Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.




Author Topic: Michelle Independent ~ Birmingham  (Read 8320 times)


115 review(s) for Michelle Independent (112 positive, 0 neutral, 3 negative) [Indexed by Admin]


password02

Just like he did with Madlin Moon..........
TB

+1 - Ha Ha -  :D :D :D

Completely forgotten about that - Thanks for reminding -  :thumbsup:

Think bangers should respond and provide some more details as others have said,otherwise it could look like he is fishing. ...


OP is entitled to his opinion & review. He also seems like a seasoned punter. I agree it would be good to hear more details but to chide OP's intention by saying he is being deliberately brief wouldn't be fair to him either.

Personally I have seen MI once in Birmingham once (thanks to PW's recommendation) and I enjoyed it. With respect to the smell of fags, I had scrutinised her previous reviews and had particularly requested her to refrain from smoking pre-punt & do her best to avoid cigarette smell. She gave me the option of cancelling the punt if I didn't wish to go ahead. I took a chance and went ahead with the punt & didn't get any cigarette smell during the punt.

 It takes guts to post a negative review on a popular girl and I applaud the OP for doing so if it is genuine. I think the army of admirers of a popular WG (call them fluffies, White knights or whatever) should not tear into the OP for doing so.

With no prejudice to this review or MI, certain WGs develop inflated egos over time and feel they can take the mick out punters and feel immune from scrutiny! I recently had a bad experience with a well reviewed London prossie L with her attitude but it wasn't during an actual punt but during punting related discussions on Twitter & hence won't elaborate.

So punters should feel free to share their honest experiences, no matter how good a WG has been during previous punts.
« Last Edit: August 24, 2015, 08:37:00 PM by fitasfuck »

OP is entitled to his opinion & review. He also seems like a seasoned punter. I agree it would be good to hear more details but to chide OP's intention by saying he is being deliberately brief wouldn't be fair to him either.

Personally I have seen MI once in Birmingham once (thanks to PW's recommendation) and I enjoyed it. With respect to the smell of fags, I had scrutinised her previous reviews and had particularly requested her to refrain from smoking pre-punt & do her best to avoid cigarette smell. She gave me the option of cancelling the punt if I didn't wish to go ahead. I took a chance and went ahead with the punt & didn't get any cigarette smell during the punt.

 It takes guts to post a negative review on a popular girl and I applaud the OP for doing so if it is genuine. I think the army of admirers of a popular WG (call them fluffies, White knights or whatever) should not tear into the OP for doing so.

With no prejudice to this review or MI, certain WGs develop inflated egos over time and feel they can take the mick out punters and feel immune from scrutiny! I recently had a bad experience with a well reviewed London prossie L with her attitude but it wasn't during an actual punt but during punting related discussions on Twitter & hence won't elaborate.

So punters should feel free to share their honest experiences, no matter how good a WG has been during previous punts.
Agree punters should share all punting related stories openly on here if at all possible, so you should do the same with your London related incident

Offline comaminion

Agree punters should share all punting related stories openly on here if at all possible, so you should do the same with your London related incident


Yeah +1

Also I love women who smoke not relevant just saying
Banning reason: White-knighting

Ok thanks, will have a think about it & may do it separately. Will let this thread run.

OP can you come up with more details?

I think B&G is entitled to his opinion. Maybe she just had an off day??

Folk react as though it suddenly invalidates all the positive reviews of her. It doesn't. It just gives a little more info on her.

tcm

Offline azrael

I think B&G is entitled to his opinion. Maybe she just had an off day??

Folk react as though it suddenly invalidates all the positive reviews of her. It doesn't. It just gives a little more info on her.

tcm

Everyones entitled to their opinions, this site is so punters like youself, myself, OP or any of the others that have comented on here can vent their anger or scream out in fluffiness about tgeir punt, but a 7 line negative review leaves OP open to criticism, i dont think this thread will dent her cliental or her income but i for one would be intrested to know why OP's punt went sideways and untill he responds we'll never know :drinks:

password02

Everyones entitled to their opinions, this site is so punters like youself, myself, OP or any of the others that have comented on here can vent their anger or scream out in fluffiness about tgeir punt, but a 7 line negative review leaves OP open to criticism, i dont think this thread will dent her cliental or her income but i for one would be intrested to know why OP's punt went sideways and untill he responds we'll never know :drinks:

You have made some valid points  :thumbsup:

Offline comaminion

Everyones entitled to their opinions, this site is so punters like youself, myself, OP or any of the others that have comented on here can vent their anger or scream out in fluffiness about tgeir punt, but a 7 line negative review leaves OP open to criticism, i dont think this thread will dent her cliental or her income but i for one would be intrested to know why OP's punt went sideways and untill he responds we'll never know :drinks:

On the flip side he has positives maybe he us very astute and demands the best so if I trail blazed one of his positives it would be like meeting a goddess

One point he mentioned no refreshments I had this when I saw Vicky I noted it in my review

Weren't a massive deal might mean more for others though
Banning reason: White-knighting

...i for one would be intrested to know why OP's punt went sideways and untill he responds we'll never know....

