You people need to lighten up. I find it ludicrous how some of the UKPunters get so much into the philosophy of "not being a fluffy" that can't understand that it's perfectly normal for someone to get so excited about a punt to use enthusiastic language.
I've done it a few times, and all those times are still marked in my memory as extraordinary experiences: they deserved to be described with ravished terms.
There's absolutely nothing wrong with writing a positive review if the punt was great and that's not my point. I don't doubt the validity of the OP but this review does veer towards the fluffier end of the spectrum.
However, the reason why many frown upon fluffy reviews, is that taken further to the extreme they become useless. If we end up with reviews that look like your typical AW fluffer bullshit, it diminishes the validity of the review and works against the reviewer. Because it looks like it comes from a tout, pimp, the prossie, a newbie, a virgin, or a white knight.
Some wince inducing stuff from these forums like:
-A gentleman doesn't tell so I won't go into the details.
-Treat her well.
-Her flower was flush with fragrant juices.
-She responded sweetly again to the external and internal attention given to her curvy body.
-Upon her laying back and speeding her legs ready for me to slim in, was the moment worth while.
-Her amazing young body, beautiful face laying there while I pounded into her as hard as I could.
-Looking adoringly at me in this way was deeply enchanting, almost heavenly.
No doubt great descriptions of an encounter in a women's sex novel but the rose tinted gushiness of it makes me want to throw up.
At the end of the day we are paying for sex and she is putting on an act, and some girls do a damn fine job of it. However, a WG is not a girlfriend, lover, soul mate. Some fluffy reviews make it sound like she is. She isn't. And never will be.