Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.




Author Topic: Another fabulous Sheffield report  (Read 5074 times)

Online NIK

http://www.auto-censored.com/frs/fr_view.php?recnum=109138


Maybe I'm being unfair as I haven't seen Lucy and the occasional previous reports have been positive, however there is just something about this type of report, especially by a first time poster, that I find irritating.
It says she's 24 on her web site. Now there was a blonde Lucy who used to advertise in the local paper many years ago, if it's the same one she has to be a damn site more tha 24. Anyway she has been advertising on this site for several years as it is. Maybe it's a bit like Amy who I see in London. It says 24 on her site which hasn't been updated since well before I started seeing her and that was SEVEN years ago.
Back to Lucy and it now says size 14 on the site which has increased from 12. The girl in the photos is certainly not size 14 and probably not 12 either.

At least Amy still isn't size 14 or even 12!  :D

Offline brooksey

I haven't seen her in person either so can't be judgmental about her current appearance. However she has good fb on AW. She did a bit of camming about 3 years back, and I thought then she was friendly and quite easy on the eye, more like the pics and I would say not size 14. So my guess is she has got a little larger since then! (well many people do) and is being honest about it but without going as far as actually getting new pictures...
One black mark was she claimed at one time to be on tour in London (I assume to drum up cam trade), but clearly wasn't, since she suddenly got very vague when I tried to make a booking with her, and also seemed unclear about the difference between London Bridge and Tower Bridge.
So not averse to using a few tricks to increase her business, but if I was in Sheffield I would still be quite tempted to look her up.

Offline Ali Katt

As a sidenote I was going to see Lucy about 5 years ago, I think. She had her phone off or wasn't answering, this was at 10am, she was probably asleep, rather than with a client, I called again around 12pm and phone was still off or not answering so I saw a girl off AW instead.

This was when she charged £120 an hour, I think. The price increase and weight gain, she was a size 10, when I first tried to see her, has put me off, rebooking. There are many other escorts that offer better prices and are a body shape I prefer - If I am going to see a size 14 or bigger, which I have done before, I will see some someone with TNA, not a pear shape. She's a very successful working girl but I think the increased price and weight gain does her no favours. I think she's a bit bland for my taste, which maybe why the fluffbombs like her so much.

I think all reviews should be met with a pinch of salt unless you trust the reviewer. I saw another Sheffield girl, Hannah on the back of her good reviews and was disappointed.

Online NIK

As a sidenote I was going to see Lucy about 5 years ago, I think. She had her phone off or wasn't answering, this was at 10am, she was probably asleep, rather than with a client, I called again around 12pm and phone was still off or not answering so I saw a girl off AW instead.

This was when she charged £120 an hour, I think. The price increase and weight gain, she was a size 10, when I first tried to see her, has put me off, rebooking. There are many other escorts that offer better prices and are a body shape I prefer - If I am going to see a size 14 or bigger, which I have done before, I will see some someone with TNA, not a pear shape. She's a very successful working girl but I think the increased price and weight gain does her no favours. I think she's a bit bland for my taste, which maybe why the fluffbombs like her so much.

I think all reviews should be met with a pinch of salt unless you trust the reviewer. I saw another Sheffield girl, Hannah on the back of her good reviews and was disappointed.

And it sure is a fluffbomb review!

As a sidenote I was going to see Lucy about 5 years ago, I think. She had her phone off or wasn't answering, this was at 10am, she was probably asleep, rather than with a client, I called again around 12pm and phone was still off or not answering so I saw a girl off AW instead.

This was when she charged £120 an hour, I think. The price increase and weight gain, she was a size 10, when I first tried to see her, has put me off, rebooking. There are many other escorts that offer better prices and are a body shape I prefer - If I am going to see a size 14 or bigger, which I have done before, I will see some someone with TNA, not a pear shape. She's a very successful working girl but I think the increased price and weight gain does her no favours. I think she's a bit bland for my taste, which maybe why the fluffbombs like her so much.

