Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.




Author Topic: London - Kathryn Foxx - Notting Hill Gate Station  (Read 3684 times)


4 review(s) for English Kathryn (3 positive, 0 neutral, 1 negative) [Indexed by Admin]


Offline Arar77

A little unfair, I think.  Let's jump on the guy when he doesn't come through with the other reviews he's promised.  But as you've promised them, Flipping Newbie, it's time to shit or get off the pan.

OP, you truly are the biggest waste of space I've come across on this forum since joining - truly spectacularly pathetic

Your 'review' belongs on AW, not UKP.  :hi:  :thumbsdown:  :diablo:
Spot on. Everyone has a different review style but if you are going to submit one, at least try and put some essential information in it i.e what actually occurs in the punt ( if it happened)  so the rest of us can make a judgement call re future bookings.

Offline zundabar

The thread does have this in it "Kathryn is expensive, and definitely did make me hesitant to make booking".

Which, unless she wants to be seen as "high class and worth it" :vomit: makes very little sense to put in if it is her.

"please feel free to ask me any questions you may have in this thread or even via PM" does suggest the opposite though, I can only think of a handful of people friendly or experienced enough on UKP that would be able to add that much in PM's that they would not be able to do in the review (poor review skills taken into account).

From my best guess I'd say he either has a bit of EAS or is Kathrynn/a friend or regular of her's who is doing her a favour. OP, if you aren't any of these things then I do apologise but with what you've said so far not much of a defence has been put up - can you think of any negatives at all, even small ones, to point out? very difficult to believe the only problem was the pricing and mentioning even the little things that might have happened could give you some credibility.

+ looking through the few posts the OP has in other threads the writing style and attitude stays the same but the most noticeable thing is that they were made in June a couple of months before Kathryn's profile was made on AW. If she has had past profiles then this of course means nothing but if not then the chances of it being her go down a bit.

« Last Edit: September 23, 2015, 10:30:33 AM by zundabar »

Sorry guys, have taken all on board, and will ensure future reviews are better.

Offline zundabar

It isn't the quality that's being questioned, it's your legitimacy because of various bits and bobs that have been outlined.

Even the best of punts will have a couple of small problems to point out but other than you hesitating at the pricing you don't mention any.

Offline flouch

posted my review now.  warning - i tend towards "fluffy"...

Offline PLeisure

Sorry guys, have taken all on board, and will ensure future reviews are better.
You could focus on improving this review before attempting any future ones  :hi:

To recap - and this is being reproduced from Punting Wiki's "Guide to UKP Review Writing so that you don't feel you are being personally attacked:
1. Write a review in order to allow other punters to make an informed choice about whether they want to visit the WG, not in order to “promote” the girl because you think “she deserves it”.
4. Make your review informative and accessible [...] If you write a long review then a good summary highlighting the positive, neutral and negative points can be very helpful
8. Write your review keeping in mind your audience. Answer the questions that you might want answered about a girl that you are interested to meet for first time: (i) whether her pictures are authentic and accurate, (ii) what is her attitude during the meeting, (iii) whether her place is safe, discreet, clean etc. (iv) whether she clock-watches or not, (v) whether she is rushing you or not, (vi) whether she provides all the listed services or she tries to avoid them, (vii) whether she will meet a dress request, (viii) whether she will meet an unusual service request.
9. Aim for balance and include aspects that could deter other punters. You may downplay them if they didn't bother you but you should mention them. For example, you may not care much about CIM so if it’s not offered you don’t see it as a negative but for others this may be important. Similarly, not offering kissing, french kissing or deep french kissing, not allowing "fingers", or only providing covered service may be decisive for other punters. Likewise, for appearance (having tattoos, piercings, saggy tits, fake tits, full waist, some belly, stretch-marks, slightly fat arse, etc) particularly where it is not obvious in the profile photographs, being smoker, speaking only very basic English are all worth mentioning.
12.  It can be very helpful to point out areas of distinctive or outstanding service from a WG for readers whose tastes may be similar to your own. Particularly - point out "nice surprises" at the opening of your review to catch the attention of others who share your interests.


