Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.




Author Topic: Naughty Girl Soph  (Read 26504 times)

Offline foresight

The ceaseless cynicsm from some posters is very wearing.
The girl seems to have got herself into a bind, caught between being a mother and one of the dirtiest girls on AW.
However inevitable that this would happen, there is a human being in there.
I hope she can sort herself out.

Offline Fannytastico

  • Banned
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 508
The give-away is the calling of the loved one, "it"
Well it would, cos the rest of the blog is a piece of literary genius.

Offline Mellow

I've seen this shite from the other side. It's soley for the purpose of gathering up the "Fluffies" to jump up and down protesting her innocence. Sure enough, even here on UKP, she's managed to infiltrate

Why the fuck would you blog such personal drivel? 

Offline PuntingPete

I've seen this shite from the other side. It's soley for the purpose of gathering up the "Fluffies" to jump up and down protesting her innocence. Sure enough, even here on UKP, she's managed to infiltrate

Why the fuck would you blog such personal drivel?

Firstly I have not protested her innocence whatsoever, secondly I am not a 'fluffy' and thirdly if you don't like the drivel she writes then don't read it. What harm is it doing you??

Offline Lucy chambers

  • Banned
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 350
I've seen this shite from the other side. It's soley for the purpose of gathering up the "Fluffies" to jump up and down protesting her innocence. Sure enough, even here on UKP, she's managed to infiltrate

Why the fuck would you blog such personal drivel? 

Personal drivel as maybe but at no point does she mention having a child in it. Therefore to then debate her skills as a mother, the likelihood of investigation by Social Services and whether she should kiss her child goodnight is slightly outside of this arena. Since when does common decency come under being ''fluffy''?

I couldn't give a monkeys what anyone does with their own body, nor do I care what activities they get up to with their paying clientele. It is 2011 isn't it?

Hands up, it was me that mentioned the babysitter, probably shouldn't have done so, sorry :(

Offline HPotter

Hands up, it was me that mentioned the babysitter, probably shouldn't have done so, sorry :(


I also joined in on that, really sorry Soph x

I tried to call her earlier but phone is dead. Has she gone I wonder?

Offline Mellow

Her childcare arrangements and home life are no ones business but her own. As are her bedroom practices.
Bollocks Lucy.... She used, yes used the fact that she had (or maybe had) a sprog waiting in the background to blame her inconsistency on.


H Potter wrote:
Quote
I have seen her several times in the past, she is real but she does like to mess people around a lot. I knew she had a kid - she tells me he's in nursery most of the time so she can work, so why she lied about a babysitter is beyond me.

If you have a child and you work as a hooker, surely you are adult enough to fight your own corner without feeling the need to blame a child for your own irresponsibility and lack of professionalism. She reminds me of one of those sink estate slatterns that swear down on their child's life just to stop the interrogations of her peers.

Naughty Girl Soph is someone I know quite well both in a professional capacity and a personal one. A truly delightful girl with a lovely personality. Some questions to the rest of you who are denigrating her:
Have you actually met her? Do you know her circumstances? Do you know how careful she is about all she does?

If you don't like her blogs or her profile then don't read them.

From your comments obviously not! Sophie is prepared to be whatever you want her to be; if you are not interested in the services she provides, which vary from a delightful GFE to something much more extreme, then don't see her. Leave her to those of us who delight in her and appreciate her.

She certainly should be in the Recommended Provider area and has certainly never let me down in any way.

Offline Lucy chambers

  • Banned
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 350
Bollocks Lucy.... She used, yes used the fact that she had (or maybe had) a sprog waiting in the background to blame her inconsistency on.


No she did not, not in any public source.

Offline Mellow

No she did not, not in any public source.
She used the excuse to a client, who placed it fairly and squarely into the public domain. If she didn't want it discussed, she should have buttoned her lip.

I don't know if you've noticed, she seems to be sending cannon fodder over the trenches, so to speak, sitting back and watching the carnage of her reputation taking shape.

Offline Mellow

Naughty Girl Soph is someone I know quite well both in a professional capacity and a personal one. A truly delightful girl with a lovely personality. Some questions to the rest of you who are denigrating her:
Have you actually met her? Do you know her circumstances? Do you know how careful she is about all she does?

If you don't like her blogs or her profile then don't read them.

From your comments obviously not! Sophie is prepared to be whatever you want her to be; if you are not interested in the services she provides, which vary from a delightful GFE to something much more extreme, then don't see her. Leave her to those of us who delight in her and appreciate her.

She certainly should be in the Recommended Provider area and has certainly never let me down in any way.
I'm glad that you've just joined and that you know this Sophie really well.

