Profiles without Face Pics . . .

[Dave2014]

I will not see any girl without a Face Pic.

I will not risk turning up somewhere having arranged to pay a lot of money to see what turns out to be a munter. Yes, I can walk - but what a waste of my time and hers.

I do not buy the "privacy", "anonymity" and "discretion" arguments when a WG has Face Pics in her Private Gallery. If a WGs was genuinely concerned about their Face Pics not getting into the public sphere, they would have no Face Pics at all. Such WGs are, it seems, very happy to have their Face Pics in the public sphere providing the public pay for them (I will not).

Any views from the community?

[Cuntminion]

+1 don't care who it, if she had a 100 reviews

No face pic, no booking

[RedKettle]

I am not so hard line on the face pic thing - although more likely to book if there is one.

I get more worked up when there are no decent pictures of the body - what is that about??  We are paying to use something, so we surely should be able to see what it is like.

[Dee4cumalot]

Call me fluffy but I prefer to not see a face pic (get turned on with a surprise) but I do view feedbacks and reviews on here to get the best description facially

[Dave2014]

Call me fluffy but I prefer to not see a face pic (get turned on with a surprise) but I do view feedbacks and reviews on here to get the best description facially

So you don't like that much of a surprise then?????

[Dee4cumalot]

A slight surprise I should add than

Long as feedback confirms she does what she offers and doesn't look like a back end of a bus than I'll take a chance
Only met 3 girls since I started punting and not been disappointed (non have face pics)
So I'm quids in 

[Big Cat]

I've seen a few with no face pics based on other punters' descriptions... haven't been disappointed yet

[smiths]

I will not see any girl without a Face Pic.

I will not risk turning up somewhere having arranged to pay a lot of money to see what turns out to be a munter. Yes, I can walk - but what a waste of my time and hers.

I do not buy the "privacy", "anonymity" and "discretion" arguments when a WG has Face Pics in her Private Gallery. If a WGs was genuinely concerned about their Face Pics not getting into the public sphere, they would have no Face Pics at all. Such WGs are, it seems, very happy to have their Face Pics in the public sphere providing the public pay for them (I will not).

Any views from the community?

I totally agree about WGs who wont offer free face pics but will show their face for a price by buying a PG pic, such WGs cant be that bothered about total strangers seeing their faces in my view, and I will never pay to see a PG pic on principle.

I will and have many times punted with WGs with no face pics though and whereas a face pic is preferable to not having one obviously I would of missed out on punting with many good WGs over the years if I had excluded all with no face pics. So I am prepared to take a chance on occasion and walk if necessary with a plan B option, I usually only punt in areas I am in anyway though the WG doesnt know that so that means I haven't spent more or much more on travelling than I would of done anyway, though its also a pain to waste my time.

Its also the case on UKP that a punter you find credible might have reviews/other feedback on WGs who interest you and can tell you about what she looks like, or at least confirm she isn't a pig in their view, it then comes down to you either taking their word for it knowing looks are subjective or not. I would and have taken punters words over the years and not met many WGs that I found too ugly to punt with.

[azrael]

It would be nice to be able to view a face picture, for example misskdd (kirsten) or lindsie dont show facial pictures, now as most punters would argue they are physically attractive. Im an ass and eye guy, the eyes tell all, like if a wg has "dead eyes" she's not intrested in anything other than money now if she has "come fuck me eyes" then you know you have a good un and will enjoy the time you spend together. On a personal note i think the verification photo should be readily available to view and not hidden away, that way the punter knows what he's let himself in for imho 

[Roth]

Sometimes not knowing adds to the excitement  as long as they are not munters.

Sometimes they show their Verification Pic even when they hide the face in the public and private galleries.  Prossie logic! 

[vw]

On a personal note i think the verification photo should be readily available to view and not hidden away, that way the punter knows what he's let himself in for imio 

The one with the photographic ID and real name if you zoom, why not go whole hog and make them use their real names and adresses to.  What nonsense !

[Roth]

The one with the photographic ID and real name if you zoom, why not go whole hog and make them use their real names and adresses to.  What nonsense !

Not all have photo ID or real names and addresses.  It's usually just a pic with a sign with their AW moniker and AW ID number.  Some don't even show that.  Just something to identify them to the AW mods I guess.  So not sure why some show passports or personal details if they don't need to.    They all have the option to hide them in any case.   

They don't even need to be verified.  Some of Bristol's best are unverified (Soph, Hollie Love to name a couple). 

[vw]

Not all have photo ID or real names and addresses.  It's usually just a pic with a sign with their AW moniker and AW ID number.  Some don't even show that.  Just something to identify them to the AW mods I guess.  So not sure why some show passports or personal details if they don't need to.    They all have the option to hide them in any case.   

