Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.




Author Topic: Michelle Independent ~ Birmingham  (Read 8321 times)


115 review(s) for Michelle Independent (112 positive, 0 neutral, 3 negative) [Indexed by Admin]


Offline comaminion

I guess you could figure out a new route each day

And look forward to a nicely cooked meal when you're allowed back in

I'm sure it works to some degree

Infatuation is a powerful thing and takes over common sense eventually it wears though like everything , that's when the reality and the shut throwing kicks in
Banning reason: White-knighting

Online fredpunter

Keep you fit though sent out to walk the dog 7 hours a day

Does the dog like walking 7 hours a day? If its anything like the bull terrier we had when I was a lad if you took it for a 7 hour walk you'd be carrying it for the last 6.

Offline comaminion

Does the dog like walking 7 hours a day? If its anything like the bull terrier we had when I was a lad if you took it for a 7 hour walk you'd be carrying it for the last 6.

In that case to the pub



The benefits of being put out for seven hours learn to speak dog?
Banning reason: White-knighting

Offline Michelle Independent

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 328
Decided to add my thoughts to the topic.
The thing is, this was always gonna be a negative review. If you have a quick look at his posts towards me in the last two years I know he had no interest to have a good time with me.
You gentleman ask him to provide more details of the meeting and what went wrong. Answer is he can't. Because there was nothing as such.
Was I freshly showered? I was.
Did I provide services advertised with enthusiasm? I did.
Was that me in the pictures? It was.
Thing is when Jimmy said I have no negative reviews he just decided to give it a go just for the sake of doing so. He makes meeting so awkward and horrible it was the worst in my life. It's no shock to me that Madlin Moon cut a meeting within first 5 min. To be honest I though about doing just that. But I put all my power to make sure he will have a good time and I continue. He just didn't want to have a good time from the beginning to start with.

Offline Tailpipe

Totally agree, but also concur with a previous poster that a 2 line review doesn't really help other potential clients make a decision about whether they would also get a similar service.

More info please B&G.

B&G must give you a buzz or you enjoy the chance to have a go JRC

Offline Simon S

I've looked at his reports and the only girl we have both seen is Neata of MK. He states her English was poor, not my experience, she is a British Indian girl. I think he is the opposite of the fluffies who never have a bad punt but he is either hard to please or extremely unlucky.
Banning reason: Pestering admin + Making accusations against admin

Offline comaminion

Decided to add my thoughts to the topic.
The thing is, this was always gonna be a negative review. If you have a quick look at his posts towards me in the last two years I know he had no interest to have a good time with me.
You gentleman ask him to provide more details of the meeting and what went wrong. Answer is he can't. Because there was nothing as such.
Was I freshly showered? I was.
Did I provide services advertised with enthusiasm? I did.
Was that me in the pictures? It was.
Thing is when Jimmy said I have no negative reviews he just decided to give it a go just for the sake of doing so. He makes meeting so awkward and horrible it was the worst in my life. It's no shock to me that Madlin Moon cut a meeting within first 5 min. To be honest I though about doing just that. But I put all my power to make sure he will have a good time and I continue. He just didn't want to have a good time from the beginning to start with.

He does seem hard to please yes but some people will be

I don't think he set out to give a negative, he could of got there and walked and left a negative, I don't see anyone throwing x amount of money to leave a negative that's just stupid

Referencing  madlin moon to substantiate a negative client persona is a null point unnecessary at best
That review don't mention a kick out on madlins behalf , op says he should of walked so unless there's another meet no one knows about  :unknown:

You say you provided a good booking he says otherwise, people will draw what they want from it

Just take it on the chin
Banning reason: White-knighting

Online fredpunter

To be fair to the op he had nothing but nice things to say about some girls .... Paris b for example.

Michelle ...... no one is liked by everyone ..... being liked by most people is the best any of us can hope for :hi:

he could of got there and walked and left a negative, I don't see anyone throwing x amount of money to leave a negative that's just stupid

Correct. The impression I get is that some think he went to deliberately leave a -ve. That would be very odd, given what it costs. If he did, then he's bonkers.

tcm

Offline Steve2

Correct. The impression I get is that some think he went to deliberately leave a -ve. That would be very odd, given what it costs. If he did, then he's bonkers.

tcm

Why would anyone go to a punt to deliberately not enjoy and deliberately leave a negative review for £120

Not plausible TCM

Why would anyone go to a punt to deliberately not enjoy and deliberately leave a negative review for £120

Not plausible TCM

Exactly my point, it would be complete madness. So why do I get the feeling that one or two think that's what happened?

tcm

Offline Steve2

Exactly my point, it would be complete madness. So why do I get the feeling that one or two think that's what happened?

tcm

Cos they are fluffies?

Cos they are fluffies?
+1 I don't think Michelle will gain anything by posting on here either,redcab and Co will do enough knicker wetting on her behalf

Offline comaminion

+1 I don't think Michelle will gain anything by posting on here either,redcab and Co will do enough knicker wetting on her behalf

As opposed to the post, nothing would of been the best response from mi considering she would of had all the the time in the world to compose a reply that's the best available ?

Retrospectively referring to his posts for two years?

0piggybacking the undercurrent he wanted to write a negative?

