Ok point taken you need to fuck first then write a review. I'll take a step back until my date with Adele and subsequent review.
Not necessarily. The forum is rigorously monitored by both admin and seasoned punters to weed out the idiots and wannabes. If a new member posts a glowing review, it's just as likely they'll be queried for veracity and intention. Accusations of touting are quite typical. And that is because the new member has no 'prior', ie. context to draw from.
In your 69 posts to date, you started by complaining that a review on Adele was irrelevant because she doesn't see new clients. Correct?
Pointless reviews as she doesn't see new punters!
As someone who has not Seen her and she is not easy to arrange a meeting with what good are all these reviews.
I'm going to politely suggest that these were idiot comments to make. Particularly for your 1st two posts on this forum. But, OK - maybe you were feeling the need to make an impression. And I understand you were frustrated. However, this is quite normal procedure with a hugely popular and in-demand WG.
Thankfully, a few days later you secured a booking.
Then you bit the hand that kindly fed you
I'm just saying thank you for your advice and help really do appreciate it. But some people though are way over the top. Superhuman experience , being in a different world , she's good at what she's getting paid for we get it. I'm just saying...
Then some low level, pass-agg sarcasm:
HD when I have visited Adele next month I'll write you a review and make it fluffy and warm just for you.
And then harnessing another UKP member's post to reinforce your stance vs fluffies:
Just read a comment from LL who also feels that some of the reviews for Adele are very fluffy.
You come across as not knowing what you actually want. Which camp to position yourself in. The fluffy, 'love Adele' team - or the resolute anti-fluff brigade.
Hence the forum's confusion.
It's no-one's business to tell you how to behave. But, as in most aspects of life, humility gets you places; arrogance doesn't.
Certain new members feel it important to declare that they've seen such and such WG if she's being discussed in a thread. Perhaps because they feel the need to fit in. But, until they have made sensible contributions to the forum and then a few reviews under their belt, they can be labelled as fantasists and time-wasters. Can you recognise similar behaviour in your own posts, as others have suggested?
If you can remove your ego from reading this, you should be able to see why the forum has held you in low regard so far.
