Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.




Author Topic: Lara Brooks - Stourbridge  (Read 7652 times)


1 review(s) for Lara Brooks (1 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative) [Indexed by Admin]


Offline charlie sheen

Also, this constant nonsense I read on profiles about this need for correct grammar, well written e-mails and spelling, begs another question.

Why are these so-called classy, intelligent ladies looking for this perfect prose on  prostitution sites? Are they looking to uncover the next Hemmingway on Adultwork? I thought they were there to make money selling sex. If they want to read literature they could just pick a decent book from the library, or God forbid, buy one (which of course they will never do).     

For punters the purpose of the mail system is direct communication and setting up the booking. Hello, When, What Services, Where, How Long, Thanks. Most of us have jobs and are on the move, often typing messages on mobile devices - We aren't sitting on our asses all day in our slippers and dressing gown critiquing grammar and spelling in emails; most people have better things to do.
Banning reason: Accidentally logs into banned accounts (asianjay5inch, smallindianguy32)

Offline Redster69

FFS a utility bill!......she ain't even that attractive.

Offline JIMI1234

Also, this constant nonsense I read on profiles about this need for correct grammar, well written e-mails and spelling, begs another question.

Why are these so-called classy, intelligent ladies looking for this perfect prose on  prostitution sites? Are they looking to uncover the next Hemmingway on Adultwork? I thought they were there to make money selling sex. If they want to read literature they could just pick a decent book from the library, or God forbid, buy one (which of course they will never do).     

For punters the purpose of the mail system is direct communication and setting up the booking. Hello, When, What Services, Where, How Long, Thanks. Most of us have jobs and are on the move, often typing messages on mobile devices - We aren't sitting on our asses all day in our slippers and dressing gown critiquing grammar and spelling in emails; most people have better things to do.

That's your second post I absolutely agree with   :hi:
Banning reason: Undesirable fluffy

Are they looking to uncover the next Hemmingway on Adultwork?
They would cry if we turned up off our head on absinthe like Hemingway did, we can win ! :scare:

Offline Lara Brooks

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 6
Apologies in advance that this is so long but I'm replying to many people over 3 pages of posts.

… Your first contact must not only be good English but unambiguous and no inuendos…
Good English, insofar as I can understand what the person is talking about (you’d be amazed how some just don’t make sense at all) and not too smutty because over the years I’ve found the worst TWs to be the ones who do lots of flirting/dirty talk (and never book of course).

Anyway, hello Hawkwind :). Thanks for reviewing me and I’m really sorry if I somehow had a go at you :rose:. If you want to email me privately and discuss it feel free. It’s not like me at all and I’m struggling to remember what could have made me so cross as I’m normally extremely patient and tolerant. I don’t care at all about spelling and grammar (beyond being able to understand what someone is trying to tell me of course), so maybe it was a combination of a few “faux pas” that were inadvertently made or something that was misunderstood and taken as an insult. Anyway, sorry again. The only time I ever pick anyone up on spelling is when they repeatedly call me “Laura” instead of “Lara”.

Unfortunately I really struggle with conveying emotion in writing, and have in the past been accused by some of being “too business-like”. My style, no matter how much I try otherwise is to the point, which is ideal for writing succinct scientific reports but absolutely rubbish when trying to convey friendliness via email or text.

RE my 2 hour minimum rule…
I used to offer 1 hour bookings, and met many lovely men from these appointments, but that was when my location was more discreet than my present one. Also, I have to factor in that as my availability is so limited now it no longer makes sense to offer shorter appointments unfortunately. I can completely understand that it doesn't suit everyone.  It wasn’t a case of weeding out TWs or anything like that, it was purely practical.


She's a no for me now too as she would probably not like the way I speak. I am from Dudley and have a black country accent
Nowt wrong with a Black Country accent, my partner has one, as do a couple of my regulars :cool:


Absolutely agree 'Nomeansno'... She sounds like a right snob to be honest; the type who thinks she is above her customers and that she is doing THEM a favour…If i do change my mind I might have to interview her cos I have  a better education and more £dough than her ... so she may be too thick and poor, for me....
LOL, I probably am thicker and poorer compared to you. My clients are always teaching me things, (including correcting my spelling!) and I like it like that. I wouldn’t want them to feel inferior so try very hard not to put a foot wrong.