I think all reviews should be met with a pinch of salt unless you trust the reviewer. I saw another Sheffield girl, Hannah on the back of her good reviews and was disappointed.

I feel I have to defend myself a little here.  I am a size 12/14, I changed my description to 14 to avoid anyone thinking I was very slim as I didn't want people to leave comments like "bigger than a size 12" I have never been any bigger than a size 14 and at the moment it is back to a size 12.  I always have my real age that is why it has gone up every year and I make a point of trying to update all the sites I am on although some sites do steal profiles without the girls knowing they are on there - but these are not the main sites.

I might be a bit bland, curvy girl next door type and a little submissive but there is someone for everyone.  I also have a non escort job which is why I take bookings.

If anyone has any criticisms that they would like to tell me please feel free to pm me.

As for the report, there is a client I see with that username on AW and he is definitely a real person and leaves feedback for lots of girls on there, I can only think it is the same person.

Kind Regards,

Lucy

« Last Edit: January 18, 2013, 05:46:37 PM by lucysheffield »

Online NIK

Also as I have said if she is the same Lucy who used to advertise in the Sheff Star many years ago she MUST be much more than twenty four. The ads have been banned from SS for years.
Of course it may not the same lady.

Regarding 'Beautiful' Amy she was the escort that ultimately resulted in my being banned from the joke site that was Sheffield Scene. The non punting twat called Satif suggested I was ruining girl's businesses (hardly a fucking girl, as you say she was thirty eight for years!) by reporting what I'd heard. Although I never saw her myself (above my age range) I heard from not one, but two reliable punters, that her service was immensely disappointing, amounting to no more that an expensive massage/parlour service and her photos were way out of date.

I know who I'd rather believe, two punters who I used to correspond with and trusted as real punters, or a non punting cunt who used to pander to prossies on paid sex forums. He was either a fluffy or a pimp - either way a fucking liar.
« Last Edit: January 18, 2013, 08:01:20 PM by NIK »

Also as I have said if she is the same Lucy who used to advertise in the Sheff Star many years ago she MUST be much more than twenty four. The ads have been banned from SS for years.
Of course it may not the same lady.

Regarding 'Beautiful' Amy she was the escort that ultimately resulted in my being banned from the joke site that was Sheffield Scene. The non punting twat called Satif suggested I was ruining girl's businesses (hardly a fucking girl, as you say she was thirty eight for years!) by reporting what I'd heard. Although I never saw her myself (above my age range) I heard from not one, but two reliable punters, that her service was immensely disappointing, amounting to no more that an expensive massage/parlour service and her photos were way out of date.

I know who I'd rather believe, two punters who I used to correspond with and trusted as real punters, or a non punting cunt who used to pander to prossies on paid sex forums. He was either a fluffy or a pimp - either way a fucking liar.
In one sense, this is nothing to do with me; I don't normally punt in Sheffield, although it's within travelling distance for me.

However,what I, as a newby on this Board, am confused about is which of the two last posters is the real poster?  Both seem to use exactly the same words; don't we pick up AW Profiles for that sort of thing?

Offline Ali Katt

In one sense, this is nothing to do with me; I don't normally punt in Sheffield, although it's within travelling distance for me.

However,what I, as a newby on this Board, am confused about is which of the two last posters is the real poster?  Both seem to use exactly the same words; don't we pick up AW Profiles for that sort of thing?
It looks like Nik's edited my post and copied and and pasted his in its place, I know he quoted from it earlier so maybe he copied and pasted the wrong text.

In what sense "edited"?  It appears to me [even after a couple of glasses of Red] to be "Word for word".

Online NIK

It looks like Nik's edited my post and copied and and pasted his in its place, I know he quoted from it earlier so maybe he copied and pasted the wrong text.

Sorry about that.  :blush:

Please feel free to repost as I have removed it.

Offline Ali Katt

Oh dear!

Anyway, the point I was making wasn't really to do with the dress size Lucy was advertising, I don't care if she is a 14 or a 12. It was the fact she gained weight and raised her price £10 to a rate of £130 which I don't feel is competitive. While I respect an escort can charge what she likes and punters in most cases are willing to pay it, putting on weight and raising the rate in a media-dubbed recession seems a bit silly. If anything, Lucy should have lowered her rate.