They don't even need to be verified.  Some of Bristol's best are unverified (Soph, Hollie Love to name a couple). 

They have to provide details of id to be verified, only time not on photo is if they have sent id in about another matter in the past.  most do photo thing for convenience.

I know they can hide it but azrail was saying showing should be compulsary.

Hollie love is Verified for info

If you search for not Romanian or definitely British nonverifieds don't appear even if they are.

[purple_t]

I'm not bothered by lack of face pics... quite like the surprise of not knowing exactly how they'll look until you walk in the door tbh! I'm more concerned with good body shots to be honest. So far I have not been disappointed.

[Dave2014]

I'm not bothered by lack of face pics... quite like the surprise of not knowing exactly how they'll look until you walk in the door tbh! I'm more concerned with good body shots to be honest. So far I have not been disappointed.

Here you go then. This should keep you quiet for a few minutes:

Hidden Image/Members Only

[Marmalade]

Too much of a generalisation. Big differences north and south of border I reckon as well.

For instance, the student load (now largely vanished) in Edinburgh used to be good looking reliable young women who for some reason had a habit of posting a PG at an outrageous £5. Most of the free pics were enough to show they were damn fit. They rarely put a face pic even in a PG. They were good vfm punts though. One or two (non-student) Scottish prossies have said face pic in PG. Or put a partial face pic there. One regular who did this said she didn't want people who knew her who were maybe just browsing to guess it was her. Far from foolproof but I can see the logic.

I'm more concerned if it's a fat old dusty phone with no number displayed. If it's a fit looking young woman with good UKP feedback I'll probably be more likely to chance the no face pic situation.

On English based profiles and some Scottish ones, it is more clearly a standard con.

[cueball]

I like a face pic but it doesn't influence whether I podge her or not, I like a decent body shot so I know what's waiting for me. If there is no pics then it's no punt for me.

[tantric talents]

Well I really do understand that if a student or part-timer or other individual does not want their face out there forever on the great interweb then that is their choice.
You frequently do come across profiles that say "I will not show my face but don't worry you will not be disappointed!" I have actually punted quite a few of these based on body shots and feedback/reviews etc and have been remarkably lucky so far.
 
The clever girls will put up a partial face shot with an exaggerated expression. (I am being polite as yes it may just be a dick in their gob) so you get the general idea but not the definitive passport shot.
Lets face it ( no pun intended ) if you don't like it enough to punt it you can always walk at the door.

[Marmalade]

Just a side note... if a punter has to walk away often it's probably better not to make the booking thru the website (unless you particularly want to risk gobshite feedback).

[DG]

Very few of my punts show face pics on their profiles. I tend to get a feel from body pics, how the profile reads, comms and, of course, reviews and feedback. Facial beauty isn't that important to me anyway, although a Nanny McPhee look-a-like might have me running!! It's a bit cliche, but I'd prefer a girl with a personality and decent attitude than a cold, mechanical beauty.

[Quesadilla]

Great reviews from trusted punters here are worth more to me than face pics.  I've seen a few  recommendations including MissKDD with no face pics and they have all been top drawer punts.
Also seen a few like Lindsey and Koa32 who provide photos on request via email - ie at no extra charge. Again  trusted reviews were a much better indicator than AW profile.
No question in my mind there are perfectly legit reasons why a WG would prefer to keep her identity secret and the element of surprise can simply add to the punt.

This is despite having been b&s'd in the past and seen girls who had no face pics but also no decent reviews here. You pays your money you make your choice, a well informed choice is obviously smarter. 

[howrude]

I just accept that not being able to see a girl's face in most cases is just the way it is. And in many cases, their faces aren't too far away from what I'd imagined they would be under the pixellation.

I'm quite open when it comes to faces. Some women may not have the most prettiest of faces but may have amazing bodies and a very sexy aura about them which amkes up for it. And in some cases, girls who aren't very pretty can be a turn on in a dirty, slutty kind of way. Linzi Dawn McKenzie being an example.

[Jimmyredcab]

I am happy to pay up to £2 to see a face picture in the private gallery, a girl is far less likely to get spotted by her next door neighbour if she keeps face pics private.
One huge problem is that too many punters let the girl work by her rules, you tolerate no face pictures so they get away with it.
Regarding taking the word of "trusted punters", I don't respect the taste of quite a few of our members, they would shag anything with a pulse as long as the price was right.

[Marmalade]

Regarding taking the word of "trusted punters", I don't respect the taste of quite a few of our members, they would shag anything with a pulse as long as the price was right.

You're too generous. I'm sure not everyone checks for a pulse.

[Type_O_Negative]

I am happy to pay up to £2 to see a face picture in the private gallery, a girl is far less likely to get spotted by her next door neighbour if she keeps face pics private.
One huge problem is that too many punters let the girl work by her rules, you tolerate no face pictures so they get away with it.
Regarding taking the word of "trusted punters", I don't respect the taste of quite a few of our members, they would shag anything with a pulse as long as the price was right.