Nomeansno, anyone who’s met me will most likely say I’m hardly a snob, and I see my clients (or possible clients) as equals not beneath me in any way. Their education or wealth doesn’t factor into it (because there are many who are more educated than me, and I’m not materialistic so not motivated by money). Pretty down to earth actually.
 

…i understand she feels this is what she needs to do for her own security; but it doesn't give me any security and leaves me exposed…
I fully understand how it probably puts off the majority of interested men. It was a difficult decision to make; getting the balance between my security and unsettling potential clients was really hard. It was based on the numerous horror stories I’d heard about badly behaved clients and the potential damage they can do – I do believe that us WGs have more to fear from rogue clients than men have to fear from us - and I realised I fall right on the side of putting my peace of mind first. I don’t blame anyone for going “sod that, no way am I giving her that info!”


…She was a member of UKP a few years ago and from her posts she does not sound as though she would be particularly offended by bad language - she does not write as though she is too affected by airs and graces…
Thanks Placebo. You’re right, bad language isn’t a problem. I have to watch my Ps and Qs myself; time and a place and all that ;)


Asking for personal details like a utility bill or ID is not a "verification process" it's a shakedown.  Unless she is travelling to your hotel, why does she want to know your actual name and address? By asking for those details she  is basically saying "Watch what you say about me, I know who you are"  Of course they always try and claim that it's for safety or that she is "selective" about who she sees or some such bollocks. Some sad punters even get an ego trip out of the idea that they got through the verification process or were selected…
It’s not about a selection process at all, it’s purely my peace of mind. After a few times of turning up at homes and hotels where the clients weren’t there, i.e. I’d been set up by deliberate TWs, I realised that I had to be a lot more careful. Unfortunately there are some people out there who make it their full time hobby trying to wreck the lives of WGs, and I’ve heard too many horror stories, much worse than no-shows! WGs put themselves in a very vulnerable position every time they meet a stranger for sex, and nice men perhaps forget this.

By asking for their details I’m actually saying “if you commit a crime that is worthy of me contacting the Police I will know where to direct them”. I realise I won’t be able to please everyone all of the time and sometimes I mess up (then look back and cringe!) but I always used to ask for feedback after bookings, including asking for bad FB so I knew if I’d done something wrong. I stopped doing it because it felt like clients were reading that it was mandatory and I felt awkward about that. I’m considering reinstating it, although most give FB afterwards anyway.


Also she could possibly try and blackmail if she was not happy if she got negative feedback
Despite being a prostitute my moral compass is working very well, and there is no way I’d blackmail someone no matter how much of an arse they were. I take pride in the fact that for the 15 years I’ve been doing this no-one has come a cropper.


Yeah, even the guys who have seen her and nothing untoward has happened cannot GUARANTEE that in 3/6/12months, she doesn't have a meltdown and do some sort of expose'
You do have a very valid point Jimi. When I leave the business in a couple of years I plan to exit the stage quietly and live a peaceful life, leaving my escort years behind. I hope I’m allowed to do this from men I’ve met/not met! That chapter will have closed. As for having a meltdown, I’ve been through some dark times and was able to gain the tools to keep emotionally buoyant from then on. In the unlikely event I did have a meltdown I would likely abuse myself not other people. That’s more my style. Also, unless a man is a celebrity he simply isn’t going to get named and shamed in some dodgy prossie’s expose.


Also, this constant nonsense I read on profiles about this need for correct grammar, well written e-mails and spelling, begs another question. Why are these so-called classy, intelligent ladies looking for this perfect prose on  prostitution sites? …
The reason I say “no text speak” is that, apart from the fact I don’t understand half of it, it usually comes from young men having a laugh. Not only do I want to cut down on TWs but I can’t guarantee to be able to physically can’t keep up with the under 25s and I'd hate to disappoint.