The second part was about Amy (beautiful blonde Amy) who I have seen. She raised he rate £15 from £80 to £95 I think, I paid £80. She advertised as being 38 for around 4 years, despite being at least late-40s, if not 50 when I saw her 5 years, having said that if I knew she was 50 I don't know if I'd have bothered, she is still attractive in the flesh though. If anything Amy should have lowered her rates in a recession and the fact despite her stated age, she really isn't getting any younger.

The third point was, although I may have been interested in Lucy a few years ago, I am now more sexually experienced and more interested in exotic-looking women, they can be British and an extra special service involving OWO, CIM, snowball etc - especially if I was to pay £80 for 30 mins. I appreciate that Lucy has her fans and she is popular, I just think it would be a lackluster experience, but I don't know it could be great. Vanilla is for people boxed in walls.

Also, I do not believe for a single second Lucy is 24, unless see started escorting at 19, I first saw her profile around 2009 time. Closer to 30 seems more likely.

The final point was I think a lot of escorts have been hyped up to ridiculous extremes by arse-licking fluffies and when most punters see them expecting the best ever, they are left disappointed. Amy, Hannah of Classic Touch and a few others fall into this category.

Offline Ali Katt

The original thread on Amy is Here

I think saying her service was like a glorified parlour massage isn't far off, but I saw her in my punting infancy and did have a good time. The massage was really good, the OWO OK to good, but the sex was mediocre, she was too passive, finished with HR and it was a very good handjob. I thought she was quite fun to talk to, but maybe talked to much. Like I say it's been tainted now as I've got more experienced and had a lot better since, if I had the same service today I'd be less impressed.

It is funny that everyone will think you lie. I started at 19 I never advertised in the star and I don't need to lie about my age.

Online NIK

It is funny that everyone will think you lie. I started at 19 I never advertised in the star and I don't need to lie about my age.

You say you're not the Lucy who advertised in the Star - fair enough, it must have been a different lady.

Just as well really, because if you are 24 then if you were she you would have been about 12 at the time!  :scare: :)

Ravanelli

Beautiful Amy, there's a blast from the past. Saw her about 6 years ago and she was easily mid 40's then. Her range of talent extended to laying on her back and doing fuck all else. I left a negative review for her and she responded that there was no 'chemistry' between us. WTF, I could have sworn I paid her.

Offline Ali Katt

Beautiful Amy, there's a blast from the past. Saw her about 6 years ago and she was easily mid 40's then. Her range of talent extended to laying on her back and doing fuck all else. I left a negative review for her and she responded that there was no 'chemistry' between us. WTF, I could have sworn I paid her.
Ah. I read that review I think. It also received some heavy scrutiny on Sheffield Scene, as it was her (alleged) first negative report. She says she likes a nice, gentle time, possibly an excuse for being a sack o' spuds. I think if I saw her again, I would be less than impressed, as she was my 3rd punt, I think, I had lower standards and it was OK.

Offline Tricks

Strange how these old negative reviews keep being resurrected by the defenders.

Possibly the truth hurts :D

Ravanelli

Ah. I read that review I think. It also received some heavy scrutiny on Sheffield Scene, as it was her (alleged) first negative report. She says she likes a nice, gentle time, possibly an excuse for being a sack o' spuds. I think if I saw her again, I would be less than impressed, as she was my 3rd punt, I think, I had lower standards and it was OK.

Yep, that's exactly how she described it, 'gentle'. I kid you not, you couldn't touch her anywhere because everything was too 'sensitive'. Oh, and she'd just had a front tooth knocked out and failed to mention it! There's more action in a blow up doll!

