Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.


Author Topic: Paying more to price out undesirable clientele  (Read 2108 times)

Offline Grumbleguts

£500 per hour exclusive, dont think so :rolleyes: Plenty do cheap RB when the phone is dusty ;) :hi:

Offline Madone1

The only different sensation is £500 or regret for a bad punt rather than £100 of regret, that could push someone over the edge !

A 500 pound cum once punt with a girl that's colder then a grave diggers arse would be enough for me to give up punting forever. But as I'm never going to pay stupid amounts like that it isn't going to happen anytime soon.

Because they (The Hooker) can still do 16 1 hour (60 mins) non quickies and get 8 hours sleep per day (Some need less), your logic is flawed !

i personally dont give a shit, i was just giving the op suggestions that'll make him feel better (in his mind) when punting. Your post is hypothetical, im sure in 9 out of 10 cases prossies who dont offer the quickie service fuck less which is essentially what the op is looking for.

Offline Quesadilla

i personally dont give a shit, i was just giving the op suggestions that'll make him feel better (in his mind) when punting. Your post is hypothetical, im sure in 9 out of 10 cases prossies who dont offer the quickie service fuck less which is essentially what the op is looking for.

You're really sure? 9 cases out of 10? That sounds quite specific so I'm sure you base this on some published research. Please do share!  :sarcastic:

If you want an escort that is less busy put a reverse bid out there for a complete minger who's been on AW for years and has zero feedback (or better yet hidden feedback).  You can pretty much guarantee she hasn't seen many clients lately!  :sarcastic:


Banning reason: Obnoxious and arrogant + Veiled threat of outing punter on UKE

Offline smiths

The only different sensation is £500 or regret for a bad punt rather than £100 of regret, that could push someone over the edge !

Indeed and this is a good point, my financial exposure nowadays to newbie WGs to me isn't going to break the bank though its of course not good to waste money but I would rather lose £100 than £500 obviously.

Offline MrRiz

Hey Riz

Can I ask is this a religious thing ?

No dude, not at all.

Only a few people on this thread / site seem to be getting the point that I'm alluding to, so I'll freely admit that I'm the 'weird' one here, so I'm not surprised that you wondered whether it's some religious / cultural background thing that's making me this way.

To the guy who said £250 for a BJ and £750 for the mental satisfaction is a weird fetish, I would say isn't the BJ within the same category of mental satisfaction too? You can make yourself cum, or get the cheapest hooker to do it if it's just about having a woman's mouth doing it. The rest is preference for mental satisfaction and no more, surely.  :unknown:

---

I guess I wrote an overly theoretical and analytical post for a simple question, which was - seeing as it'd be my first time and I don't plan on becoming a regular (but who does before they start) should I splash out on someone who charges more for sex, seeing as usually price correlates fairly well with quality. From the serious replies I think that's not as much the case with punting as I might have expected, though I can't fully believe that it can have no influence like some people are making out. The extremes illustrate that point/ But for someone not familiar with this market it must be a forgivable assumption.

Offline Quesadilla

Assumption is the mother of all fuck ups. It is true to say there is no direct correlation between price and quality although  I think it does depend exactly what you want from a punt.

I would say some punters want little more than a warm body attached to some wet orifices and genuinely don't see any reason to pay more for one body/orifice vs another. Ok slight exaggeration.  :lol:

Other punters want some very specific services ranging from dfk to owo to cim to a levels, bdsm or role play scenarios and most girls who offer these charge a premium for some or all of these services - either included in their standard rate or as extras.

If you fall in the former camp you can pay under £100ph. For the latter up to £200ph seems about the general limit above which you appear to get literally nothing more for your money.

The £200+ ph escorts are offering no additional services nor do they generally appear to be prettier or have more perfect bodies. None of them have gold plated vaginas.

In all three price ranges you can find escorts who deliver a good service and those who deliver a bad service.  For me personally I have never seen any well reviewed girl that offers the services you want for less than £120ph and I see no reason to go above £200ph.