I'll leave it there because this is long enough. I just wanted to give my side of the story.
« Last Edit: October 11, 2015, 08:07:16 PM by Lara Brooks »

Offline Dodo

Well, I have never met the lady but I have to say she has written a very balanced reply that I am sure will be appreciated. Thats how to put the case for the defence.
Banning reason: Making false claims against moderation

Offline broksonic

I'm pleased Lara has explained everything clearly
Banning reason: White-knight leaver

Offline Redster69

Yep.....her attractiveness has just shot through the roof......I'm sorry :rose:

Hawkwind71


Anyway, hello Hawkwind :). Thanks for reviewing me and I’m really sorry if I somehow had a go at you :rose:. If you want to email me privately and discuss it feel free. It’s not like me at all and I’m struggling


Hi Lara.

There is nothing you need apologise for. I made an ambiguous statement and you pulled me up on it. Fair play on you.

The reason why I did this review is because I had seen several guys asking abot you and there was really very little for them to read to make a valid decision. So I offered my review to help others decide. These reviews are all about balance, first what I say, second the forums response and finally the WG's response. I think this particular review serves all those points.

As I said in my review, you are one classy lady, and you have shown that once again in the way you have responded.

Kudos to you.  :hi: :drinks:

Hi Lara.

There is nothing you need apologise for. I made an ambiguous statement and you pulled me up on it. Fair play on you.

The reason why I did this review is because I had seen several guys asking abot you and there was really very little for them to read to make a valid decision. So I offered my review to help others decide. These reviews are all about balance, first what I say, second the forums response and finally the WG's response. I think this particular review serves all those points.

As I said in my review, you are one classy lady, and you have shown that once again in the way you have responded.

Kudos to you.  :hi: :drinks:
Fluffy bastard keep the ass kissing coming my way or do it in private.  Just so you get pat the spelling  :wackogirl: next time have highlighted your failure.

Nice review of a different  lady, thought the hawk only does bimbos, or was this pushing the boat out !  :hi:

Offline Placebo88

Lara , thanks for your carefully considered and informative response.It matches closely with my existing perception of you and some of the reasons why , under different circumstances , making a booking with you would be a priority for me.

I believe that I posted the first comment on this forum about you ( in a different thread ) ; stating that you would be my ideal classy and intelligent older lady booking if money was no object, and my surprise that there was no existing information or reviews of such a worthy lady on this site.This, and a few other members following up and voicing similar regard for your profile, precipitated Hawkwind's review and all that ensued.

The two key stumbling blocks for me though have been confirmed rather than removed by your response - you have addressed them but made your stance clear.This is fine , you are entitled to do as you see fit and presumably everything runs to your satisfaction as you have had many years to alter and amend things to suit you best.I do feel that you are limiting your potential clientele and effectively denying many genuine customers the pleasure of your company ( a wolf in sheep's clothing bit of flattery ? ) with your strict regulations and prices.

You say that you are not materialistic and that money is not a major motivator for you but IMO £300 is very steep even for a 2 hour booking ; especially when, as Hawkwind said, a large amount of time is spent sitting and talking , discussing the session , which is more for your benefit than the punters ; at least something that they should not be having to pay for.Some WGs/escorts/prostitutes/whatever ( I like the fact that you chose to use prostitute by the way , a new word needs to be invented but that is the closest at present ) do social meets or include social time along with full service but typically charge around 1/3 rates for this aspect of the meet.

I included most of my thoughts concerning your booking requirements in my prior post on this thread.I have never heard of another prostitute doing this and think it is excessive ; the work does carry a small element of risk but there are other ways to reduce it as much as possible and your own method is not foolproof.Sites like SAAFE have sections and info regarding security and also information and up to date forums on known dangerous men and time wasters including details and there is also a database ; National Ugly Mugs or some such thing which could be incorporated into a screening process
  Going by feedback it appears that most of your work comes through your personal site rather than Adultwork.I would have though that Adultwork could provide some help - if a potential client had good feedback from several well established girls would that not provide assurance.

