Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.


Author Topic: Should WGs be allowed to have kids?  (Read 3420 times)

Online Ali Katt

Some punters take their used johnies away with them to stop wgs having their babies.
One parlour girl told me a regular did this as he held a government position - how true this was I don't know. It's less risk just to shoot in the girl's mouth or face, russian roulette style; if you don't want kids.

Offline Matium

I feel for the poor cunt, as I know for a fact she will ruin him... :(
I've thought about tipping him off, but think I will be told to mind my own business.

Tell him anyway.

It'll give you a clean conscience knowing that you did everything you could.


Offline Melb

...and it stretches their fannies

Offline ladyofthemansion

Not if they do their pelvic floor excercises.

Offline M1nty

One parlour girl told me a regular did this as he held a government position - how true this was I don't know. It's less risk just to shoot in the girl's mouth or face, russian roulette style; if you don't want kids.
A government position? Is that kinky ?

Offline Melb

Not if they do their pelvic floor excercises.

These have a limited effect only, in my experience.
Horse riding works better but fannies are never the same again whatever deluded women and sycophantic boyfriends say.

Offline Matium

Sorry but I refuse to vote. Is this a joke? If not I have to say that really is a terrible thing to say.

From the sentence structure, methinks this was written by a female.

Something not quite right for it to be written by a man.

Anyway, how's life treating you Kylie?

 :D

Online Ali Katt

A government position? Is that kinky ?
Probably involves someone going down like a house of cards.

Offline AnthG

Voted; Yes, without single mothers there would be a scarcity of young talent.

She has approached one of her current clients and asked him to impregnate her as she thinks it will go in her favour when sentencing comes around !  :wackogirl:
He has agreed... :wacko:

in this case u would hope he is firing blanks

Offline adindas

To ensure the continued growth of quality mongering in the UK I think it is vital that the gene pool benefit from a proactive approach to selective breeding for sexual permissiveness.

I vote yes after reading this comment.  :)
Very good reason which work for the benefit of punters.
If the mother is a WG she could educate their children to understand that WGs is just one type of work or profession (?). So it will increase the quality of mongering and will possibly reduce the number of  trafficked WGs.

For the benefit of  the children themselves and taxpayers, and people including WGS should only be allowed to have children if they are able to maintain their children. Not like what we have seen nowadays where people just have children as many as they want to and later ask the society through the benefit system to take care of them.



Offline con-a-ser

I voted yes but only if it doesn't interfere with my future bookings

Yes as long as they don't bring family life into the business. I don't think any punter would want to goo goo ga ga with a WG's baby except perhaps Gary Glitter or the late Michael Jackson.

Voted; No, let them have a goldfish instead.

"Yes, loose morals should be bred into future generations"

This.

Offline kiwi69

To ensure the continued growth of quality mongering in the UK I think it is vital that the gene pool benefit from a proactive approach to selective breeding for sexual permissiveness.

Fortunately WG's in Thailand and other SE Asian countries are a self-perpetuating source of high quality talent   ;)

I don't think total reliance on the indigenous breed would produce the desired properties............... :rolleyes:

the mother and daughter thread could be about to reappear


Latest videos on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

Latest images on UKEscorting.com (free site!)