The best way to find a good punt is simply read the reviews on this site, find a girl who is well reviewed that you fancy the look of and book her. It's not rocket science 
Banning reason: Obnoxious and arrogant + Veiled threat of outing punter on UKE

Offline daviemac

I guess I wrote an overly theoretical and analytical post for a simple question, which was - seeing as it'd be my first time and I don't plan on becoming a regular (but who does before they start) should I splash out on someone who charges more for sex, seeing as usually price correlates fairly well with quality. From the serious replies I think that's not as much the case with punting as I might have expected, though I can't fully believe that it can have no influence like some people are making out. The extremes illustrate that point/ But for someone not familiar with this market it must be a forgivable assumption.

That's spot on, if you'd just asked the question as you have above all replies would've been helpful and informative.

If you look at reviews on here you'll see good and bad from all price ranges.

Offline SamLP

We all get the point being made, but it's a ludicrous point which has instigated responses in true British fashion - sarcasm. Not to mention calling punters who pay less than £500ph undesirable clientele is not a good idea as it encompasses every punter on UKP and those lurking.
Several girls out there advertise that they only see a select 2-3 people per day or week. Search for them and get the mental satisfaction you desire while pushing those niggling thoughts aside that she's really seeing as many punters as she possibly can to fit her schedule.

password02

We all get the point being made, but it's a ludicrous point which has instigated responses in true British fashion - sarcasm. Not to mention calling punters who pay less than £500ph undesirable clientele is not a good idea as it encompasses every punter on UKP and those lurking.
Several girls out there advertise that they only see a select 2-3 people per day or week. Search for them and get the mental satisfaction you desire while pushing those niggling thoughts aside that she's really seeing as many punters as she possibly can to fit her schedule.

Nicely put to a very silly OP question -  :P

Offline MrRiz

We all get the point being made, but it's a ludicrous point which has instigated responses in true British fashion - sarcasm. Not to mention calling punters who pay less than £500ph undesirable clientele is not a good idea as it encompasses every punter on UKP and those lurking.
Several girls out there advertise that they only see a select 2-3 people per day or week. Search for them and get the mental satisfaction you desire while pushing those niggling thoughts aside that she's really seeing as many punters as she possibly can to fit her schedule.

Why on earth do you say that? I made it clear time and time again that that is not what I'm saying at all. But won't labour the point now.

Thanks for the contribution though. Will increase cynicism even more for this punting world...

Offline Expl1cit

What I find ironic is she may be on one elite gentleman site charging £500 or £1000 per hour to capture those with more money than sense, but she will almost definitely be advertising at normal rates to keep herself busy for the remaining 360 days of the year when the elite business is drier than the Sahara Desert.

So while you are fucking her for £1000, the rest of us are doing her for £100.  Makes me feel even better  :drinks:
Banning reason: White-knight

Hawkwind71

What I find ironic is she may be on one elite gentleman site charging £500 or £1000 per hour to capture those with more money than sense, but she will almost definitely be advertising at normal rates to keep herself busy for the remaining 360 days of the year when the elite business is drier than the Sahara Desert.

So while you are fucking her for £1000, the rest of us are doing her for £100.  Makes me feel even better  :drinks:

Very sadly Mr Riz, this is the reality of your upcoming punt. And its not extreme, its the norm.

Why on earth do you say that? I made it clear time and time again that that is not what I'm saying at all. But won't labour the point now.

Thanks for the contribution though. Will increase cynicism even more for this punting world...
You basically called us all undesirable, hence the polite replies through gritted teeth replies !  Well in my opinion your type are undesirable and jog back to your gated community and stick your finger up your ass, I hear your private school types are into that.

Or should I say you hypothetically called us all undesirables, looking forward to your snivelling apology.


Latest videos on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

Latest images on UKEscorting.com (free site!)