Chances are I have written nothing that you have not already considered , nor will my suggestions change anything but with such a tempting lady involved I had to give it my best shot !
   
« Last Edit: October 12, 2015, 04:01:56 PM by Placebo88 »

Offline Dodo

Just an observation Place on your conclusion in your post that Lara may indeed be materialistic.
The very fact that Lara choses to charge £300 for two hours does not necessarily translate into her wanting to maximise her income. I would have thought it highly likely that she would earn, over a period, more wonga by charging say £80 ph as she would attract more punters but have to work harder.
I would guess she would much prefer one punter a day and earn £300 than say four and earn £320.

« Last Edit: October 12, 2015, 05:23:48 PM by Dodo »
Banning reason: Making false claims against moderation

Offline Placebo88

Just an observation Place on your conclusion in your post that Lara may indeed be materialistic.
The very fact that Lara choses to charge £300 for two hours does not necessarily translate into her wanting to maximise her income. I would have thought it highly likely that she would earn, over a period, more wonga by charging say £80 ph as she would attract more punters but have to work harder.
I would guess she would much prefer one punter a day and earn £300 than say four and earn £320.

I agree with your business sense and actually made a very similar comment on a recent thread concerning Bella London ;


 'If she does want to make money as she keeps saying then she should charge a competitive rate if she wishes to build up a reputation and have a good flow of clients.In this case less would definitely mean more for her and give her some hope of reaching her financial goals ! '

Girls like the Czechs at Masshouse make full use of this strategy to maximise earnings.

Maybe Lara's high rates are a part of the classy escort branding and paradoxically help to attract a certain kind of client - I don't know , perhaps Lara could give us some insights into that.All I know if that the pricing has prevented me from seeing her , even before I was aware of the booking procedure.

I would guess she would much prefer one punter a day and earn £300 than say four and earn £320.
Anyone in business would, and the lost £20 could be made from savings from washing 3 extra lots of bedding and towels.

Offline broksonic


Maybe Lara's high rates are a part of the classy escort branding and paradoxically help to attract a certain kind of client - I don't know , perhaps Lara could give us some insights into that.All I know if that the pricing has prevented me from seeing her , even before I was aware of the booking procedure.

I've decided that I will definitely see Lara and hope she will see from my AW profile that I've seen well established escorts and not want my real name and landline number . If she does want my real name I'll have to think very hard if to give it her or not
Banning reason: White-knight leaver

Offline sam55

I was pleased to read Lara's measured response answering the comments made about her and was glad to see that she didn't launch into an anti punter rant as is often the case when SP's respond.

However, as I said earlier though I wouldn't book her for 2 reasons.

Firstly, Being a one pop man I couldn't sustain foreplay for more than an hour or so which means I'd be paying 150 quid for a chat which I'm sure would be very interesting but I could chat to the women at work for nowt.

Secondly, and by far the most important. The first rule of punting, tell no-one, repeat, tell no-one, no matter how much you'd like to. Obviously, the WG knows what you look like, (unless you wear a mask which would be weird) but that must be all, no name, address, what job you do, how many kids you've got, etc etc etc, any divulgence of information is a potential shitfest down the line.
We belong to a secret society where anonymity is paramount. We all know that WG's potentially put themselves at risk every time they meet a new punter but that's an occupational hazard that 99.9% of accept without asking for ID.

There is also a risk to us, being mugged or beaten up by a pimp, B & S, getting ripped off, clockwatchers or catching something nasty. I don't think that many WG's would be very keen on giving their ID. Maybe I'll try it next time.
« Last Edit: October 12, 2015, 10:39:38 PM by sam55 »

Offline JIMI1234

Well, for my two penneth'... I thought Lara's response was well balanced and I could see her perspective on the need for security etc....

But, as i said in one of my posts, I just couldn't take the chance of being exposed in any shape or form.

If she finds a way not to require personal details, then I'm in.. Until then, I'm (still) out... A shame too, as would love to have seen her!!!
Banning reason: Undesirable fluffy

Offline azrael

I was pleased to read Lara's measured response answering the comments made about her and was glad to see that she didn't launch into an anti punter rant as is often the case when SP's respond.