Perhaps you could ask her why she decided to let punters down on more than one occasion.

Looking forwards to the response. Better still, ask her to make a contribution of her own, That would be nice,

Online Marmalade

She used the excuse to a client, who placed it fairly and squarely into the public domain. If she didn't want it discussed, she should have buttoned her lip.

True. And she may or may not be an utter cow or a delightful SP. Why would I stick my beak in? (to the conversation, not her).

If a couple of punters use the same attitude on here as was taken by a certain disreputable SP in outing a punter (with info in the public domain), then such situations just escalate and don't benefit the punter IMO. I'm all for keeping SP's in their place, but needless prossie-bashing doesn't do punters any favours. Am I missing something about her services or trashing of punters that 'justifies' it? Or is it sinking to street level (and changing the tone of the forum in the process) . . . ?

Offline john470

I suppose we have to accept that in online forums people will express aggressive, intolerant views in te full knowledge that they can remain anonymous, but it isn't clever and really is nothing but bullying. I haven't met the girl in question (I live the other side of the country), and I wouldn't indulge in all of her services if I ever do, but I have no wish to criticise her choices. I have read her blog for a while - it is always interesting and, for the most part, quite well written. I would imagine that if she has let clients down it is purely because she is in great demand and sometimes even with the most organised system mistakes can happen. I doubt that she deliberately messes people around. It would be a pity if she is scared off because of an unacceptable intrusion into her personal life.

Offline patrick8

I would have to agree with John470 regarding the intolerant views of certain individuals and the bullying taking place. Unlike John I have met the girl in question and she is not only very good at what she does but is a really sweet girl and a positive pleasure to be with in every way.The fact that some of her services may not be everybodies cup of tea is no reason for the sort of aggressive rubbish being directed at her.If people don't agree with the things in her blog,don't read it!

Offline Simple

Lol, whole load of newly registered first time posters coming out of the woodwork to support Soph with writing styles similar to those of her blog, coincidences surely...
« Last Edit: February 28, 2011, 09:44:59 PM by Simple »

Online Marmalade

Lol, whole load of newly registered first time posters coming out of the woodwork to support Soph with writing style similar to those of her blog, coincidences surely...

I agree. They do her no favours unless we were able to see a critical history for instance on another board. 'Followed her blog" . . . "from the other side of the country." then suddenly happens to be on UKP. :rolleyes: As silly and OTT IMHO as the posts denigrating her other than on the basis of personal punting experience. She's had a bad review, hence Bad Provider report. Not the end of the world. Just end of.

Offline smiths

I agree. They do her no favours unless we were able to see a critical history for instance on another board. 'Followed her blog" . . . "from the other side of the country." then suddenly happens to be on UKP. :rolleyes: As silly and OTT IMHO as the posts denigrating her other than on the basis of personal punting experience. She's had a bad review, hence Bad Provider report. Not the end of the world. Just end of.

And i agree with you. Those that do this must think we are as thick as two short planks and wouldnt notice. I always laugh when this happens, talk about digging a bigger hole. :D

Offline Mellow

snip......
It's been proven that much of her feedback is fake - multiple id's.... snip
Things are looking a bit suss.

'Bout time this bint joins the forum with her real fake working name  :D


Offline patrick8

Never been on one of these forums until today, it seems there are some serious saddos around with nothing better to do than slag people off that they obviously know nothing about -- just think they do!

Offline James999

doctordavid
john470
patrick8

How odd that you all join today and find this thread for your first post, and how none of you capitalise your name  :sarcastic:

Offline NIK

it is always interesting and, for the most part, quite well written.

Well, like any other art form, peoples' views are subjective about quality.

But well written?  :rolleyes:

This will be my final post in this forum.

I have no idea who john and patrick are. I use the pseudonym doctordavid in a number of places including AW where I have enough positive feedback to show that I am a real person.

I call myself doctor because I am one. I am also a service provider but a consultant not a working girl like Soph. However I have also let people down from time to time. These things happen; illness, my child's illness, traffic jams and flight delays have all lead to problems at times.

That is just the real world and those of us with enough humility to accept that the world does not revolve around us accept that.

Just leave the girl alone to get on with her life.

Offline softlad

This gets more suspicious every post these new guy's make.
I'll be intersted to see her profile when it comes back on line,
to see if she has feedback from 'doctordavid'
I smell a few rat's.......

Sorry to immediately break my last ruling but it seems that both Soph and I have fallen foul of something I was told a long time ago and I should have remembered!

"Never argue with idiots: they drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience."





Latest media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)