If the purpose of UKP is still eluding the OP, as I understand it - and, indeed, appreciate it - it is to provide essential information that will enable other punters to make an informed decision as to whether they should meet with the WG under review.
OP has said:
I feel as though it's ungentleman [sic] like to go into such details in an open forum with regards to my shinanigans [sic] with another lady.

 - and admits he is being hypocritical in enjoying the vivid details that other punters provide.
He understands that he lacks credibility, as this is his first review.

Well, OP - the general consensus here (again, this is only my understanding) is that punters gain credibility by filing decent reviews. Not shying away from going "into such details in an open forum" for fear of being "ungentleman"-ly.

Then, we get his one concession to 'lurid' detail.....
And, look, I have already changed my view, any specifics that you would like to ask, like how deep was her french kissing? I'm happy to answer, global village and that, kathryn offers a delightful service, and wants to do so with many other like minded people, who am I to hold back. And for everyone who is now wondering as I've brought it up,   kathryns french kissing was very enjoyable, but I know i am not a great kisser, so that was a let down on my part. For me, dfk is subjective, but there were tongues involved.
- Except there is negligible information. A lil' tongue kung fu..... woo hoo ! Except, he isn't a great kisser so a let down.

OP is at least honest in revealing the reason he joined UKP:
there was a point that ukpunting wouldn't let me view anymore of the reviews unless I became a member, never wanted to be a member, and hence the name [...] I did choose the name coz in hadn't planned on staying on that long, or even reviewing, but I'm starting to like posting my comments.


How about liking the inaugural review you have posted, OP?  :music:

In just three lines, flouch has provided valuable intel:
I saw her recently.  She's got a pretty face, small boobs, great ass with shortish black/dark brown hair - an alternative look for sure.  You don't see in the photos so much, but she has big hips.  Probably a size 12, but carries it very well.  In fact, she epitomises the phrase "more cushion for the pushin'" when fucking doggy style.  She's not at all fat[...]

And, SuitedandBooted gets the UKP ethos:
All new members (I am one) should have the sense to understand the style of this forum and if they are not willing to follow the lead, then perhaps better not to write a review that gives the rest of us no new information.


What's with the, "you can PM me for further details" nonsense? wtf !

I don't know what you've heard but there's no need to get naked with us for your first review. We have no such initiation ceremony.
That's not what I was told! Something about a pig's head ?.....

It isn't the quality that's being questioned, it's your legitimacy because of various bits and bobs that have been outlined.

Even the best of punts will have a couple of small problems to point out but other than you hesitating at the pricing you don't mention any.
+1
Yes but speaking about hesitation at the pricing could simply be another ploy to make it seem legit and justify the overpricing?

Offline zundabar

could be, won't probe any further as I'm sure if we analysed every phrase to death we would end up with something far from the truth (as much as I love analysis).

OP - the main point of the review is not to make the escort look good, it is to show the UKP community what the experience was like so they know what they would get if they were to follow in your footsteps. Omitting information for the sake of preserving your spiffy button polish is downright counter-productive and does more harm than good - if you were telling a friend about a book including spoilers would you deliberately miss out the bad bits or would you explain that it has it's problems?.

Guys I'm sorry, I haven't had time to amend the review, I was hesitant to leave a review for Kathryn, or anyone else for that matter, I don't know how to leave a review nicely, they were all excuses about not being gentlemen like, i will amend the review appropriately and put a bit of thought into it, thank you for voicing your frustration, i will take all highlighted issues on board.

Offline PLeisure

Cheers for taking all the above comments on board, F_n

fyi - once posted, you have a small window of about 60secs to revise a post. Which may be why you encountered some frustration in this thread. You cannot amend this review now, hence the recommendation that each reviewer consults the Punting Wiki for appropriate guidelines when posting a review.
You can, however, add a new post to this thread with any useful information you'd like to share.