However, as I said earlier though I wouldn't book her for 2 reasons.

Firstly, Being a one pop man I couldn't sustain foreplay for more than an hour or so which means I'd be paying 150 quid for a chat which I'm sure would be very interesting but I could chat to the women at work for nowt.

Secondly, and by far the most important. The first rule of punting, tell no-one, repeat, tell no-one, no matter how much you'd like to. Obviously, the WG knows what you look like, (unless you wear a mask which would be weird) but that must be all, no name, address, what job you do, how many kids you've got, etc etc etc, any divulgence of information is a potential shitfest down the line.
We belong to a secret society where anonymity is paramount. We all know that WG's potentially put themselves at risk every time they meet a new punter but that's an occupational hazard that 99.9% of accept without asking for ID.

There is also a risk to us, being mugged or beaten up by a pimp, B & S, getting ripped off, clockwatchers or catching something nasty. I don't think that many WG's would be very keen on giving their ID. Maybe I'll try it next time.

+1, gonna agree with sam on this. Theres no way an SP needs to know my personal details, first timers should be asked to book through aw if the SP is that concerned that way if anything goes sideways the police can easily track you down.

Offline Placebo88

+1, gonna agree with sam on this. Theres no way an SP needs to know my personal details, first timers should be asked to book through aw if the SP is that concerned that way if anything goes sideways the police can easily track you down.

Is it correct that the police could easily trace someone from their Adultwork profile? I am aware of a fair number of established prostitutes who demand formal AW bookings for those with no feedback , first time visitors or in some cases every booking. I had initially included a similar suggestion in the penultimate paragraph of my post ( response 60 ) , suggesting the making and confirmation of booking requests , but edited it out as I was uncertain of the facts and did not wish to give false information.Marty McFly has a known AW account , has he been brought in for questioning yet ( sorry , I cannot be bothered to read a thread that long ! ) ?

If it is factually sound ; problem solved ! I would be totally happy to be easily traceable using police methods should the need arise , my objection is to putting this sensitive information in the hands of someone who could hypothetically use it against me  - I have gone through all the reasons for this earlier and for me even the booking itself would suffer for it.

Maybe this giving of information is a reason why there were no prior reviews of Lara on this site.I have found plenty of historic reviews elsewhere but they are so fluffy and sycophantic that they sound as though they were written with a gun ( or threat of a letter to the wife ) held to their heads !

I am not for one minute saying that Lara would in any way make use of the information to harm , manipulate or subdue a decent customer ; it is most likely exactly as she says.Still , without absolute certainty , doubts will creep in.




Offline sam55

Is it correct that the police could easily trace someone from their Adultwork profile? I am aware of a fair number of established prostitutes who demand formal AW bookings for those with no feedback , first time visitors or in some cases every booking. I had initially included a similar suggestion in the penultimate paragraph of my post ( response 60 ) , suggesting the making and confirmation of booking requests , but edited it out as I was uncertain of the facts and did not wish to give false information.Marty McFly has a known AW account , has he been brought in for questioning yet ( sorry , I cannot be bothered to read a thread that long ! ) ?

If it is factually sound ; problem solved ! I would be totally happy to be easily traceable using police methods should the need arise , my objection is to putting this sensitive information in the hands of someone who could hypothetically use it against me  - I have gone through all the reasons for this earlier and for me even the booking itself would suffer for it.

Maybe this giving of information is a reason why there were no prior reviews of Lara on this site.I have found plenty of historic reviews elsewhere but they are so fluffy and sycophantic that they sound as though they were written with a gun ( or threat of a letter to the wife ) held to their heads !

I am not for one minute saying that Lara would in any way make use of the information to harm , manipulate or subdue a decent customer ; it is most likely exactly as she says.Still , without absolute certainty , doubts will creep in.

