Best Punter in Scotland?

[DG]

Just read a few threads where a couple of well established UKP members are giving newbies a hard time over lack of posts and reviews, particularly when most reviews are neutrals or negatives. Got me thinking what makes a good punter and would it be possible for UKP members to determine who the best punter in Scotland is? And btw you can't vote for yourself 

[auldie63]

Got to be the Tazman surely?

[TommyMoundfrigger]

Got to be the Tazman surely?

Yeah. For being the luckiest punter. His are always AMAZING.

[tazman1002001]

Just read a few threads where a couple of well established UKP members are giving newbies a hard time over lack of posts and reviews, particularly when most reviews are neutrals or negatives. Got me thinking what makes a good punter and would it be possible for UKP members to determine who the best punter in Scotland is? And btw you can't vote for yourself 

DG I wasn't really giving them a hard time....I was just challenging why they were giving certain feedback on a positive review when they themselves have NEVER had a positive review on here.....now there is no way I will beleive that they have never had a positive punt so I was just calling them out.

[tazman1002001]

Yeah. For being the luckiest punter. His are always AMAZING.

I keep harping on about my research "before" a punt....... It works so well for me but most people think with their cocks and not there iPads....lol

[TommyMoundfrigger]

I keep harping on about my research "before" a punt....... It works so well for me but most people think with their cocks and not there iPads....lol

Maybe you should share your research technique Taz, instead of your punting experiences and we could all have the same luck?

[DG]

DG I wasn't really giving them a hard time....I was just challenging why they were giving certain feedback on a positive review when they themselves have NEVER had a positive review on here.....now there is no way I will beleive that they have never had a positive punt so I was just calling them out.

Wasn't having a pop mate, just using a bit of artistic licence to start a thread. I tend to agree with you as it happens. Fluffy solidarity 

[DG]

Maybe you should share your research technique Taz, instead of your punting experiences and we could all have the same luck?

Don't think it's rocket science Pete. Not sure if this is exactly how Taz does it, by my technique is;

Have a type, in my case local independents, preferably part-time. Physicality or age not that important to me but I do have a penchant for petite 30 - 40 year olds

Check AW feedback and see who's been seeing the WG you are interested in. If there all Sergi suspects or wallopers,  then probably give a wide berth

If profile obviously a cut and paste or otherwise obviously Romanian, again ta ta

Is she within your price limits?

Is she within travelling distance?

And finally, check out UKP reviews.

[TommyMoundfrigger]

Thanks for that DG but surely you'd put UKP reviews before AW reviews?

But really my post was a friendly dig at Taz's AMAZING success.

[DG]

Thanks for that DG but surely you'd put UKP reviews before AW reviews?

But really my post was a friendly dig at Taz's AMAZING success.

Of course UKP reviews are more reliable than AW feedback but a profile is a good place to start. Even when I read a UKP review, the first thing I do is go to the AW profile link to check the girl out myself as I've found that there are plenty of UKP members who will debunk a good review, so they're not 100% reliable. some of my positive reviews have been rubbished, so it's a matter of taste in some cases.

Anyway we're off topic here; so Taz gets your vote then; that's 2 

[tazman1002001]

Yeah that's pretty much my technique .....only other thing I do is check the girls feedback....and then check the feedback of the guys who have left feedback .....and check what girls these guys have seen....if it's names I know the that's a positive....also see if these girls have left the guys feedback ....it's just confirms that it's all genuine...

I have the advantage of my business being online a lot so can do bits of checks here and there..

Also and very simply I call the girl and try and talk to her...if she says she doesn't speak English I still call and say I want to say hello....and this works for me

Ps thanks for the votes so far..is there a prize....like a 1hr punt with a girl of my choice?

[tazman1002001]

Seeker for me..... Even though I don't agree with all his reviews lol

[Dime]

Jazzman for me- I like his style of reviews as he splits all aspects of the punt into a positive or negative category. He has detailed knowledge of the majority of girls at GEA, and other girls in the Glasgow area as well.

[seeker]

Well there you have
Not only do the prossies like him
And his hard to earn 10/10
Taz will fix it 
But I think the punters also like
Taz's get up and go
And report back to the troops  sharpish style.
Personally I think he just a sexaholic like me

[bensonhedges20]

Tbh Taz has earned alot of girls some cash by reviewing them etc

BUT

Taz doesnt have a top 5 list. Every escort is a 10/10 with him which is awkward for multiple reasons

1- escorts do have off days
2- the reviews are of a first meet but always contain atleast one 'AMAZING' or one of many superlatives
3- no punter has 3 good punts let alone 10 no matter how much research one does.