The problem is that if and when he does elaborate, there'll be a load of punters trying to tell him why he's wrong. Let's see.

tcm

Offline Sylvester

The problem is that if and when he does elaborate, there'll be a load of punters trying to tell him why he's wrong. Let's see.

tcm
That is not a valid reason to not provide details.  If his reasons are sound, then he should be able to articulate them and have them stand up to a little scrutiny.

That's what happens with everyone else's reviews...
Banning reason: Prossie fanboy (Atticus Finch)

Offline azrael

The problem is that if and when he does elaborate, there'll be a load of punters trying to tell him why he's wrong. Let's see.

tcm


That is not a valid reason to not provide details.  If his reasons are sound, then he should be able to articulate them and have them stand up to a little scrutiny.

That's what happens with everyone else's reviews...

I for one wouldnt mind open criticism on a review just as long as it was not i.e  say " im pissed off becuase she bumped me for a longer booking or a regular client"  type if negative review


That is not a valid reason to not provide details.  If his reasons are sound, then he should be able to articulate them and have them stand up to a little scrutiny.

That's what happens with everyone else's reviews...
So true about everyone else's it helps keep the forum honest, although it is probably more difficult the more popular a girl is because so many people have the opposite opinion.

Offline Jimmyredcab

Well the OP is entitled to review Michelle as he sees fit based on his experience with her, although I don't recognise any aspect of his experience based on my own time with her.


I feel duty bound to point out that the OP has 21 reviews online, 13 of those are negatives ----------- can I respectfully suggest that he is either extremely fussy or extremely unlucky.    :unknown: :unknown:

She now has 2 negative reviews and 52 positive ------------ I advise members to use their own judgement.   :hi:

Offline Diehard


Yeah +1

Also I love women who smoke not relevant just saying

Re the smoking I agree with you up to a point. The girls who so called socially smoke, I.e occasionally when out to look the part, are very sexy. However girls who smoke as a habit, and MI may do given the smell in her premises, are a turn off unless they eradicate the smell and taste. Thankfully when I kissed MI there was no stale taste or anything and I enjoyed my time with her. Not sure I would go back though in light of the OP review.

I feel duty bound to point out that the OP has 21 reviews online, 13 of those are negatives ----------- can I respectfully suggest that he is either extremely fussy or extremely unlucky.    :unknown: :unknown:

She now has 2 negative reviews and 52 positive ------------ I advise members to use their own judgement.   :hi:
Ratios and statistics say yes to me, but also believe anyone can have an off day and should be reviewed as such.

Offline Jimmyredcab

Ratios and statistics say yes to me, but also believe anyone can have an off day and should be reviewed as such.

Agreed, but to compare the punt to a Soho walkup is pushing credibility.      :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

There is another possibility -------------- the other 52 reviews are not accurate.     :unknown:

There is another possibility -------------- the other 52 reviews are not accurate.     :unknown:
That would be one hell of a fraud.

I look forward to the next review of someone who hasn't been before. 

Offline Jimmyredcab

That would be one hell of a fraud.

I look forward to the next review of someone who hasn't been before.

I was being sarcastic.       :hi: :hi: :hi: :hi:


I feel duty bound to point out .......

Cheerleader Jimmy. If you're unhappy with my -/+ ratio then I suggest you; (a) avoid reading my reviews, (b) report me to admin, (c) go join some other punting forum, one that only allows punters to write fluffy OTT comments/reviews - you'd fit in well.

Possibly b&g just feels the need to post up -ve reviews more keenly than +ve's? Who knows?

That said, with a 26:1 +ve to -ve ratio, the chances are you'll have a good time and probably, like most of us, she has the odd bad day, or just doesn't click with who she's meeting.

tcm

Offline Jimmyredcab

Cheerleader Jimmy. If you're unhappy with my -/+ ratio then I suggest you; (a) avoid reading my reviews, (b) report me to admin, (c) go join some other punting forum, one that only allows punters to write fluffy OTT comments/reviews - you'd fit in well.

I don't give two shits what you think of me -------------- Admin and NIK know that I am no fluffy but I like to praise good service, your punting record has not been very successful, maybe it's time to find a new hobby, how about trainspotting.    :rolleyes:


B&G may have done her a favour..of sorts.  As MI will probably be reading this thread, it should be used as constructive criticism and acted upon, similar to customer complaints/feedback.

I could be wrong, but the next punter will probably get a cheery welcome, a really good fuck with fresh tasting breath...




Latest videos on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

Latest images on UKEscorting.com (free site!)