Aw come on Kathryn.  We love the way that you look.  Just talk normally to us for fuck's sake.  We don't mind a WG visiting the site - just don't do it via a fake review.  It has a woman's fingerprints all over it - take that as a compliment honey.

Offline PLeisure

- take that as a compliment honey.
You have such a way with the laydeez, JR  :D

Offline reddoor1119

  • Banned
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 4
You have such a way with the laydeez, JR  :D

For Fuck sake. I am Kathryn Foxx. I did not write this review... For one I wouldn't rate myself an 8 out of 10 for looks I'd have given myself a 9... I'm not a sensitive woman this client is far more sensitive than I. And a lovely guy for that matter. It means sweet Fuck all to me if you think I wrote this, I'm busy, I have plenty of clients and already have another popularity without relying on writing my own reviews you dip stick. That aside. Thanks for all the .... You're not a model bollocks from another punter on here. Yes. I am. I'm a published model and am also a suicide girl though I shouldn't really be justifying myself to some random keyboard warrior whom I've never met!

Good day to you all!
Banning reason: Abusive

Offline reddoor1119

  • Banned
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 4
Banning reason: Abusive

Huh!  Women are plain hard to understand.

Offline PLeisure

For Fuck sake. I am Kathryn Foxx. I did not write this review... For one I wouldn't rate myself an 8 out of 10 for looks I'd have given myself a 9... I'm not a sensitive woman this client is far more sensitive than I. And a lovely guy for that matter. It means sweet Fuck all to me if you think I wrote this, I'm busy, I have plenty of clients and already have another popularity without relying on writing my own reviews you dip stick. That aside. Thanks for all the .... You're not a model bollocks from another punter on here. Yes. I am. I'm a published model and am also a suicide girl though I shouldn't really be justifying myself to some random keyboard warrior whom I've never met!

Good day to you all!

Why is she venting her frustration at me  :D  :unknown:  :scare:
I was merely commending Jim Rockford on his special way with the lay-deez...... sheesh
Think I need to tear up a lil'..  :cry:

Offline Sexy kxx

  • Banned
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 2
I'm sure it was a mistake she doesn't know how to highlight quotes properly... I can imagine is what Kathryn would say... And she would apologise If her account hadn't been banned for defending herself
....  ;)
Banning reason: Previously banned

Offline finn5555

I have upset her  :blush:

She sent me a PM

I'm Kathryn Foxx aka the 'shit prossie' that you've dubbed me without even meeting me. Just want you to know your comments hurt me. Think carefully in future. I'm just a normal girl with feelings and you upset me

 :manhater:

Offline Admin

  • Site Owner
Her public post:
I'm not a sensitive woman this client is far more sensitive than I.

But the PM she sent above:
Quote
Think carefully in future. I'm just a normal girl with feelings and you upset me

Which one is it then.

Offline Sexy kxx

  • Banned
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 2
I wouldn't say I was sensitive I'd say I was human. The client who wrote this was a lovely gentlemen and I am also a nice girl and both of my accounts were banned for trying to defend myself
 Being called a shit prossie hurts. Being laughed at for saying I'm a model which also is true hurts
 I didn't abuse anyone
 I respect all my clients and I respect all uk punters so sorry if I offended anyone I just wanted you to see that your words have effects on us 'prossies' I'm
A tough cookie but seeing this thread today made me sad
Sorry again
 
Banning reason: Previously banned

Guys,  I'm not kathryn, this is all my fault for writing so sentiment,  will butch up more for my future reviews.

Offline zundabar

we now know you almost certainly aren't, look at the more recent posts in this thread.

Offline Admin

  • Site Owner
I didn't abuse anyone

you dip stick.

But that is abusive and not acceptable on UKP.
It might be on other forums, where girls can freely abuse punters without a banning, but not on here.




Latest videos on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

Latest images on UKEscorting.com (free site!)