I thought it was a typo with an extra naught when I first read it . . .
But the report is pretty damning when it also contains the bait-switch matches even in the face of the face of so many positive reports. I haven't gone through all the links, but the biggest weakness, unless someone can prove otherwise, is that the agency actually claims that Chloe is a model anyway . . .so, unless it's a different girl that is actually supplied, the only thing that has been switched is the name. At those sort of crazy prices, perhaps one can reasonably expect models doing escort work on the side?
The service the punter says he was given is horrific. But I would also have wonder, even as a devil's advocate, about the screening process and whether they just didn't match. Being a photographic model, especially at 20, means she is good looking, can exude personality on camera, can strike different poses in reasonably rapid succession, tall and skinny, knows how to dress, and is on time and presentable. It does, unfortunately, guarantee that she knows how to do a decent blow job. I notice that one of the other bad reports cites 'mechanical performance' as well - typical of a genuine model perhaps IMO - their job is quite mechanical after all (not that that's an excuse)
Now if a guy books a genuine model for a 1hr appointment, does the girl expect to give a handjob and
blow job within the first 15 minutes?
Possible yes, it's not unreasonable, but I'd like to know if he discussed his requirements with the agency.
If someone knows the other people who have left feedback on the agency that would help. Otherwise I don't personally think his one report is enough to damn them. Look at the other places he's left reports on - not many - the one that could be accessed is for a soho walk up
! Nothing wrong with liking both ends of the scale . . . but how many punters like both the £20 quickie and the £750 an hour ffs??
That it's his first field report in 5 years doesn't exactly endear him either.
Glancing through a random selection of FRs on eth agency by other punters, there's quite a lot that have only posted a single FR and on that agency - never a good sign. But not all - 'Black Hawk' has given quite a reasonable travelling selection - although his cred is
blighted by recommending fucking everyone.
So was it a bait and switch? I'm not sure how Anne-Marie is identified as Alden Corinna. Bust sizes don't match,. at least on these photos and profiles. If there's maybe a definitive match I've maybe missed it, though they could
be the same person. So what exactly does he mean? Presumably that the girl he was sent didn't look like the butterflies photo or the one on the model URL (Do butterflies perhaps say on the, "She is really so-and-so . . ."?
1. Anne Marie
2. Alden Corinna
My main problem is that the agency - at those prices - wasn't more careful in making sure they had a happy customer and didn't - as far as we can tell - take steps to do something about it. Lots of missing pieces. Maybe Matium should take one for the boys.