MEETING DETAILS: Escort name:
Jessy (AW nickname: Miss Jessy)Website: https://www.adultwork.com/3023496
(image form here
Type of Visit: Incall (W1K, Bond Street)
Advertised incall price structure: 0.5h £60, 1h: £100, 1.5h: £160, 2h: £200
Fee Paid: £100, Time paid for: 1 hour
Actual time spent: 35mins (I got short-changed by 25mins!)PREAMBLE:
A negative experience with a girl with one of the most appalling attitudes I have ever encountered. ABOUT THE VENUE: (mostly positive)
A flat very close to the Bond Street station. Actually “very close” is an understatement. It is on the higher floors of that building and there is no lift so you have to climb plenty of stairs. The interior of the flat is modern/refabricated. It is only an one-bedroom property and shared with her flatmate (who is usually Almma). When I visited Almma was using the proper bedroom while Jessy was using the living room which she “converted” into a bedroom. There was no double bed though – more like an elevated sofa corner being used as a single bed. You can see the “bed” in this picture 1
. The lighting of the room is rather poor and most of the light is provided by a flat screen TV playing in the background. You can see this part of the room in this picture 2
. The bathroom is modern and clean and where this picture 3
was taken. Overall a decent place in Central London. Worth noting that the Jessy-Almma pair tours around the country quite a lot. Even in London they sometimes use a well-known hotel near the Aldgate East station or a (less-known) hotel near the Oxford Street station. ABOUT THE ESCORT’S PHYSICAL APPEARANCE: (positive)
Jessy is a cute Romanian girl in her mid-20s (profile says 23 but I would say probably 2-3 years older but that is not much of an issue anyway). The pictures are genuine and accurate so not much for me to describe really. When I met her she looked like this picture 4
and this picture 5
. Her body is quite hot – this picture 7
is accurate enough about her body. She is size 8 with 34DD enhanced boobs (good boobjob I have to say). Height around 5ft5in if I recall correctly. According to my beauty scale her face score is 7.8/10 and body score is 8.7/10. Overall 8.3/10ABOUT THE ESCORT’S PERSONALITY AND OTHER FACTS: (negative)
Her awful attitude is the main reason this review is negative. While not rude she is particularly stroppy, argumentative, and confrontational; she gets super-easily agitated, she is up her own arse, she acts like doing you a favour, she is sarcastic, dishonest and a con-artist. I have come across many girls with shitty attitudes but very rarely across a girl combining so many negatives characteristics all in one. She is also one of those girls with the mentality that she is doing us a favour by gracing us with her presence at “such low rates”. Typical of a jaded pimped prostitute who continues doing this job purely for the money while openly hating it. By the way she is doing this job for 5 years now. Her spoken English level is currently B1-B2 as that is defined by CEFR
but frankly better if she couldn’t speak at all as each word that came out of her mouth was either vitriolic or delusional pro$$ie bullocks. ABOUT THE MEETING: (A) Meeting arrangement: (negative)
Comms are text-only and handled by your typical Romanian “receptionist” (i.e. pimp). Confirms services but avoids answering crucial, cross-checking questions for the obvious reasons – hidden extras and missing basic services which become apparent only during the booking – after payment is made of course.(B) During the meeting: (negative) Services offered: superficial French kissing, protected penetration sex, OWO, COB, handjobPOSITIVES
1. Good blowjob and handjob
2. When she wants she can be somewhat playful with fake moans.
3. Well presented. She does pay attention to her make-up and hair.NEUTRALS
1. French kissing was with tongue but perfunctory and with no passion. It was basically mechanical tongue swirling … kissing a fish would be more sensual.
2. No pussy fingering.
3. No ballsucking/ball-licking.
4. The way she cleans up herself is with a sink wash instead of a proper shower. I know that as I saw her doing this before I got to the shower at the end of the booking and she was getting prepared for the next punter.
5. You can't touch her hair. She gets angry if you do so.NEGATIVES
1. No reverse oral or 69. She says she hates it and that she doesn't even allow her boyfriend to lick her pussy.
2. Her stroppy attitude is a mood killer.
3. She acts like making you a favour.
4. Transactional and most of the time mechanical.
5. I paid for 1hr, yet I was in and out in just 35mins and that including 5mins at the end for my shower and dressing up.
6. In relation to point 5. She played a con that I can now clearly see from other posters/reviewers is common amongst her group (including Almma, though Almma is a bit more honest). You go for half an hour and she tells you that it is cum once and gives you a list of extras, £20 each. Then she says “But 1 hour is cum twice. And you can have DFK and OWO (which are otherwise £20 each) for free!”. You agree to stay for the hour for £100 but in the end it turns out that it is 30mins, cum once and she just added her extras on the 30min fee so it is £60+£20+£20=£100. What a con! I can’t believe I fell for such a cheap trick. I should had stuck with my original decision to go only for 30mins - a decision made given her previous negative reviews.
7. From the “1hr” booking (or rather 30mins with extras) the penetration sex time was a mere 5minutes, reasoning I am too big (that is utter bullshit to begin with plus her 5 year prossie experienced pussy is very loose anyway). She refused more penetration, saying she would only do handjob and blowjob but 90% of the remaining time it was only handjob.
8. When she decided to stop penetration I thought I would at least get more sex action by the end but when I suggested it she got agitated and threatened to stop the meeting at the 8min mark with no refund. WTF is wrong with this girl?
9. She refused doing the cowgirl position.
10. There is zero mention about extras on her profile, yet there are many and every extra is £20 EACH. Just to name a few: FK: £20, OWO: £20, COB: £20. As a “special treat” she offered me COB for “free”. Oh lucky me…
11. Profile promises the world but a number of these “exotic” services (such as reverse oral for example...) are not even available as extras. CONCLUSIONS AND FINAL VERDICT:
Though she is physically good looking and some of the services like her blowjob and handjob are well executed, her stroppy attitude and argumentative demeanour kills the mood and in conjunction with the clockwatching, conning practices and the exclusion of basic services like RO, at the end leaves you feeling both angry and frustrated. I left some days before reviewing her so that I can judge completely unemotionally but the verdict is still the same: A very big NEGATIVE
Q. Do I recommend her? A. No. Not even for 30mins £60. If she is working with Almma choose her instead. Not that Almma is offering more services (in fact she offers slightly fewer) but at least she has a friendly attitude and she is superior in terms of looks as well. And if you are thinking about a Jessy-Almma duo better forget it unless you want to waste your money and regret it afterwards.
Q. Would I meet her again (going back in time)? A. No.
Q. Will I meet her again in the future? A. No.DETAILED SCORES ABOUT THE ESCORT:
Attractiveness/Beauty: 8.3/10 (face score: 7.8/10; body score 8.7/10) – ratings are based on this scale and criteria
GFE illusion: 2/10
Willingness to please: 2/10
Participation & Enthusiasm: 3/10
Available services: 5/10
Quality of available services: 5/10
Hygiene Standard: 6/10
English level: 6.5/10
Smoker status: Smoker (but uses mouthwash)
Pubic hair: Fully shaven
Quality/price ratio: Poor NONMENCLATURE OF SUBSECTIONS RATINGS: positive
=4.5 or 5 stars, mostly positive
=3.5 or 4 stars, mixed
=2 or 3 stars, negative
=0 or 1 starsneutral
=something that either doesn't bother me personally generally or didn't bother me at the time although it would be preferable if it were available or avoided (depending on the subject). It might be decisive for others though that is why is mentioned.