As I see it, you haven't got it right at all. Nowhere has the word "allowed" been used. She does not assume to control what punters do. Her preference is that reviews are not written but she understands that she cannot "demand" that and nor would she attempt to. Her Twitter post simply thanks those who have not written recent reviews. Punters are not being "played" and it seems quite obvious that you are twisting things to suit whatever agenda you have.
claretandblue - as far as I am aware she has no plans to visit London.
Do you not see the irony in those two statements.
My right (as you put it) is to comment the way I see fit based on what is written about Katie, maybe some of you should do her a favour & think very carefully about what you write because all you are doing in my opinion is making her look like a manipulative prossie, I seriously doubt that is how she wants to come across or in fact how she actually is.
On closer inspection the word "allowed" was a little bit of an exaggeration on my part but as it was written within a question I feel that its still valid.
For example....
Lex wrote
She tweeted that she asked for no reviews
The OP wrote
Thanks guys and yes PLeisure I discussed posting a review with Katie during punt and she said she still enjoys it if it is a guys first review But your right she doesn't need reviews as she is simply the best IMHO.
Now I don't have access to her twatter page & quite frankly I don't care about it but what else would I possible deduce from those two statements?
My agenda (again how you put it) is to help keep UKP as fluffy free as possible & if that means me challenging a bunch of fan-boys when I feel they are being manipulated on what gets written on UKP then so be it, if that irks you then feel free to report me & let admin decide if I've crossed the line.