I would imagine that Admin will know more about this sort of thing.
I would think that it is possible to ascertain the IP address of a member of AW and thence get their name and street address from the service provider - I might be talking bollocks here! I thought that this was the way that paedos get caught.
As I say, I have no expertise in this area at all.

Offline azrael

Is it correct that the police could easily trace someone from their Adultwork profile? I am aware of a fair number of established prostitutes who demand formal AW bookings for those with no feedback , first time visitors or in some cases every booking. I had initially included a similar suggestion in the penultimate paragraph of my post ( response 60 ) , suggesting the making and confirmation of booking requests , but edited it out as I was uncertain of the facts and did not wish to give false information.Marty McFly has a known AW account , has he been brought in for questioning yet ( sorry , I cannot be bothered to read a thread that long ! ) ?

If it is factually sound ; problem solved ! I would be totally happy to be easily traceable using police methods should the need arise , my objection is to putting this sensitive information in the hands of someone who could hypothetically use it against me  - I have gone through all the reasons for this earlier and for me even the booking itself would suffer for it.

Maybe this giving of information is a reason why there were no prior reviews of Lara on this site.I have found plenty of historic reviews elsewhere but they are so fluffy and sycophantic that they sound as though they were written with a gun ( or threat of a letter to the wife ) held to their heads !

I am not for one minute saying that Lara would in any way make use of the information to harm , manipulate or subdue a decent customer ; it is most likely exactly as she says.Still , without absolute certainty , doubts will creep in.

Your ip address is a starting point, your email address comes into play. Not to mention your phone number, did you know they can trace your phone even when the phone is switched off, but tge technical guys on here will probably give you a better answer. Nothing is sacred anymore to "big brother" if they want to find you they can

Nothing is sacred anymore to "big brother" if they want to find you they can
More often than not they cannot be bothered though.

Offline smiths

I was pleased to read Lara's measured response answering the comments made about her and was glad to see that she didn't launch into an anti punter rant as is often the case when SP's respond.

However, as I said earlier though I wouldn't book her for 2 reasons.

Firstly, Being a one pop man I couldn't sustain foreplay for more than an hour or so which means I'd be paying 150 quid for a chat which I'm sure would be very interesting but I could chat to the women at work for nowt.

Secondly, and by far the most important. The first rule of punting, tell no-one, repeat, tell no-one, no matter how much you'd like to. Obviously, the WG knows what you look like, (unless you wear a mask which would be weird) but that must be all, no name, address, what job you do, how many kids you've got, etc etc etc, any divulgence of information is a potential shitfest down the line.
We belong to a secret society where anonymity is paramount. We all know that WG's potentially put themselves at risk every time they meet a new punter but that's an occupational hazard that 99.9% of accept without asking for ID.

There is also a risk to us, being mugged or beaten up by a pimp, B & S, getting ripped off, clockwatchers or catching something nasty. I don't think that many WG's would be very keen on giving their ID. Maybe I'll try it next time.

Indeed, your second rule is one not to break for ANY WG in my view however much I might want to punt with her. Its simply not how my punting has worked for over 30 years and I wont be changing that as I punt to suit ME not WGs. Lara can of course operate as she wishes.

Offline sam55

Your ip address is a starting point, your email address comes into play. Not to mention your phone number, did you know they can trace your phone even when the phone is switched off, but tge technical guys on here will probably give you a better answer. Nothing is sacred anymore to "big brother" if they want to find you they can

It's impossible to trace a phone when it's switched off.

With smartphones the potential is there for it to be traced when it's on, I'm not saying that it's easy. With the old fashion variety, the best they could get would be triangulation from the nearest phone masts which I don't think can be done it real time.
I know they do this stuff all the time in "Spooks" and James Bond but it's bollox.

Offline Lara Brooks

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 6

…you are entitled to do as you see fit and presumably everything runs to your satisfaction as you have had many years to alter and amend things to suit you best…
I think this is the important part. I’ve tweaked and changed things over the years and the way I operate now works, for now. There’s always the possibility that I shall continue to tweak things because I’m in a rather transitionary stage in life before I retire completely from the sex industry.