He has his ways but i would say some clued up escorts suck up to him, treat him differently than others, research his reviews and cater to him.

For that reason i would say an anonymous punter who doesnt let people know their aw or ukp handle but reviews on the sly would be a better punter as the review would be to more normal standards.

Tazs review is like a xxx advert for a porn site. He reviews the best bits and while they may look amazing the real details are different for everyone else.

[Happy99]

Tbh Taz has earned alot of girls some cash by reviewing them etc

BUT

Taz doesnt have a top 5 list. Every escort is a 10/10 with him which is awkward for multiple reasons

1- escorts do have off days
2- the reviews are of a first meet but always contain atleast one 'AMAZING' or one of many superlatives
3- no punter has 3 good punts let alone 10 no matter how much research one does.

He has his ways but i would say some clued up escorts suck up to him, treat him differently than others, research his reviews and cater to him.

For that reason i would say an anonymous punter who doesnt let people know their aw or ukp handle but reviews on the sly would be a better punter as the review would be to more normal standards.

Tazs review is like a xxx advert for a porn site. He reviews the best bits and while they may look amazing the real details are different for everyone else.

  So true, but expect the usual petulant personal attack in return. Gave up reading those reviews long ago. Long been suspected a discount or extra time is given by WGs in return for them. Maybe a more useful vote would be least discerning punter or most indiscreet punter.

[seeker]

So true, but expect the usual petulant personal attack in return. Gave up reading those reviews long ago. Long been suspected a discount or extra time is given by WGs in return for them. Maybe a more useful vote would be least discerning punter or most indiscreet punter.

Come on BnH
The topic is "who's 5he best punter in Scotland "
So who's your choice 
And no voting for yer self. ..Ken 

[RandyF]

Taz doesnt have a top 5 list. Every escort is a 10/10 with him which is awkward for multiple reasons

1- escorts do have off days
2- the reviews are of a first meet but always contain atleast one 'AMAZING' or one of many superlatives
3- no punter has 3 good punts let alone 10 no matter how much research one does.

Taz really needs to reinvent his rating system.  Retire the old one.  A new one has no relation to it. Times have changed. Hooring's a diferent world from when he started using it.  The old results are all still valid of course girlfriends  , you were all 10/10's of course.

Neither us or the hoors can differentiate anymore. It's  unfair to the hoors that go that extra mile to please, and give a quality service - all they'll ever get a fucking 10/10, exactly the same score as that dreary 100% average ugly Polish scrubber got last time round.

A new ratings system would allow Taz to start afresh.  Then when he does meet a thoroughly average, hard looking hoor (and by fuck, he meets plenty of those) he can do the right thing and have her a 5...and not even feel bad about it 

But way it is now, he has to give them all 10/10.   It's absurd 

[RandyF]

Got me thinking what makes a good punter and would it be possible for UKP members to determine who the best punter in Scotland is? And btw you can't vote for yourself 

Best punter?  Questions a big vague and contentions DG 

Most prolific punter?  - Seeker, Mavgoose?

Best reviewer? -  Pilgrim, Cactus, Marmalade couple others I've forgotten. But what off the niche reviewers that only visit Saunas or pimped agency
trollops -  Willie Loman, Dime etc., etc. Don't they get a look in?

Most egotistical punter - "half pint of spunk delivered,  just the 3 orgasms for her today - Blahh I was tired" - No one springs to mind 

Special honorary award for persistence in the face of adversity - TAZ!

Who'd be the sest punter from the hoors point of view? That'd be an interesting one eh. we'll never know the answer either.  None of the above I'd say for starters 

[tazman1002001]

So true, but expect the usual petulant personal attack in return. Gave up reading those reviews long ago. Long been suspected a discount or extra time is given by WGs in return for them. Maybe a more useful vote would be least discerning punter or most indiscreet punter.

Happy clearly it's not going well for you at all....I would suggest maybe reading my reviews and maybe you WILL get a POSITIVE Punt some day as just now you reviewed only 3 negative punts in your whole punting career......oh are you also maybe only giving us the boring negative shite and not sharing your good reviews...... ?

[tazman1002001]

Taz really needs to reinvent his rating system.  Retire the old one.  A new one has no relation to it. Times have changed. Hooring's a diferent world from when he started using it.  The old results are all still valid of course girlfriends  , you were all 10/10's of course.