Offline Ali Katt

Yep, that's exactly how she described it, 'gentle'. I kid you not, you couldn't touch her anywhere because everything was too 'sensitive'. Oh, and she'd just had a front tooth knocked out and failed to mention it! There's more action in a blow up doll!
Yep I did read that report. She must be in the wars a lot, when I saw her she had just recovered from a broken ankle and had been off for a few weeks. When I saw her she was OK with me licking her out and touching her breasts, but she said I could stroke her hair, but couldnn't pull it or twist it in-case her husband finds out what she had been up to. She should invest in a 50p hairbrush.

Ravanelli

When I saw her she was OK with me licking her out and touching her breasts

Both off the menu for me, you must have had the 'chemistry'


Ravanelli

Bloody hell my old report is still there and here it is; it was the word compatible she used not chemistry though I'd still say WTF, I thought I paid her. Remember though boys, 'she finds it difficult to pretend.' Fucking hilarious, I wouldn't look at her twice if she walked past me in the street.


Strange one this... I've been meaning to visit Amy for a while after reading good reports and seeing her pictures on the website. I went to see her for obvious reasons and booked a one hour appointment. I think Amy must have spoke for at least 30 minutes before she got down to business. The other weird thing is that Amy's nipples are too sensitive and her clit is too sensitive... now with all my ex-girlfriends this has always been a good thing; not with Amy though, this means you can't actually touch them. Clearly when you book with Amy, everything has to be right for Amy. I was left feeling as though what I wanted was a secondary concern.
Don't get me wrong, Amy was a very nice woman and I understand why most of her clientele are regulars. If you like lots of talking and aren't too bothered about the hot, dirty sex then Amy may well fit the bill. Personally, I left feeling like I should have only paid for half an hour which wasn't particularly great.
Recommended:   No
Would You return: No
Rebuttal:   Amy writes:

I agree we were not compatable at all, probably down to me not being able to enjoy it, for that I apologize, but I find it difficult to pretend. My nipples and clit are sensitive and taking note of body language and what a girl likes means that we can carry on and enjoy ourselves, you didn't and it was too painful for me and I couldn't persuade you to alter things. You CAN touch me as others have not said otherwise. If you wanted "hot, dirty sex" then why did you book me? if you do your homework you will see I don't have the "pornstar" service. A lot of my appointments run well over time but I'm afraid it wasn't to be with this one.
The bad accident I suffered with my tooth has now been dealt with.  Regards amy.

Online NIK

Both off the menu for me, you must have had the 'chemistry'

If women don't like being touched then they shouldn't be prossying! :angry:
I expect she had no problem touching the money!

Offline Ali Katt

You say you're not the Lucy who advertised in the Star - fair enough, it must have been a different lady.

Just as well really, because if you are 24 then if you were she you would have been about 12 at the time!  :scare: :)
Now advertising as being 28, under the name DiamondLucyxx - so there maybe she did advertise in the star and is actually a lot older than she first made out.
Quote
It is funny that everyone will think you lie. I started at 19 I never advertised in the star and I don't need to lie about my age.
Quote
Also, I do not believe for a single second Lucy is 24, unless see started escorting at 19, I first saw her profile around 2009 time. Closer to 30 seems more likely.
You can't kid a kidder.
« Last Edit: February 07, 2013, 11:42:26 PM by Ali Katt »

Offline brooksey

Now advertising as being 28, under the name DiamondLucyxx - so there maybe she did advertise in the star and is actually a lot older than she first made out.You can't kid a kidder.

Are we saying DiamondLucyxx is the same person as lucysheffield.co.uk ? one looks quite a bit thinner than the other.
Anyway I was in Sheffield a few days ago and tried to contact the latter Lucy through AW but there was no reply and the account is now suspended (though fb still visible).

Offline Ali Katt

Are we saying DiamondLucyxx is the same person as lucysheffield.co.uk ? one looks quite a bit thinner than the other.
Anyway I was in Sheffield a few days ago and tried to contact the latter Lucy through AW but there was no reply and the account is now suspended (though fb still visible).
Guaranteed. She has lost weight, she does look size 10 from the pictures, she did say she had lost weight on this thread. She now work in Doncaster according to her profile. She has kept the same feedback.




Latest videos on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

Latest images on UKEscorting.com (free site!)