…I do feel that you are limiting your potential clientele and effectively denying many genuine customers the pleasure of your company…
I know, you’re right because I’ve chatted to men who’ve wanted to meet me but are not happy with my security. It’s unfortunate, but luckily for them they have plenty of choice of ladies who operate less strictly. What I will always tell new ladies is to decide what they are happy doing and only do it that way, rather than feeling pressured into complying with the norm; we have to do what is right for us and, with the greatest of respect, I don’t care what other ladies do or how they operate their businesses as long as it works for them.


…You say that you are not materialistic and that money is not a major motivator for you but IMO £300 is very steep even for a 2 hour booking ; especially when, as Hawkwind said, a large amount of time is spent sitting and talking , discussing the session , which is more for your benefit than the punters…
Justifying my pricing isn’t something I’m going to get into apart from to say I have limited time each month to accept bookings and it make sense to charge more and see fewer men than charge less and see more. It’s also about discretion at my new location, as I mentioned earlier. Discussing the session is so that the client hopefully gets what he wants, when he wants, not so I can waste time chatting.

Regarding the chatting…most of my clients book longish appointments because they want an experience that is more like a date than a series of shags, which I realise isn’t for everyone. Many are very nervous or sensitive or simply just want to take it very slowly. I’ve tried the approach where I’ve put them in control of timing but many were too nervous to make the first move within a reasonable time period so that wasn’t ideal. To give you an idea of what a minefield it can be I once saw a man who wanted to take things slowly, but wanted me to make the first move. That was fine until I made a move after I felt we’d chatted long enough and he told me to get off, that I was moving too fast for him! It seems I’m dammed if I do and damned if I don’t. Ultimately I am not a mind reader and it can be extremely hard to gauge what to do for the best.
 
Thankfully the majority of men who have met me revisit so what I did worked for them, even if it’s just until they gained confidence. What I’ve found is that when I’ve tried asking (before a meet) what they have in mind/what they hope to get out of the appointment they will either say something like “I just want to go with the flow”, which is so subjective and doesn’t give me any insight into how to time it right for them, or they want to shag like they did when they were 30/40 years younger (only to find that they simply can’t!). It seemed to cause more stress and anxiety for them having to discuss what they thought they’d want, so I stopped asking. Maybe I should reconsider broaching the subject pre-meeting again, because at least it helps to minimise misunderstandings regarding expectations?


…Sites like SAAFE have sections and info regarding security and also information and up to date forums on known dangerous men and time wasters including details and there is also a database ; National Ugly Mugs or some such thing which could be incorporated into a screening process
  Going by feedback it appears that most of your work comes through your personal site rather than Adultwork.I would have though that Adultwork could provide some help - if a potential client had good feedback from several well established girls would that not provide assurance.

Thanks for the info on safety etc. I already subscribe to Ugly Mugs but I don’t find it helpful; firstly it seems to deal predominantly with street workers and the men who are attracted to them (not my demographic), and the information about attackers is next to useless most of the time because the ladies haven’t the foggiest who these men are so have nothing but a vague description for the Police (which brings me right back to why I ask for the details I do). The thing is, because no-one else is so strict they don’t know who they've met or had problems with, so their info is not of huge help to me. All I’d get is “his name was John (I doubt it), he was average height and weight, and drove a silver Mondeo” LOL. If I’m lucky I’d get a phone number, but new SIM cards are so easy to get hold of that a mobile number is potentially not of great use either.

So few of my clients are from AW that at this stage in my “career” I’m not sure it’s something that’s worth me exploring. I use AW purely for free advertising and to direct potential clients to my website. I’m not sure if it’s cleaned up its act but AW used to have an awful reputation for fakes; fake girls, fake reviews, fake clients, and that it wasn’t to be trusted, so I don’t particularly trust it. But as I said, I tweak things from time to time so I may change my mind. But please bear in mind that all my rules are as a result of things happening, either to myself or to other ladies, rather than some sick game to make clients jump through hoops. I hope that’s answered the questions.




Latest videos on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

Latest images on UKEscorting.com (free site!)