IMO, it is the usual rhetoric, easy for plod to chase soft, easy-to-catch targets.
What slightly bothers me is the Sgt's reference to 'off-street'. He wants to move into a very dangerous area as surely if he wants to make arrests on stairways and doorsteps, where is the burden of proof?
Are plod going to sit in an unmarked car outside every Nottingham hookers place, with a long lens camera collecting mugshots, collecting car numbers and matching the two? Are they going to sit in hotel lobbies watching for potential punters?
Their approach is no more that a waste of police time and a complete mismanagement of priorities. Nottingham has far more serious issues to reslove, and as usual, this is a blurring of the lines between using the worn out excuse of trafficking against women who want to do this work.
No emphasis on drivers on their phones, smoking with kids in the car, traffic light offences, clamping down on burgulary, etc, just pick an easy job where you can sit on your fat arses......
Sorry plod, the one-size fits all approach doesnt work.