+1

That's why i need to see face. No face picture - no booking.

[Jimmyredcab]

+1

That's why i need to see face. No face picture - no booking.

Punting "blind" is like turning the clock back 20 years before the Internet.

If I want to gamble I will visit a casino.   

[Roth]

You're too generous. I'm sure not everyone checks for a pulse.

Pulse? What pulse?! 

[vw]

Just had a message back on AW with not t bottom

This member has opted to show you their Face Picture.

Has anyone else seen this before ?

[pking_paul]

No, not seen that before?

I prefer the part timers who rarely show their faces for obvious reasons, in private either.

So far they've been my best punts.

[Roth]

Just had a message back on AW with not t bottom

This member has opted to show you their Face Picture.

Has anyone else seen this before ?

Sounds dodgy.      Not had that before. 

[vw]

Sounds dodgy.      Not had that before. 

Was quite useful, she was even willing to pop out at 530am, local ATM was doing its maintenance so didn't work out for me but useful to know.

[tantric talents]

I absolutely respect all the guys here who say;
No face picture no punt
No phone number no punt
Ironically one of the best punts I ever had was with a girl who posted neither.
Comms were slow and measured too but I was patient.
One day she phoned me discretely.
We arranged to meet.
I ended up fucking the most unimaginably beautiful and sexed up supermodel I had ever seen!
Life is all about managed risk, so sometimes it might be worth bending your own "rules" a little.
Just saying 

[smiths]

I absolutely respect all the guys here who say;
No face picture no punt
No phone number no punt
Ironically one of the best punts I ever had was with a girl who posted neither.
Comms were slow and measured too but I was patient.
One day she phoned me discretely.
We arranged to meet.
I ended up fucking the most unimaginably beautiful and sexed up supermodel I had ever seen!
Life is all about managed risk, so sometimes it might be worth bending your own "rules" a little.
Just saying 

What others do is up to them but if I said no face pic no punt and no number no punt my choice of WGs would be severly cut down, just no number no punt is my rule that suits me.

[greychap]

I will not see any girl without a Face Pic.

I will not risk turning up somewhere having arranged to pay a lot of money to see what turns out to be a munter. Yes, I can walk - but what a waste of my time and hers.

I do not buy the "privacy", "anonymity" and "discretion" arguments when a WG has Face Pics in her Private Gallery. If a WGs was genuinely concerned about their Face Pics not getting into the public sphere, they would have no Face Pics at all. Such WGs are, it seems, very happy to have their Face Pics in the public sphere providing the public pay for them (I will not).

Any views from the community?

I agree with the face pic argument if they have them in private gallery then there after the money from that so obviously don't have a problem with there face on show anyway.

But I am more then happy to see a girl with no face pic as most wont show because of family or they have a career and doing this on the side, I sometimes find some that do show there face usually don't give a shit and dont have another job outside of this and tend to live a more trashy life plus if there doing incalls at there home and showing there face not very discreet so im happy with a girl that hides there face as this is there secret life.

Some girls that are in your face with what they do and everyone knows what they do are not always discreet and a lot of the scanks and blackmailers tend to have everyone knowing what they do to make money.

[G.Raff]

Great reviews from trusted punters here are worth more to me than face pics.  I've seen a few  recommendations including MissKDD with no face pics and they have all been top drawer punts.
Also seen a few like Lindsey and Koa32 who provide photos on request via email - ie at no extra charge. Again  trusted reviews were a much better indicator than AW profile.
No question in my mind there are perfectly legit reasons why a WG would prefer to keep her identity secret and the element of surprise can simply add to the punt.

This is despite having been b&s'd in the past and seen girls who had no face pics but also no decent reviews here. You pays your money you make your choice, a well informed choice is obviously smarter. 

+1

I've had very good punts with WGs who didn't show face pics and am happy that I didn't exclude them as otherwise I wouldn't have seen them.
I see the whole face pic issue with a pinch of salt, I think the criteria of me choosing a WG is much more complex and face pics is just one of them but not the primary one.
Reviews, body pics, the "feel" of the profile, and other subconscious factors.

[Jimmyredcab]

I see the whole face pic issue with a pinch of salt, I think the criteria of me choosing a WG is much more complex and face pics is just one of them but not the primary one.
Reviews, body pics, the "feel" of the profile, and other subconscious factors.

I agree to a certain extent, I have one rule that I will never break and that is NO ROMANIANS under any circumstances.

I will sometimes break the photo rule if enough of the other boxes are ticked such as location, age, price and services.

A pro$$ie has a perfect right not to show her face -------------- and we have a perfect right to reject her.   

