with the discussion instead of insulting me? We're talking about BDSM, what it involves, the potential risks to girls offering these services and whether offering submissive services is a gateway to BB. Do you have anything to offer to this discussion? I get that you hate my guts, but I think we can take that for granted now so there's no need to make that point (again). Thanks for your interest, but, as I say, the point has been well and truly made. Honestly.
Banning reason: Prossie fanboy + Sharing account with banned member (Atticus Finch aka Sylvester)

Of course you're entitled to your view. But then any girl who offers BDSM/ submission on her likes list would for you be opening herself up to the liklihood of actual abuse. I think you'd find the opposite: that the girls that do so are very aware, vet their clients carefully, and are - have to be - very scrupluous about what they will/ will not do and who they will/ won't do it with.

Well she hasnt done that great job as she obviously met with a few mentalists and obsessives.

Earlier this year I got so pissed off with a UKP star that, like Mr Brightside, I wrote her a Dear John email saying that despite her blandishments re: me being special etc etc  there was so wide a gap between word and deed that it was surely best for us to go our separate ways. This provoked an interesting twitter exchange and my wounded pride was duly salved. But, you know, having a little spat with a WG only makes the gfe illusion all the more lifelike.

After you’ve had an amazing time with a girl, she’s cum several times, so have you, it’s been fucking great…how can you not want some kind of confirmation that this was more than a normal fuck n chuck?



I mean look at the facts she meets punters who are so desperate for validation that require molly coddling that they were more than a payed for fuck and write dear john letters to prossies

You can do what ever you like little Katie and play out whatever fantasies that make you the money but my point is what he said in the so called review about choking you, slapping you and spitting in your face or whatever it is, most wg's I doubt would enjoy being chocked and slapped about most avoid that kind of thing.

But that is up to you what you offer but if a punter took it a bit far and you got injured I doubt you would get much sympathy reporting it to the police or reporting it on SAFFE because uncle sweet hearts review reads your up for that.

But of course up to you if you like being perceived like that and up to you if you do get someone that takes it too far. :wacko:

I repeat my point. A good Dom never crosses boundaries and accepts full responsibility of his sub. Someone who not only dominates his sub, but at the same time nurtures, cares for and protects the selfless trust his sub reposes in him. Great feeling when you know you are responsible for not only your own enjoyment but equally responsible for the pleasure of your sub which she seems to derive in her total submission. The red lines are never meant to be crossed. The sceptics will never understand!

Offline unclesweetheart

Well she hasnt done that great job as she obviously met with a few mentalists and obsessives.

I mean look at the facts she meets punters who are so desperate for validation that require molly coddling that they were more than a payed for fuck and write dear john letters to prossies

Which particular mentalists and obsessives - me excepted - are you referring to?
Banning reason: Prossie fanboy + Sharing account with banned member (Atticus Finch aka Sylvester)

Offline greychap

Well she hasnt done that great job as she obviously met with a few mentalists and obsessives.

I mean look at the facts she meets punters who are so desperate for validation that require molly coddling that they were more than a payed for fuck and write dear john letters to prossies

We all know there is a lot of loons and stalkers in this industry anyway but her encouraging uncle sweet pea to do these type of reviews about being smacked about and choked is just encouraging more nut jobs FFS :dash:  Why cant some people see that. :unknown:
Banning reason: North East shit stirrer who contributes nothing

Which particular mentalists and obsessives - me excepted - are you referring to?

Where do you want to start?

ok lets say someone who is so unstable they make threats of violence on the internet to other posters because their favourite prossie has been given a negative

If I was a submissive prossie i dont think I would want to let that person choke me

Offline unclesweetheart

We all know there is a lot of loons and stalkers in this industry anyway but her encouraging uncle sweet pea to do these type of reviews about being smacked about and choked is just encouraging more nut jobs FFS :dash:  Why cant some people see that. :unknown:

See Katie's post.
Banning reason: Prossie fanboy + Sharing account with banned member (Atticus Finch aka Sylvester)

Offline unclesweetheart

Where do you want to start?

ok lets say someone who is so unstable they make threats of violence on the internet to other posters because their favourite prossie has been given a negative

If I was a submissive prossie i dont think I would want to let that person choke me

Well thats one. You mentioned more than one. And LK showed her quality by publically telling McF why she wouldn't see him. Which suggests to me that that her vetting procedures are pretty bloody good and strong. Who else did you have in mind?
Banning reason: Prossie fanboy + Sharing account with banned member (Atticus Finch aka Sylvester)

Offline greychap

I repeat my point. A good Dom never crosses boundaries and accepts full responsibility of his sub. Someone who not only dominates his sub, but at the same time nurtures, cares for and protects the selfless trust his sub reposes in him. Great feeling when you know you are responsible for not only your own enjoyment but equally responsible for the pleasure of your sub which she seems to derive in her total submission. The red lines are never meant to be crossed. The sceptics will never understand!

Stop keep going on about a good sub a bad sub I get that type of role play if your into it and I know girls that do those type of role plays but most (WG ) don't encourage being hit or choked or spat in the face by the punter , your missing the point it entirely :dash:
Banning reason: North East shit stirrer who contributes nothing

Why not engage with the discussion instead of insulting me? We're talking about BDSM,
Maybe admin should change the title of the thread, exert your dominance and tell him !

Well thats one. You mentioned more than one. And LK showed her quality by publically telling McF why she wouldn't see him. Which suggests to me that that her vetting procedures are pretty bloody good and strong. Who else did you have in mind?

You want more ok how about a poster who before he had even met her was tipping her off  and white knighting her about a negative review when Sir Frank gave her one  for cancelling at the last moment and giving shit comms

That sound normal behaviour....

Or do you want more sweetheart

Offline greychap

I repeat my point. A good Dom never crosses boundaries and accepts full responsibility of his sub. Someone who not only dominates his sub, but at the same time nurtures, cares for and protects the selfless trust his sub reposes in him. Great feeling when you know you are responsible for not only your own enjoyment but equally responsible for the pleasure of your sub which she seems to derive in her total submission. The red lines are never meant to be crossed. The sceptics will never understand!

Think you been reading too much of Fifty shades of grey :lol:
Banning reason: North East shit stirrer who contributes nothing

well that's one way of avoiding the argument.
Because you are a pissed up wanker, no need for me to argue with you,there are plenty of sane punters on this site who are able to rip you to shreds without me adding to it  :drinks:




Latest media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)