I should of turned him away because he is the worst ever? ( but you didn't, if you did because he was the worst ever I could understand but you didn't so I don't see it as anything other than dramatic effect sprinkling to shitcan b&g )

He would go to personal expense to drop a negative

All madness statements

Only fact here is for whatever reason punt went south and b&g (and its his right to whether I agree or not) exceptionally high standards
Banning reason: White-knighting

Offline Placebo88

A full review from the OP is the only way anyone else is going to be able to make a judgement on this one ; was Michelle's typical style of service just not to his taste , was she having a bad day , was the OP in a bad mood ....? The devils in the details.I've read positive reviews that have put me off a WG and very occassionally vice versa through having the details of the meet related !

Michelle seems to please about 95% going by review stats on here which is pretty good.A very few WGs have the ability to assess the specific punter's requirements and adapt the meet to suit them , maybe Michelle has only the one style of doing things which didn't click with the OP.There are enough reviews of her on here though that he should have known what to expect!

Agree that it makes no sense that the OP would make the booking in the hope of deliberately fashioning a bad punt out of it and then leaving a negative review.Also absolutely no point in Michelle's contribution to this thread for obvious reasons of bias ; unless it was to admit to some blame and offer a specific explanation to the matter as Mandy ( Leicester based ) later did to her accidental timing error in London.To clarify I am not accrediting blame to anyone !

I have not yet seen Michelle but a single negative review will certainly not put me off when weighed against all the good feedback she has.You can't please all of the people all of the time!

Online Jimmyredcab

+1 I don't think Michelle will gain anything by posting on here either.

She has a perfect right to give her version of events ----- unless Admin rules otherwise, his record of negative reviews tells me all I need to know.     :hi:

Offline NIK


I have not yet seen Michelle but a single negative review will certainly not put me off when weighed against all the good feedback she has.You can't please all of the people all of the time!

Couldn't have put it better myself.  :thumbsup:

Online Jimmyredcab

Couldn't have put it better myself.  :thumbsup:

Be careful NIK, they will be accusing you of being a fluffy like myself.    :rolleyes:

I don't understand all these punters who have this need to defend her (the same names of course). You visited her and you know she is good (or very good). And that's why some of you keep re-visiting her. Do you think you will get credits from her for doing it?

And another thing - OP did negative review. He was there so he has a right to write negative review if she disappointed him. From my POV he is very credible UKP member.

All there comments "more details please" put a smile on my face. And the only one reason for these comments is a fact she is a forum darling (but not for me  :sarcastic:).

Offline Tailpipe

And another thing - OP did negative review. He was there so he has a right to write negative review if she disappointed him. From my POV he is very credible UKP member.

All there comments "more details please" put a smile on my face. And the only one reason for these comments is a fact she is a forum darling (but not for me  :sarcastic:).

Boy dicks like you made me stop posting , the likes of JRC , NIK and smiths have forgotten more about punting than 90% of the posters .
Waste of space

password02

She has a perfect right to give her version of events ----- unless Admin rules otherwise, his record of negative reviews tells me all I need to know.     :hi:

+1
Don't usually agree with Mr JRC and in most cases we respect each others point of view and move on - But as JRC has said - ''his record of negative reviews tells me all I need to know''

Call me fluffy or a dick I really do not care as I have every right to post my views like other members - But here's a thought shared by a few already - I personally think he actually went there with a negative review already in his head and nothing that MI would have done would have changed his mind.

That's my few lines on this thread and will not add anything else to this negative review -
 :hi:

Boy dicks like you made me stop posting , the likes of JRC , NIK and smiths have forgotten more about punting than 90% of the posters .
Waste of space

???

Offline johnnyboy61

The problem is that the original review is very brief and contains many subjective statements without giving enough objective detail as to what went on to back up these statements. I'm not doubting that the OP feels how he did, but he knew he would be rattling the cages of Michelle's many fans, so the brevity of the review almost seems deliberately provocative.

With regards to Michelle's service being "vanilla", some members who may not have seen her seem to think that this is a criticism. It simply refers to the fact that her services are quite limited when compared with some of the other UKP Darlings. It doesn't mean that they are delivered in a cold and detached manner, in fact it is the feeling that Michelle is giving as much as she can of herself to you during the punt that makes her so popular. Yes services anal and CIM are not on offer, but for me that's no problem as I don't usually take those services with those who provide them anyway.

OP, had a shit time, fair enough, as has been said I don't suppose it is going to make a dent in Michelle's popularity. But equally you can understand members who have had quite a different experience making their point.

If you are a Pink Floyd fan and someone came on to a forum pointing out how shit and pretentious their music was I think you might well feel the need to respond and argue the opposite because you feel strongly that their opinion is wrong. If it happens on here there are mutterings of Fluffy or White Knight. This seems more than a little unfair.
« Last Edit: August 25, 2015, 08:33:35 PM by johnnyboy61 »
Banning reason: Successfully caused damaging problems on UKEscorting

+1
Don't usually agree with Mr JRC and in most cases we respect each others point of view and move on - But as JRC has said - ''his record of negative reviews tells me all I need to know''

Call me fluffy or a dick I really do not care as I have every right to post my views like other members - But here's a thought shared by a few already - I personally think he actually went there with a negative review already in his head and nothing that MI would have done would have changed his mind.

That's my few lines on this thread and will not add anything else to this negative review -
 :hi:

His record of negative reviews has nothing to do with all these accusations of him wiriting this negative review just for the sake of it.

Punters with negative reviews try to find "alternatives" for forum darlings. And that's why those punters are more important than these who book well reviewed girls only (these punters think they are perfect punters and UKP tough guys with positive reviews only  :sarcastic:)




Latest videos on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

Latest images on UKEscorting.com (free site!)