Neither us or the hoors can differentiate anymore. It's  unfair to the hoors that go that extra mile to please, and give a quality service - all they'll ever get a fucking 10/10, exactly the same score as that dreary 100% average ugly Polish scrubber got last time round.

A new ratings system would allow Taz to start afresh.  Then when he does meet a thoroughly average, hard looking hoor (and by fuck, he meets plenty of those) he can do the right thing and have her a 5...and not even feel bad about it 

But way it is now, he has to give them all 10/10.   It's absurd 

Cmon on Randy.....currently on your review your on a 100% success rate all positive reviews even if it's only 3 ...maybe your the one who is secretly giving 10/10 reviews as thats all we have seen...... Maybe your the secret white knight?

My review go on the feeling of the punt at the time....yeah maybe I could score down cos the bed was squeaky, the girl has a stretch mark on her stomach, maybe her kissing isn't great..... I take that on board ....but all of my POSITIVE punts have been 100% positive and that's the important bit isn't it?

[tazman1002001]

Long been suspected a discount or extra time is given by WGs in return for them.

I drive a Bentley as one of my cars ......and any time I go to the dealership I get treated like royalty ......they know me and it's great.

That's how it is with a WG .....if she knows me she will,treat me like a king and I get a great punt.....this isn't a secret boss type experiment I am punting for a great fuck and when I get one I will let everyone know...including the girl as I know next time I'm going to get treated like a king.... So I'm happy for you all to secret tests on girls to see how shit they are....but that not for me 

[chilly]

Agree with many of the posts on here , post after post of  sickophantic drivel from the same person just tends to get tedious

Give me a good honest reviewer any day of the week and not one looking to virtually massage his own inflated ego

[JazzMan]

There's useful info in all reviews, it's just a pity that more punters don't do them.

[tazman1002001]

Agree with many of the posts on here , post after post of  sickophantic drivel from the same person just tends to get tedious

Give me a good honest reviewer any day of the week and not one looking to virtually massage his own inflated ego

Hey you go again with your crap, to clarify you have 1 NEGATIVE and 1 Neutral review and that's it....from what place of expereince are you coming out with this shit .... We are ALL waiting with baited breath for at least one.....just one "good honest review" ..... Can you at least do that 

[JazzMan]

Agree with many of the posts on here , post after post of  sickophantic drivel from the same person just tends to get tedious

Give me a good honest reviewer any day of the week and not one looking to virtually massage his own inflated ego

Totally agree Chilly

[Old enough to know better]

I drive a Bentley as one of my cars ......and any time I go to the dealership I get treated like royalty ......they know me and it's great.


Dad? Is that you?
 You fucking old whore munger you!

[mr small]

Cheers Dakota, 

not often allowed out at weekends 

will keep her in mind if I get the chance but sounds like it will be a long shot 

[solway]

Let the girls speak

[tazman1002001]

I drive a Bentley as one of my cars ......and any time I go to the dealership I get treated like royalty ......they know me and it's great.


Dad? Is that you?
 You fucking old whore munger you!

Yes it's me Son .....you know how much of a cunt your mother is ....just like you are so I gotta get some action somewhere 

[tazman1002001]

Totally agree Chilly

I totally disagree.....

[DG]

Best punter?  Questions a big vague and contentions DG 

Most prolific punter?  - Seeker, Mavgoose?

Best reviewer? -  Pilgrim, Cactus, Marmalade couple others I've forgotten. But what off the niche reviewers that only visit Saunas or pimped agency
trollops -  Willie Loman, Dime etc., etc. Don't they get a look in?

Most egotistical punter - "half pint of spunk delivered,  just the 3 orgasms for her today - Blahh I was tired" - No one springs to mind 

Special honorary award for persistence in the face of adversity - TAZ!

Who'd be the sest punter from the hoors point of view? That'd be an interesting one eh. we'll never know the answer either.  None of the above I'd say for starters 

Randy, I'm really intrigued, who is this egotistical punter, he sounds a top guy? 

[DG]

Randy, it wasn't so vague in my head when I wrote it  think what I meant was;

Who goes about punting the right way?
- Who gives honest reviews?
- Who treats WGs decently; during and post punt?
- Who offers the best, considered and balanced advice to other punters?
- Who respects the opinions of other punters?
- Who doesn't have an agenda (who hasn't been banned already)?
- Who doesn't talk a lot of pish?

or any other criteria other members may think relevant.