[Daffodil]

I am loathe to have absolute rules in punting. Yes, I prefer a face picture and yes, I prefer a telephone number, but I've had some excellent punts with girls who display neither.

[Daffodil]

I don't think that having face pictures in private galleries is purely to make money and, even if so, I don't have a big problem with it as prossies are in this business to make money. Many use the credits earned to display their number or "available today". As is apparent from this thread, not all punters need a face picture so in some ways it's an extra.

In addition having a face picture in private is one extra layer of anonymity. It means only guys who have signed up and given AW money will see it, guys who are likely punters with an interest in seeing the girl, rather than schoolboys browsing the site for giggles. It's not foolproof, but it does improve anonymity.

[Hatcher]

The principle - why pay to look at adverts? I can test drive a Ferrari for nowt, so ....

[Luke]

Most don't show it as they are not pretty, there are very few who don't show for other reasons,

[Marmalade]

Most don't show it as they are not pretty, there are very few who don't show for other reasons,

Something in that I suppose. A mercenary girl with a pretty face can more efficiently find a well-heeled meal ticket to marry her than charge 'per plunge'. A good looking verification photo would be Guinness Book of Records material. But many a girl looks pretty through beer goggles or cock pressure. The most beautiful girl in the world is an ugly cow if she stabs you in the back.

I don't expect prossies to have a beautiful face: but nicely presented and not hideously ugly is reasonable.

[Marmalade]

The principle - why pay to look at adverts? I can test drive a Ferrari for nowt, so ....

If I am actually on the point of buying I might think it's worth looking at the speel. 50p on a PG has helped me rule out many a prostitite.

[Siadwel]

I've punted girls with and without face pics. Rarely will I pay for a PG to see a face pic, but I will pay for a PG for an unshopped naked body pic, which is more important to me.

'Good-Looking', 'Attractive', 'Munter' and 'Pug-Ugly' are purely subjective observations, anyway. My Ex won't win any prizes, but when the light catches her just right, and she's smiling, my heart still skips a beat.

My attitude is that I'm no oil-painting but I'm willing to pay the price. If a girl's no oil-painting but gives a good service for that price, then we're two ugly fuckers fucking each other and both getting what we want.

Fine by me.

[Jimmyredcab]

If I am actually on the point of buying I might think it's worth looking at the speel. 50p on a PG has helped me rule out many a prostitite.

I agree but very few private galleries are 50 pence ----------- I am willing to pay £2 to see a private gallery but only if I am on the verge of making a booking.

I have seen the management of Adultwork described as scumbags and robbers ---------- I would say they are very astute businessmen, they are not a charity.     

[Marmalade]

'Good-Looking', 'Attractive', 'Munter' and 'Pug-Ugly' are purely subjective observations, anyway.

Well no they're not actually. They are socially derived norms which we ignore selectively.

I think it was maybe Anth that posted a chart and it's probably on UKP wiki. If you put Charlize Theron next to some fat old minger scumbag with no teeth and a drool, an exveedingly high number of people will plump for Theron as the most attractive.

Ignoring this is at the root of fluffies making ridiculously overblown compliments about a woman's looks. They might none of them be catwalk models but that still leaves a very big range. To ignore this objectively is to mislead other punters.

My Ex won't win any prizes, but when the light catches her just right, and she's smiling, my heart still skips a beat.

that would be a "10" for lighting then...

My attitude is that I'm no oil-painting

Bet you knew that without a torch 

[Marmalade]

I agree but very few private galleries are 50 pence ----------- I am willing to pay £2 to see a private gallery but only if I am on the verge of making a booking.

I see quite a few at 50p up here. I might spend £2 as an exception but think it's a bit much. Any more than £1 would be a post-punt splurge on a (comparatively speaking) very attractive prossie to savour. I can think of about 2, maybe three, where that was worth it. Both of them students who had bothered doing non-professional but very nice photos.

Where it was a reg or I'd taken the photos I'd expect a passkey of some sort!

[Hatcher]

I don't expect prossies to have a beautiful face: but nicely presented and not hideously ugly is reasonable.

Not fussed about the face and will choose a nice arse every time, but I walked last year when a fit-bodies Romanian hooker smiled at me showing a mouth full of black teeth. I often look at the PG if I'm pretty sure I'm going to go for it, but I won't pay silly prices - up to a quid or so.

[Roth]

Verification pics can be handy if the prossie happens to be verified and allow them to be viewed. 

[Jimmyredcab]

Verification pics can be handy if the prossie happens to be verified and allow them to be viewed. 

Very few pro$$ies allow their verification photo to be viewed, maybe one in twenty ------- if that.   

[johnbanebridge]

I am one of the most particular (although some would say picky  ) punters, a face pick is a must for me and time and money is so precious for us all unless reliable sources can attest to the WG's beauty.