Anyway, the point I was making wasn't really to do with the dress size Lucy was advertising, I don't care if she is a 14 or a 12. It was the fact she gained weight and raised her price £10 to a rate of £130 which I don't feel is competitive. While I respect an escort can charge what she likes and punters in most cases are willing to pay it, putting on weight and raising the rate in a media-dubbed recession seems a bit silly. If anything, Lucy should have lowered her rate.
The second part was about Amy (beautiful blonde Amy) who I have seen. She raised he rate £15 from £80 to £95 I think, I paid £80. She advertised as being 38 for around 4 years, despite being at least late-40s, if not 50 when I saw her 5 years, having said that if I knew she was 50 I don't know if I'd have bothered, she is still attractive in the flesh though. If anything Amy should have lowered her rates in a recession and the fact despite her stated age, she really isn't getting any younger.
The third point was, although I may have been interested in Lucy a few years ago, I am now more sexually experienced and more interested in exotic-looking women, they can be British and an extra special service involving OWO, CIM, snowball etc - especially if I was to pay £80 for 30 mins. I appreciate that Lucy has her fans and she is popular, I just think it would be a lackluster experience, but I don't know it could be great. Vanilla is for people boxed in walls.
Also, I do not believe for a single second Lucy is 24, unless see started escorting at 19, I first saw her profile around 2009 time. Closer to 30 seems more likely.
The final point was I think a lot of escorts have been hyped up to ridiculous extremes by arse-licking fluffies and when most punters see them expecting the best ever, they are left disappointed. Amy, Hannah of Classic Touch and a few others fall into this category.